https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-2281
References
- Fischer TB. 2017. Editorial. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(2):117.
- Fischer TB. 2018. Editorial: IA, alternative facts and fake news – is the post-factual turn starting to turn? Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 36(3):8.
- FLNROD. 2019. Elk Valley cumulative effects management framework: project background. Victoria (BC): Forest, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development.
- Geißler G, Rehhausen A, Fischer TB, Hanusch M. 2019. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Germany? – meta-review of SEA research in the light of effectiveness dimensions. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):219–232.
- Gibson R. 2012. In full retreat: the Canadian government’s new environmental assessment law undoes decades of progress. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(3):179–188.
- Gibson RB, Doelle M, Sinclair AJ. 2016. Next generation environmental assessment for Canada: basic principles and components of generic design. The Next Generation Environmental Assessment Project. Waterloo (ON): University of Waterloo.
- Graetz G. 2015. Energy for whom? Uranium mining, Indigenous people, and navigating risk and rights in Australia. Energy Res Soc Sci. 8:113–126.
- Hegmann G, Yarranton GA. 2011. Alchemy to reason: effective use of cumulative effects assessment in resource management. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(5):484–490.
- IEC Independent Environmental Consultants (IEC). 2018. Volume 1: filestone 3 – final SEA report. Strategic environmental assessment of Wood Buffalo National Park World Heritage Site. Edmonton (AB): IEC.
- Lambers J. 2015. Extinction risks from climate change. Science. 348(6234):501–502.
- Lauerman V. 2018. Analysis: bill C-69 – an economy and energy security killer. Daily Oil Bull. 9(24). https://www.dailyoilbulletin.com/article/2018/9/24/analysis-bill-c-69-an-economy-and-energy-security-/
- Lobos V, Partidario M. 2014. Theory versus practice in strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 48:34–46.
- Noble B, Gibson R, White L, Blakley J, Nwanekezie K, Croal P. 2019. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Canada under directive-based and informal practice. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):344–355.
- Noble B, Nwanekezie K. 2017. Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:165–173.
- Noble BF. 2017. Getting the big picture: how regional assessment can pave the way for more inclusive and effective environmental assessments. Ottawa (ON): MDLI.
- Olzynski M. 2019. Proposed Bill C-69 amendments undermine science. Policy Options 27 May. [accessed 2019 Jun 15]. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/
- Partidario MR, Monteiro MB. 2019. Strategic environmental assessment effectiveness in Portugal. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):247–265.
- Sinclair J, Doelle M, Gibson RB. 2018. Implementing next generation assessment: a case example of a global challenge. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:166–176.
- Therivel R, Gonzalez A. 2019. Introducing SEA effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):181–187.
- Udofia A, Noble BF, Poelzer G. 2017. Meaningful and efficient? Exploring the challenges to Aboriginal participation in environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 65:164–174.
- UNESCO. 2015. Decision: 39 COM 7B.18. Wood Buffalo National Park: Canada. ( N 256). http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6275/
- Yahey M. 2014. Letter from Chief Marvin Yahey, Blueberry River First Nations, to Mary Polak, Minister of Environment, Government of British Columbia, regarding the Spectra Energy’s Westcoast Connector gas transmission project environmental assessment. [accessed 2014 Oct 28]. https://projects.eao.gov.bc.ca/