Environmental assessment: a third division subject at the university

References

• Ahmad B, Wood C. 2002. A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 22(3):213–234.
   Google Scholar
• Alemagi D, Sondo VA, Ertel J. 2007. Constraints to environmental impact assessment practice: a case study of Cameroon. J Environ Assess Pol Manage. 9(3):357–380.
   Google Scholar
• Ali OMM. 2007. Policy and institutional reforms for an effective EIA system in Sudan. J Environ Assess Pol Manage. 9(1):67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Badr EA. 2009. Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Egypt. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(3):193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Bond A, Retief F, Cave B, Fundingsland M, Duinker PN, Verheem R, Brown AL. 2018. A contribution to the conceptualisation of quality in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 68:49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherp A, Golubeva S. 2004. Environmental assessment in the Russian Federation: evolution through capacity building. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 22(2):121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen A, Vu HH, Pedrono M. 2011. An evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Vietnam: the gap between theory and practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(2):136–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Belcakova I, Aschemann R, editors. 2008. Environmental assessment lecturers’ handbook. Bratislava: ROAD.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U. 2013. Environmental assessment and management related master level degree programmes in the EU: baseline, trends, challenges and opportunities. J Environ Assess Pol Manage. 15(4):1350020.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Onyango V. 2012. SEA related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(4):253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Saeed A, Schijf B, Khan MI. 2014. EIA teaching at tertiary level institutions in Pakistan – baseline and development needs. In: Fischer TB, editor. Environmental impact assessment handbook for Pakistan. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan; p. 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola P. 2008. Trends in education in environmental assessment: a comparative analysis of European EA-related Master programmes. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 26(2):148–158.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Salvador NN. 2000. EIA in Brazil: a procedures-practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20(2):191–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A. 2015. Impact assessment research in Ireland and Spain: an overview of current trends and future directions. J Environ Assess Pol Manage. 17(1):1550007.
   Google Scholar
• Jalava K, Pasanen S, Saalasti M, Kuitunen M. 2010. Quality of environmental impact assessment: Finnish EISs and the opinions of EIA professionals. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 28(1):15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(4):287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabera T. 2017. Environmental impact assessment in higher education institutions in East Africa: the case of Rwanda. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(8):7852–7864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RK, Hart A, Freeman C, Coutts B, Colwill F, Hughes A. 2012. Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 32(1):11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos TB, Cecílio T, Joanaz de Melo J. 2008. Environmental impact assessment in higher education and training in Portugal. J Clean Prod. 16(5):639–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross WA, Morrison-Saunders A, Marshall R. 2006. Common sense in environmental impact assessment: it is not as common as it should be. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 24(1):3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE. 2010. Environmental impact assessment teaching at the university of São Paulo: evolving approaches to different needs. J Environ Assess Pol Manage. 12(3):245–262.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, Mitchell R. 2017. Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning process. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, Morrison-Saunders A. 2010. Teaching impact assessment: results of an international survey. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 28(3):245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmack CM, Sinclair AJ, Fitzpatrick P. 2005. An overview of the state of environmental assessment education at Canadian universities. Int J Sust Higher Ed. 6(1):36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Van Loon L, Driessen PPJ, Kolhoff A, Runhaar HAC. 2010. An analytical framework for capacity development in EIA e the case of Yemen. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(2):100–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland U. 2012. Teachings on environmental impact assessments in geography reflecting demands of the working practice: a German case study. J Environ Assess Pol Manage. 14(3):1250019.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Chang IS, Bina O, Lam KC, Xu H. 2011. Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China - five-year review and prospects. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(1):77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Kørnøv L, Christensen P. 2013. Critical factors for EIA implementation: literature review and research options. J Environ Manage. 114:148–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar