For IA, a ‘place-based’ towards ‘flow-based’ landslide ahead

References

• Bouzarovski S, Konieczny M. 2010. Landscapes of paradox: public discourses and policies in Poland’s relationship with the nord stream pipeline. Geopolitics. 15(1):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breu T, Bader C, Messerli P, Heinimann A, Rist S, Eckert S. 2016. Large-scale land acquisition and its effects on the water balance in investor and host countries. PLoS One. 11(3):e0150901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson AK, Taylor WW, Liu J, Orlic I. 2017. The telecoupling framework. An integrative tool for enhancing fisheries management. Fisheries. 42(8):395–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco LR, Chan J, McGrath FL, Nghiem LTP. 2017. Biodiversity conservation in a telecoupled world. Ecol Soc. 22(3):24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challies E, Newig J, Lenschow A. 2019. Governance for sustainability in telecoupled systems. In: Friis C, Nielsen J, editors. Telecoupling. Palgrave studies in natural resource management. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Challies E, Newig J, Lenschow A. 2014. What role for social–ecological systems research in governing global teleconnections? Global Environ Change. 27:32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Han MY, Peng K, Zhou SL, Shao L, Wu XF, Wei WD, Liu SY, Li Z, Li JS, et al. 2018. Global land-water nexus: agricultural land and freshwater use embodied in worldwide supply chains. Sci Total Environ. 613–614:931–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane JP, Driscoll A, O Gallachoir BP. 2015. Quantifying the impacts of national renewable electricity ambitions using a North-West European electricity market model. Renewable Energy. 80:604–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deines JM, Liu X, Liu J. 2016. Telecoupling in urban water systems: an examination of Beijing’s imported water supply. Water Int. 41:251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin H, Rueda X, Mahanti A. 2017. Transforming governance in telecoupled food systems. Ecol Soc. 22(4):32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang B, Tan Y, Li C, Cao Y, Liu J, Schweizer PJ, Shi H, Zhou B, Chen H, Hu Z. 2016. Energy sustainability under the framework of telecoupling. Energy. 106(C):253–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearnside PM. 2016. Environmental and social impacts of Hydroelectric Dams in Brazilian Amazonia: implications for the aluminum industry. World Dev. 77(C):48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis C, Nielsen J. 2017a. On the system. Boundary choices, implications, and solutions in telecoupling land use change research. Sustainability. 9(6):974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis C, Nielsen JØ. 2017b. Land-use change in a telecoupled world. The relevance and applicability of the telecoupling framework in the case of banana plantation expansion in Laos. Ecol Soc. 22(4):30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparri NI, Waroux YP. 2015. The coupling of South American soybean and cattle production frontiers: new challenges for conservation policy and land change science. Conserv Lett. 8:290–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert AQ, Sovacool BK. 2017. US liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports: boom or bust for the global climate? Energy. 141:1671–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höll TL, Geißler G, Köppel J. 2019. When power politics trump environmental governance – LNG terminals in Germany. In: Conference presentation, 4th International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP4); Jun 26–28. Montreal: University of Concordia.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes G, Cavanagh CJ. 2016. A review of the social impacts of neoliberal conservation: formations, inequalities, contestations. Geoforum. 75:199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köppel J, Geißler G, Rehhausen A, Wende W, Albrecht J, Syrbe RU, Magel I, Scholles F, Putschky M, Hoppenstedt A, et al. 2018. Strategische Umweltprüfung und (neuartige) Pläne und Programme auf Bundesebene – Methoden, Verfahren und Rechtsgrundlagen. Umweltbundesamt: Dessau-Roßlau, Texte 81/2018, Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit, Forschungskennzahl 3713 16 100.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Kwonb H-T, Choib K-H, Choa JH, Lima W, Moona I. 2011. Current status and future projections of LNG demand and supplies: A global prospective. Energy Policy. 39:4097–4104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenschow A, Newig J, Challies E. 2016. Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Env Polit. 25(1):136–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J. 2014. Forest sustainability in China and implications for a telecoupled world. Asia Pacific Policy Stud. 1:230–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J. 2017. Integration across a metacoupled world. Ecol Soc. 22(4):30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M, DeFries R, Dietz T, Fu F, Hertel TW, Izaurralde RC, Lambin EF, Li S, Martinelli LA, McConnell WJ, Moran EF, Naylor R, Ouyang Z, Polenske KR, Reenberg A, Miranda Rocha G de, Simmons CS, Verburg PH, Vitousek PM, Zhang F, Zhu C. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecol Soc. 18(2):26.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yang W, Li S. 2016. Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ. 14(1):27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loiseau E, Aissani L, Feon SL, Laurent F, Cerceau J, Sala S, Roux P. 2018. Territorial Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): what exactly is it about? A proposal towards using a common terminology and a research agenda. J Clean Prod. 176:474–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Hoffman L, Diffendorfer J, Wiederholt R, Bagstad KJ, Thogmartin WE, McCracken G, Medellin RL, Russell A, Semmens D. 2017. Operationalizing the telecoupling framework for migratory species using the spatial subsidies approach to examine ecosystem services provided by Mexican free-tailed bats. Ecol Soc. 22(4):23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munroe DK, Batistella M, Friis C, Gasparri NI, Lambin EF, Liu J, Meyfroidt P, Moran E, Nielsen JØ. 2019. Governing flows in telecoupled land systems. Curr Opin Env Sust. 38:53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberlack C, Boillat S, Brönnimann S, Gerber JD, Heinimann A, Ifejika Speranza C, Messerli P, Rist S, Wiesmann U. 2018. Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems. Ecol Soc. 23(1):16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena de Andrade JG, Franco Barbosa PS, Alves Souza LC, Makino DL. 2011. Interbasin water transfers: the Brazilian experience and international case comparisons. Water Resour Manag. 25:1915–1934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raya Rey AN, Pizarro JC, Anderson CB, Huettmann F. 2017. Even at the uttermost ends of the Earth. How seabirds telecouple the Beagle Channel with regional and global processes that affect environmental conservation and social-ecological sustainability. Ecol Soc. 22(4):31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehhausen A, Köppel J, Scholles F, Stemmer B, Syrbe RU, Magel I, Geißler G, Wende W. 2018. Quality of federal level strategic environmental assessment – A case study analysis for transport, transmission grid and maritime spatial planning in Germany. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 73:41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief F, Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, King N. 2016. Global megatrends and their implications for environmental assessment practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rulli MC, Saviori A, D’Odorico P. 2013. Global land and water grabbing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:892–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter M, Koellner T, Alkemade R, Arnhold S, Bagstad KJ, Erb KH, Frank K, Kastner T, Kissinger M, Liu J, López-Hoffmann L, Maes J, Marques A, Martín-Lopéz B, Meyer C, Schulp CJE, Thober J, Wolff S, Bonn A. 2018. Interregional flows of ecosystem services: concepts, typology and four cases. Ecosystem Services. 31:231–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson M. 2018. The rise of the right to know. Politics and the culture of transparency, 1945–1975. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikor T, Graeme A, Bebbington AJ, Benjaminsen TA, Gentry BS, Hunsberger C, Izac AM, Margulis ME, Plieninger T, Schroeder H, et al. 2013. Global land governance: from territory to flow? Curr Opin Env Sust. 5:522–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauser G, Brandl A, Johnson TE. 2014. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: A review of the environmental impacts. Sci Total Environ. 470–471:800–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Tong YX, Liu J. 2017. Telecoupled land-use changes in distant countries. J Integr Agric. 16(2):368–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonini F, Liu J. 2017. Telecoupling Toolbox. Spatially explicit tools for studying telecoupled human and natural systems. Ecol Soc. 22(4):11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres A, Brandt J, Lear K, Liu J. 2017. A looming tragedy of the sand commons. Science. 357(6355):970–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihma A, Wigell M. 2016. Unclear and present danger: Russia’s geoeconomics and the Nord Stream II pipeline. Global Affairs. 2(4):377–388.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt C, Popa-Lisseanu AG, Niermann I, Kramer-Schadt S. 2012. The catchment area of wind farms for European bats: A plea for international regulations. Biol Conserv. 153:80–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth J, Oberle S, Zubair A, Köppel W. 2019. Wie klimafreundlich ist LNG? Kurzstudie zur Bewertung der Vorkettenemissionen bei Nutzung von verflüssigtem Erdgas (LNG). Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, Texte 21/2019, FKZ 3716 43 100 0.
   Google Scholar
• Winde F, Brugge D, Nidecker A, Ruegg U. 2017. Uranium from Africa - An overview on past and current mining activities: re-appraising associated risks and chances in a global context. J Afr Earth Sci. 129:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar