1,484
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter

Evolution or revolution? Reflecting on IA effectiveness in Thailand

& ORCID Icon
Pages 156-166 | Received 31 May 2019, Accepted 03 Sep 2019, Published online: 13 Sep 2019

References

  • Arts J, Runhaar HAC, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Van Laerhoven F, Driessen PPJ, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 14:40.
  • Baird M, Frankel R. 2015. Mekong EIA briefing: environmental impact assessment comparative analysis in lower Mekong couuntries. Washington, D.C.:PACT.
  • Banhalmi-Zakar Z, Gronow C, Wilkinson L, Jenkins B, Pope J, Squires G, Witt K, Williams G, Womersley J. 2018. Evolution or revolution: where next for impact assessment? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36:506–515.
  • Biermann F, Gupta A. 2011. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics. 70:1856–1864.
  • Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2016. A game theory perspective on environmental assessment: what games are played and what does this tell us about decision making rationality and Legitimacy? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 57:187–194.
  • Bond A, Pope J. 2012. The state of the art of impact assessment in 2012. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 30:1–4.
  • Cashmore M, Richardson T. 2013. Power and environmental assessment: introduction to the special issue. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 39:1–4.
  • Chanchitpricha C 2012. Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in Thailand: a case study of a Potash mine HIA in Udon Thani Norwich: University of East Anglia.
  • Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2018. Investigating the effectiveness of mandatory integration of health impact assessment within environmental impact assessment (EIA): a case study of Thailand. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36:16–31.
  • Chanchitpricha C, Morrison-Saunders A, Bond A. 2019. Investigating the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Thailand. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37:356–368. 10.1080/1461551720191595941.
  • Derakhsham R, Mancini M, Turner JR. 2019. Community’s evaluation of organisational legitimacy: formation and reconsideration. Int J Project Manage. 37:73–86.
  • Fakkum S. 2013. Environmental and health impact assessment system in Thailand [Independent study]. Bangkok, Thailand: National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA).
  • Glasson J, Therivel R. 2019. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. 5th ed. London: Routledge.
  • Hotimsky S, Cobb R, Bond A. 2006. Contracts or scripts? A critical review of the application of institutional theories to the study of environmental change. Ecol Soc, 11:41.
  • International Finance Corporation (IFC). 2012. IFC performance standards on environmental and social sustainability. Washington:IFC, World Bank Group.
  • Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:287–300.
  • Kim M, Wolf C. 2014. The impact assessment we want. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 32:19–20.
  • Lyhne I, van Laerhoven F, Cashmore M, Runhaar H. 2017. Theorising EIA effectiveness: A contribution based on the Danish system. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:240–249.
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2010. Notification of ministry of natural resources and environment Re: specification of project types, scales, and regulations for activities which may cause severe effects on health, environment and natural resources B.E.2553, 31 August 2010 (in Thai). In: Thai government gazette. Vol. 127. Special Part 104d. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 34–35. Repealed in January 2019.
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2012. Natural resources and environment ministerial notification Re: specification of project types, scales, regulations and guidelines in the preparation of environmental impact assessment. In: Thai government gazette. Vol. 129. special part 97d. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 1–2. Repealed in January 2019.
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2015a. Natural resources and environment ministerial notification Re: specification of project types, scales, and regulations which may cause severe effects on health, environment and natural resources B.E.2553 No.2. In: Thai government gazette. Vol. 132. Part 300d. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 5. Repealed in January 2019.
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2015b. Natural resources and environment ministerial notification re: specification of project types, scales, regulations and guidelines in the preparation of environmental impact assessment No.6 (B.E.2557). In: Thai government gazette. Vol. 132. special part 11d Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 13. R epealed in November 2015.
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2015c. Natural resources and environment ministerial notification re: specification of project types, scales, regulations and guidelines in the preparation of environmental impact assessment No.8 (B.E.2558). In: Thai government gazette. Vol. 132. special part 300d. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 6. Repealed in January 2019.
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2019a. Ministerial notification of the ministry of natural resources and environment re: specifications of projects or actions which are subject to conduct environmental impact assessment (EIA); and principles, methods and requirement in the preparation of environmental impact statement (in Thai). In: Thai Government gazette no 136 special section 3d published on 4 January 2019. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 1–11.
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2019b. Ministerial notification of the ministry of natural resources and environment re: specifications of projects or actions which may cause severe effects on environmental quality, health, and quality of life of affected people in community; and such projects or actions are subject to conduct Environmental and Health Impact Assessment (EHIA). In: Thai Government gazette no136 special section 3d; published on 4 January 2019. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 12–18.
  • Montano M, Fischer TB. 2019. Towards a more effective approach to the development and maintenance of SEA guidance. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37:97–106.
  • Morrison-Saunders A, Bailey M. 2009. Appraising the role of relationship between regulators and consultants for effective EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:284–294.
  • NESDB supports SEA concept & guideline (in Thai) Bangkok. [Online]. [Accessed 2018 October] http://www.nesdb.go.th/mobile_detail.php?cid=7&nid=6777
  • Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning (ONEP). 2007. Guideline for health impact assessment in EIA report in Thailand (in Thai). Bangkok:ONEP.
  • Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning (ONEP). 2013. Guideline for health impact assessment in EIA report in Thailand (in Thai). Bangkok: ONEP.
  • Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning (ONEP). 2015a. Climate change master plan B.E. 2558-2593 (in Thai). Bangkok: ONEP, MONRE.
  • Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning (ONEP). 2015b. Thailand’s intended national determined contribution. Bangkok. Thaland: ONEP.
  • Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning (ONEP). 2019. Notification of ONEP re: public participation guideline in the preparation process of environmental impact statement (in Thai). Thai Government gazett no 136 special section 36d. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 31.
  • Office of the Prime Minister. 2018. Prime minister office notification re: the announcement of the national reform plan (in Thai). Thai Government gazette no 135 section 24a. Bangkok, Thailand: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office (CGPO). p. 1–2, 1–469.
  • ONEP. 2006. Guideline of public participation and social impact assessment in environmental impact assessment process (in Thai). Bangkok:ONEP.
  • ONEP. 2009. Strategic enironmental assessment: SEA (in Thai): office of natural resources and environment policy and planning (ONEP).
  • ONEP. 2018. How EIA is better in NEQA no.2 B.E.2561? (infographic sheet in Thai). Bangkok: ONEP [Online]. [Accessed 2019Apr].
  • Pengkam S, Chaiyarak B, Jinwong A, Siriwatanapaiboon S, Kamkongsak L, Yothawichit S, Kamchiangta A. 2006. Health impact assessment of Potash mining project at Udon Thani province (Research Report in Thai). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Health Systems Research Institute.
  • Phromlah W. 2018. Public participation: how can we make it work for the environmental impact assessment system in Thailand? Asia Pac J Environ Law. 21:126–146.
  • Pope J, Bond A, Cameron C, Retief F, Morrison-Saunders A. 2018. Are current effectiveness criteria fit for purpose? Using a controversial strategic assessment as a test case. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 70:34–44.
  • Prince of Songkla University. 2018. Sustainable development and environmental impact assessment. Faculty of Law. Bangkokbiznews. http://www.bangkokbiznews.com/blog/detail/644609.
  • Public Service Centre: Office of the Permanent Secretary. 2009. Public participation guideline upon The regulation of the Prime Minister Office on public consultation B.E. 2548 (in Thai). Bangkok: The Secretariate of the Cabinet Printing Office.
  • Retief F, Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, King N. 2016. Global megatrends and their implications for environmental assessment practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:52–60.
  • Sadler B. 1996. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment. Final report. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
  • Sandang C, Poboon C. 2018. Strategic environmental assessment in Thailand (in Thai). J Community Dev Res (Hum Social Sci). 11:90–100.
  • Shepherd A, Ortolano L. 1997. Organizational change and environmental impact assessment at the electricity generating authority of Thailand: 1972-1988. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 17:329–356.
  • Sinclair AJ, Peirson-Smith TJ, Boerchers M. 2017. Environmental assessments in the internet age: the role of e-governance and social media in creating platforms for meaningful participation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 35:148–157.
  • Swangjang K. 2018. Comparative review of EIA in the association of Southeast Asian Nations. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:33–42.
  • Thai Constitution. 2007. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E.2550 (2007). No 124, Section 47; issued on 24th August 2007. – Repealed in 2014 (except Chapter 2 of the Constitution).
  • Thai Constitution. 2017. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E.2560 (2017). No 134, section 40a Thailand The Thai Government Gazette. p. 1–90.
  • Thailand Board of Investment (BOI). 2014. Thailand board of investment guide on environmental regulations. Bangkok:BOI.
  • The Prime Minister. 1992. The enhancement and conservation of national environmental quality act (NEQA) B.E.2535. Bangkok:Thailand.
  • The Prime Minister. 2018. The enhancement and conservation of national environmental quality act (NEQA) (no.2) B.E. 2561. Thai Government gazette, no 135, special section 27a, published on 19 April 2018 Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Theophilou V, Bond A, Cashmore M. 2012. Application of SEA Directive to EU structural funds: Perspectives on effectiveness. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 30:136–144.
  • van Doren D, Driessen PPJ, Schijf B, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: towards a better understanding. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:120–130.
  • Wangwongwattana S, Sano D, King PN. 2015. Assessing environmental impact assessment (EIA) in Thailand: implementation challenges and opportunities for sustainable development planning (working paper). Hayama, Japan: Institute of Global Environmental Strategies.
  • Wirutskulshai U, Sajor E, Coowanitwong N. 2011. Importance of context in adoption and progress in application of strategic environmental assessment: experience of Thailand. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:352–359.
  • Wood C. 2003. Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. Edinburgh: Prentice Hall.
  • World Bank. 2006. Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations and Strategic Environmental Assessment Requirements [Online]. Washington (DC): Environment and Social Development Department (East Asia and Pacific Region). [Accessed 2015]. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/949001468167952773/pdf/408730PAPER0EI1onal1review01PUBLIC1.pdf.
  • Yusook S 2018. Part 1: the roles of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) (in Thai). The seminar on SEA and water resource management in Thailand, 26 June 2018. Bangkok: The Berkeley Hotel. [Online]. http://wwwonepgoth/eia/กฎหมายที่เกี่ยวข้อง/sea/.
  • Zhang J, Kornov L, Christensen P. 2013. Critical factors for EIA implementation: literature review and research options. J Environ Manage. 114:148–157.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.