References
- Asselin J, Parkins JR. 2009. Comparative case study as social impact assessment: possibilities and limitations for anticipating social change in the Far North. Soc Indic Res. 94(3):483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9444-7.
- Baring-Gould M. 1976. Social impact of the trans-Alaska pipeline construction in Valdez, Alaska 1974–1975. No. PB-279328. Anchorage (USA): Alaska University. Department of Sociology.
- Becker HA, and Vanclay F, eds. 2003. The international handbook of social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar.
- Bryan J, Munday M, Pickernell D, Roberts A. 2006. Assessing the economic significance of port activity: evidence from ABP operations in industrial South Wales. Marit Policy and Manage. 33(4):371–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830600895600.
- Burdge R. 1999. A community guide to social impact assessment. Rev ed. Wisconsin: Social Ecology Press.
- Burdge, R. J. 2004. The concepts, process and methods of social impact assessment. Middleton, WI: Social Ecology Press.
- Burdge RJ, Chamley S, Downs M, Finsterbusch K, Freudenburg B, Fricke P, Gramling B, Smith M, Kragh BC, Stoffle R, et al. 2003. Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA. Impact Assess and Project Appraisal. 21(3):231–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766293.
- Burdge RJ, Vanclay F. 1996. Social impact assessment: a contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assess. 14(1):59–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1996.9725886.
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2020. Unemployment Accessed 23 July 2020. https://www.bls.gov/data/#unemployment
- Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Global logistics development partners I 2017. Utah inland port: Feasibility analysis Retrieved 12 August 2020. wtcutah.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Inland-Port.pdf
- Campbell DT, Stanley JC. 1966. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
- Deseret News. 2020a. Frustrated at no progress to stop Utah inland port, activists turn focus on Rio Tinto Accessed 28 June 2021. https://www.deseret.com/utah/2020/8/26/21402779/salt-lake-city-inland-port-rio-tinto-kennecott-stop-polluting-port-ancestral-burial-sites
- Deseret News. 2020b. Utah inland port critics detail concerns in new report Accessed 28 June 2021. https://www.deseret.com/utah/2020/1/22/21077387/utah-inland-port-new-report-air-quality-activists-salt-lake-city
- Dooms M, Haezendonck E, Valaert T. 2013. Dynamic green portfolio analysis for inland ports: an empirical analysis on Western Europe. Res in Transp Bus & Manage. 8:171–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.006.
- Envision Utah. 2019. Utah inland port authority: public engagement report Retrieved 28 June 2021. https://inlandportauthority.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/UIP-Phase-1-Report-FINAL-2-1.pdf
- Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess and Project Appraisal. 30(1):34–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356.
- Etikan I. 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J of Theor and App Stat. 5(1):1. doi:https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2020. Uniform crime reports Accessed 1 June 2020. https://ucrdatatool.gov/
- Federal Housing Finance Agency. 2020. HPI for counties (all-transactions index) Accessed 1 June 2020. https://www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/Downloads/Documents/HPI/HPI_AT_BDL_co
- Ferrari C, Merk O, Bottasso A, Conti M, and Tei A Ports and Regional Development: a European Perspective. In: OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/5k92z71jsrs6-en.
- Frank J. 1931. Mr. justice holmes and non-euclidean legal thinking. Cornell LQ. 17:568. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol17/iss4/2
- Freudenburg WR. 1986. Social impact assessment. Annu Rev Sociol. 12(1):451–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.002315.
- Gochnour N. 2016. Salt Lake inland port market assessment Retrieved 12 August 2020. Salt Lake City (Utah); https://gardner.utah.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/IP-Brief-PRESS2.pdf
- Gripaios P, and Gripaios R. 1995. The impact of a port on its local economy: the case of Plymouth. Marit Policy & Manage. 13–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839500000029.
- Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. 2016. Using social impact assessment to strengthen community resilience in sustainable rural development in mountain areas. Mt Res Dev. 36(4):431–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00027.1.
- IOCPG, Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment. 2003. Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA: the Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assess and Project Appraisal. 21(3):231–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766293.
- Jacquet JB. 2014. A Short History Of Social Impact Assessment. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1470.5686.
- Khaslavskaya A, Roso V. 2020. Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future. Marit Econ & Logistics. 22:265–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00152-9.
- Lättilä L, Henttu V, Hilmola O-P. 2013. Hinterland operations of sea ports do matter: dry port usage effects on transportation costs and CO2 emissions. Transp Res Part E: Logistics and Transp Rev. 55:23–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.007.
- Linden A. 2015. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata. 15(2):480–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1501500208.
- Ng AK, Tongzon JL. 2010. The transportation sector of India’s economy: dry ports as catalysts for regional development. Eurasian Geogr and Econ. 51:669–682. doi:https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.51.5.669.
- Nolan JJ III. 2004. Establishing the statistical relationship between population size and UCR crime rate: its impact and implications. J Crim Justice. 32(6):547–555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.08.002.
- The Port of Virginia. 2020. Facilities: Virginia inland port Accessed 28 June 2021. http://www.portofvirginia.com/facilities/virginia-inland-port-vip/unty.xlsx
- Prozzi J, Henk R, McCray J, and Harrison R. 2002. Inland ports: planning successful developments (Report No. FHWA/TX-03/40832) Accessed 15 July 2021. University of Texas at Austin; https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.214.9201&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Rodrigue J-P, Notteboom T. 2012. Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: two of a kind? Res in Transp Bus & Manage. 5:4–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.003.
- Roso V, Lumsden K. 2009. The dry port concept: moving seaport activities inland. UNESCAP, Transp and Commun Bull for Asia and the Pac. 5(78):87–102. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/bulletin78_Article-5.pdf
- Salt Lake County. 2017. A brief history of Salt Lake County’s inland port efforts Retrieced 12 August 2020. Salt Lake City; https://slco.org/uploadedFiles/depot/fRD/fEconDev/Inland-Port-White-PaperRebranded3.2.2017.pdf
- Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell TD. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- South Carolina Ports Authority. 2020. About Us Accessed 12 August 2020. http://scspa.com/about/
- State of Utah. 2018. S.B. 234 Utah inland port authority Retrieved 13 August 2020. Utah https://le.utah.gov/~2018/bills/static/sb0234.html
- Stevens T. 2021. Utah Inland Port removes west-side representatives from community advisory council without explanation. The Salt Lake Tribune. 2021 Mar 26.
- Stop The Polluting Port Coalition. 2020. Common sense vs. the Utah inland port: it’s time for answers to obvious questions Retrieved 22 June 2021. https://66701292-937d-4a98-8bdd-a8df4141811b.filesusr.com/ugd/b237b1_f25dfb8e44e94dc18c8724745f401878.pdf
- Utah Inland Port Authority. 2021. Envision Utah 2019 Accessed 22 June 2021. https://inlandportauthority.utah.gov/scenarios/
- Vanclay F. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 22(3):183–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6.
- Vanclay FM. 2005. Principles for social impact assessment: a critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26(1):3–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.05.002.
- Vanclay F. 2020. Reflections on social impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assess and Project Appraisal. 38(2):126–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1685807.
- Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, and Franks D. 2015. Social impact assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo ND: International Association for Impact Assessment.
- Wiegmans B, Witte P, Spit T. 2015. Inland port performance: a statistical analysis of Dutch inland ports. Transp Res Procedia. 8:145–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.06.050.
- Witte P, Wiegmans B, Ng AKY. 2019. A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research. J of Transp Geogr. 74:53–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.001.