4,164
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The use of social media in impact assessment: experiences among national infrastructure developers in Denmark

, &
Pages 456-466 | Received 04 Jan 2018, Accepted 06 Jul 2018, Published online: 24 Jul 2018

References

  • Afzalan N, Muller B. 2014. The role of social media in green infrastructure planning: a case study of neighbourhood participation in park siting. J Urban Technol. 21(3):67–83.
  • Arnstein SR. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of The American Planning Association. 35(4):216–224.
  • Beierle TC, Crayford J. 2002. Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. S.I: Routledge.
  • Bode L. 2012. Facebooking it to the polls: a study in online social networking and political behavior. J Inf Technol Politics. 9(4):352–369.
  • Böhme K 2002. Nordic echoes of European spatial planning: discursive integration in practice. Stockholm: Nordregio. Report No. 8.
  • Borch K, Dahlgaard V, Munk AK. 2017. Strategisk kommunikation om vindmøller på sociale medier [Strategic communication regarding wind turbines on social media]. Copenhagen: Wind2050 Policy Brief no. 2.
  • Boulianne S. 2015. Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information Commun Soc. 18(5):524–538.
  • Clark BY, Brudney JL, Jang S. 2013. Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: investigating the distributional biases. Public Adm Rev. 73(5):687–701.
  • Fischer T. 2017. Foreword to the first issue of 2017. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 35(1):1.
  • Fredericks J, Foth M. 2013. Augmenting public participation: enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0. Aust Planner. 50(3):244–256.
  • Graham J, Amos B, Plumptre T. 2003. Principles for good governance in the 21st century. Ontario: Institute of Governance Policy Brief no 15.
  • Green N. 2002. On the move: technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. Inf Soc. 18(4):281–292.
  • Healey P. 2006. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Illsley B, Jackson T, Deasley N. 2014. Spheres of public conversation: experiences in strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 44:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.08.001
  • Jiang H, Qiang M, Lin P. 2016. Assessment of online public opinions on large infrastructure projects: a case study of the three gorges project in china. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:38–51.
  • Kenski K, Stroud NJ. 2006. Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. J Broadcast Electron Media. 50(2):173–192.
  • Kleinhans R, van Ham M, Evans-Cowley J. 2015. Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance. Plann Pract Res. 30(3):237–247.
  • Larsen SV, Hansen AM, Lyhne I, Aaen SB, Ritter E, Nielsen H. 2015. Social impact assessment in Europe: a study of social impacts in three Danish cases. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 17:04.
  • Linders D. 2012. From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q. 29(4):446–454.
  • Lyhne I 2012. Strategic environmental assessment and the Danish energy sector: exploring non-programmed strategic decisions. [Dissertation]. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
  • Lyhne I, Cashmore M, Runhaar H, van Laerhoven F. 2015. Quality control for environmental policy appraisal tools: an empirical investigation of relations between quality, quality control and effectiveness. J Environ Policy Plann. 18(1):121–140.
  • Lyhne I, Nielsen H, Aaen SB. 2016. What determines the substantive influence of public participation? an investigation of planners’ views on conditions for participatory practices in Denmark. Plann Pract Res. 31(3):311–326.
  • Meuleman L. 2015. Owl meets beehive: how impact assessment and governance relate. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 33(1):4–15.
  • O’Faircheallaigh C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(1):19–27.
  • Odparlik L, Köppel J. 2013. Access to information and the role of environmental assessment registries for public participation. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 31(4):324–331.
  • Prenzel PV, Vanclay F. 2014. How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 45:30–37.
  • Redecker C, Ala-Mutka K, Punie Y. 2010. Learning 2.0 - the impact of social media on learning in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission Joint Research Centre Report no. JRC 56958.
  • Segerberg A, Bennett WL. 2011. Social media and the organization of collective action: using twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. Commun Rev. 14(3):197–215.
  • Sinclair JA, Peirson-Smith TJ, Boerchers M. 2017. Environmental assessments in the internet age: the role of e-governance and social media in creating platforms for meaningful participation. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 35(2):148–157.
  • Smidstrup C 2014 Sep 22. Borgerne tager magten via nettet [citizens seize power via the Internet].Nordjyske [Danish Newspaper]. [Accessed 2017 May 30.URL:https://nordjyske.dk/plus/borgerne-tager-magten-via-nettet/24264c2c-a426-4839-a230-98e225199c62https://nordjyske.dk/plus/borgerne-tager-magten-via-nettet/24264c2c-a426-4839-a230-98e225199c62
  • Statistica. 2017. Share of daily social media users in Denmark in 2016, by social media site.Statistics Denmark.
  • Tang G, Lee FLF. 2013. Facebook use and political participation. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 31(6):763–773.
  • Williamson W, Parolin B. 2013. Web 2.0 and social media growth in planning practice: a longitudinal study. Plann Pract Res. 28(5):544–562.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.