Modifying social impact assessment to enhance the effectiveness of company social investment strategies in contributing to local community development

References

• Arce A. 2003. Value contestations in development interventions: community development and sustainable livelihoods approaches. Community Dev J. 38:199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp I, Lombard A. 2018. Can social impact assessment contribute to social development outcomes in an emerging economy? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36(2):173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocklesby MA, Fisher E. 2003. Community Development in Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches. Community Dev J. 38(3):185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Carney D. 2002. Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches: progress and Possibilities for Change. London: Department for International Development. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3e77/ad6da25b647439ea95c210cfc27dc3da56a2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaye J, Ross H. 2019. Community resilience and community development: what mutual opportunities arise from interactions between the two concepts? Community Dev. 50(2):181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernea M. 1997. The Risks and Reconstruction Model for resettling displaced populations. World Dev. 25(10):1569–1587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare M, Schirmer J, Vanclay F. 2014. Community Engagement and Social License to Operate. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 32(3):188–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy K. 2014. Community development requirements in mining laws. Extr Ind Soc. 1(2):200–215.
   Google Scholar
• EBRD. 2014. Environmental and Social Policy. London (UK): European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. http://www.ebrd.com/news/publications/policies/environmental-and-social-policy-esp.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ejdemo T, Söderholm P. 2015. Wind power, regional development and benefit-sharing: the case of Northern Sweden. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 47:476–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves AM. 2008. Evaluating community investments in the mining sector using multi-criteria decision analysis to integrate SIA with business planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(4–5):338–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Barclay M. 2011. Enhancing the benefits of local content: integrating social and economic impact assessment into procurement strategies. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 29(3):205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Factor G, Vanclay F, Götzmann N, Moreiro S. 2017. Adapting social impact assessment to address a project’s human rights impacts and risks. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 67:73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks DM, Vanclay F. 2012. Social Impact Assessment: the State of Art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Ogorodnikova V, Dietsche E. 2016. IPIECA Local Content: A Guidance Note. 2nd ed. London: IPIECA. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. http://www.ipieca.org/resources/good-practice/local-content-a-guidance-document-for-the-oil-and-gas-industry-2nd-edition/.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Vanclay F. 2009. Social Development Needs Analysis as a Tool for SIA to Guide Corporate-Community Investment: applications in the Minerals Industry. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossgard-Moser T. 2005. Operations and supply chain management social performance: key lessons from recent experiences within Shell. Corporate Gov Int J Bus Soc. 5(3):105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Frank F, Smith A. 1999. The Community Development Handbook: A Tool to Build Community Capacity. Canada: HDRC. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://ccednet-rcdec.ca/sites/ccednet-rcdec.ca/files/051-hrdc-cd_handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gazprom. 2020. Gas Pipeline Nord Stream 2: A new export gas pipeline running from Russia to Europe across the Baltic Sea. [accessed 2020 Jan 25]. http://www.gazprom.com/about/production/projects/pipelines/built/nord-stream2/
   Google Scholar
• Glucker AN, Driessen PPJ, Kolhoff A, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Public participation in Environmental Impact Assessment: why, who and how? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:104–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulakov I, Vanclay F. 2018. Social Impact Assessment in the Russian Federation: does it meet the key values of democracy and civil society? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36(6):494–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulakov I, Vanclay F. 2019. Social impact assessment and stakeholder engagement in the Russian Federation: representativeness, deliberativeness and influence. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 75:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Montes I, Emery M, Fernandez-Baca E. 2009. The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and the Community Capitals Framework: the importance of system-level approaches to community change efforts. Community Dev. 40(2):106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Gӧtzmann N, Vanclay F, Seier F. 2016. Social and Human Rights Impact Assessments: what can they learn from each other? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34(1):14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Vanclay F, Langdon EJ, Arts J. 2016a. Conceptualizing social protest and the significance of protest action to large projects. Extr Ind Soc. 3(1):217–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Vanclay F, Langdon EJ, Arts J. 2016b. The importance of cultural aspects in impact assessment and project development: reflections from a case study of a hydroelectric dam in Brazil. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34(4):306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz-Karp J, Pope J. 2011. Enhancing Effectiveness through Deliberative Democracy. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New Directions in Social Impact Assessment: conceptual and Methodological Advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 78–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hedin LT, Ranängen H. 2017. Community involvement and development in Swedish mining. Extr Ind Soc. 4:630–639.
   Google Scholar
• ICMM. 2012. Community Development Handbook. London: International Council on Mining and Metals. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://www.icmm.com/website/publications/pdfs/social-and-economic-development/4080.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2000. Investing in People: sustaining Communities through Improved Business Practice. A Community Development Resource Guide for Companies. Washington DC: International Finance Corporation. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/14048.
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2010. Strategic Community Investment: A Good Practice Handbook for Companies Doing Business in Emerging Markets. Washington DC: International Finance Corporation. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/27842.
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2012. Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/24e6bfc3-5de3-444d-be9b-226188c95454/PS_English_2012_Full-Document.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=jkV-X6h.
   Google Scholar
• Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. 2016a. Using Social Impact Assessment to strengthen community resilience in sustainable rural development in mountain areas. Mt Res Dev. 36(4):431–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. 2016b. Experiencing local community resilience in action: learning from post-disaster communities. J Rural Stud. 47:204–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INRC. 2016. Organizer’s Workbook: tools to support your awesome Neighborhood. Indianapolis: Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. http://www.inrc.org/files/file/inrc-orgworkbook-webres-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IPIECA. 2017. Creating Successful, Sustainable Social Investment: guidance Document for the Oil and Gas Industry. 2 ed. London: IPIECA. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. http://www.ipieca.org/resources/good-practice/creating-successful-sustainable-social-investment-2nd-edition/.
   Google Scholar
• Jijelava D, Vanclay F. 2017. Legitimacy, Credibility and Trust as the Key Components of a Social Licence to Operate: an Analysis of BP’s Projects in Georgia. J Clean Prod. 140(3):1077–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Jijelava D, Vanclay F. 2018. How a large project was halted by the lack of a Social Licence to Operate: testing the applicability of the Thomson and Boutilier Model. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 73:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• João E, Vanclay F, den Broeder L. 2011. Emphasising enhancement in all forms of impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 29(3):170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D, Vanclay F. 2013. Human Rights and Impact Assessment: clarifying the connections in practice. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31(2):86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzmann J, McKnight J. 1993a. Assets-Based Community Development. Natl Civ Rev. 85(4):23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann J, McKnight J. 1993b. Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community’s Assets. Evanston (IL): Institute for Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann J, McKnight J. 2005. Discovering Community Power: A Guide to Mobilizing Local Assets and your Organization’s Capacity. Evanston (IL): ABCD Institute. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/publications/publications-by-topic/Documents/kelloggabcd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez C, Franks D. 2014. Does mining company-sponsored community development influence social licence to operate? Evidence from private and state-owned companies in Chile. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 32(4):294–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathie A, Cunningham G. 2003. From clients to citizens: asset-Based Community Development as a strategy for community-driven development. Dev Pract. 13(5):474–486.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight J. 2013. A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing. Evanston (Il.): ABCD Institute. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/publications/publications-by-topic/Documents/A%20Basic%20Guide%20to%20ABCD%20Community%20Organizing(3).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moser C, Dani A, eds. 2008. Assets, Livelihoods, and Social Policy. Washington (DC): World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Nord Stream 2. 2017a. Russian Social Impact Assessment. London: Environmental Resources Management Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Nord Stream 2. 2017b. Community Investment Framework – russia.
   Google Scholar
• Nord Stream 2. 2019a. Permitting Overview. [accessed 2020 Jan 25] https://www.nord-stream2.com/environment-permitting/permitting-overview/
   Google Scholar
• Nord Stream 2. 2019b. Stakeholder Engagement Plan – russia. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://www.nord-stream2.com/en/pdf/document/261/
   Google Scholar
• Nord Stream 2. 2019c. Project Documentation. Volume 7.2.1. Frecom. accessed 2020 Feb 20. https://www.nord-stream2.com/ru/pdf/document/207/
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2010. Public Participation and Environmental Impact Assessment: purposes, Implications, and Lessons for Public Policy Making. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30:19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogwang T, Vanclay F, van den Assem A. 2018. Impacts of the oil boom on the lives of people living in the Albertine Graben region of Uganda. Extr Ind Soc. 5:98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Ogwang T, Vanclay F, van den Assem A. 2019. Rent-seeking practices, local resource curse, and social conflict in Uganda’s emerging oil economy. Land. 8(4):53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen JR, Kemp D. 2012. Assets, capitals and resources: frameworks for corporate community development in mining. Bus Soc. 51(3):382–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasaribu S, Vanclay F, Zhao Y. 2020. Challenges to implementing Socially-Sustainable Community Development in oil palm and forestry operations in Indonesia. Land. 9(3):61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patiwael P, Groote P, Vanclay F. 2019. Improving Heritage Impact Assessment: an analytical critique of the ICOMOS Guidelines. Int J Heritage Stud. 25(4):333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patiwael P, Groote P, Vanclay F. 2020. The influence of framing on the legitimacy of Impact Assessments: examining the Heritage Impact Assessments conducted for the Liverpool Waters Project. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1734402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Pittman R, eds. 2009. An Introduction to Community Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson JW, Green GP. 2011. Introduction to Community Development: theory, Practice and Service-Learning. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan M. 2017. Aligning resettlement planning and livelihood restoration with social impact assessment: a practitioner perspective. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 35(1):81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan M, Streather T. 2011. Converting project risks to development opportunities through SIA enhancement measures: a practitioner perspective. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 29(3):217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. 2001. Labour Code of Russian Federation of 30.12.2001 № 197-FZ.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones I 1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis, IDS Working Paper 72. accessed 2020 Feb 20. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/3390/Wp72.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Scoones I. 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. J Peasant Stud. 36(1):171–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner C, Mersham G. 2008. Corporate social responsibility in South Africa: emerging trends. Soc Bus Rev. 3(3):239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth E, Steyn M, Esteves AM, Franks D, Vaz K. 2015. Five ‘big’ issues for land access, resettlement and livelihood restoration practice. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 33(3):220–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth E, Vanclay F. 2017. The Social Framework for Projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 35(1):65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth E, Vanclay F. 2018. Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Livelihoods. In: Therivel R, Wood G, editors. Methods of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment. 4th ed. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 546–576.
   Google Scholar
• Söderholm P, Svahn N. 2015. Mining, regional development and benefit-sharing in developed countries. Resour Policy. 45:78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNGC. 2010. Principles for Social Investment (PSI). New York: United Nations Global Compact. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. https://www.unpri.org/.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg L, Vanclay F. 2017. A human rights based approach to project-induced displacement and resettlement. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 35(1):34–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg L, Vanclay F. 2018. Challenges in implementing the corporate responsibility to respect human rights in the context of project-induced displacement and resettlement. Resour Policy. 55:210–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voort N, Vanclay F. 2015. Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 21(1):5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2017a. Project induced displacement and resettlement: from impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 35(1):3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2017b. Principles to assist in gaining a social licence to operate for green initiatives and biodiversity projects. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 29:48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks D. 2015. Social Impact Assessment: guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects. Fargo ND: International Association for Impact Assessment. [accessed 2020 Feb 20]. http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SIA_Guidance_Document_IAIA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Hanna P. 2019. Conceptualising company response to community protest: principles to achieve a social licence to operate. Land. 8(6):101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar