Environment-related underlying dynamics of project adaptability: a case study of sponge-city PPPs in China

References

• Akanni PO, Oke AE, Akpomiemie OA. 2015. Impact of environmental factors on building project performance in Delta State, Nigeria. HBRC J. 11(1):91–97. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.02.010.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson CC, Renaud FG. 2021. A review of public acceptance of nature-based solutions: the ‘why’,‘when’, and ‘how’of success for disaster risk reduction measures. Ambio. 50(8):1552–1573. doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01502-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansah RH, Sorooshian S. 2017. Effect of lean tools to control external environment risks of construction projects. Sustain Cities Soc. 32:348–356. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashill NJ, Jobber D. 2014. The effects of the external environment on marketing decision-maker uncertainty. J Mark Manag. 30(3–4):268–294. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.811281.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay N, Klotz L. 2019. Role of community participation for green stormwater infrastructure development. J Environ Manage. 251:109620. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett J. 1991. International construction project management: general theory and practice. Oxford: Butterworths-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen KA. 1987. Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol. 17:37–69. doi:10.2307/271028.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JD. 2011. Likert items and scales of measurement. Statistics (Ber). 15(1):10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA, Moore MT. 2012. Confirmatory factor analysis. Handb Struct Equ Model. 361:379.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA. 2015. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. [place unknown]: Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. 2013. Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. [place unknown]: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne J, Green M, and Dallas S. 2019. WSUD implementation in a precinct residential development: perth case study. In Approaches to water sensitive urban des. Woodhead Publishing: Elsevier; p. 541–559.
   Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Scott D, Chan APL. 2005. Factors affecting the success of a construction project. J Constr Eng Manag. 130(1):153–155. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FKS, Griffiths JA, Higgitt D, Xu S, Zhu F, Tang Y-T, Xu Y, Thorne CR. 2018. “Sponge City” in China—A breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy. 76:772–778. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Fischer TB. 2022. The role of impact assessment in the development of urban green infrastructure: a review of EIA and SEA practices in Thailand. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(3):191–201. doi:10.1080/14615517.2022.2027075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung E, Chan APC, Kajewski S. 2012. Factors contributing to successful public private partnership projects. J Facil Manag. 10(1):45–58. doi:10.1108/14725961211200397.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming TL, Shackleton RT, Förster J, Dini J, Khan A, Gumula M, Kubiszewski I. 2017. Achieving the national development agenda and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) through investment in ecological infrastructure: a case study of South Africa. Ecosyst Serv. 27:253–260. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, van Rijswick HFMW, Driessen PPJ, Keessen AM. 2018. Governance of the sponge city programme in China with Wuhan as a case study. Int J Water Resour Dev. 34(4):578–596. doi:10.1080/07900627.2017.1373637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhi VSK, Mahalingam A. 2020. Relating institutions and governance strategies to project outcomes: study on public–private partnerships in infrastructure projects in India. J Manag Eng. 36(6):4020076. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmon J. 2021. Private sector investment in infrastructure: project finance, PPP projects and PPP frameworks. [place unknown]: Kluwer Law International BV.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson GH, Joo EM. 2019. Using green infrastructure to add value and assist place-making in public realm developments. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(6):464–478. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1648731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emeseh E. 2009. Social responsibility in practice in the oil producing Niger Delta: assessing corporations and government’s actions. J Sustain Dev Africa. 11(2):113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(1):34–42. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.660356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett G, Lamound J, Morzillo A, Chan F, Matsler A. 2015. Sustainable drainage systems: helping people live with water. Proc ICE-Water Manag. 169(2):94–104.
