Health impact assessment of a mining project in Swedish Sápmi: lessons learned

References

• Beans JA, Saunkeah B, Woodbury RB, Ketchum TS, Spicer PG, Hiratsuka VY. 2019. Community protections in American Indian and Alaska Native participatory research—A scoping review. Social Sciences. 8(4):127. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8040127.
   Google Scholar
• Beowulf Mining plc. 2019. Annual Report 2019. London: Beowulf Mining plc.
   Google Scholar
• Berensson K. 2004. HIA at the local level in Sweden. In: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S, editors. Health Impact Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 213–222.
   Google Scholar
• Berensson K, Tillgren P. 2017. Health impact assessment (HIA) of political proposals at the local level: successful introduction, but what has happened 15 years later? Glob Health Promot. 24(2):43–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975916683386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia R, et al. 2010. Minimum elements and practice standards for health impact assessment. GHPC Materials:11.
   Google Scholar
• Birley M. 2011. Health impact assessment: principles and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blåhed H, San Sebastian M. 2020. Det är ju faktiskt framtiden som tas ifrån en: en hälsokonsekvensbedömning med anledning av den potentiella gruvetableringen i Gállok/ Kallak,svenska Sápmi. [Actually, it is the future that is being taken away from you: a health impact assessment on account of the potential mine establishment in Gállok/ Kallak,Swedish Sámpi]. Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Blåhed H, San Sebastian M. 2021. “If the reindeer die, everything dies”: the mental health of a Sámi community exposed to a mining project in Swedish Sápmi. Int J Circumpolar Health. 80(1):1935132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2021.1935132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobba S. 2019. Ethics of medical research in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. Aust J Prim Health. 25(5):402–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1071/PY18049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin H, Hodge S. 2008. A guide to Quantitative Methods in Health Impact Assessment. Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell D. 1998. Risk language and dialects: expressing risk in relative rather than absolute terms is important. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 316(7139):1242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1242b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher S, Watts V, McCormick AKHG, Young S. 2008. Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. Am J Public Health. 98(8):1398–1406. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.125757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Broeder L, Uiters E, Ten Have W, Wagemakers A, Schuit AJ. 2017. Community participation in Health Impact Assessment. A scoping review of the literature. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 66:33–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty BL, et al. 2010. Bearing the burden: the effects of mining on First Nations in British Columbia. Cambridge: International Human Rights Clinic, Harvard Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen H, et al. 2021. Ethical considerations for community-based participatory research with Sami communities in North Finland. In: Ambio. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Finer D, Tillgren P, Berensson K, Guldbrandsson K, Haglund BJA. 2005. Implementation of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) tool in a regional health organization in Sweden—a feasibility study. Health Promot Int. 20(3):277–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dai009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Cave B. 2018. Health in impact assessments – introduction to a special issue. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 36(1):1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1363976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flicker S, Travers R, Guta A, McDonald S, Meagher A. 2007. Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: recommendations for institutional review boards. J Urban Health. 84(4):478–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geological Survey of Sweden. 2019. Bergverksstatistik 2018 [Statistics of the Swedish Mining Industry 2018]. Retrieved from http://resource.sgu.se/produkter/pp/pp2019-2-rapport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibson G, Klinck J. 2005. Canada’s resilient north: the impact of mining on aboriginal communities. Pimatisiwin. 3(1):116–139.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway NR, Johannesdottir SL, Piniewski M, Macura B. 2019. What ecotechnologies exist for recycling carbon and nutrients from domestic wastewater? A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence. 8(1):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0145-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh F, Harris E, Chok HN, Baum F, Harris-Roxas B, Kemp L, Spickett J, Keleher H, Morgan R, Harris M, et al. 2013. Characteristics of health impact assessments reported in Australia and New Zealand 2005-2009. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 37(6):534–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund A, Johansson V. 2008. Miljökonsekvensbeskrivning. [Environmental Impact Assessment]. Uppsala: SLU - Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet [Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences]. No. 4/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hifab. 2013. Miljökonsekvensbeskrivning - tilll ansökan om bearbetningskoncession för fyndigheten Kallak Norra [Environmental Impact Assessment - to the application for an exploitation concession permit regarding findings in North Kallak]. Umeå:Hifab.
   Google Scholar
• Israel BA, et al. 2001. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership apprach in health research. Educ Health. 14:2.
   Google Scholar
• Kågström M. 2009. Hur ska man hantera det här med hälsa?: en kunskapsöversikt om hälsans roll i konsekvensbeskrivning och transportplanering [How to handle this with health?: a review of the role of health in impact assessments and transport planning]. Uppsala: institutionen för stad och land, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet SLU. Uppsala: Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kågström M, Hilding-Rydevik T, Sjöberg I. 2013. Human health frames in EIA – the case of Swedish road planning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 31(3):198–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.772708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemm J. 2001. Health impact assessment: a tool for healthy public policy. Health Promot Int. 16(1):79–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.1.79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsson I, Linell A. 2010. Review Article: health impact assessment developments in Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 38(2):115–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809357097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence R, Larsen RK. 2017. The politics of planning: assessing the impacts of mining on Sami lands. Third World Q. 38(5):1164–1180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1257909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence R, Larsen RK. 2019. Fighting to be herd: impcts of the Propsed Boliden Copper Mine in Laver, Älvsbyn, Sweden for the Semisjaur Njarg Sami Reindeer Herding Community. Stockholm: Stockholm Environmental Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis J, Hoover J, MacKenzie D. 2017. Mining and environmental health disparities in Native American communities. Curr Environ Health Rep. 4(2):130–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0140-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linell A. 2005. Health impact assessment of a road traffic project. Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• Linell A, et al. 2008. Health impact assessment in physical planning: in-depth comprehensive plan for the Fyrvalla-Remonthagen area, Östersund. Östersund: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• Lock K. 2000. Health impact assessment. BMJ. 320(7246):1395–1398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mactaggart F, McDermott L, Tynan A, Gericke C. 2016. Examining health and well-being outcomes associatedwith mining activity in rural communities of high-income countries: a systematic review. Aust J Rural Health. 24(4):230–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. 2017. God och jämlik hälsa - en utvecklad folkhälsopolitik. Stockholm: regeringskansliet. Stockholm: Swedish Government Offices. ( Miljöbedömningsförordning (2017:966) (SE))
   Google Scholar
• Minkler M. 2004. Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Educ Behav. 31(6):684–697. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104269566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry J, Stevens A. 2001. Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward. BMJ. 323(7322):1177–1182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson S, Harnesk D, Islar M. 2017. What local people? Examining the Gállok mining conflict and the rights of the Sámi population in terms of justice and power. Geoforum. 86:20–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. Sweden’s Environmental Objectives - An introduction. Stockholm:Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Befolkning och hälsa i miljöbedömningen. [Population and health in the environmental impact assessment]. Retrieved from https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Stod-i-miljoarbetet/Vagledningar/Miljobedomningar/Specifik-miljobedomning/Miljoaspekter-i-miljobedomning/Befolkning-och-halsa/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Institute of Public Health. 2005. A guide to health impact assessments: focusing on social and environmental sustainability. Stockholm:Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• WHO Regional Office for Europe. 1999. Gothenburg Consensus Paper on Health Impact Assessment: main Concepts and Suggested Approach. Copenhagen:World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson E, Kenny A, Dickson-Swift V. 2018. Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: a scoping review. Qual Health Res. 28(2):189–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317690721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler MS, Furu P, Viliani F, Cave B, Divall M, Ramesh G, Harris-Roxas B, Knoblauch AM. 2020. Current global health impact assessment practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(9):2988. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wismar M, et al. 2007. The effectiveness of health impact assessment: scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. Cophenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar