Integrating ecosystem services in Swedish environmental assessments: an empirical analysis

References

• Albert C, Aronson J, Fürst C, Opdam P. 2014. Integrating ES in landscape planning: requirements, approaches and impacts. Landscape Ecol. 29:1277–1285.10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker J, Sheate WR, Phillips P, Eales R. 2013. ES in environmental assessment – help or hindrance? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:3–13.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell R, Lennon M. 2014. The utilisation of environmental knowledge in landuse planning: drawing lessons for an ES approach. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 32:263–282.10.1068/c12289j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC. 2000. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl K, Burkhard B, Jacob K. 2016. Should the ES concept be used in European Commission impact assessment? Ecol Indic. 61:6–17.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. 2017. Environmental impact assessment of projects. Guidance on the preparation of the environmental impact assessment report. (Directive 2011/92/EU as amended by 2014/52/EU). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/EIA_guidance_EIA_report_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment – towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68:643–653.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Therivel R, Bond A, Fothergill J, Marshall R. 2016. The revised EIA directive – possible implications for practice in England. UVP Rep. 30(2):106–112.
   Google Scholar
• Galler C, Albert C, von Haaren C. 2016. From regional environmental planning to implementation: paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 18:118–129.10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneletti D. 2013. Editorial: ES in environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:1–2.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines-Young R, Potschin. 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Report to the European Environmental Agency. EEA Framework Contract No. EEA/IEA/09/003. European Environmental Agency, Nottingham, UK, p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen K, Hansson J, Maia de Souza D, Russo Lopes G. 2016. Biofuels and ecosystem services. Sweden: The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels. Report No 2016:XX, f3. www.f3centre.se.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen K, Malmaeus M. 2016. Ecosystem services in Swedish forests. Scand J For Res. 31(6):626–640. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen K, Malmaeus M, Lindblad M. 2014. Ekosystemtjänster i svenska skogar. IVL Report B2190, 85 p.
   Google Scholar
• Helming K, Diehl K, Geneletti D, Wiggering H. 2013. Mainstreaming ES in European policy impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:82–87.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honrado JP, Vieira C, Soares C, Monteiro MB, Marcos B, Pereira HM, Partidário MR. 2013. Can we infer about ES from EIA and SEA practice? A framework for analysis and examples from Portugal. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:14–24.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) in cooperation with Institute of Environmental Assessment, UK (IEAUK). 1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen TP, Marttunen M, Sarkki S, Rytkönen A-M. 2013. Integrating ES into environmental impact assessment: an analytic–deliberative approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:54–64.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Esen SE, Yashiro M. 2013. Linking ES to strategic environmental assessment in development policies. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:75–81.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg F, Ozment S, Stickler M, Henninger N, Treweek J, Venn O, Mock G. 2011. ES review for impact assessment: introduction and guide to scoping. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute (WRI). Working Paper. http://www.wri.org/publication/ecosystem-services-review-for-impact-assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg F, Treweek J, Stickler M, Henninger N, Venn O, Mock G. 2014. Weaving ES into impact assessment. WRI.org. ISBN: 978-1-56973-832-0.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom U, Rodéhn J. 2008. MKB-tillämpningen i Sverige. Antalet MKB för verksamheter och åtgärder 2005 och 2006 [Impact assessments in Sweden. Number of impact assessments for businesses and actions]. Rapporter Institutionen för stad och land · nr 1/2008, MKB-centrum. ISBN: 978-91-85735-07-5, 33 p. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Maes J, Liquete C, Teller A, Erhard M, Paracchini ML, Barredo JI, Grizzetti B, Cardoso A, Somma F, Petersen J-E, et al. 2016. An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Ecosyst Serv. 17:14–23.10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas A, Ramos TB, Haase D, Santos R. 2015. ES in spatial planning and strategic environmental assessment – a European and Portuguese profile. Land Use Policy. 48:158–169.10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute, Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orbe J, Theorell C. 2012. Inställningen till vindkraftpark i Falkenberg [Attitudes to the wind park at Falkenberg]. Swedish: Sifo. https://kommun.falkenberg.se/download/18.593ac2a914cea246c7a8c945/1432892805807/13+Medbo+inv%C3%A5narnas+inst%C3%A4llning+till+Kattegatt+Offshore.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Partidario MR, Gomes RC. 2013. ES inclusive strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:36–46.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeringens proposition 2016/17:200. 2017. Miljöbedömningar. Regeringen överlämnar denna proposition till riksdagen [A proposition by the Swedish Government]. Harpsund den 1 june 2017. Sid. p. 77.
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg R. 2015. ES in SEA: are we missing the point of a simple concept? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34(1):79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOU 2013:68. 2013. Synliggöra värdet av ekosystemtjänster – Åtgärder för välfärd genom biologisk mångfald och ekosystemtjänster [Visualize the ecosystem services – actions for welfare through biodiversity and ecosystem services]. ISBN 978-91-38-24017-5. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. 2015. Ekosystemtjänster från svenska hav - Status och påverkansfaktorer. Havs- och vattenmyndighetens rapport 2015:12. ISBN 978-91-87025-83-9.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Report 5873. ISBN 978-91-620-5873-9.pdf, 193 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tajima R, Fischer TB. 2013. Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from English spatial planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:29–37.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [TEEB] The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. 2009. TEEB climate issues update. September 2009. http://www.teebweb.org/.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP – United Nations Environmental Programme. Goals and principles of environmental impact assessment. Preliminary note. Issued on January 16, 1987. https://www.soas.ac.uk/cedep-demos/000_P514_IEL_K3736-Demo/treaties/media/1987%20UNEP%20Goals%20and%20Principles%20of%20Environmental%20Impact%20Assessment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. 2002. Environmental impact assessment training resource manual. 2nd ed. http://www.unep.ch/etu/publications/EIAMan_2edition_toc.htm.
   Google Scholar