Public understanding of risk in health impact assessment: a psychosocial approach

References

• Adler School of Professional Psychology. date unknown. Mental health impact assessment (MHIA). [accessed 2016 May 25]. https://www.adler.edu/page/institutes/institute-on-social-exclusion/projects/mhia/mental-healthimpact-assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht G. 2005. ‘Solastalgia’. A new concept in health and identity [online]. Vol. 3 PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature; pp. 41–55. [accessed 2016 May 28]. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=897723015186456;res=IELHSS
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht G, Sartore GM, Connor L, Higginbotham N, Freeman S, Stain KB, Tonna A, Pollard G. 2007. Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry. 15(1):41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ampuero D, Goldswosthy S, Delgado LE, Miranda J. 2015. Using mental well-being impact assessment to understand factors influencing well-being after a disaster. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 33(3):184–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angignard M, Peters-Guarin G, Greiving S. 2014. Chapter 12 The relevance of legal aspects, risk cultures and insurance possibilities for risk management . In: T. van Asch, Corominas, J, Greiving, S, Malet, J.P, Sterlacchini, S eds.. Mountain risks: from prediction to management and governance, advances in natural and technological hazards research 34. Dordrecht: Springer ScienceCBusiness Media; pp. 327–340. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6769-012.
   Google Scholar
• Aven T, Renn O. 2009. On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. J Risk Res. 12(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. 2014. Assessing impacts on people’s relationships to place and community in health impact assessment: an anthropological approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 33(2):154–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett L. 2007. Psychosocial effects of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. Medicine, Conflict and Survival. 23(1):46–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baxter AJ, Vos T, Scott KM, Ferrari AJ, Whiteford HA. 2014. The global burden of anxiety disorders in 2010. Psychol Med. 44:2363–2374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birley M. 2015. Social determinants of risk perception. London: BirleyHIA; [accessed 2016]. For IAIA15, Florence: http://conferences.iaia.org/2015/Final-Papers/Birley,%20Martin%20-%20Social%20determinants%20of%20risk%20perception.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brousselle A, Guerra SG. 2017. Public health for a sustainable future: the need for an engaged ecosocial approach. Debate S, de Janeiro R. Vol. 41. N. Especial; pp. 14–21, Mar 2017..
   Google Scholar
• Carney MR, Freedland KE. 2000. Depression and medical illness. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. USA: Oxford University Press; p. 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF, Segerstrom SC. 2010. Optimism. Clin Psychol Rev. 30(7):879–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins T. 2018. Australia’s first positive residences. APSAA Student Accommodation Journal. 2(1):23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Coggins T, Heitor MJ, Virgolino A, Carreiras J, Nicolau BL. 2016. MWIA: the impact of a community-based intervention on the mental wellbeing of professionals working with those unemployed. Portugal: Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Friedli L, Coggins T, Edmonds N, O’Hara K, Snowden L, Stansfield J, Steuer N, Scott-Samuel A. 2010. The mental well-being impact assessment toolkit. 2nd ed. London: National Mental Health Development Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Stansfield J. 2009. Improving mental well-being through impact assessment. London: National Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett S, Willcox S. 2015. The Australian healthcare system. South Melbourne. Victoria (Australia): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dustin DL, Bricker SK, Schwab KA. 2009. People and nature: toward an ecological model of health promotion. Leisure Sci. 32(1):3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelstein MR. 2003. Weight and weightlessness: administrative court efforts to weigh psycho-social impacts of proposed environmentally hazardous facilities. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 21(3):195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer R, Klein WM. 2015. Risk perceptions and health behavior. Curr Opin Psychol. 5:85–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene G, Turley R, Mann M, Amlôt R, Page L, Palmer S. 2014. Differing community responses to similar public health threats: a cross-disciplinary systematic literature review. Sci Total Environ. 470:59–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton LC. 1985. Concern about toxic wastes: three demographic predictors. Sociological Perspectives. 28(4):463–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham N, Connor L, Albrecht G, Freeman S, Kingsley A. 2007. Validation of an environmental distress scale. EcoHealth. 3:245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilding-Rydevik T, Vohra SRuotsalainen A, Pettersson A °,Pearce N, Breeze C, Hrncarova M, Lieskovska Z, PaluchovaK, Thomas L, Kemm J. 2005. Health aspects in EIA: D 2.2report WP 2, 2005. improving the implementation of environmental impact assessment: improvements in EIA implementation in Europe. Vienna, Austria, O¨ IR, O¨ sterreichischesInstitut fu¨ r. Vienna, Austria, O¨ IR: O¨ sterreichischesInstitut fu¨ r Raumplanung (Austrian Institute for RegionalStudies and Spatial Planning).
   Google Scholar
• Horton R. 2015. Comment: planetary health: a new science for exceptional action. The Lancet. 386L:1921.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. 2012. Devil’s Bargain? Energy risks and the public. First report of session 2012–13. London: Authority of the House of Commons. [accessed 2016 May 25]. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmsctech/428/42802.htm
   Google Scholar
• Howe H. 1990. Predicting public concern regarding toxic substances in the environment. Environ Health Perspect. 87:275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung H-C, Wang T-W. 2011. Determinants and mapping of collective perceptions of technological risk: the case of the second nuclear power plant in Taiwan. Risk Anal. 31(4):668–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet JB, Stedman RC. 2014. The risk of social psychological disruption as an impact of energy development and environmental change. J Environ Plann Manag. 57(9):1285–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kågström M, Hilding-Rydevik T, Sjöberg I. 2013. Human health frames in EIA – the case of Swedish road planning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 31(3):198–207.
   Google Scholar
• Kashpur VV, Afanasieva DO, Negrul SV, Kirpotin SN. 2015. Public attitude to the development of nuclear power industry and ecological risks (the case of the Tomsk region). Int J Environ Stud. 72(3):592–598.
   Google Scholar
• Kubzandky LD, Kiwachi I. 2000. Affective states and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. USA: Oxford University Press; p. 213–241.
   Google Scholar
• Lemyre L, Lee JEC, Mercier P, Bouchard L, Krewski D. 2006. The structure of Canadians’ health risk perceptions: environmental, therapeutic and social health risks. Health, Risk and Society. 8(2):85–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima ML. 2004. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. J Environ Psychol. 24(1):71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima ML, Marques S. 2005. Towards successful social impact assessment follow-up: a case study of psychosocial monitoring of a solid waste incinerator in the north of Portugal. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 23(3):227–233.
   Google Scholar
• López-Navarro MA, Llorens-Monzonís J, Tortosa-Edo T. 2013. The effect of social trust on citizens’ health risk perception in the context of a petrochemical industrial complex. International. J Environ Res Public Health. 10:399–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Rodríguez A, Escribano-Bombín R. 2013. Visual significance as a factor influencing perceived risks: cost-effectiveness analysis for overhead high voltage power-line redesign. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 31(4):291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucyk K. 2015. Report on mental health in health impact assessment. Calgary: Habitat Health Impact Consulting Corp. [accessed 2018 Jun 15]. www.habitatcorp.com
   Google Scholar
• Lucyk K, Gilhuly K, Tamburrini A, Rogerson B 2015. Mental health in health impact assessment. (Working paper).
   Google Scholar
• Luria P, Perkins C, Lyons M. 2009. Health risk perception and environmental problems: findings from ten case studies in north west England. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. http://www.cph.org.uk/publications.aspx. [accessed 2016 May 25].
   Google Scholar
• Marcon A, Nguyen G, Rava M, Braggion M,G, Zanolin ME. 2015. A score for measuring health risk perception in environmental surveys. Sci Total Environ. 527–528:270–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmot M. 2007. Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes. Lancet. 370(9593):1153–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martikainen P, Bartley M, Lahelma E. 2002. Psychosocial determinants of health in social epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 31(6):1091–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren L, Hawe P. 2005. Ecological perspectives in health research. Epidemiol Community Health. 59:6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller W 2010. A critical review of health impact assessments in Ontario’s nuclear industry. Unpublished Masters Thesis. Toronto (Ontario): Ryerson University. accessed 2016 May 25. digital.library.ryerson.ca/islandora/object/RULA%3A1865/datastream/OBJ/view
   Google Scholar
• Parkhill KA KL Henwood, NF Pidgeon, P. Simmons2011. Laughing it off? humour, affect and emotion work in communities living with nuclear risk. Br J Sociol. 62(2):324–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons R, Moffat K. 2014. Integrating impact and relational dimensions of social licence and social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 32(4):273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon N, Henwood K, Parkhill K, Venables D, Simmons P. 2008. Living with Nuclear Power in Britain: a mixed-methods study. UK: University of Cardiff and University of East Anglia. [accessed 2016 May 25]. https://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/SCARRNuclearReportPidgeonetalFINAL3.pdf; https://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/SCARRNuclearReportPidgeonetalFINAL3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roach I. 2013. Examining public understanding of the environmental effects of an energy-from-waste facility. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 31(3):220–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist M, Visschers VHM. 2013. Acceptance of nuclear power: the Fukushima effect. Energy Policy. 59:112–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 2012. The perception gap: radiation and risk. Bull At Scientists. 68(3):67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AG, Luria P, Reid J, Lyons M, Jarvis R. 2010. Real or illusory? Case studies on the public perception of environmental health risks in the North West of England Int. J Environ Res Public Health. 7:1153–1173.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M. 2012. Review and evaluation of research literature on public nuclear risk perception and implications for communication strategies. Consultancy Project for the Australian Uranium Association. Sydney: University of Western Sydney. [accessed 2016 May 25]. http://www.minerals.org.au/file_upload/files/reports/7.5D_Download_Report_Nuclear_Risk_Perception_Literature_Review_Report_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. 2015. Safeguarding human health in the anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–lancet commission on planetary health. The Lancet. 386: 1973–2028.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo CW, McComas KA, Kannaovakun P. 2007. Cancer anxiety and the perception of risk in alarmed communities. Risk Anal. 27(2): 337–350. [accessed 2016 May 25]. disaster.colostate.edu/Data/Sites/1/cdra-research/trumboetal2007canceranxiety.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigger-Ross C, Uzzell D. 1996. Place and identity processes. J Environ Psychol. 16:205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables D, Pidgeon NF, Parkhill KA, Henwoo KL, Simmons P. 2012. Living with nuclear power: sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. J Environ Psychol. 32:371–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield S, Elliott SJ. 2000. Risk perception and well-being: effects of the landfill siting process in two southern Ontario communities. Soc Sci Med. 50:1139–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker C, Baxter J, Ouellette D. 2015. Adding insult to injury: the development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities. Soc Sci Med. 133:358–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, Watts N, Adger WN, Agnolucci P, Blackstock J, Byass P, Cai W, Chaytor S, Colbourn T, Collins M, et al. 2015. Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. The Lancet. 386:1861–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlodarczyk TL, Tennyson J. 2003. Social and economic effects from attitudes towards risk. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 21(3):179–185.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 1999. Gothenburg Consensus Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J, Parry J, Mathers J. 2005. Participation in health impact assessment: objectives, methods and core values. Bull World Health Organ. 83:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar