https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-7315
References
- Ballesteros M. 2018. Transposition and implementation of the 2014 directive on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Briefing requested by the PETI committee of the European parliament. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies.
- Bartlett RV, Kurian PA. 1999. The theory of environmental impact assessment: implicit models of policy making. Policy & Politics. 27(4):415–433.
- Cashmore M, Richardson T, Hilding-Ryedvik T, Emmelin L. 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environ Impact Ass Rev. 30(6):371–379.
- De Bruijn JA, Ten Heuvelhof EF. 1999. Scientific expertise in complex decision-making processes. Sci Public Policy. 26(3):179–184.
- Dunleavy P. 2018. Micro-institutions in liberal democracies: what they are and why they matter. Political studies association. [accessed 2019 May 13]. https://www.psa.ac.uk/psa/news/micro-institutions-liberal-democracies-what-they-are-and-why-they-matter.
- Fischer F, Forester J, editors. 1993: The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
- Fischer TB. 2016. Lessons for impact assessment from the UK referendum on BREXIT. Impact Ass Proj Apprais. 34(3):183–185. doi:10.1080/14615517.2016.1211756.
- Flyvbjerg B. 2012. Why mass media matter and how to work with them: phronesis and megaprojects. In: Flyvbjerg B, Landmann T, Schram S, editors. Real social science: applied phronesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 95–121.
- Flyvbjerg B. 2019. When the Danish government sent their chief planner to threaten me. LinkedIn blog. [accessed 2019 May 16]. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/when-danish-government-sent-chief-planner-threaten-me-bent/.
- Freedom House. 2019a. Democracy in retreat. Freedom in the world 2019. [accessed 2019 April 20]. www.freedomhouse.org.
- Freedom House. 2019b. Methodology. In: democracy in retreat. Freedom in the world 2019. [accessed 2019 April 20]. www.freedomhouse.org.
- Garb Y, Manon M, Peters D. 2007. environmental impact assessment: between bureaucratic process and social learning. In: Fischer F, Miller G, Sidney M, editors. Handbook of public policy analysis. London: Taylor and Francis; p. 481–491.
- Jasanoff S. 1990. The fifth branch. Science advisers as policymakers. Harvard.
- Mounk Y. 2018. The people vs. democracy. Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. London: Harvard University Press.
- Nooteboom S. 2007. Impact assessment procedures for sustainable development: a complexity theory perspective. Environ Impact Ass Rev. 27(7):645–665.
- Rozema JG, Bond AJ. 2015. Framing effectiveness in impact assessment: discourse accommodation in controversial infrastructure development. Env Impact Ass Rev. 50:66–73.
- Therivel R. 2019. Effectiveness of English local plan SA/SEAs. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.
- UN. 2019a. Webpage of the United Nations sustainable development goals knowledge platform. [accessed 2019 May 19]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs.
- UN. 2019b. Webpage about progress of SDG 16. [accessed 2019 May 19]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg16.
- UNECE. 2019. Website concerning the EU conventions on environmental assessment. [accessed 2019 May 16]. https://www.unece.org/env/eia/welcome.html.
- UNEP. 2018. Assessing environmental impacts - a global review of legislation. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
- UNEP. 2019. Environmental rule of law: first global report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
- Ward H. 2008. Liberal democracy and sustainability. Environ Polit. 17(3):386–409.
- Winfield M, Curran D, Olszynski M 2018. “How post-truth politics is sinking debate on environmental assessment reform”. The Conversation, UK Edition