References
- Act no 973. 2020. Bekendtgørelse af lov om miljøvurdering af planer og programmer og af konkrete projekter (VVM) [Act on environmental assessment of plans and programmes and specific projects (EIA)]. Adopted by the Danish Parliament June 25, 2020. [Accessed 10 August 2020]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/973
- ADB & UNEP. 2019. Strengthening the environmental dimensions of the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia and the Pacific: tool Compendium. [Accessed 10 August 2020]. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Environment%20and%20Energy/sustainable%20land%20management/Environmental_Dimensions_of_SDGs_in_Asia.pdf
- Arts J, Runhaar H, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Van Laerhoven F, Driessen PPJ, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: Reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manag. v.14, nr.4. 1250025 1–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433321500251
- Canter L, Ross B. 2014. A basic need for integration – bringing focus to the scoping process. J Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 32:21-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872848
- Cashmore M, Rudolph D, Larsen SV, Nielsen H. 2019. International experiences with opposition to wind energy siting decisions: lessons for environmental and social appraisal. J Environ Plan Manag. 62:1109–1132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1473150
- Chandrakumar C, McLaren S. 2018. Exploring the linkages between the environmental sustainable development goals and planetary boundaries using the DPSIR impact pathway framework. Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies; p.413–423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66981-63-319-66981-6
- Choi J, Hwang M, Kim G, Seong J, Ahn J. 2016. Supporting the measurement of the United Nations’ sustainable development goal 11 through the use of national urban information systems and open geospatial technologies: a case study of south Korea. Open Geospatial Data, Softw Stand. 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-016-0005-0.
- COWI. 2018a. Etape 3 Udvidelse af Skagen Havn. VVM redegørelse, miljøvurdering af plangrundlaget og Natura 2000. Væsentlighedsvurdering. Bind 1. Hovedrapport. Skagen Havn. [Accessed 22 July 2020]. https://planinfo.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/sites/default/files/media/vvm_etape_3_skagenhavnsamlet.pdf
- COWI. 2018b. Miljøvurdering af forslag lokalplan 280 og forslag til kommuneplantillæg 2/2017 for Firskovvej – vejforlængelse til Jægersborgvej. Sammenfattende redegørelse. Lyngby Taarbek Kommune. [Accessed 22 July 2020]. https://dokument.plandata.dk/12_9400131_1531392736929.pdf.
- COWI. 2018c. Miljøvurdering (VVM) af energinyttiggørelse af forbrændingsegnet farligt affald på Vestforbrænding. Miljøkonsekvensrapport (VVM-redegørelse). Version 22. Juni 2018. Vestforbrænding. [Accessed 22 July 2020]. https://mst.dk/media/167709/20181102-vestforbraending-bilag-f.pdf
- COWI. 2018d. Tuborg Syd – boliger. Miljøkonsekvensrapport. Danica Pension. [Accessed 22 July 2020]. https://planinfo.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/sites/default/files/media/miljoekonsekvensrapport_tuborg_syd_inkl_bilag.pdf
- COWI. 2019. Areal- og kapacitetsudvidelse af Lumby Spulefelt. Miljøkonsekvensrapport. Lindø Port of Odense. [Accessed 22 July, 2020]. https://planinfo.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/sites/default/files/media/miljoekonsekvensrapport_samt_meddelt_miljoegodkendelse.pdf.
- Del Campo G, Gazzola A, Onyango P. 2020. The mutualism of strategic environmental assessment and sustainable development goals. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 82(106383):1–9.
- Fischer T. 2020. Editorial – embedding the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in IAPA’s remit. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(4):269–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2020.1772474.
- Glasson J, Chadwick TR. 1999. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. 2nd ed. London (UK): Spon Press.
- Hacking T. 2019. The SDGs and the sustainability assessment of private-sector projects: theoretical conceptualisation and comparison with current practice using the case study of the Asian Development Bank. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37:2–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2018.1477469
- Hapuarachchi A, Kughey K, Rennie H. 2016. Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) addressing development-induced disasters: a comparison of the EIA processes of Sri Lanka and New Zealand. Natural Hazards. 81(1):423–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2089-8.
- Hawkings JM. 2018. Textual Analysis. In: Allen M, editor. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousan Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; p.1754-1756.
- Hresc J, Riley E, Harris P. 2018. Mining project’s economic impact on local communities, as a social determinant of health: a documentary analysis of environmental impact statements. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:64–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.009
- Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J. 2007. Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 14:78-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469709
- Kørnøv L, Christensen P, Nielsen EH. 2005. Mission impossible: does environmental impact assessment in Denmark secure a holistic approach to the environment. Impact Assess. Proj Apprais. 23(4):303–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765427.
- Kørnøv L, Lyhne L, Davila JG. 2020. Linking the UN SDGs and environmental assessment: towards a conceptual framework. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 85:106463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106463.
- Larsen SV, Hansen AM, Nielsen HN. 2018. The role of EIA and weak assessments of social impacts in conflicts over implementation of renewable energy policies. Energy Policy. 115:43–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.002
- Larsen SV, Merrild Hansen A, Lyhne I, Bjørn Aaen S, Ritter E, Nielsen H. 2015. Social impact assessment in Europe: a Study of social impacts in three Danish cases. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 17:1550038. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/262085253/Larsen_et_al_2015_VBN_version.pdf
- Lyhne I, Cashmore M, Runhaar H, Van Laerhoven F. 2016. Quality control for environmental policy appraisal tools: an empirical investigation of relations between quality, quality control and effectiveness. J Environ Policy Plan. 18:121–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2015.1053438.
- Lyhne I, Kørnøv L. 2013. How do we make sense of significance? Indications and reflections on an experiment. Impact Assess. Proj Apprais. 31(3):180–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.795694.
- Maier S, Beck T, Vallejo JF, Horn R, Söhlemann JH, Nguyen TT. 2016. Methodological approach for the sustainability assessment of development cooperation project for built innovations based on the SDGs and life cycle thinking. J Sustainability. 8(10):1006. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101006
- Matthews NE, Stamford L, Shapira P. 2019. Aligning sustainability assessment with responsible research and innovation: towards a framework for constructive sustainability assessment. Sustain Prod Consum. 20:58–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2019.05.002
- Morgan R. 1998. Environmental impact assessment. In: A methodological perspective. Mass: USA7. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn JA, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32:2–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872841.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Sánchez LE, Retief F, Sinclair J, Doelle M, Jones M, Wessels J-A, Pope J. 2020. Gearing up impact assessment as a vehicle for achieving the UN sustainable development goals. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1677089
- Nilsson M, Persson Å. 2017. Policy note: lessons from environmental policy integration for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Environ Sci Policy. 78:36–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.003
- Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Lafortune G, Fuller G, Woelm F 2020. The sustainable development goals and COVID-19. Sustainable Development Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Sadler, B. 1996. Environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Canada: Minister of Supply and Services Canada (Final Report).
- Sebestyén V, Bulla M, Rédey Á, Abonyi J. 2019. Network model-based analysis of the goals, targets and indicators of sustainable development for strategic environmental assessment. J Environ Manage. 238:126–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.096
- Shah S. 2019. An analysis of EIA report of the second international airport project, Nepal. Hydro Nepal: J Water Energy Environ. 24:57–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/hn.v24i0.23585.
- Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie N, Stigson B, Shrivastava P, Leach M, O’Connell D. 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci. 12:911–919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
- Stockholm Resilience Center. 2016. Contributions to Agenda 2030. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Stockholm University. [Accessed 5 August 2020]. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2017-02-28-contributions-to-agenda-2030.html.
- UN. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. [Accessed 10 August 2020]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
- Weston J. 2000. EIA decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice. J Environ Plan Manag. 43(2):185–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560010667.
- Williams A, Dupuy K. 2017. Deciding over nature: corruption and environmental impact assessments. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 65:118–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2017.05.002
- Wood G, Glasson J, Becker J. 2006. EIA scoping in England and Wales: practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:221-241. doi:https://doi.org/10/1016/j.eiar.2005.02.001
- Wulf C, Werker J, Zapp P, Schreiber A, Schlör H, Kuckshinrichs W. 2018. Sustainable development goals as a guideline for indicator selection in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. 25th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference. Procedia CIRP 6; p.59–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.144
- Zhang J, Kørnøv L, Christensen P. 2013. Critical factors for EIA implementation: literature review and research options. J Environ Manage. 114:148–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030