References
- Antonson H, Levin L. 2020. A crack in the Swedish welfare façade? A review of assessing social impacts in transport infrastructure planning. Prog Plann. 138:100428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.11.001.
- Arce-Gomez A, Donovan JD, Bedggood RE. 2015. Social impact assessments: developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:85–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.006.
- Arts J. 1998. EIA follow-Up: on the role of ex post evaluation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Groningen: GeoPress.
- Arts J, Caldwell P, Morrison-Saunders A. 2001. EIA Follow-up: good practice and future directions: findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 Conference. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 19(3):175–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154601781767014.
- Aucamp I, Woodborne S. 2020. Can social impact assessment improve social well-being in a future where social inequality is rife?. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(2):132–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1676068.
- Banhalmi-Zakar Z, Gronow C, Wilkinson L, Jenkins B, Pope J, Squires G, Witt K, Williams G, Womersley J. 2018. Evolution or revolution: where next for impact assessment?. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36(6):506–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2018.1516846.
- Banister D. 2008. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy. 15(2):73–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
- Barca F, McCann P, Rodriguez-Pose A. 2012. The case of regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. J Reg Sci. 52(1):134–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x.
- Bertolini L. 2012. Integrating mobility and urban development agendas: a manifesto. disP Plann Rev. 48(1):16–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2012.702956.
- Beukers E, Bertolini L, Te Brömmelstroet M. 2012. Why Cost Benefit Analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: a process perspective. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 46(1):68–78.
- Brömmelstroet M, Bertolini L. 2011. The role of transport‐related models in urban planning practice. Transport Rev. 31(2):139–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.541295.
- Capra C. 2018. The Smart City and its citizens. In: Information Resources Management Association, editor. E-planning and collaboration: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; p. 321–341.
- Cashmore M, Richardson T, Hilding-Ryedvik T, Emmelin L. 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(6):371–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.004.
- Chamseddine Z, Ait Boubkr A. 2020. Exploring the place of social impacts in urban transport planning: the case of Casablanca City. Urban Plann Transport Res. 8(1):138–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2020.1752793.
- Daniell K, Kay A, editors. 2017. Multi-level governance: conceptual challenges and case studies from Australia. Canberra: ANU Press.
- Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):34–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356.
- Fensham P. 2015. The Sydney metropolitan strategy: implementation challenges. In: Buek J, Ryder A, editors. Governance in transition. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 42–64.
- Fischer TB. 2005. Having an impact? Context elements for effective SEA application in transport policy, plan and programme making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 7(3):407–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333205002158.
- Flyvbjerg B. 2014. What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview. Project Manage J. 45(2):6–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409.
- Flyvbjerg B. 2016. The fallacy of beneficial ignorance: a test of hirschman’s hiding hand. World Dev. 84:176–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.012.
- Flyvbjerg B. 2017. Introduction - The iron law of megaproject management. In: Flyvbjerg B, editor. The Oxford handbook of megaproject management. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 1–18.
- Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W. 2003. Megaprojects and risk - an anatomy of ambition. 1st ed. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.
- Franks D, Vanclay F. 2013. Social Impact Management Plans: innovation in corporate and public policy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:40–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.004.
- Greater Sydney Commission (GSC). 2017. Engagement strategy. [accessed 2020 May 4]. https://gsc-public-1.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/gsc_engagement_strategy.pdf#engagementstrategy.
- Gulakov I, Vanclay F, Ignatyev A, Arts J. 2020. Challenges in meeting international standards in undertaking Social Impact Assessment in Russia. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 83:106410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106410.
- Hanna P, Vanclay F, Langdon EJ, Arts J. 2016. Conceptualizing social protest and the significance of protest actions to large projects. Extr Ind Soc. 3(1):217–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.10.006.
- Healey P. 1999. Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. J Plann Educ Res. 19(2):111–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9901900201.
- Healey P. 2003. Collaborative planning in perspective. Plann Theory. 2(2):101–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002.
- Heeres N, Tillema T, Arts J. 2012. Functional-spatial sustainability potentials of integrated infrastructure planning. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 48:2533–2544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1224.
- Homsy GC, Liu Z, Warner ME. 2019. Multilevel governance: framing the integration of top-down and bottom-up policymaking. Int J Public Administration. 42(7):572–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1491597.
- Howitt R. 2003. Local and non-specialist participation in impact assessment. In: Liu CQ, Liu Q, Zhao Z, Xiao T, Guha J, editors. Strategic management of environmental and socio-economic issues: a handbook. Guiyang (China): Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House; p. 27–36.
- International Finance Corporation (IFC). 2012. Performance standards and guidance notes. Washington (DC):International Finance Corporation.
- Jones P, Lucas K. 2012. The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications. J Transp Geogr. 21:4–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.012.
- Kvam R. 2018. Social impact assessment: integrating social issues in development projects. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank. [accessed 2020 May 4]. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Social_Impact_Assessment_Integrating_Social_Issues_in_Development_Projects.pdf
- Legacy C. 2016. Transforming transport planning in the postpolitical era. Urban Stud. 53(14):3108–3124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015602649.
- Legacy C. 2018. The post‐politics of transport: establishing a new meeting ground for transport politics. Geog Res. 56(2):196–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12263.
- Legacy C, Cook N, Rogers D, Ruming K. 2018. Planning the post‐political city: exploring public participation in the contemporary Australian city. Geog Res. 56(2):176–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12285.
- Legacy C, Curtis C, Neuman M. 2014. Adapting the deliberative democracy ‘template’ for planning practice. Town Plan Rev. 85(3):319–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2014.20.
- Lucas K, Philips I, Verlinghieri E. 2021. A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10176-6
- Marshall R, Arts J, Morrison-Saunders A. 2005. International principles for best practice EIA follow-up. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 23(3):175–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765490.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J, editors. 2004. Assessing impact, handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Earthscan Publishers.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J, Bond A, Pope J, Retief F. 2021. Reflecting on, and revising, international best practice principles for EIA follow-up. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 89:106596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106596.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J, Marshall R. 2007. EIA follow up international best practice principles. In: Special publication series No. 6 Fargo. USA: International Association for Impact Assessment; p. 1–4. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SP6_1.pdf
- Mottee LK, Arts J, Vanclay F, Howitt R, Miller F. 2020a. Limitations of technical approaches to transport planning practice in two cases: social issues as a critical component of urban projects. Plann Theory Pract. 21(1):39–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1696980.
- Mottee LK, Arts J, Vanclay F, Miller F, Howitt R. 2020b. Metro infrastructure planning in Amsterdam: how are social issues managed in the absence of environmental and social impact assessment? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(4):320–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2020.1741918.
- Mottee LK, Arts J, Vanclay F, Miller F, Howitt R. 2020c. Reflecting on how social impacts are considered in transport infrastructure project planning: looking beyond the claimed success of Sydney’s South West Rail Link. Urban Policy Res. 38(3):185–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2020.1730787.
- Mottee LK, Howitt R. 2018. Follow-up and social impact assessment (SIA) in urban transport-infrastructure projects: insights from the Parramatta rail link. Aust Plann. 55(1):46–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2018.1506496.
- O’Faircheallaigh C. 2009. Effectiveness in social impact assessment: aboriginal peoples and resource development in Australia. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27(2):95–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X438715.
- Parsons R. 2020. Forces for change in social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(4):278–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1692585.
- Parsons R, Everingham JA, Kemp D. 2019. Developing social impact assessment guidelines in a pre-existing policy context. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37(2):114–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2018.1485612.
- Parsons R, Luke H. 2021. Comparing reflexive and assertive approaches to social licence and social impact assessment. Extr Ind Soc. 8(2):100765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.06.022.
- PintoE, Morrison-Saunders A, Bond A, Pope J, Retief F. 2019. Distilling and applying criteria for best practice EIA follow-up. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 21(2): 1950008-1-1950008-32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433321950008X.
- Pope J, Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2013. Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008.
- Priemus H, Van Wee B. 2013. Mega-projects: high ambitions, complex decision-making, different actors, multiple impacts. In: Priemus H, Van Wee B, editors. International handbook on mega-projects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 1–10.
- Sager T. 2002. Deliberative planning and decision making: an impossibility result. J Plann Educ Res. 21(4):367–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100402.
- Sager T. 2016. Activist planning: a response to the woes of neo-liberalism?. Eur Plann Stud. 24(7):1262–1280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1168784.
- Storey K, Jones P. 2003. Social impact assessment, impact management and follow-up: a case study of the construction of the Hibernia offshore platform. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 21(2):99–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766400.
- Storey K, Noble B. 2005. Socio-economic effects monitoring: toward improvements Informed by bio-physical effects monitoring. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 23(3):210–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765526.
- Stratford E, Bradshaw M. 2016. Qualitative research design and rigour. In: Hay I, editor. Qualitative research methods in human geography. Ontario (Canada): Oxford University Press; p. 117–129.
- Sturup S. 2016. The problem/solution nexus and its effects on public consultation. In: Leshinsky R, Legacy C, editors. Instruments of planning: tensions and challenges for more equitable and sustainable cities. New York: Routledge; p. 45–57.
- Switzer A. 2019. Transitioning the transport and land-use system [Doctoral thesis]. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Universiteit van Amsterdam.
- Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 21(1):5–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491.
- Vanclay F. 2017. The potential contribution of social impact assessment to megaproject developments. In: Lehtonen M, Joly PB, Aparicio L, editors. Socioeconomic evaluation of megaprojects: dealing with uncertainties. Abingdon (UK): Routledge; p. 181–198.
- Vanclay F. 2020. Reflections on Social Impact Assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(2):126–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1685807.
- Vanclay F, Baines JT, Taylor CN. 2013. Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31(4):243–253
- Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks DM. 2015. Social Impact Assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo: ND.[accessed 2020 May 4]. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SIA_Guidance_Document_IAIA.pdf
- Veeneman W, Mulley C. 2018. Multi-level governance in public transport: governmental layering and its influence on public transport service solutions. Research in Transportation Economics. 69:430–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.005.
- Woltjer J. 2002. The ‘public support machine’: notions of the function of participatory planning by Dutch infrastructure planners. Plann Pract Res. 17(4):437–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450216358.
- World Bank. 2018. Environmental and social impact assessments (English).Responsible Agricultural Investment (RAI) knowledge into action note; no. 14. Washington (D.C):World Bank Group. [accessed 2020 May 4]. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/843201521089993123/Environmental-and-social-impact-assessments