2,369
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

From global to local: impact assessment and social implications related to wind energy projects in Oaxaca, Mexico

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 479-493 | Received 27 Mar 2018, Accepted 13 Jul 2018, Published online: 21 Aug 2018

References

  • Alpizar–Castro I, Rodríguez–Monroy C. 2016. Review of Mexico׳s energy reform in 2013: background, analysis of the reform and reactions. Renew Sustainable Energ Rev. 58:725–736.
  • Avila-Calero S. 2017. Contesting energy transitions: wind power and conflicts in the isthmus of tehuantepec. NO-Journal Political Ecology. 24:992.
  • Baker S. 2016. Mexican energy reform, climate change, and energy justice in indigenous communities. Nat Resour Journal. 56:369–390.
  • Barrow C. 1997. Environmental and social impact assessment : an introduction. London: Arnold.
  • Barrow C. 2000. Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
  • Batel S, Devine-Wright P. 2015. Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: insights from social representations theory. Public Understing Sci. 24:311–325.
  • Beddies ADS. 2011. The World Bank´s poverty and social impact analysis. In: New directions social impact assessment: conceptual methodological advances. In Vanclay, F. and Esteves, A.M. editors. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing p. 306–322.
  • Beery JA, Day JE 2015. Community investment in wind farms: funding structure effects in wind energy infrastructure development. Environ Sci Tech. 49:2648–2655.
  • Benecke G. 2009. Varieties of carbon governance: taking stock of the local carbon market in India. J Environ Dev. 18:346–370.
  • Böhm S, Misoczky MC, Moog S. 2012. Greening capitalism? A marxist critique of carbon markets. Organ Stud. 33:1617–1638.
  • (CONEVAL) Comisión Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. 2016. Medición de la pobreza en méxico y en las entidades federativas 2016. Mexico: CONEVAL.
  • Bruns E, Ohlhorst D, Wenzel B. 2010. Introduction to the Methodology. In: Ohlhorst D. Wennel B., editors. Renewable energies in Germany’s electricity market : a biography of the innovation process. 1st. Springer, Berlin.p. 7-13.
  • Corbera E, Jover N. 2012. The undelivered promises of the clean development mechanism: insights from three projects in Mexico. Carbon Manage. 3:39–54.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 1996. Ley general del equilibrio ecológico y la protección al ambiente. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2008. Ley para el aprovechamiento de energías renovables y el financiamiento de la transición energética. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2012. Ley general de cambio climático. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2014a. Reglamento de la ley de la industria eléctrica. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2014b. Reglamento de la ley de hidrocarburos. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2015. Ley de transición energética. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2017a. Decreto de declaratoria de la zona económica especial de salina cruz. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2017b. Constitución política de los estados unidos mexicanos. México: Secretaría de Gobernación.
  • Dendena B, Corsi S. 2015. The environmental and social impact assessment: a further step towards an integrated assessment process. J Clean Prod. 108:965–977.
  • Elliott D, Schwartz M, Scott G, Haymes S, Heimiller D, George R 2003. Wind energy resource atlas of oaxaca . Golden, CO (United States).
  • Ervine K. 2013. Carbon markets, debt and uneven development. Third World Quarter. 34:653–670.
  • Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 30:34–42.
  • Franks DM, Brereton D, Moran CJ. 2013. The cumulative dimensions of impact in resource regions. Resour Policy. 38:640–647.
  • Gartman V, Wichmann K, Bulling L, Elena Huesca-Pérez M, Köppel J. 2014. Wind of change or wind of challenges: implementation factors regarding wind energy development, an international perspective. AIMS Energy
  • Glasson J. 2001. Methods of environmental impact assessment. Peter Morris Riki Therivel, editors. Methods environmental impact assessment. Vol. 2. 3rd. London: Spon Press, Taylor & Francis Group. 560.
  • Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 2013. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. The Natural and Built Environment Studies. Routledge, UK.
  • Guevara Romero M, Blanca Rosa TM, de Lourdes FL. 2015. Aprovechamiento sustentable de los recursos naturales desde la visión de las comunidades indígenas: sierra norte del estado de puebla. Nova Scientia Vol. 7 no. 14. Leon, Oct. 2015.
  • Hanna P, Vanclay F. 2013. Human rights, indigenous peoples and the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 31:146–157.
  • Hanna P, Vanclay F, Langdon EJ, Arts J. 2016. The importance of cultural aspects in impact assessment and project development: reflections from a case study of a hydroelectric dam in Brazil. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 34:306–318.
  • Henningsson M, Jönsson S, Bengtsson R, Bluhm G, Bolin K, Boden B, Ek K, Hammarlund K, Hannukka I, Johansson C, els S, Mels T, Nilson M. 2013. The effects of wind power on human interests [Accessed 2015 Jun 18] Available from: http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer6400/978-91-620-6545-4.pdf
  • Huesca-Pérez ME, Sheinbaum-Pardo C, Köppel J. 2016. Social implications of siting wind energy in a disadvantaged region - The case of the isthmus of tehuantepec, Mexico. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev. 58:952–965.
  • (IFC) International Finance Corporation. 2012. IFC performance standards on environmental and social. World Bank Group.
  • Idom. 2015. Evaluación ambiental y social estratégica para el desarrollo eólico en el sur del istmo de tehuantepec [Accessed July 05]. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/136647/18439_EASE_E_lico_Tehuantepec_Resumen_ejecutivo_espa_ol.pdf
  • International Fincance Corporation. 2012. IFC performance standards on environmental and social sustainability. IFC World Bank Group. Washington DC.
  • Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:287–300.
  • Langbroek M, Vanclay F. 2012. Learning from the social impacts associated with initiating a windfarm near the former island of Urk, The Netherlands. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:167–178.
  • Larsen SV, Hansen AM, Lyhne I, Aaen SB, Ritter E, Nielsen H. 2015. Social impact assessment in Europe: a study of social impacts in three Danish cases. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 17:1550038.
  • Lau LC, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. 2012. Global warming mitigation and renewable energy policy development from the kyoto protocol to the copenhagen accord - A comment. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev. 16:5280–5284.
  • Ledec G, Kennan W, Aiello RG, 2011. Greening the Wind. A World Bank Study. Washington DC: World Bank.
  • Lederer M. 2011. From CDM to REDD+ — what do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance? Ecol Econ. 70: 1900–1907.
  • Lloyd B, Subbarao S. 2009. Development challenges under the clean Development Mechanism (CDM)-can renewable energy initiatives be put in place before peak oil? Energy Policy. 37:237–245.
  • Longhurst R. 2016. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Nicholas C, Meghan C, Gillespie TW, French S, editors. Key methods geogr. 3rd.Ed. London, UK: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Nadaï A, Labussière O. 2013. Playing with the line, channelling multiplicity: wind power planning in the Narbonnaise (Aude, France). Environ Plann D Soc Space. 31: 116–139.
  • Nahmad-Sitton S. 2011. El impacto social del uso del recurso eólico. Informe final para el Consejo Oaxaqueño de Ciencia y Tecnología (COCyT) del Conacyt. Proyecto 123396. Centro de Investigaciones y estudios superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS) Unidad Pacífico Sur. Oaxaca (México).
  • Nzeadibe TC, Ajaero CK, Okonkwo EE, Okpoko PU, Akukwe TI, Njoku-Tony RF. 2015. Integrating community perceptions and cultural diversity in social impact assessment in Nigeria. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 55:74–83.
  • Odparlik LF, Köppel J. 2013. Access to information and the role of environmental assessment registries for public participation. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 31:324–331.
  • Official Journal of the European Union. 2014. DIRECTIVE 2014/52/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment [Accessed 2018 July 05]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052
  • Papillon M, Rodon T. 2017. Proponent-indigenous agreements and the implementation of the right to free, prior, and informed consent in Canada. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:216–224.
  • Paris Climate Change Conference 2015 [Accesed 2016 December 13]. Available from: http://unfccc.int/meetings/paris_nov_2015/meeting/8926.php
  • Phillips J, Newell P. 2013. The governance of clean energy in India: the clean development mechanism (CDM) and domestic energy politics. Energy Policy. 59: 654–662.
  • Reinecke S, Pistorius T, Pregernig M. 2014. UNFCCC and the REDD+ Partnership from a networked governance perspective. Environ Sci Policy. 35: 30–39.
  • Roberts R. 2006. Involving the public. In: Henk A, Becker H, Vanclay F, editors. International handbook social impact assessment concept methodological advances. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 258–277.
  • Schön S. 2007. Handbuch Konstellationsanalyse : ein interdisziplinäres brückenkonzept für die nachhaltigkeits-, technik- und innovationsforschung. München. Oekom Verlag.
  • Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). 2008. Manifestación de impacto ambiental piedra larga etapa I [Accessed 2017 January 26]. Available from: http://sinat.semarnat.gob.mx/dgiraDocs/documentos/oax/estudios/2008/20OA2008E0003.pdf
  • Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). 2011. Manifestación de impacto ambiental piedra larga etapa II [Accessed 2017 January 26]. Available from: http://sinat.semarnat.gob.mx/dgiraDocs/documentos/oax/estudios/2011/20OA2011E0012.pdf
  • (SENER) Secretaría de Energía. 2016. Prospectiva de energías renovables 2016–2030 [Accessed 2017 Aug 16]. Secretaría de Energía, Mexico. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/177622/Prospectiva_de_Energ_as_Renovables_2016-2030.pdf.
  • Slootweg R, Vanclay F, van Schooten M. 2003. Integrating environmental and social impact assessment. In: Henk A, Becker H, Vanclay F, editors. International handbook social impact assessment concept methodological advances. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing. 56-71.
  • Smyth E, Vanclay F. 2017. The social framework for projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35:65–80.
  • Stigka EK, Paravantis JA, Mihalakakou GK. 2014. Social acceptance of renewable energy sources: A review of contingent valuation applications. Renew Sustainable Energ Rev. 32:100–106.
  • Therivel R, Wood G.2018.Methods of environmental and social impact assessment.4th Therivel R, Wood G,editors.New York: Routledge.
  • Thomas L 2015. Avanza proyecto de parque eólico comunitario en Ixtepec. El Universal [Accessed 2018 April 05]. Available from: http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/articulo/estados/2015/10/11/avanza-proyecto-de-parque-eolico-comunitario-en-ixtepec
  • Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 21:5–12.
  • Vanclay F, Esteves AM. 2011. Current issues and trends in social impact assessment. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions social impact assessment conceptual methodological advances. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks DM. 2015. Social impact assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Int Assoc Impact Assessment. 1:98.
  • Weidner H. 2002. Capacity building in national environmental policy : a comparative study of 17 countries. Berlin. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
  • Wood C. 2003. Environmental impact assessment in developing countries. Int Dev Plan Rev. 25:301–321.
  • World Bank Group. 2017. World Bank environmental and social framework. Washington DC.: The World Bank Group.
  • Wright Z M. 2012. A voice for the community: public participation in wind energy development. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management. Volume 8 – Spring 2012
  • Yin RK. 2014. Case study research : design and methods. 5th ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Los Angeles (US). Sage Publications

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.