Freshwater cumulative effects and environmental assessment in the Mackenzie Valley, Northwest Territories: challenges and decision-maker needs

References

• Armitage DR. 2005. Collaborative environmental assessment in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 25(3):239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson SF, Canter LW. 2011. Assessing the cumulative effects of projects using geographic information systems. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:457–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlin C, Gibson R. 2017. Lasting regional gains from non-renewable resource extraction: the role of sustainability-based cumulative effects assessment and regional planning for mining development in Canada. Extractive Ind Soc. 4(1):36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ball M, Noble BF, Dubé MG. 2013b. Valued ecosystem components for watershed cumulative effects: an analysis of environmental impact assessments in the south Saskatchewan river watershed, Canada. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 9(3):469–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball M, Somers G, Wilson JE, Tanna R, Chung C, Duro DC, Seitz N. 2013a. Scale, assessment components, and reference conditions: issues for cumulative effects assessment in Canadian watersheds. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 9(3):370–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragagnolo C, Geneletti D, Fischer TB. 2012. Cumulative effects in SEA of spatial plans – evidence from Italy and England. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(2):100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter LW, Atkinson SF. 2011. Multiple uses of indicators and indices in cumulative effects assessment and management. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(5):491–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2009. Regional strategic environmental assessment in Canada. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://www.ccme.ca/files/Resources/enviro_assessment/rsea_principles_guidance_e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain A, Haile W. 2016. Environmental assessment and environmental impact review in the post-devolution Northwest Territories. In: Hanna KS, editor. Environmental impact assessment: practice and participation. 3rd ed. Ontario (Canada): Oxford University Press; p. 241–267.
   Google Scholar
• Chilima JS, Blakely JA, Noble BF, Patrick RJ. 2017. Institutional arrangements for assessing and managing cumulative effects on watersheds: lessons from the Grand River watershed, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Water Res J. 42(3):223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CIMP] Cumulative Impact Monitoring Program. 2015. 2016-2020 action plan. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/sites/enr/files/press_pdf_cam_nwtcimp_nwt_cimp_action_plan_2016-2020_designed_30_september_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cronmiller J, Noble B. 2018. Integrating environmental monitoring with cumulative effects management and decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 14(3):407–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé M, Munkittrick K. 2001. Integration of effects-based and stressor-based approaches into a holistic framework for cumulative effects assessment in aquatic ecosystems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 7(2):247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé MG. 2003. Cumulative effect assessment in Canada: a regional framework for aquatic ecosystems. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23(6):723–745.
   Google Scholar
• Dubé MG, Muldoon B, Wilson J, Maracle KB. 2013. Accumulated state of the Yukon River watershed: part I critical review of literature. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 9(3):426–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duinker PN, Burbidge EL, Boardley SR, Greig LA. 2013. Scientific dimensions of cumulative effects assessment: toward improvements in guidance for practice. Environ Rev. 21(1):40–52.
   Google Scholar
• Duinker PN, Greig LA. 2006. The impotence of cumulative effects assessment in Canada: ailments and ideas for redeployment. Environ Manag. 37(2):153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich A. 2010. Cumulative cultural effects and reasonably foreseeable future developments in the upper Thelon Basin, Canada. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 28(4):279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick P, Sinclair AJ, Mitchell B. 2008. Environmental impact assessment under the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act: deliberative democracy in Canada’s north? Environ Manag. 42(1):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley MM, Mease LA, Martone RG, Prahler EE, Morrison TH, Murray CC, Wojcik D. 2017. The challenges and opportunities in cumulative effects assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:122–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham MP, Halseth GR, Johnson CJ, Parkes MW. 2016. Exploring cumulative effects and impacts through examples. In: Gillingham MP, Halseth GR, Johnson CJ, Parkes MW, editors. The integration imperative: cumulative environmental, community and health effects of multiple natural resource developments. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 153–189.
   Google Scholar
• [GNWT] Government of Northwest Territories. 2010. Northwest Territories environmental audit. SENES Consultants Limited. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. https://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/en/services/nwt-environmental-audit
   Google Scholar
• [GNWT] Government of Northwest Territories. 2015. Northwest Territories environmental audit. Arcadis design & consultancy. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. https://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/en/services/nwt-environmental-audit
   Google Scholar
• [GNWT] Government of Northwest Territories. 2015a. Government of Northwest Territories 2015-2016 business plan. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://www.fin.gov.nt.ca/sites/default/files/documents/fin_bp_2015-16_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [GNWT] Government of Northwest Territories. 2015b. Trends in development activities requiring a permit in the NWT, 7.4. In NWT state of the environment report. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/state-environment/74-trends-development-activities-requiring-permit-nwt.
   Google Scholar
• [GNWT] Government of Northwest Territories. 2015c. Driving Forces 1-6. In NWT state of the environment report. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/state-environment/driving-forces-1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Gwich ́in Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement. 1992. The Gwich ́in-The government of Northwest Territories-The government of Canada. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1427294051464/1427294299170
   Google Scholar
• Halseth GR, Gillingham MP, Johnson CJ, Parkes MW. 2016. Cumulative effects and impacts: the need for a more inclusive, integrative, regional approach. In: Gillingham MP, Halseth GR, Johnson CJ, Parkes MW, editors. The integration imperative: cumulative environmental, community and health effects of multiple natural resource developments. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hegmann G, Yarranton GA. 2011. Alchemy to reason: effective use of cumulative effects assessment in resource management. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(5):484–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inuvialuit Final Agreement. 1984. The committee for original people’s entitlement representing the inuvialuit of the inuvialuit settlemt region- The government of Canada. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://www.irc.inuvialuit.com/sites/default/files/Inuvialuit%20Final%20Agreement%202005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jones FC. 2016. Cumulative effects assessment: theoretical underpinnings and big problems. Environ Rev. 24(2):187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph C, Zeeg T, Angus D, Usborne A, Mutrie E. 2017. Use of significance thresholds to integrate cumulative effects into project-level socio-economic impact assessment in Canada. Enviro Impact Assess Rev. 67:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land Claims and Self Government Agreement. 2003. The Tlicho-the government of Northwest Territories-The government of Canada. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. https://www.tlicho.ca/content/tlicho-agreement
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act. Statutes of Canada. 1998. c.25. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. Government of Canada Justice Laws Website: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/M-0.2/.
   Google Scholar
• Mantyka-Pringle CS, Jardine TD, Bradford L, Bharadwaj L, Kythreotis AP, Fresque-Baxter J, the Slave River and Delta Partnership. 2017. Bridging science and traditional knowledge to assess cumulative impacts of stressors on ecosystem health. Enviro Internatl. 102:125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RE, Parkins JR. 2011. The challenge of developing social indicators for cumulative effects assessment and land use planning. Ecol Soc. 16:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MVEIRB] Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board. 2004. Environmental impact assessment guidelines. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://reviewboard.ca/process_information/guidance_documentation/guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Noble B. 2015. Cumulative effects research: achievements, status, directions and challenges in the Canadian context. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 17(01):1550001.
   Google Scholar
• Noble B, Liu J, Hackett P. 2017. The contribution of project environmental assessment to assessing and managing cumulative effects: individually and collectively insignificant? Environ Manag. 59(4):531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble BF, Ketilson S, Aitken A, Poelzer G. 2013. Strategic environmental assessment opportunities and risks for Arctic offshore energy planning and development. Marine Policy. 39:296–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olander LP, Johnston RJ, Tallis H, Kagan J, Maguire LA, Polasky S, Palmer M. 2018. Benefit relevant indicators : ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes. Ecol Indic. 85:1262–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L, Morse JM. 2013. Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (third edition). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement. 1993. The Sahtu dene and metis-The Sahtu Tribal council-The government of Northwest Territories-The government of Canada. [internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/DAM/DAM-INTER-HQ/STAGING/texte-text/sahmet_1100100031148_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schindler DW, Donahue WF. 2006. An impending water crisis in Canada’s western prairie provinces. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 103(19):7210–7216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz NE, Westbrook CJ, Noble BF. 2011. Bringing science into river systems cumulative effects assessment practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(3):172–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheelanere P, Noble BF, Patrick RJ. 2013. Institutional requirements for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management: lessons from a Canadian trans-boundary watershed. Land Use Policy. 30(1):67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair AJ, Doelle M, Duinker PN. 2017. Looking up, down, and sideways: reconceiving cumulative effects assessment as a mindset. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires AJ, Dubé MG. 2013. Development of an effects-based approach for watershed scale aquatic cumulative effects assessment. Integr Environ Asses Manag. 9(3):380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling EJ, Filardi C, Toomey A, Sigouin A, Betley E, Gazit N, Jupiter S. 2017. Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales. Nature Ecol Evol. 1:1798–1806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R, Ross B. 2007. Cumulative effects assessment: does scale matter? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27: 365–385.
   Google Scholar
• Weber M, Krogman N, Antoniuk T. 2012. Cumulative effects assessment: linking social, ecological, and governance dimensions. Ecol Soc. 17(2):22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo A, Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K, McNaughton Nicholls C, Lewis J. 2013. In-depth interviews. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks(CA): Sage Publications; p. 177–208.
   Google Scholar