Progressing Green Infrastructure planning: understanding its scalar, temporal, geo-spatial and disciplinary evolution

References

• Arts J, Caldwell P, Morrison-Saunders A. 2001. Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions—findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 conference. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 19(3):175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Austin G. 2014. Green infrastructure for landscape planning: integrating human and natural systems. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley T. 2016. Handbook of biophilic planning & design. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict MA, McMahon ET. 2002. Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable Resour J. Autumn:12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict MA, McMahon ET. 2006. Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer R, van Ek R. 2004. Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ. 50(1–2):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne J, Sipe N, Searle G. 2010. Green around the gills? The challenge of density for urban greenspace planning in SEQ. Aust Plann. 47(3):162–177.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne JA, Lo AY, Jianjun Y. 2015. Residents’ understanding of the role of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in Hangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan. 138:132–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CABE Space. 2009. Making the invisible visible: the real value of park assets. London (UK): CABE Space.
   Google Scholar
• Calderón-Contreras R, Quiroz-Rosas LE. 2017. Analysing scale, quality and diversity of green infrastructure and the provision of urban ecosystem services: a case from Mexico City. Ecosyst Serv. 23:127–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Gwilliam R, Morgan R, Cobb D, Bond A. 2004. The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 22(4):295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Richardson T, Hilding-Ryedvik T, Emmelin L. 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(6):371–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement S, Moore SA, Lockwood M. 2015b. Authority, responsibility and process in Australian biodiversity policy. Environ Plann Law J. 32(2):93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement S, Moore SA, Lockwood M, Mitchell M. 2015a. Using insights from pragmatism to develop reforms that strengthen institutional competence for conserving biodiversity. Policy Sci. 48(4):463–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement S, Moore SA, Lockwood M, Morrison TH. 2016. A diagnostic framework for biodiversity conservation institutions. Pac Conserv Biol. 21(4):277–290.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S. 2016. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Collier MJ. 2015. Novel ecosystems and social-ecological resilience. Landsc Ecol. 30(8):1363–1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cord AF, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M, Dittrich A, Hermans-Neumann K, Kaim A, Leinhoop N, Locher-Krause K, Priess J, Schröter-Schlaack C, et al. 2017. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosyst Serv. 28:264–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies C, Lafortezza R. 2017. Urban green infrastructure in Europe: is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy. 69:93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies C, Macfarlane R, McGloin C, Roe M. 2006. Green infrastructure planning guide. Anfield Plain: North East Community Forest.
   Google Scholar
• Demuzere M, Orru K, Heidrich O, Olazabel E, Geneletti D, Orru H, Bhave AG, Mittal N, Feliu E, Faehnle M. 2014. Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. J Environ Manage. 146:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppisch S, Hasibovic S. 2013. Social-ecological resilience thinking as a bridging concept in transdisciplinary research on climate-change adaptation. Nat Hazards. 67(1):117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Marino M, Lapintie K. 2018. Exploring the concept of green infrastructure in urban landscape. Experiences from Italy, Canada and Finland. Landsc Res. 43(1):139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovers S. 2005. Environment and sustainability policy: creation, implementation, evaluation. Annandale: NSW: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duinker PN, Greig LA. 2006. The impotence of cumulative effects assessment in Canada: ailments and ideas for redeployment. Environ Manage. 37(2):153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duinker PN, Greig LA. 2007. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: improving explorations of the future. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(3):206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn AD. 2010. Siting green infrastructure: legal and policy solutions to alleviate urban poverty and promote healthy communities. BC Envtl Aff L Rev. 37(1):41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ecotec & Sheffield Hallam University. 2013. Green infrastructure’s contribution to economic growth: a review. London (UK): Eftec.
   Google Scholar
• England’s Community Forests & Forestry Commission. 2012. Benefits to health and wellbeing of trees and green spaces. Farnham: Forest Research. http://www.communityforest.org.uk/resources/case_study_health_and_wellbeing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Escobedo FJ, Giannico V, Jim CY, Sanesi G, Lafortezza R. 2019. Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban For Urban Greening. 37:3–12. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. The multifunctionality of green infrastructure: in-depth report. Brussels:Science and Environment Policy, DG Environment News Alert Service.
   Google Scholar
• Firehock K. 2015. Strategic green infrastructure planning: a multi-scale approach. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2010. The theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: towards a more systematic approach. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2016. Health and Hamburg’s Grünes Netz (Green network) plan. In: Coutts C, editor. Green infrastructure and public health. 2015. London: Routledge; p. 286–298.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Fawcett P, Nowacki J, Clement S, Hayes S. 2018. Consideration of urban green space in impact assessment for health. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36(1):32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn KM, Traver RG. 2013. Green infrastructure life cycle assessment: A bio-infiltration case study. Ecol Eng. 55:9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster J, Lowe A, Winkelman S. 2011. The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation. Washington (DC): Centre for Clean Air Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Garmendia E, Apostolopoulou E, Adams WM, Bormpoudakis D. 2016. Biodiversity and green infrastructure in Europe: boundary object or ecological trap? Land Use Policy. 56:315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson RB. 2006. Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 8(3):259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S. 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environ. 33(1):115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Threival R. 2013. Introduction to environmental imoact assessment. 4th ed. Abindgon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer MA. 1993. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalizations of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. In: Fischer F, Forester J, editors. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press; p. 43–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer MA. 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sci. 36(2):175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer MA, Wagenaar H. Eds. 2003. Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansem R, Olafsson AS, van der Jagt APN, Rall E, Pauleit S. 2019. Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: what is the state of practice? Ecol Indic. 96(2):99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen R, Pauleit S. 2014. From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio. 43(4):516–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmund PC, Smith D. 2006. Designing greenways: sustainable landscapes for nature and people. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen N, Perkins H, Roy P. 2006. The political ecology of uneven urban green space: the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Rev. 42(1):3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetler M, Allen W, Meurk C. 2011. Conserving urban biodiversity? Creating green infrastructure is only the first step. Landsc Urban Plan. 100(4):369–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard E. 2009. Garden cities of to-Morrow (Illustrated edition). Gloucester: Dodo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatieva M, Stewart GH, Meurk C. 2011. Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landsc Ecol Eng. 7(1):17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe M. 2010. Environmental reveiws & case studies reflections on green infrastructure economics. Environ Pract. 12:357–365.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasooriya V, Ng A, Muthukumaran S, Perera B. 2017. Green infrastructure practices for improvement of urban air quality. Urban For Urban Greening. 21:34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jim C, Chen WY. 2007. Consumption preferences and environmental externalities: A hedonic analysis of the housing market in Guangzhou. Geoforum. 38(2):414–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman R, Pungetti G. 2004. Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design and implementation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Naumann S, Davis M, Artmann M, Bonn A. 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol Soc. 21(2):39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabisch N, Qureshi S, Haase D. 2015. Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces—A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keesstra S, Nunes J, Novara A, Finger D, Avelar D, Kalantari Z, Cerdà A. 2018. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ. 610–611:997–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen L, Marsden T, Milbourne P. 2006. Community forests and regeneration in post-industrial landscapes. Geoforum. 37(5):831–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill C, Lenschow A. 1998. Coping with Europe: the impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy. J Eur Public Policy. 5(4):595–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc CB, Osmond P, Peters A. 2017. Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies. Urban Ecosyst. 20(1):15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N, Zong Y. 2010. Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landsc Urban Plan. 95(1):16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijnendijk CC, Ricard RM, Kenney A, Randrup TB. 2006. Defining urban forestry – A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For Urban Greening. 4(3–4):93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz TM, Gupta D, Mudliar P, Ranjan P. 2015. Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: A synthesis framework. Environ Sci Policy. 53:139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosareo L, Ries R. 2007. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of green roofs. Build Environ. 42(7):2606–2613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon M, Scott M. 2014. Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Plann Rev. 85(5):563–587.
   Google Scholar
• Li F, Wang R, Paulussen J, Liu X. 2005. Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landsc Urban Plan. 72(4):325–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Ding L, Ren M, Li C, Wang H. 2017. Sponge city construction in China: a survey of the challenges and opportunities. Water. 9(9):594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley S, Pauleit S, Yeshitela K, Cilliers S, Shackleton C. 2018. Rethinking urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services from the perspective of sub-Saharan African cities. Landsc Urban Plan. 180:328–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liquete C, Kleeschulte S, Dige G, Maes J, Grizzetti B, Olah B, Zulian G. 2015. Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study. Environ Sci Policy. 54:268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little C. 1990. Greenways for America. Baltimaore: John Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell ST, Taylor JR. 2013. Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landsc Ecol. 28(8):1447–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews T, Lo AY, Byrne JA. 2015. Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landsc Urban Plan. 138::155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHarg IL. 1969. Design with Nature. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
   Google Scholar
• McLain RJ, Lee RG. 1996. Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environ Manage. 20(4):437–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow S, Newell JP. 2017. Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: growing resilience in Detroit. Landsc Urban Plan. 159:62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell I. 2015. Green infrastructure planning: policy and objectives. In: Sinnett D, Smith N, Burgess S, editors. Handbook on green infrastructure: planning, design and implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Mell I. 2017. Financing the future of green infrastructure planning: alternatives and opportunities in the UK. Landsc Res. 43(6):751–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell I, Allin S, Reimer M, Wilker J. 2017. Strategic green infrastructure planning in Germany and the UK: a transnational evaluation of the evolution of urban greening policy and practice. Int Plann Stud. 22(4):333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell IC. 2009. Can green infrastructure promote urban sustainability? Proc Inst Civil Eng Eng Sustainability. ES1:23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mell IC. 2014. Aligning fragmented planning structures through a green infrastructure approach to urban development in the UK and USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 13(4):612–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell IC. 2016. Global green frastructure: lessons for successful policy-making, investment and management. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Fischer T. 2009. What is wrong with EIA and SEA anyway? A sceptic’s perspective on sustainability assessment. In: Sheate WR, editor. Tools, techniques & approaches for suatinability: collected writings in environmental assessment policy and management. London: World Scientific; p. 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J. 2004. Eds Assessing Impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Eartscan.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn JA, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 32(1):2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Erickson TA. 2014. Co-production of knowledge–action systems in urban sustainable governance: the KASA approach. Environ Sci Policy. 37:182–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann S, Davis M, Kaphengst T, Pieterse M, Rayment M. 2011. Design, implementation and cost elements of green infrastructure projects. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Ecologic institute and GHK Consulting. Contract no. 070307/2010/577182/ETU/F.1.
   Google Scholar
• Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L. 2007. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ. 60(3):498–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell JP, Seymour M, Yee T, Renteria J, Longcore T, Wolch JR, Shishkovsky A. 2013. Green alley programs: planning for a sustainable urban infrastructure? Cities. 31:144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman P, Thornley A. 1996. Urban planning in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nykvist B, Nilsson M. 2009. Are impact assessment procedures actually promoting sustainable development? Institutional perspectives on barriers and opportunities found in the Swedish committee system. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(1):15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS. 2006. Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 11(1):18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond CM, Frantzeskaki N, Kabisch N, Berry P, Breil M, Nita MR, Geneletti D, Calfapietra C. 2017. A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environ Sci Policy. 77:15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes RAW. 2007. Understanding governance: ten years on. Organ Stud. 28(8):1243–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins P. 2012. Political ecology: a critical introduction. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Roe M, Mell I. 2013. Negotiating value and priorities: evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development. J Environ Plann Manage. 56(5):650–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse DC, Bunster-Ossa I. 2013. Green infrastructure: a landscape approach. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, Silva-Sánchez SS. 2008. Tiering strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment in highway planning in São Paulo, Brazil. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(7):515–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaltegger S, Synnestvedt T. 2002. The link between ‘green’and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. J Environ Manage. 65(4):339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling J, Logan J. 2008. Greening the rust belt: a green infrastructure model for right sizing America’s shrinking cities. J Am Plann Assoc. 74(4):451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt VA. 2011. Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Criti Policy Stud. 5(2):106–126.