   Google Scholar
• Eybpoosh M, Dikmen I, Talat Birgonul M. 2011. Identification of risk paths in international construction projects using structural equation modeling. J Constr Eng Manag. 137(12):1164–1175. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Fawcett P, Clement S, Hayes S, Nowacki J. 2018. Consideration of urban green space in impact assessments for health. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 36(1):32–44. doi:10.1080/14615517.2017.1364021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, and González A. 2021. Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment [Internet]. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing. [accessed 2022 Jun 26]. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781789909920/9781789909920.xml
   Google Scholar
• Gain AK, Giupponi C, Wada Y. 2016. Measuring global water security towards sustainable development goals. Environ Res Lett. 11(12):124015. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallopín GC. 1996. Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach. Environ Model Assess. 1(3):101–117. doi:10.1007/BF01874899.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco C, Michelini L, Iasevoli G. 2015. Measuring value creation in social enterprises: a cluster analysis of social impact assessment models. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 44(6):1173–1193. doi:10.1177/0899764014555986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudiene N, Banaitis A, Podvezko V, Banaitiene N. 2014. Identification and evaluation of the critical success factors for construction projects in Lithuania: AHP approach. J Civ Eng Manag. 20(3):350–359. doi:10.3846/13923730.2014.914082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Li W, and Yuan J. 2019. Social impact assessment for sponge city PPPs: framework and indicators. In: Sustain build struct build a sustain tomorrow. Taylor & Francis Group: CRC Press; p. 319–328.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson TK, Hallin A. 2014. Rethinking dichotomization: a critical perspective on the use of “hard” and “soft” in project management research. Int J Proj Manag. 32(4):568–577. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. Technometrics. 31(3):130–131.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington D. 2009. Confirmatory factor analysis. New York (USA): Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawken S, Sepasgozar SME, Prodanovic V, Jing J, Bakelmun A, Avazpour B, Che S, Zhang K. 2021. What makes a successful Sponge City project? Expert perceptions of critical factors in integrated urban water management in the Asia-Pacific. Sustain Cities Soc. 75:103317. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge GA, and Greve C. 2016. On public-private partnership performance: a contemporary review. Public Work Manag Policy. [Internet]. 1–24. Accessed 26 June 2022. http://pwm.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1087724X16657830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holand IS. 2015. Lifeline issue in social vulnerability indexing: a review of indicators and discussion of indicator application. Nat Hazards Rev. 16(3):4014026.1–4014026.12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle RH. 1995. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. [place unknown]: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hui J, Rial I. 2017. Regulating local government financing vehicles and public–private partnerships in China. J Infrastructure, Policy Dev. Internet. 1(2):1–26. http://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/jipd/article/view/67.
   Google Scholar
• Jia H, Wang Z, Zhen X, Clar M, Shaw LY. 2017. China’s sponge city construction: a discussion on technical approaches. Front Environ Sci Eng. 11(4):1–11. doi:10.1007/s11783-017-0984-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Zevenbergen C, Fu D. 2017. Understanding the challenges for the governance of China’s “sponge cities” initiative to sustainably manage urban stormwater and flooding. Nat Hazards. 89(1):521–529. doi:10.1007/s11069-017-2977-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Zevenbergen C, Ma Y. 2018. Urban pluvial flooding and stormwater management: a contemporary review of China’s challenges and “sponge cities” strategy. Environ Sci Policy. 80:132–143. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiricka-Pürrer A, Fischer TB. 2022. Climate change in environmental assessment in Europe -A lot of potential and a lot to do. 1st Editio. [place unknown]: Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Routledge (chapter 7).
   Google Scholar
• Joseph C, Gunton TI, Hoffele J. 2020. Assessing the public interest in environmental assessment: lessons from cost-benefit analysis of an energy megaproject. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(5):397–411. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1780371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Wang S, Chan APC, Lam PTI. 2010. Preferred risk allocation in China’s public–private partnership (PPP) projects. Int J Proj Manag. 28(5):482–492. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan Z, Ali M, Kirikkaleli D, Wahab S, Jiao Z. 2020. The impact of technological innovation and public‐private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: consumption‐based carbon emissions analysis. Sustain Dev. 28(5):1317–1330. doi:10.1002/sd.2086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kineber AF, Othman I, Oke AE, Chileshe N, Buniya MK. 2021. Impact of value management on building projects success: structural equation modeling approach. J Constr Eng Manag. 147(4):4021011. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc K, Ekmekcioğlu Ö, Özger M. 2021. An integrated framework for the comprehensive evaluation of low impact development strategies. J Environ Manage. 294:113023. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesnikov YA, Pavlyuk AV, Radachinsky YN, Rodionova ND. 2018. Problems of implementation of public-private partnership in Russia. Eur Res Stud J. XXI(1):187–197. doi:10.35808/ersj/1171.
   Google Scholar
• Krajangsri T, Pongpeng J. 2017. Effect of sustainable infrastructure assessments on construction project success using structural equation modeling. J Manag Eng. 33(3):4016056. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuye JO. 2004. Continental policy targeting and the Nepadisation process: issues, trends and options. J Public Adm Spec Issue. 39(4):458–469.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova NV, Rahimova LM, Gafurova VM, Simakov D, Zinovyeva EG, Ivanova LA. 2017. External environment as a factor of ensuring the competitiveness of organizations in the regional market of medical services. Eur Res Stud. 20(4A):308–322.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner J. 2004. Strategy implementation tactics as response to organizational, strategic, and environmental imperatives. Manage Rev. 15(4):460–480.
   Google Scholar
• Leung S-O. 2011. A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point likert scales. J Soc Serv Res. 37(4):412–421. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.580697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CH. 2015. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 47(3):1–14. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li X, Li J, Fang X, Gong Y, and Wang W. 2016. Case studies of the sponge city program in China. In: World environ water resour congr; USA: Environmental and Water Resources Institute of ASCE. p. 295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Ding L, Ren M, Li C, Wang H. 2017. Sponge city construction in China: a survey of the challenges and opportunities. Water. 9(9):594. doi:10.3390/w9090594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Xia Q, Wen S, Wang L, and Lv L. 2019. Identifying factors affecting the sustainability of water environment treatment public-private partnership projects. Adv Civ Eng, 2019:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Wang F, Yu Y, Huang Z, Li M, Guan Y. 2019. Comprehensive performance evaluation of LID practices for the sponge city construction: a case study in Guangxi, China. J Environ Manage. 231(1):10–20. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li H, Lv L, Zuo J, Bartsch K, Xia Q, Xia Q. 2020. Determinants of public satisfaction with an Urban Water environment treatment PPP project in Xuchang, China. Sustain Cities Soc. 60:102244. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin G, Shen GQ, Sun M, Kelly J. 2011. Identification of key performance indicators for measuring the performance of value management studies in construction. J Constr Eng Manag. 137(9):698–706. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Wang Y, Wilkinson S. 2016. Identifying critical factors affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of tendering processes in public-private partnerships (PPPs): a comparative analysis of Australia and China. Int J Proj Manag. Internet. 34(4):701–716. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Love PED, Sing MCP, Smith J, Matthews J. 2017. PPP social infrastructure procurement: examining the feasibility of a lifecycle performance measurement framework. J Infrastruct Syst. 23(3):4016041. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wang Z, Skitmore M, Yan L. 2019. How contractor behavior affects engineering project value-added performance. J Manag Eng. 35(4):04019012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD). 2014. Technical guidance of sponge city construction [Internet]. accessed 2021 May 25]. https://www.chinappp.cn/upload/201605/04/201605041230521650.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Musa MM, Bin Amirudin R, Sofield T, Mus MA. 2015. Influence of external environmental factors on the success of public housing projects in developing countries. Constr Econ Build. 15(4):30–44. doi:10.5130/AJCEB.v15i4.4514.
   Google Scholar
• Mustow SE 2021. Chapter 13: Strategic environmental assessment in the water sector. In: Fischer T, González A, editors, Handb Strateg Environ Assess [ Internet]. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 203–218. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781789909920/9781789909920.00025.xml
   Google Scholar
• Njoroge JK, Ongeti WJ, Kinuu D, and Kasomi FM. 2016. Does external environment influence organizational performance? The case of Kenyan state corporations. Manag Organ Stud. 3(3):41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Olanipekun AO, Xia B, Hon C, Darko A. 2018. Effect of motivation and owner commitment on the delivery performance of green building projects. J Manag Eng. 34(1):4017039. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng S, Shi G, and Zhang R. 2019. Social stability risk assessment: status, trends and prospects —a case of land acquisition and resettlement in the hydropower sector. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 39(5):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira E, Ahn S, Han S, Abourizk SM. 2019. Finding causal paths between safety management system factors and accident precursors. J Manag Eng. 36(2):4019011–4019049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter K, Ward S, Shaw D, Macdonald N, White I, Fischer TB, Butler D, Kellagher R. 2011. Engineers and planners: sustainable water management alliances. Proc Inst Civ Eng Eng Sustain. 164(4):239–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin HP, Li ZX, Fu G. 2013. The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics. J Environ Manage. 129C:577–585. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. 2006. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res. 99(6):323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Liu Y, Zuo J, Pan N, Ma G. 2015. On the management of social risks of hydraulic infrastructure projects in China: a case study. Int J Proj Manag. 33(3):483–496. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha A, Chan T-K, Aibinu AA, Chen C. 2017. Efficient risk transfer in PPP wastewater treatment projects. Util Policy. 48:132–140. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2017.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RP, Bwalya D, and Fu D. 2018. Feasibility and adaptability of sponge city concept: a case study of Lusaka. Zambia: Researchgate; p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Suopajärvi L. 2013. Social impact assessment in mining projects in Northern Finland : comparing practice to theory. Environ Impact Assess Rev [Internet]. 42:25–30. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamirat NY, Muse HA. 2020. Construction project success under uncertainty: interrelations among the external environment, intellectual capital, and project attributes. J Constr Eng Manag. 146(10):5020012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq S, Zhang X. 2020. Critical failure drivers in international water PPP projects. J Infrastruct Syst. Internet. 26(4):04020038. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. 2011. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2:53–55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tilt B, Braun Y, He D. 2009. Social impacts of large dam projects: a comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. J Environ Manage. 90(suppl.3):S249–S257. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de Meene SJ, Brown RR, Farrelly MA. 2011. Towards understanding governance for sustainable urban water management. Glob Environ Chang. 21(3):1117–1127. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 22(3):183–211. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 21(1):5–12. doi:10.3152/147154603781766491.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks DM. 2015. Social Impact Assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. [Internet]. [place unknown]: International Association for Impact Assessment. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SIA_Guidance_Document_IAIA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2017. Project-induced displacement and resettlement: from impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development? Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35(1):3–21. doi:10.1080/14615517.2017.1278671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent K. 2004. Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change in Africa. Norwich (U.K): Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vörösmarty CJ, Osuna VR, Cak AD, Bhaduri A, Bunn SE, Corsi F, Gastelumendi J, Green P, Harrison I, Lawford R. 2018. Ecosystem-based water security and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 18(4):317–333. doi:10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Li F. 2016. Daily activity space and exposure: a comparative study of Hong Kong’s public and private housing residents’ segregation in daily life. Cities. 59:148–155. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Sun M, Song B. 2017. Public perceptions of and willingness to pay for sponge city initiatives in China. Resour Conserv Recycl. 122:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. 1996. Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Journl Emerg Prim Heal Care. 19(5):42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wong THF, Rogers BC, Brown RR. 2020. Transforming cities through water-sensitive principles and practices. One Earth. 3(4):436–447. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Yan Q, Wang X, He S, Zhu L 2010. Research on entropy-TOPSIS in external environment evaluation of power grid corporation. In: NEET 2010;International Conf Nucl energy Eng Technol. Beijing (China): Communications in Computer and Information Science,Springer Science and Media; p. 420–427 ( 8).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Sun X, Xue H. 2019. Identifying critical risks in sponge city PPP projects using DEMATEL method: a case study of China. J Clean Prod. 226:949–958. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuhair MH, Kurian PA. 2016. Socio-economic and political barriers to public participation in EIA: implications for sustainable development in the Maldives. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 34(2):129–142. doi:10.1080/14615517.2016.1176404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar