The functions of knowledge management processes in urban impact assessment: the case of Ontario

References

• Arts J, Runhaar HA, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Van Laerhoven F, Driessen PP, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 14(04):1250025.10.1142/S1464333212500251
   Google Scholar
• [AUS DOEWR] Australian Government: Department of the Environment and Water Resources. 2014. Compliance and monitoring. http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/compliance/index.html [accessed 2014 July 16].
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand K. 2003. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environ Politics. 3(4):24–41.10.1162/152638003322757916
   Google Scholar
• Blewitt  J. 2014. Understanding sustainable development. London (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J. 2012. Sustainability assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):53–62.10.1080/14615517.2012.661974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A, Retief F, Cave B, Fundingsland M, Duinker PN, Verheem R, Brown AL. 2018. A contribution to the conceptualisation of quality in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 68:49–58.10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond AJ, Viegas CV, Coelho CCDSR, Selig PM. 2010. Informal knowledge processes: the underpinning for sustainability outcomes in EIA? J Cleaner Prod. 18(1):6–13.10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruijn HD, Heuvelhof ET. 2000. Networks and decision making. Utrecht: LEMMA Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chinowsky P, Diekmann J, Galotti V. 2008. Social network model of construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(10):804–812.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(804)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen AM. 2010. NEPA in the hot seat: a proposal for an office of environmental analysis. J Law Reform, 169. http://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol44/iss1/5
   Google Scholar
• Corral S, Monagas MC. 2017. Social involvement in environmental governance: the relevance of quality assurance processes in forest planning. Land Use Policy. 67:710–715.10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport TH. 2015. Process management for knowledge work. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M. editors. Handbook on business process management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos J, van Buuren A, van Schie N. 2011. Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environ Sci Policy. 14(6):675–684.10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Diraby TE. 2006. Web-services environment for collaborative management of product life-cycle costs. J Constr Eng Manage. 132(3):300–313.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(300)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Diraby TE, Wang B. 2005. e-society portal: integrating urban highway construction projects into the knowledge city. J Constr Eng Manage. 132 (11):1196–1211.
   Google Scholar
• Evers M, Jonoski A, Almoradie A, Lange L. 2016. Collaborative decision making in sustainable flood risk management: a socio-technical approach and tools for participatory governance. Environ Sci Policy. 55:335–344.10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidélis T, Rosa AR, Albergaria R. 2016. Developing an analytical framework to assess the consistency of contents and terminology used by SEA reports for similar types of plans. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 18(04):1650024.10.1142/S1464333216500241
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. EIA Rev. 23(2):155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, TB. 2005. Having an impact? Context elements for effective SEA application in transport policy, plan and programme making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 07(03):407–432.10.1142/S1464333205002158
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2006. Strategic environmental assessment and transport planning: towards a generic framework for evaluating practice and developing guidance. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 24(3):183–197.10.3152/147154606781765183
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P. 2006. SEA effectiveness criteria—equally valid in all countries? The case of Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:396–409.10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gore T, Golobic M, Pinho P, Sykes O, Marot N, Waterhout B. 2015. Territorial impact assessment of european draft directives—the emergence of a new policy assessment instrument. Eur Planning Stud. 23(3):433–451.10.1080/09654313.2013.868292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparatos A, El-Haram M, Horner M. 2008. A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environ Impact Asses. 28:286–311.10.1016/j.eiar.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson RB. 2005. Sustainability assessment: criteria and processes. Sterling (VA): Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Golobič M, Marot N, Kolarič Š, Fischer TB. 2015. Applying territorial impact assessment in a multi-level policy-making context–the case of Slovenia. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 33(1):43–56.10.1080/14615517.2014.938438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes SJ, Barker A, Jones CE. 2017. Re-examining the rationale for strategic assessment: an evaluation of purpose in two systems. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 19(4): 1750020–1750046.
   Google Scholar
• Hommes S, Hulscher SJ, Mulder JP, Otter HS, Bressers HTA. 2009. Role of perceptions and knowledge in the impact assessment for the extension of Mainport Rotterdam. Mar Policy. 33(1):146–155.10.1016/j.marpol.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogmartens R, Van Passel S, Van Acker K, Dubois M. 2014. Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. Environ Impact Asses. 48:27–33.10.1016/j.eiar.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlbert M, Gupta J. 2015. The split ladder of participation: a diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environ Sci Policy. 50:100–113.10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D, Fischer TB, Kidd S. 2009. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment – the significance of learning. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27(2):133–144.10.3152/146155109X454302
   Google Scholar
• Jiliberto R. 2011. Recognizing the institutional dimension of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 29(2):133–140.10.3152/146155111X12959673795921
   Google Scholar
• Kinawy SN, Bakht MN, El-Diraby TE. 2017. Mismatches in stakeholder communication: the case of the Leslie and Ferrand transit stations, Toronto, Canada. Sustainable Cities Soc. 34:239–249.10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Siedow T, Tosics I. 2005. Knowledge management and policy application in urban management and housing. Working paper. Leibniz-Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner, Germany. https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Knorr-Siedow+T+%2C+Tosics+I+.+2005+.+Knowledge+management+and+policy+application+in+urban+management+and+housing+%2C+working+paper.+&btnG=
   Google Scholar
• Kørnøv L, Zhang J, Christensen P. 2015. The influence of street level bureaucracy on the implementation of strategic environmental assessment. J Environ Planning Manage. 58(4):598–615.10.1080/09640568.2013.873711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger T, Page T, Hubacek K, Smith L, Hiscock K. 2012. The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling. Environ Modell Softw. 36:4–18.10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert JH, Karvetski CW, Spencer DK, Sotirin BJ, Liberi DM, Zaghloul HH, Koogler JB, Hunter SL, Goran WD, Ditmer RD, et al. 2011. Prioritizing infrastructure investments in Afghanistan with multiagency stakeholders and deep uncertainty of emergent conditions. J Infrastruct Syst. 18(2):155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J. 1994. Organizing modernity: social ordering and social theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen M. 2009. Indicators as an appraisal technology: framework for analysing policy influence and early insights into indicator role in the UK energy sector. 8th Int. Conf. of the European Society for Ecological Economics; June 29–July 2; Ljubljana, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Markolf SA, Klima K, Wong TL. 2015. Adaptation frameworks used by US decision-makers: a literature review. Environ Syst. 35(4):427–436.
   Google Scholar
• McClean S, Shaw A. 2005. From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge—an exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 15(6):729–749.10.1177/1049732304273927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles LD. 2015. Techniques of value analysis and engineering. Portland (OR): Miles Value Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders  A, Fischer  T. 2006. What is wrong with EIA and SEA anyway? A sceptic’s perspective on sustainability assessment. J Environ  Assess  Policy Manage. 8(1):19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Towards sustainability assessment follow-up. Environ Impact Asses. 45:38–45.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2012. Walking the sustainability assessment talk—progressing the practice of environmental impact assessment (EIA). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 36:34–41.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nik Bakht M, El-diraby TE. 2016. Communities of interest-interest of communities: social and semantic analysis of communities in infrastructure discussion networks. Comput-Aided Civ Inf. 31(1):34–49.10.1111/mice.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble B, Nwanekezie K. 2017. Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: principles, approaches and research directions. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:165–173.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olagunju A, Gunn JA. 2016. Challenges to integrating planning and policy-making with environmental assessment on a regional scale–a multi-institutional perspective. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34(3):236–253.10.1080/14615517.2016.1176412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2006. Applying strategic environmental assessment: good practice guidance for development co-operation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper M, van der Veen A, editors. 2005. Foundations of IT service management: based on ITIL. Van Haren Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pope J, Petrova S. 2017. Sustainability assessment: a governance mechanism for sustainability. In: Hartz-Karp J, Marinova D, editors. Methods for sustainability research. Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar Publishing;  p. 142.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, et al. 2010. What is social learning? Ecol Soc. 15(4): r1. [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP. 2001. Public involvement in EA in Canada: a transformative learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess. 21(2):113–136.10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00076-7
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP. 2017. Reconceptualizing public participation in environmental assessment as EA civics. Environ Impact Assess. 62:174–182.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair AJ, Diduck A, Fitzpatrick P. 2008. Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: critical reflections on 15 years of research. Environ Impact Assess. 28(7):415–428.10.1016/j.eiar.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootweg R, Jones M. 2011. Resilience thinking improves SEA: a discussion paper. Impact Assess Project A. 29(4):263–276.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass TJ, Kasi M. 1986. Function analysis: the stepping stones to good value. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Soria-Lara JA, Bertolini L, Brömmelstroet M. 2016. An experiential approach to improving the integration of knowledge during EIA in transport planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 56:188–199.10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surahyo M, El-Diraby TE. 2009. Schema for interoperable representation of environmental and social costs in highway construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(4):254–266.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:4(254)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima R, Fischer TB. 2013. Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from English spatial planning Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:29–37.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CN, Bryan CH, Goodrich CG. 2004. Social assessment: theory, process and techniques. 3rd ed. Lincoln (NE): Taylor Baines Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson CS, El-Haram MA, Emmanuel R. 2011. Mapping sustainability assessment with the project life cycle. Proc Inst Civil Eng-Eng Sustainability. 164(2):143–157.10.1680/ensu.2011.164.2.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thygesen J, Agarwal A. 2014. Key criteria for sustainable wind energy planning—lessons from an institutional perspective on the impact assessment literature. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 39:1012–1023.10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigar G. 2017. The four knowledges of transport planning: enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making. Transp Policy. 58:39–45.10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinov A, Kolagani N, McCall MK, Glynn PD, Kragt ME, Ostermann FO, Ramu P. 2016. Modelling with stakeholders–next generation. Environ Modell Softw. 77:196–220.10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells C. 2015. The civic organization and the digital citizen. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190203610.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• White L, Noble BF. 2013. Strategic environmental assessment for sustainability: a review of a decade of academic research. Environ Impact Asses. 42:60–66.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar