Wind energy environmental assessment requirements and processes: an uneven landscape

References

• Alberta Environment and Parks 2016. Standardized terms of reference. Edmonton AB: AB Environment and Parks. [accessed 2020 May 19]. https://open.alberta.ca/publications/4903130.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development [AESRD] 2013. Guide to preparing EIS reports in Alberta. Edmonton (AB): AESRD
   Google Scholar
• Bataille C, Sawyer D, Melton N. 2015. Pathways to deep decarbonization in Canada. Ottawa ON: SDS Network, Institute for Sustainable Development, and International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F, Gunn J. 2014. Impact assessment: eroding benefits through streamlining. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 45:46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office [BCEAO] 2019a. Early engagement policy. Victoria (BC): BCEAO.
   Google Scholar
• British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office [BCEAO] 2019b. Readiness decision policy. Victoria (BC): BCEAO.
   Google Scholar
• British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office [BCEAO] 2019c. Environmental assessment user guide. Victoria (BC): BCEAO.
   Google Scholar
• Canada Energy Regulator [CER] 2019. Canada’s energy future 2019: energy supply and demand projections to 2040. Ottawa (ON): CER.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment [CCME] 2014. About the CCME. [accessed 2020 May 19]. https://www.ccme.ca/.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment [CCME] 2016a. Guidance manual for environmental site characterization in support of environmental and human health risk assessment. Winnipeg MB: CCME.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment [CCME] 2016b. Groundwater sustainability assessment approach: guidance for application. Winnipeg MB: CCME.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Wind Energy Association [CWEA] 2020. Canadian Wind Energy Association. [accessed 2020 May 9]. https://canwea.ca/.
   Google Scholar
• Ceglarz A, Beneking A, Ellenbeck S, Battaglini A. 2017. Understanding the role of trust in power line development projects: evidence from two case studies in Norway. Energy Policy. 110:570–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman AJ, McLellan BC, Tezuka T. 2018. Prioritizing mitigation efforts considering co-benefits, equity and energy justice: fossil fuel to renewable energy transition pathways. Appl Energy. 219:187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian J, Shipley L 2019. Electricity regulation in Canada: overview. Thomson Reuters Practical Law. [accessed 2020 May 12]. https://ca.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-632-4326?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen NE 2013. Planning and development of wind farms: environmental impact and grid connection. DTU Wind Energy I (46).
   Google Scholar
• Council of Canadian Academies [CCA] 2019. Greater than the sum of its parts: toward integrated natural resource management in Canada. Ottawa (ON): Expert Panel on the State of Knowledge and Practice of Integrated Approaches to Natural Resource Management in Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva GDP, Magrini A, Tolmasquim MT, Branco DAC. 2019. Environmental licensing and energy policy regulating utility-scale solar photovoltaic installations in Brazil: status and future perspectives. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(6):503–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai K, Bergot A, Liang C, Xiang W-N, Huang Z. 2015. Environmental issues associated with wind energy – A review. Renew Energy. 75:911–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Environment 2017. Developments that require environmental assessment. Information Bulletin 01-02. Halifax (NS): Government of Nova Scotia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment 2018. Regulatory time frames for environmental assessment. Information Bulletin 01-02. Halifax (NS): Government of Nova Scotia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment 2019. Proponent’s guide to environmental assessment. Halifax (NS): Government of Nova Scotia.
   Google Scholar
• Doelle M, Critchley R. 2015. The role of strategic environmental assessments in improving governance of emerging new industries: A case study of wind developments in Nova Scotia. McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy 11(1): 87–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelle M, Sinclair J. 2019. The new IAA in Canada: from revolutionary thoughts to reality. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 79. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment and Local Government 2018. Guide to EIA in New Brunswick. Fredericton (NB): Government of New Brunswick
   Google Scholar
• Environment and Local Government 2019. Sector guideline: additional information requirements for wind turbines. Fredericton (NB): Government of New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Environment, Labour and Justice 2010. EIA guidelines. Charlottetown (PE): Government of Prince Edward Island.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Panel. 2017. Building common ground: A new vision for impact assessment in Canada. Ottawa ON: CEAA.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Lochner P, Annegarn H. 2020. Evaluating the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment to facilitate renewable energy planning and improved decision-making: A South African case study. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(1):28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartman V, Bulling L, Dahmen M, Geißler G, Köppel J. 2016. Mitigation measures for wildlife in wind energy development, consolidating the state of knowledge – part 2: operation, decommissioning. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 18(3):1650014.
   Google Scholar
• Geißler G, Köppel J, Gunther P. 2013. Wind energy and environmental assessments - a hard look at forerunners’ approaches: germany and the United States. Renew Energy. 51:71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna K, McGuigan E, Noble B, Parkins J. 2019. An analysis of the state of impact assessment research for low carbon power production: building a better understanding of information and knowledge gaps. Energy Res Soc Sci. 50:116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsberger C, Froese S, Hoberg G. 2020. Toward ‘good process’ in regulatory reviews: is Canada’s new system any better than the old? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 82. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias G, Del Rio P, Dopico JA. 2011. Policy analysis of authorisation procedures for wind energy deployment. Energy Policy. 39:4067–4076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Renewable Energy Agency 2020. 10 years progress to action. [accessed 2020 Mar 18]. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jan/10-Years-Progress-to-Action.
   Google Scholar
• Jay S. 2010. Planners to the rescue: spatial planning facilitating the development of offshore wind energy. Mar Pollut Bull. 60:493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C, Orr B, Eiser R. 2011. When is enough, enough? Identifying predictors of capacity estimates for onshore wind-power development in a region of the UK. Energy Policy. 39:4563–4577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic S 2019 February 12. Proper environmental impact assessments, cooperation with local community key for renewable energy projects. Balkan Green Energy News. [accessed 2020 Mar 12]. https://balkangreenenergynews.com/proper-environmental-impact-assessment-cooperation-with-local-community-key-for-renewable-energy-projects/.
   Google Scholar
• Kennett S. 1997. Boundary issues and Canadian environmental legislation. In: Caldwell LK, Bartlett RV, editors. Environmental Policy: transnational Issues and National Trends. Westport (CT): Quorum; 131– 156.
   Google Scholar
• Langbroek M, Vanclay F. 2012. Learning from the social impacts associated with initiating a windfarm near the former island of Urk, The Netherlands. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(3):167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh A, Gibbons P, Jones J, Constable A, Wilkinson D. 2018. Delays, stoppages and appeals: an empirical evaluation of the adverse impacts of environmental citizen suits in the New South Wales land and environment court. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 69:94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB]. 2004. Environmental impact assessment guidelines. Yellowknife (NT): MVEIRB.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB] 2019. Ten-day pause period for preliminary screenings. Yellowknife (NT): MVEIRB.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board [MVLWB] 2013. Engagement and consultation policy: engagement guidelines for applicants and holders of water licenses and land use permits. Yellowknife (NT): MVLWB.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean I, Inger R, Benson D, Booth CG, Embling CB, Grecian WJ, Heymans JJ, et al. 2014. Resolving issues with environmental impact assessment of marine renewable energy installations. Front Mar Sci. 16. doi:10.3389/fmars.2014.00075.
   Google Scholar
• Manitoba Sustainable Development 2018a. Environmental assessment and licensing under the Environment Act. Winnipeg (MB): Government of Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Manitoba Sustainable Development 2018b. Environment Act proposal report guidelines. Winnipeg (MB): Government of Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les Changements Climatiques [MELCC] 2018a. Directive pour la réalisation d’une étude d’impact sur l’environnement. Quebec (QC): MELCC
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les Changements Climatiques [MELCC] 2018b. L’information et la consultation du public dans le cadre de la procédure d’évaluation et d’examen des impacts sur l’environnement: guide à l’intention de l’initiateur de projet. Quebec (QC): MELCC.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks 2019. Technical guide to renewable energy approvals. Toronto (ON): Government of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Municipal Affairs and Environment 2017. Environmental assessment: guide to the process. St. John’s (NL): Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Canada [NRCan] 2019. Electricity facts. [accessed 2020 May 26]. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/data-analysis/energy-data-analysis/energy-facts/electricity-facts/20068#L3.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Canada [NRCan] 2020. Renewable energy facts. [accessed 2020 May 26]. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-and-data/data-and-analysis/energy-data-and-analysis/energy-facts/renewable-energy-facts/20069.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt T. 2016. Increasing cooperation and advancing reconciliation in the cooperative management of protected areas in Canada’s North. In: Hermann TM, Martin T, editors. Indigenous peoples’ governance of land and protected territories in the Arctic. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Noble BF, Gibson R, White L, Blakley J, Croal P, Nwanekezie K. 2019. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Canada under directive-based and informal practice. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):344–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunavut Impact Review Board [NIRB] 2018. Illustrative process Guide: NIRB Technical Guide Series. Cambridge Bay (NU): NIRB
   Google Scholar
• Nunavut Impact Review Board [NIRB] 2020. Proponent’s guide: NIRB technical guide series. Cambridge Bay (NU): NIRB.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR, Sheate W. 2013. Knowledge brokerage – potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 39:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phylip-Jones J, Fischer TB. 2013. EIA for wind farms in the United Kingdom and Germany. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 15(2):1340008.
   Google Scholar
• Portman ME, Duff JA, Koppel J, Reisert J, Higgins ME. 2009. Offshore wind energy development in the exclusive economic zone: legal and policy supports and impediments in Germany and the US. Energy Policy. 37:3596–3607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin C, Burch S, Layzell D, Meadowcroft J, Mousseau N, Dale A, Henriques I, Margolis L, Matthews D, Paquin D, et al. 2017. Re-energizing Canada: pathways to a low carbon future. [accessed 2020 Jan 23]. http://sustainablecanadadialogues.ca/pdf_2017/ReEnergizing_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Powell BH. 2015. Model for harmonized provincial environmental and sustainability assessment. Edmonton (AB): Environmental Law Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Roach R. 2003. Common ground: the case for interprovincial cooperation in western Canada. Edmonton (AB): Canada West Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan K, Danylchuk A, Jordan A. 2019. Consideration of scales in offshore wind environmental impact assessments. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 75:59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment 2012a. Technical proposal guidelines: guide to assessing projects and preparing proposals under the Environmental Assessment Act. Regina (SK): Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment 2012b. Environmental assessment in Saskatchewan: an Overview of the Environmental Assessment Process. Regina (SK): Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• SaskPower 2016. Plans for a sustainable power future: decisions, options, timelines. Regina (SK): SaskPower.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher K. 2017. Large scale renewable energy project barriers: environmental impact assessment streamlining efforts in Japan and the EU. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 65:100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster E, Bulling L, Köppel J. 2015. Consolidating the state of knowledge: A synoptical review of wind energy’s wildlife effects. Environ Manage. 56(2):300–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart DE, Stojanovic TA, Warren CR. 2014. Is EIA part of the wind power planning problem? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 49:13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth L, Scolobig A. 2016. Stakeholder empowerment through participatory planning practices: the case of electricity transmission lines in Norway and France. Energy Res Soc Sci. 23:189–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSHRC 2017. Advancing knowledge on collaborative and sustainable energy and natural resource development in Canada: Insights and opportunities for knowledge mobilization and future research. Ottawa ON: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. [accessed 13 April 2020]. http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/society-societe/community-communite/ifca-iac/02-natural_resources_report-ressources_naturelles_rapport-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor K 2019. Jurisdictional review of energy regulation by province and territory. Council for Clean and Reliable Energy. [accessed 2020 May 03]. https://www.ivey.uwo.ca/cmsmedia/3787550/jurisdictionalreview-f.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Udofia A, Noble B, Poelzer G. 2017. Meaningful and efficient? Enduring challenges to Aboriginal participation in environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 65:164–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board [YESAB] 2019. Filing requirements for project proposals submitted to a designated office for evaluation. Directive no. 2. Whitehorse (YT): YESAB.
   Google Scholar
• Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board [YESAB] 2020. Pre-submission engagement for executive committee screenings. Whitehorse (YT): YESAB.
   Google Scholar
• Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board [YESAB] n.d. Project proponents and proposals. Whitehorse (YT): YESAB.
   Google Scholar