Redefining the impact assessment of buildings: an uncertainty-based approach to rating codes

References

• Adegbile MBO. 2013. Assessment and adaptation of an appropriate green building rating system for Nigeria. J Environ Earth Sci. 3(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Alyami GSH , Rezgui Y . 2012. Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 5:52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amasuomo TT , Atanda J , Baird G . 2017. Development of a building performance assessment and design tool for residential buildings in Nigeria. Procedia Eng. 180:221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ascough JC II , Maier HR , Ravalico JK , Strudley MW . 2008. Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecol Modell. 219:383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assefa G , Glaumann M , Malmqvist T , Kindembe B , Hult M , Myhr U , Eriksson O . 2007. Environmental assessment of building properties—where natural and social sciences meet: the case of EcoEffect. Building and Environment. 42:1458–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balducci A . 2011. Strategic planning as exploration. Town Plann Rev. 82(5):529–546.
   Google Scholar
• Becchio C , Corgnati SP , Fabrizio E , Monetti V , Seguro F . 2014. Application of the LEED PRM to an Italian existing building. Energy Procedia. 62:141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Berardi U . 2012. Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: rating systems and rated buildings. Sustainable Development. 20(6):411–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth AT , Choudhary R . 2013. Decision making under uncertainty in the retrofit analysis of the UK housing stock: implications for the green deal. Energy and Buildings. 64:292–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bribián IZ , Usón AA , Scarpellini S . 2009. Life cycle assessment in buildings: state-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Building and Environment. 44:2510–2520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo S , Caserio M , Coles R , Jancovic L , Gaterell MR . 2012. A scenario-based analysis of building energy performance. Proceedings of the ICE - Engineering Sustainability. 165(1):69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon Trust . 2012. Closing the gap – lessons learned on realising the potential of low carbon building design. The Carbon Trust. Available at https://www.carbontrust.com/media/81361/ctg047-closing-the-gap-low-carbon-building-design.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore M . 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 24:403–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore M , Richardson T , Hilding-Ryedvik T , Emmelin L . 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environ Impact Assess. 30:371–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C , Bond A . 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandratilake SR , Dias WPS . 2013. Sustainability rating systems for buildings: comparisons and Correlations. Energy. 59:22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X , Yang H , Lu L . 2015. A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools. Renew Sus Energy Rev. 50:1425–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W , Behzadzodagar , Feifesun . 2017. Comparative analysis of environmental performance of an office building using BREEAM and GBL. Int J Sus Dev Plan. 12(3):528–540.
   Google Scholar
• Chew MYL , Das S . 2008. Building grading systems: a review of the state-of-the-art. Arc Sci Rev. 51(1):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cole RJ . 1998. Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Res Infor. 26(1):3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole RJ . 2005. Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles. Building Res Infor. 35(5):455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole RJ , Valdebenito MJ . 2013. The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED. Building Res Infor. 41(6):662–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte E , Valeria Monno V . 2012. Beyond the buildingcentric approach: a vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings. Env Impact Ass Rev. 34:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley D , Aho I . 1999. Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends. Building Res Infor. 27(4/5):300–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey N , Bramley G , Power S , Brown C . 2009. The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Sus Dev. 19(5):289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Duinker PN , Greig LA . 2007. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: improving explorations of the future. Env Impact Ass Rev. 27:206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabi V , Andersen RV , Corgnati S , Olesen BW . 2012. Occupants’ window opening behaviour: a literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models. Building Env. 58:188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein S . 2005. Planning Theory and the City. J Plann Educ Res. 25:121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner RA , Ryce T . 2008. A comparative analysis of two building rating systems. Part 1: evaluation. Pro Ins Civil Eng-Eng Sus. 161(1):55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer T , Dalkmann H , Lowry M , Tennøy A. 2010. The dimensions and context of transport decision making: In: Robert Joumard, R. Henrik Gudmundsson, H. editors. Indicators of environmental sustainability in transport: An interdisciplinary approach to methods. INRETS; p. 79-102,
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB , Therivel R , Bond A , Fothergill J , Marshall R . 2016. The revised eia directive–possible implications for practice in england. Uvp Report. 30(2):106-112.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler KM , Rauch EM 2006. Sustainable buildings rating systems – summary. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. [accessed 2017 Oct 05 ]. Available from http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-15858.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galloway TD , Mahayni RG . 1977. Planning theory in retrospect: the process of Paradigm Change. J Am Plann Assoc. 43(1):62–71.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin R , Sunikka-Blank M . 2012. Economic viability in thermal retrofit policies: learning from ten years of experience in Germany. Building Env. 58:188–198.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Sanchez D , Lacarrière B , Musy M , Bourges B . 2014. Application of sensitivity analysis in building energy simulations: combining first- and second-order elementary effects methods. Energy and Buildings. 68:741–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill ZM , Tierney MJ , Pegg IM , Allan N . 2010. Low energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Building Res Infor. 38(5):491–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapio A , Viitaniemi P . 2008. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Env Impact Ass Rev. 28:469–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas R , Biermayr P . 2000. The rebound effect for space heating empirical evidence from Austria. Energy Policy. 28(6–7):403–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking T , Guthrie P . 2008. A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Env Impact Ass Rev. 28:73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haroglu H . 2013. The impact of Breeam on the design of buildings. Pro Ins Civil Eng-Eng Sus. 166(1):11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier J . 2005. Straddling the post-structuralist abyss: between transcendence and immanence? Plan The. 4(3):271–299.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier J . 2011. Strategic navigation across multiple planes -Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Plann Rev. 82(5):503–527.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfe CJ , Hensen JLM . 2011. Uncertainty analysis in building performance simulation for design support. Energy and Buildings. 43(10):2798–2805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt DVL , Lombardi DN , Farmani R , Jefferson I , Memon FA , Butler D , Rogers CDF . 2012. Urban Futures and the code for sustainable homes. Proc Inst Civil Eng–Eng Sus. 165(1):37–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalava K , Pölönen I , Hokkanen P , Kuitunen M . 2013. The precautionary principle and management of uncertainties in eias–analysis of waste incineration cases in finland. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 31(4):280-290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U , Fischer TB . 2016. 25 years of the UK EIA System: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Env Impact Ass Rev. 61:19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R , Fischer TB . 2016. EIA follow-up in the UK — a 2015 update. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 18(1):1650006.
   Google Scholar
• Kajikawa Y , Inoue T , Goh TN . 2011. Analysis of building environment assessment frameworks and their implications for sustainability indicators. Sus Sci. 6:233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizmane M , Slihte S , Borodinecs A . 2016. Key criteria across existing sustainable building rating tools. Energy Procedia. 96:94–99.
   Google Scholar
• Leung W , Noble B , Gunn J , Jaeger JAG . 2015. A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment. Env Impact Ass Rev. 50:116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lützkendorf T , Lorenz DP . 2006. Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools. Building Res Infor. 34(4):334–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateus R , Bragança L . 2011. Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: developing the methodology SBToolPT-H. Building Env. 46:1962–1971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes AC , Cripps A , Bouchlaghem D , Buswell R . 2012. Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Appl Energy. 97:355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirakyan A , De Guio R . 2015. Modelling and uncertainties in integrated energy planning. Ren Sus Energy Rev. 46:62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazami A , Gaterell M , Nicol F . 2015. A comprehensive review of environmental design in UK schools: history, conflicts and solutions. Ren Sus Energy Rev. 46:249–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RK . 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 30(1):5-14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers D , Kitsuse A . 2000. Constructing the future in planning: a survey of theories and tools. J Plann Educ Res. 19(3):221–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham GR , Mancini S , Birt BJ . 2009. Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but. Energy and Buildings. 41:897–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen MS , Driscoll PA . 2016. An international review of ex-post project evaluation schemes in the transport sector. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 18(01):1650008.
   Google Scholar
• Perdicoúlis A , Glasson J . 2009. The causality premise of EIA in practice. Impact Ass Project App. 27(3):247–250.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Lombard L , Ortoiz J , Gonzáles R , Maestre IR . 2009. A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes. Energy and Buildings. 41:272–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope J , Bond A , Morrison-Saunders A , Retief F . 2013. Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 41:1 –9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pushkar S , Shaviv E . 2016. Using shearing layer concept to evaluate green rating systems. Arc Sci Rev. 59(2):114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragas AMJ , Huijbregts MAJ , Henning-de Jong I , Leuven RS . 2009. Uncertainty in environmental risk assessment: implications for risk-based management of river basins. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 5(1):27–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan HM , Colyvan M , Borgman MA . 2002. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecological Appl. 12(2):618–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijnders L , van Roekel A . 1999. Comprehensiveness and adequacy of tools for the environmental improvement of buildings. J Clean Prod. 7:221–225.
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff R . 2009. Green buildings and building assessment systems: a new area of interest for planners. J Plann Lit. 24(1):3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans J , Van Asselt MBA . 2001. Uncertainty management in integrated assessment modelling: towards a pluralistic approach. Environ Monit Assess. 69:101–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameni SMT , Gaterell M , Montazami A , Ahmed A . 2015. Overheating investigation in UK social housing flats built to the Passivhaus standard. Building Env. 92:222–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweber L , Hasan Haroglu H . 2014. Comparing the fit between BREEAM assessment and design processes. Building Res Infor. 42(3):300–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuvander L , Femenías P , Mjörnell K , Meiling P . 2012. Unveiling the process of sustainable renovation. Sustainability. (4):1188–1213.
   Google Scholar
• Tullos D . 2009. Assessing the influence of environmental impact assessments on science and policy: an analysis of the three gorges project. J Environ Manage. 90:208–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimpari J , Junnila S . 2016. Theory of valuing building life-cycle investments. Building Research & Information. 44(4):345–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker WE , Harremöes P , Rotmans J , van der Sluijs JP , van Asselt MBA , Janssen P , Krayer von Krauss MP . 2003. Defining uncertainty a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment. 4(1):5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wallhagen M , Glaumann M . 2011. Design consequences of differences in building assessment tools: a case study. Building Res Infor. 39(1):16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallhagen M , Glaumann M , Eriksson O , Westerberg U . 2013. Framework for detailed comparison of building environmental assessment tools. Buildings. 3:39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Weston J . 2000. EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice. J Environ Plann Manag. 43(2):185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Yu W , Li B , Yang X , Wang Q . 2015. A development of a rating method and weighting system for green store buildings in China. Ren Energy. 73:123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H , Magoulès F . 2012. A review on the prediction of building energy consumption. Ren Sus Energy Rev. 16:3586–3592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L , Zhou Z . 2017. Developing a rating system for building energy efficiency based on in situ measurement in China. Sustainability. 9:208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar