From global to local: impact assessment and social implications related to wind energy projects in Oaxaca, Mexico

References

• Alpizar–Castro I, Rodríguez–Monroy C. 2016. Review of Mexico׳s energy reform in 2013: background, analysis of the reform and reactions. Renew Sustainable Energ Rev. 58:725–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila-Calero S. 2017. Contesting energy transitions: wind power and conflicts in the isthmus of tehuantepec. NO-Journal Political Ecology. 24:992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker S. 2016. Mexican energy reform, climate change, and energy justice in indigenous communities. Nat Resour Journal. 56:369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrow C. 1997. Environmental and social impact assessment : an introduction. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow C. 2000. Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Batel S, Devine-Wright P. 2015. Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: insights from social representations theory. Public Understing Sci. 24:311–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddies ADS. 2011. The World Bank´s poverty and social impact analysis. In: New directions social impact assessment: conceptual methodological advances. In Vanclay, F. and Esteves, A.M. editors. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing p. 306–322.
   Google Scholar
• Beery JA, Day JE 2015. Community investment in wind farms: funding structure effects in wind energy infrastructure development. Environ Sci Tech. 49:2648–2655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benecke G. 2009. Varieties of carbon governance: taking stock of the local carbon market in India. J Environ Dev. 18:346–370.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm S, Misoczky MC, Moog S. 2012. Greening capitalism? A marxist critique of carbon markets. Organ Stud. 33:1617–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (CONEVAL) Comisión Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. 2016. Medición de la pobreza en méxico y en las entidades federativas 2016. Mexico: CONEVAL.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns E, Ohlhorst D, Wenzel B. 2010. Introduction to the Methodology. In: Ohlhorst D. Wennel B., editors. Renewable energies in Germany’s electricity market : a biography of the innovation process. 1st. Springer, Berlin.p. 7-13.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera E, Jover N. 2012. The undelivered promises of the clean development mechanism: insights from three projects in Mexico. Carbon Manage. 3:39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 1996. Ley general del equilibrio ecológico y la protección al ambiente. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2008. Ley para el aprovechamiento de energías renovables y el financiamiento de la transición energética. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2012. Ley general de cambio climático. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2014a. Reglamento de la ley de la industria eléctrica. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2014b. Reglamento de la ley de hidrocarburos. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2015. Ley de transición energética. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2017a. Decreto de declaratoria de la zona económica especial de salina cruz. Mexico: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• (DOF) Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2017b. Constitución política de los estados unidos mexicanos. México: Secretaría de Gobernación.
   Google Scholar
• Dendena B, Corsi S. 2015. The environmental and social impact assessment: a further step towards an integrated assessment process. J Clean Prod. 108:965–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott D, Schwartz M, Scott G, Haymes S, Heimiller D, George R 2003. Wind energy resource atlas of oaxaca . Golden, CO (United States).
   Google Scholar
• Ervine K. 2013. Carbon markets, debt and uneven development. Third World Quarter. 34:653–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 30:34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks DM, Brereton D, Moran CJ. 2013. The cumulative dimensions of impact in resource regions. Resour Policy. 38:640–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartman V, Wichmann K, Bulling L, Elena Huesca-Pérez M, Köppel J. 2014. Wind of change or wind of challenges: implementation factors regarding wind energy development, an international perspective. AIMS Energy
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J. 2001. Methods of environmental impact assessment. Peter Morris Riki Therivel, editors. Methods environmental impact assessment. Vol. 2. 3rd. London: Spon Press, Taylor & Francis Group. 560.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 2013. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. The Natural and Built Environment Studies. Routledge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Guevara Romero M, Blanca Rosa TM, de Lourdes FL. 2015. Aprovechamiento sustentable de los recursos naturales desde la visión de las comunidades indígenas: sierra norte del estado de puebla. Nova Scientia Vol. 7 no. 14. Leon, Oct. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Vanclay F. 2013. Human rights, indigenous peoples and the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 31:146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Vanclay F, Langdon EJ, Arts J. 2016. The importance of cultural aspects in impact assessment and project development: reflections from a case study of a hydroelectric dam in Brazil. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 34:306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsson M, Jönsson S, Bengtsson R, Bluhm G, Bolin K, Boden B, Ek K, Hammarlund K, Hannukka I, Johansson C, els S, Mels T, Nilson M. 2013. The effects of wind power on human interests [Accessed 2015 Jun 18] Available from: http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer6400/978-91-620-6545-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huesca-Pérez ME, Sheinbaum-Pardo C, Köppel J. 2016. Social implications of siting wind energy in a disadvantaged region - The case of the isthmus of tehuantepec, Mexico. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev. 58:952–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (IFC) International Finance Corporation. 2012. IFC performance standards on environmental and social. World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Idom. 2015. Evaluación ambiental y social estratégica para el desarrollo eólico en el sur del istmo de tehuantepec [Accessed July 05]. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/136647/18439_EASE_E_lico_Tehuantepec_Resumen_ejecutivo_espa_ol.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Fincance Corporation. 2012. IFC performance standards on environmental and social sustainability. IFC World Bank Group. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbroek M, Vanclay F. 2012. Learning from the social impacts associated with initiating a windfarm near the former island of Urk, The Netherlands. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen SV, Hansen AM, Lyhne I, Aaen SB, Ritter E, Nielsen H. 2015. Social impact assessment in Europe: a study of social impacts in three Danish cases. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 17:1550038.
   Google Scholar
• Lau LC, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. 2012. Global warming mitigation and renewable energy policy development from the kyoto protocol to the copenhagen accord - A comment. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev. 16:5280–5284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledec G, Kennan W, Aiello RG, 2011. Greening the Wind. A World Bank Study. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer M. 2011. From CDM to REDD+ — what do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance? Ecol Econ. 70: 1900–1907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd B, Subbarao S. 2009. Development challenges under the clean Development Mechanism (CDM)-can renewable energy initiatives be put in place before peak oil? Energy Policy. 37:237–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst R. 2016. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Nicholas C, Meghan C, Gillespie TW, French S, editors. Key methods geogr. 3rd.Ed. London, UK: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nadaï A, Labussière O. 2013. Playing with the line, channelling multiplicity: wind power planning in the Narbonnaise (Aude, France). Environ Plann D Soc Space. 31: 116–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahmad-Sitton S. 2011. El impacto social del uso del recurso eólico. Informe final para el Consejo Oaxaqueño de Ciencia y Tecnología (COCyT) del Conacyt. Proyecto 123396. Centro de Investigaciones y estudios superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS) Unidad Pacífico Sur. Oaxaca (México).
   Google Scholar
• Nzeadibe TC, Ajaero CK, Okonkwo EE, Okpoko PU, Akukwe TI, Njoku-Tony RF. 2015. Integrating community perceptions and cultural diversity in social impact assessment in Nigeria. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 55:74–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odparlik LF, Köppel J. 2013. Access to information and the role of environmental assessment registries for public participation. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 31:324–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Journal of the European Union. 2014. DIRECTIVE 2014/52/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment [Accessed 2018 July 05]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052
   Google Scholar
• Papillon M, Rodon T. 2017. Proponent-indigenous agreements and the implementation of the right to free, prior, and informed consent in Canada. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris Climate Change Conference 2015 [Accesed 2016 December 13]. Available from: http://unfccc.int/meetings/paris_nov_2015/meeting/8926.php
   Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Newell P. 2013. The governance of clean energy in India: the clean development mechanism (CDM) and domestic energy politics. Energy Policy. 59: 654–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke S, Pistorius T, Pregernig M. 2014. UNFCCC and the REDD+ Partnership from a networked governance perspective. Environ Sci Policy. 35: 30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts R. 2006. Involving the public. In: Henk A, Becker H, Vanclay F, editors. International handbook social impact assessment concept methodological advances. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 258–277.
   Google Scholar
• Schön S. 2007. Handbuch Konstellationsanalyse : ein interdisziplinäres brückenkonzept für die nachhaltigkeits-, technik- und innovationsforschung. München. Oekom Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). 2008. Manifestación de impacto ambiental piedra larga etapa I [Accessed 2017 January 26]. Available from: http://sinat.semarnat.gob.mx/dgiraDocs/documentos/oax/estudios/2008/20OA2008E0003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). 2011. Manifestación de impacto ambiental piedra larga etapa II [Accessed 2017 January 26]. Available from: http://sinat.semarnat.gob.mx/dgiraDocs/documentos/oax/estudios/2011/20OA2011E0012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• (SENER) Secretaría de Energía. 2016. Prospectiva de energías renovables 2016–2030 [Accessed 2017 Aug 16]. Secretaría de Energía, Mexico. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/177622/Prospectiva_de_Energ_as_Renovables_2016-2030.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg R, Vanclay F, van Schooten M. 2003. Integrating environmental and social impact assessment. In: Henk A, Becker H, Vanclay F, editors. International handbook social impact assessment concept methodological advances. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing. 56-71.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth E, Vanclay F. 2017. The social framework for projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35:65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigka EK, Paravantis JA, Mihalakakou GK. 2014. Social acceptance of renewable energy sources: A review of contingent valuation applications. Renew Sustainable Energ Rev. 32:100–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R, Wood G.2018.Methods of environmental and social impact assessment.4th Therivel R, Wood G,editors.New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas L 2015. Avanza proyecto de parque eólico comunitario en Ixtepec. El Universal [Accessed 2018 April 05]. Available from: http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/articulo/estados/2015/10/11/avanza-proyecto-de-parque-eolico-comunitario-en-ixtepec
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal. 21:5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM. 2011. Current issues and trends in social impact assessment. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions social impact assessment conceptual methodological advances. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks DM. 2015. Social impact assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Int Assoc Impact Assessment. 1:98.
   Google Scholar
• Weidner H. 2002. Capacity building in national environmental policy : a comparative study of 17 countries. Berlin. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
   Google Scholar
• Wood C. 2003. Environmental impact assessment in developing countries. Int Dev Plan Rev. 25:301–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. 2017. World Bank environmental and social framework. Washington DC.: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wright Z M. 2012. A voice for the community: public participation in wind energy development. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management. Volume 8 – Spring 2012
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2014. Case study research : design and methods. 5th ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Los Angeles (US). Sage Publications
   Google Scholar