   Google Scholar
• Scott WR. 2014. Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi A, Muruyama A. 2013. A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnett D, Smith N, Burgess S. Eds. 2015. Handbook on green infrastructure: planning, design and implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg R. 2016. Ecosystem services in SEA: are we missing the point of a simple concept? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34(1):79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Yorkshire Forest Partnership & Sheffield City Council. 2012. The va lue project: the final report. Sheffield: South Yorkshire Forest Partnership & Sheffield City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Spartari B, Yu Z, Montalto FA. 2011. Life cycle implications of urban green infrastructure. Environ Pollut. 159(8–9):2174–2179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star SL, Griesemer JR. 1989. Institutional ecology,translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci. 19(3):387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan H, Williams P, Marchington M, Knight L. 2013. Collaborative futures: discursive realignments in austere times. Public Money Manage. 33(2):123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CW. 2011. Linking landscape and health: the recurring theme. Landsc Urban Plan. 99(3):187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threlfall CG, Walker K, Williams NSG, Hahs AK, Mata L, Stork N, Livesley SJ. 2015. The conservation value of urban green space habitats for Australian native bee communities. Biol Conserv. 187:240–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins EL, Adger WN. 2004. Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecol Soc. 9(2):10. [online].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landsc Urban Plan. 81(3):167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren A, Potter K, Warner J, Fischer TB. 2015. Making space for institutional change? A comparative case study on regime stability and change in river flood management in the Netherlands and England. Int J Water Governance. 3:81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kerkhoff LE, Lebel L. 2015. Coproductive capacities: rethinking science-governance relations in a diverse world. Ecol Soc. 20(1):14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandermeulen V, Verspecht A, Vermeire B, Van Huylenbroack G, Gellynck X. 2011. The use of economic valuation to create public support for green infrastructure investments in urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 103(2):198–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Banzhaf E. 2018. Towards a better understanding of green infrastructure: a critical review. Ecol Indic. 85:758–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber T. 2007. Ecosystem services in Cecil County’s Green Infrastructure: Technical Report for the Cecil County Green Infrastructure Plan. Annapolis (MD).
   Google Scholar
• Wende W. 2002. Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the federal republic of Germany. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 20(2):93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson O, Hughes O. 2011. Urban green space policy and discourse in England under new labour from 1997 to 2010. Plann Pract Res. 26(2):207–228.
   Google Scholar
• Winkel G, Gleißner J, Pistorius T, Sotirov M, Storch S. 2011. The sustainably managed forest heats up: discursive struggles over forest management and climate change in Germany. Criti Policy Stud. 5(4):361–390.
   Google Scholar
• Wise S. 2008. Green infrastructure rising. Am Plann Assoc. 74(8):14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wood C, Dejeddour M. 1992. Strategic environmental assessment: EA of policies, plans and programmes. Impact Assess. 10(1):3–22.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO). 2017. Urban green space interventions and health: A review of impacts and effectiveness; [accessed 2019 Mar 18]. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/337690/FULL-REPORT-for-LLP.pdf?ua=1
   Google Scholar
• Wright H. 2011. Understanding green infrastructure: the development of a contested concept in England. Local Environ. 16(10):1003–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F. 2015. Planning for growth: urban and regional planning in China. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young OR, Lambin EF, Alcock F, Haberl H, Karlsson SI, McConnell WJ, Myint T, Pahl-Wostl C, Polsky C, Ramakrishnan PS, et al. 2006. A portfolio approach to analyzing complex human-environment interactions: institutions and land change. Ecol Soc. 11(2):31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RF. 2011. Planting the living city: best practices in planning green infrastructure—results from major U.S. cities. J Am Plann Assoc. 77(4):368–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RF, McPherson EG. 2013. Governing metropolitan green infrastructure in the United States. Landsc Urban Plan. 109(1):67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RF, Zanders J, Lieberknecht K, Fassman-Beck E. 2014. A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure. J Hydrol. 519:2571–2583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar