Strategic environmental assessment monitoring: the enduring forgotten sibling

References

• Arts J. 1998. EIA follow-up: on the role of ex post evaluation in environmental impact assessment. Groningen: Geo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azcárate J, Balfors B, Bring A, Destouni G. 2013. Strategic environmental assessment and monitoring: arctic key gaps and bridging pathways. Environmental Research Letters. 8( 044033):9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton L, Ache P. 2017. Citizen-sensor-networks to confront government decision-makers: two lessons from The Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management. 196:234–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherp A, Partidário MR, Arts J. 2012. From formulation to implementation: strengthening SEA through follow-up. In: Sadler B, Dusik J, Fischer T, Partidario M, Verheem R, and Aschemann R, editors. Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment. UK: Earthscan. p. 515–534.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal-Clayton B, Sadler DB. 2005. Strategic Environmental Assessment: a Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities. L 197/30 21.7.2001.
   Google Scholar
• EC (2019). REFIT evaluation of the SEA Directive. European Commission. [accessed 2022 Jan 24]. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/sea-refit.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ECGF (2021). Compilation of CJEU Case Law on Member States’ Obligation to Remedy Failures to Carry out Environmental Assessments. European Commission: DG ENV - Environmental Compliance and Governance Forum. [accessed 2022 Jan 24]. https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/cafdbfbb-a3b9-42d8-b3c9-05e8f2c6a6fe/library/cd912549-8639-4591-aaf5-f5f250a465f3/details.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (2012). Review of Effectiveness of SEA in Ireland. Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency. [accessed 2022 Jan 24]. https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring--assessment/assessment/SEA-EFFECTIVENESS-REVIEW-MAIN-REPORT-2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (2018). Second Review of Strategic Environmental Assessment Effectiveness in Ireland. Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency. [accessed 2022 Jan 24]. https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring--assessment/assessment/second-review-of-sea-effectiveness-in-ireland.php.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (2021). Tiering of Environmental Assessment – the Influence of SEA on Project Level EIA. Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency. [accessed 2022 Jan 24]. https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/epa-research-2030-reports/Research_Report_391.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EU (2020). Environmental Assessment of Projects and Plans and Programmes – rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [accessed 2022 Jan 24]. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/EIA_rulings_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, and Retief F. 2021. Does strategic environmental assessment lead to more environmentally sustainable decisions and action? Reflections on substantive effectiveness. In: Fischer TB, and González A, editors. Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. p. 114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Gachechiladze M, Noble BF, Bitter BW. 2009. Following-up in strategic environmental assessment: a case study of 20-year forest management planning in Saskatchewan, Canada. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 27(1):45–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X430362.
   Google Scholar
• Gachechiladze-Bozhesku M, Fischer TB. 2012. Benefits of and barriers to SEA follow-up - Theory and practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 34:22–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A, Bullock C, Gaughran A, Watkin-Bourne K. 2019. Towards a better understanding of SEA effectiveness in Ireland. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 37(3–4):233–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1580475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A, Gazzola P. 2019. Untapping the potential of technological advancements in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 63(4):585.603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A, Therivel R. 2021. Raising the game in environmental assessment: insights from tiering practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 92:106695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez M, Bekessy SA, Gordon A. 2021. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: an evaluation of six Australian cases. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 87:106552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi SP, Purnaweni H, and Prabawani B (2019). The powerless of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): case Studies of North Kendeng Mountain Area, Central Java, Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences; Aug 7-8; Semarang, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch M, Glasson J. 2008. Much ado about SEA/SA monitoring: the performance of English regional spatial strategies, and some German comparisons. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 28(8):601–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAIA. 2002. Strategic Environmental Assessment: performance Criteria. Fargo (USA):International Association for Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Jiricka-Pürrer, A., Wanner, A., and Hainz-Renetzeder, C. (2021). Who cares? Don't underestimate the values of SEA monitoring! Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 90:106610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamorgese L, Geneletti D, Partidario MR. 2015. Reviewing strategic environmental assessment practice in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 17(2):1550017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333215500179.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L, Nilsson M. 2010. SEA monitoring in Swedish regional transport infrastructure plans - Improvement opportunities identified in practical experience. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 30(6):400–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas A, Ramos TB, Nunes L. 2012. Developing an integrated approach for the strategic monitoring of regional spatial plans. Land Use Policy. 29(3):641–651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J. 2004. Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Wiklund H, Finnveden G, Jonsson DK, Lundberg K, Tyskeng S, Wallgren O. 2009. Analytical framework and tool kit for SEA follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 29(3):186–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partidário MR, Arts J. 2005. Exploring the concept of strategic environmental assessment follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 23(3):246–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765481.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR, and Fischer TB. 2004. Follow-up in current SEA understanding. In: Morrison-Saunders A, and Arts J, editors. Assessing Impact: handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up. London: Routledge. p. 224–247.
   Google Scholar
• Persson Å, Nilsson M. 2007. Towards a framework for sea follow-up: theorethical issues and lessons from policy evaluation. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 9(4):473–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333207002901.
   Google Scholar
• Polido A, João E, Ramos TB. 2016. Strategic Environmental Assessment practices in European small Islands: insights from Azores and Orkney Islands. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 57:18–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler B. 2004. On evaluating the success of EIA and SEA. In: Morrison-Saunders A, and Arts J, editors. Assessing Impact: handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up. London: Routledge. p. 248–285.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B, Dusik J, Fischer T, Partidario M, Verheem R, Aschemann R. 2012. Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Söderman T, Kallio T. 2009. Strategic environmental assessment in Finland. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 11(1):1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333209003269.
   Google Scholar
• Stepenuck KF, Green L. 2015. Individual- and community-level impacts of volunteer environmental monitoring: a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature. Ecology and Society. 20(3):19. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07329-200319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R, González A. 2019. Introducing SEA effectiveness. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 37(3–4):181–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1601432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R, González A. 2021. “Ripe for decision”: tiering in Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 87:106520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallgren O, Nilsson M, Jonsson DK, Wiklund H. 2011. Confronting sea with real planning: the case of follow-up in regional plans and programmes in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 13(2):229–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333211003869.
   Google Scholar