Gearing up impact assessment as a vehicle for achieving the UN sustainable development goals

References

• Asian Development Bank (2012). Handbook on poverty and social analysis A Working Document, ADB. [accessed 2019 Jun 5]. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/33763/files/handbook-poverty-social-analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bailey J, English V. 1991. Western Australian environmental impact assessment: an evolving approach to environmentally sound development. Environ PlannLaw J. 8(3):190–199.
   Google Scholar
• Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J. 2012. Sustainability assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byer P, Cestti R, Croal P, Fisher W, Hazell S, Kolhoff A, Kørnøv L (2018). Climate Change in Impact Assessment: international Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No. 8. Fargo, N.D., USA: International Association for Impact Assessment. [accessed 2019 Jun 5]. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SP8ClimateChange2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dixon JA, Carpenter RA, Fallon LA, Sherman PB, Manipomoke S. 2010. Economic analysis of the environmental impacts of development projects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doelle M. 2018 October 26. Integrating climate change into environmental impact assessments: key design elements. [accessed 2019 Jul 15] https://ssrn.com/abstract=3273499
   Google Scholar
• Doelle M, Sinclair JA, (2019). The New IAA in Canada: from revolutionary thoughts to reality, Environ Impact Assess Rev. 79; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106292
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundingsland-Tetlow M, Hanusch M. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavanas N, Moutsiakis E, Tasopoulou A, Verani E, Fourkas V. 2018. The territorial impact assessment of transport: the case of the Egnatia motorway system in the cohesion potential of Southeast Europe. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36(4):2294–2307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking T. 2018. The SDGs and the sustainability assessment of private sector projects: theoretical conceptualisation and comparison with current practice using the case study of the Asian Development Bank. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37(1):2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking T, Guthrie PM. 2008. A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(2–3):73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Roxas B, Viliani F, Bond A, Cave D, Mark Divall M, Furu P, Harris P, Soeberg M, Wernham A, Winkler M. 2012. Health impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):4–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D, Vanclay F. 2013. Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31(2):86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolhoff AJ. 1996. Integrating gender assessment study into environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 11(4):261–266.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan R. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A. 2018. Advanced introduction to environmental impact assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn J, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 32(1):2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2012. Walking the sustainability assessment talk – progressing the practice of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 36:34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L. 2007. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ. 60(3):498–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble B, Nwanekezie K. 2017. Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: principles, approaches and research directions. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partidário M, Verheem R (2019) Impact assessment and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), FASTIPS No. 19, International Association for Impact Assessment. [accessed 2019 Jun 17]. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/Fastips_19SDGs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2015. A strategic advocacy role in SEA for sustainability. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 17(1). doi:10.1142/S1464333215500155.
   Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2010. The evolution of environmental assessment debates – critical perspectives from South Africa. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 12(4):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa JCS, Sanchez LE. 2015. Is the ecosystem service concept improving impact assessment? Evidence from recent international practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, Croal P. 2012. Environmental impact assessment, from Rio-92 to Rio+ 20 and beyond. Ambiente & Sociedade. 15(3):41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Scrase JI, Sheate WR. 2002. Integration and integrated approaches to assessment: what do they mean for the environment? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 4:27–294.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair JA, Doelle M, Duinker P. 2017. Looking up, down, and sideways: reconceiving cumulative effects assessment as a mindset. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:18–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair JA, Doelle M, Gibson RB. 2018. Implementing next generation assessment: A case example of a global challenge. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:16–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaling H, Montes J, Sinclair AJ. 2011. Best practices for promoting participation and learning for sustainability: lessons from community-based environmental assessment in Kenya and Tanzania. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 13(3):343–366.
   Google Scholar
• UN – United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations (UN) General Assembly. [accessed 2019 Apr 24]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030AgendaforSustainableDevelopmentweb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Program – UNDP. 2013. Integrating HIV and gender-related issues into environmental assessment in Easternand Southern Africa. [accessed 2019 May 24]. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/hivaids/English/Guidelines_for_Integrating_HIV_and_Gender_related_Issues_into_Environmental_Assessment_in_Eastern_and_So uthern_Africa.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 21(1):5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2015. Changes in the impact assessment family 2003–2014: implications for considering achievements, gaps and future directions. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17(1). doi:10.1142/S1464333215500039.
   Google Scholar
• Yang T. 2019. The emergence of the environmental impact assessment duty as a global legal norm and general principle of law. Hastings Law Journal. 70(2):525–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar