From medicine to poison: how flexible strategic environmental assessment may be? Lessons from a non-regulated SEA system

References

• Arts J, Tomlinson P, Voogd H. 2011. Planning in tiers? Tiering as a way of linking SEA and EIA. In: Sadler B et al., editors. Handbook of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan; p. 415–433.
   Google Scholar
• Ashe J, Marsden S. 2011. SEA in Australia. In: Sadler B et al., editors. Handbook of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan; p. 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bina O. 2007. A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(7):585–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bina O. 2008. Context and systems: thinking more broadly about effectiveness in strategic environmental assessment in China. Environ Manage. 42:717–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Gunn JAE, Pope J, Retief F. 2015. Managing uncertainty, ambiguity and ignorance in impact assessment by embedding evolutionary resilience, participatory modelling and adaptive management. J Environ Manage. 151:97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Stoeglehner G. 2013. Designing an effective sustainability assessment process. In: Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Howitt R, editors. Sustainability assessment: pluralism, practice and progress. Oxford: Routledge. p. 231–244.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Therivel R. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 18(3):183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Gwilliam R, Morgan R, Cobb D, Bond A. 2004. The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 22:295–310.
   Google Scholar
• [CEC] Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Off J Eur Commun L. 197:0030–37.
   Google Scholar
• Cherp A, Watt A, Vinichenko V. 2007. SEA and strategy formation theories: from three Ps to five Ps. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(7):624–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal-Clayton B, Sadler B. 2005. Strategic environmental assessment: a sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23(2):155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2006. Strategic environmental assessment and transport planning: towards a generic framework for evaluating practice and developing guidance. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 24(3):183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2010. Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30:62–69. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P. 2006. SEA effectiveness criteria – equally valid in all countries? The case of Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:396–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Onyango V. 2012. SEA related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(4):253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Potter K, Donaldson S, Scott T. 2011. Municipal waste management strategies, strategic environmental assessments and the consideration of climate change in England. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 13(4):541–565.
   Google Scholar
• Franco MLPB. 2007. Análise de conteúdo [Content Analysis]. Brasília: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Gachechiladze-Bozhesku M, Fischer TB. 2012. Benefits of and barriers to SEA follow-up — theory and practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 34:22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzola P. 2008. What appears to make SEA effective in different planning systems. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 10(1):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Salvador NNB. 2000. EIA in Brazil: a procedures-practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20:191–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A, Therivel R, Fry J, Foley W. 2015. Advancing practice relating to SEA alternatives. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 53:52–63. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González JCT, De La Torre MCA, Milán PM. 2014. Present status of the implementation of strategic environmental assessment in Mexico. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16:1450021.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen AM, Kørnøv L, Cashmore M, Richardson T. 2013. The significance of structural power in strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 39:37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilding-Rydevik T, Bjarnadóttir H. 2007. Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:666–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IAIA] International Association for Impact Assessment. 2002. Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria. Spec Publ Ser. (1). [accessed 2018 Jun 04]. http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/sp1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland EPA (Ireland Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. Review of effectiveness of SEA in Ireland: key findings and recommendations. accessed 2018 Jan 16. http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/ea/reviewofeffectivenessofseainireland-mainreport.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson T, Dixon J. 2006. Applying strategic environmental assessment to land-use and resource-management plans in Scotland and New Zealand: a comparison. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 24:89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D, Fischer TB, Kidd S. 2009. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment - the significance of learning. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(2):133–144.
   Google Scholar
• João E, McLauchlan A. 2014. Would you do SEA if you didn’t have to? – reflections on acceptance or rejection of the SEA process. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(2):87–97. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.889265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly AH, Jackson T, Williams P. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment: lessons for New South Wales, Australia, from Scottish practice. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd S, Fischer T, Jha-Thakur U. 2011. Developing the learning potential of strategic environmental assessment in spatial planning. In: Rogerson R, Sadler S, Green A, Wong C, editors. Sustainable communities: skills and learning for place making. University of Hertfordshire Press. p. 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff D, Montaño M, Ranieri VEL, Oliveira ISD, Doberstein B, Souza MP. 2007. Limitations and drawbacks of using Preliminary Environmental Reports (PERs) as an input to environmental licensing in São Paulo state: a case study on natural gas pipeline routing. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:301–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kørnøv L, Thissen WAH. 2000. Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 18(3):191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. 2003. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos CC, Fischer TB, Souza MP. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment in tourism planning—extent of application and quality of documentation. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 35:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima LH, Magrini A. 2010. The Brazilian audit tribunal’s role in improving the federal environmental licensing process. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(2):108–115. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loayza F. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment in the World Bank: learning from recent experience and challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lobos V, Partidário MR. 2014. Theory versus practice in Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 48:34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid CK, Hickey GM, Bouchard MA. 2011. Strategic environmental assessment effectiveness and the initiative for the integration of regional infrastructure in South America (IIRSA): a multiple case review. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 13(4):515–540. doi:10.1142/S1464333211003997.
   Google Scholar
• Malvestio AC, Montaño M. 2013. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment applied to renewable energy in Brazil. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 15(2):1340007. doi:10.1142/S1464333213400073.
   Google Scholar
• Margato V, Sánchez LE. 2014. Quality and outcomes: a critical review of strategic environmental assessment in Brazil. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16(2):1–32. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500112.
   Google Scholar
• Martin L, Morrison-Saunders A. 2015. Determining the value and influence of informal strategic advice for environmental impact assessment: Western Australian perspectives. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 33:265–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews B, Ross L. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Edinburgh: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McGimpsey P, Morgan R. 2013. The application of strategic environmental assessment in a non-mandatory context: regional transport planning in New Zealand. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MMA] Ministério do Meio Ambiente [Ministry of Environment]. 2002. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica [Strategic Environmental Assessment]. Brasília: MMA/SQA.
   Google Scholar
• Montañez-Cartaxo LE. 2014. Strategic environmental assessment in the Mexican electricity sector. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16(02):1450012. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500124.
   Google Scholar
• Montaño M, Malvestio AC, de Oppermann PA. 2013. Institutional learning by SEA practice in Brazil. UVP - Report. 27(4+5):201–206.
   Google Scholar
• Montaño M, Oppermann P, Malvestio AC, Souza MP. 2014. Current state of the SEA system in Brazil: a comparative study. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16(02):1450022. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500227.
   Google Scholar
• Montis A. 2013. Implementing strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning tools: a study on the Italian provinces. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:53–63. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J. 2013. Learning by doing: sustainability assessment in Western Australia. In: Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Howitt R, editors. Sustainability assessment: pluralism, practice and progress. Oxford: Routledge. p. 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Mota AC, La Rovere EL, Fonseca A. 2014. Industry-driven and civil society-driven strategic environmental assessments in the iron mining and smelting complex of Corumbá, Brazil. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16(2):1450010. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500100.
   Google Scholar
• Nitz T, Brown AL. 2001. SEA must learn how policy making works. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 3(3):329–342.
   Google Scholar
• Noble BF, Nwanekezie K. 2017. Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: principles, approaches and research directions. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberling DF, La Rovere EL, Silva HVO. 2013. SEA making inroads in land-use planning in Brazil: the case of the extreme South of Bahia with forestry and biofuels. Land Use Policy. 35:341–358. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2012. Strategic environmental assessment in development practice: a review of recent experience. OECD Publishing. [10 March 2013]. doi:10.1787/9789264166745-en.
   Google Scholar
• Olagunju A, Gunn JAE. 2014. First steps toward best practice SEA in a developing nation: lessons from the central Namib uranium rush SEA. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 1–12. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.941233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 1996. Strategic environmental assessment: key issues emerging from recent practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 16:31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2010. Definição de Critérios e Avaliação de Relatórios Ambientais [Criteria definition and environmental reports assessment]. Lisbon: Portuguese Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment better practice guide - methodological guidance for strategic thinking in SEA. Lisbon: Portuguese Environment Agency and Redes Energéticas Nacionais (REN), SA.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2015. Strategic advocacy role in SEA for sustainability. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17(1):1550015–1550018.
   Google Scholar
• Polido A, Ramos TB. 2015. Towards effective scoping in strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. (June):1–13. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.993155.
   Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2006. The quality and effectiveness of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) as a decision-aiding tool for national park expansion — the greater Addo Elephant National Park case study. Koedoe. 49:103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2007. A performance evaluation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) processes within the South African context. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(1):84–100. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2008. The emperor’s new clothes — reflections on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) practice in South Africa. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:504–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar H, Driessen PPJ. 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 25:2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B. 2011. Taking stock of SEA. In: Sadler B et al., editors. Handbook of strategic environmental assessment. New York (NY): Earthscan; p. 621.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez L, Croal P. 2012. Environmental impact assessment, from Rio-92 to Rio+ 20 and beyond. Ambiente e Sociedade. 15:41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, Silva-Sánchez SS. 2008. Tiering strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment in highway planning in São Paulo, Brazil. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(7):515–522. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Triana E, Enriquez S. 2007. Using policy-based strategic environmental assessments in water supply and sanitation sector reforms: the cases of Argentina and Colombia. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 25:175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Silva HVO, Pires SHM, Oberling DF, La Rovere EL. 2014. Key recent experiences in the application of SEA in Brazil. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16(2):1450009. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500094.
   Google Scholar
• Slunge D, Loayza F. 2012. Greening growth through strategic environmental assessment of sector reforms. Public Adm Dev. 32:245–261. doi:10.1002/pad.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slunge D, Tran TTH. 2014. Challenges to institutionalizing strategic environmental assessment: the case of Vietnam. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 48:53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeglehner G, Brown AL, Kørnøv LB. 2009. SEA and planning: ‘ownership’ of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(2):111–120.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlow MF, Hanusch M. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(1):15–24. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.666400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 1993. Systems of strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 13:145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 2010. Strategic environmental assessment in action. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R, Minas P. 2002. Measuring SEA effectiveness: ensuring effective sustainability appraisal. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 20:81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Tshibangu GM, Montaño M. 2016. Energy related strategic environmental assessment applied by multilateral development agencies — an analysis based on good practice criteria. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). 2003. The protocol on strategic environmental assessment. 2018 Jan 25. www.unece.org/env/eia/sea_protocol.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Van Buuren A, Nooteboom S. 2009. Evaluating strategic environmental assessment in The Netherlands: content, process and procedure as indissoluble criteria for effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27:145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doren D, Driessen PPJ, Schijf B, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: towards a better understanding. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:120–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor D, Agamuthu P. 2014. Policy trends of strategic environmental assessment in Asia. Environ Sci Policy. 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Seht H. 1999. Requirements of a comprehensive strategic environmental assessment system. Landsc Urban Plan. 45:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker H, Spaling H, Sinclair AJ. 2016. Towards a home-grown approach to strategic environmental assessment: adapting practice and participation in Kenya. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 34(3):186–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallington T, Bina O, Thissen W. 2007. Theorising strategic environmental assessment: fresh perspectives and future challenges. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(7):569–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White L, Noble B. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment in the electricity sector: an application to electricity supply planning, Saskatchewan, Canada. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(4):284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirutskulshai U, Sajor E, Coowanitwong N. 2011. Importance of context in adoption and progress in application of strategic environmental assessment: experience of Thailand. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(3):352–359. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank, University of Gothenburg, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment. 2011. Strategic environmental assessment in policy and sector reform: conceptual model and operational guidance. October. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8559-3.
   Google Scholar