Contextual challenges for implementing strategic environmental assessment in the Global South: insights from a case study in Mexico

References

• Ahumada Cervantes B, Espejel Carbajal MI, Arámburo Vizcarra G. 2011. Beneficios potenciales de la evaluación ambiental estratégica en la planeación del desarrollo en México, caso de estudio el Programa Nacional de Infraestructura 2007-2012. Investigación Ambiental: Ciencia y Política Publica. 3 2 :5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Annandale D, Fischer TB, Montaño M, Purcell C, Coles J, Aung T. 2021. Guidelines for strategic environmental assessment in developing countries: examples from Asia. In:Fischer , TB, Gonzalez, A, editors. Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 126–139. doi:10.4337/9781789909937.00019.
   Google Scholar
• Azcárate J, Balfors B, Bring A, Destouni G. 2013. Strategic environmental assessment and monitoring: arctic key gaps and bridging pathways. Environ Res Lett. 8(4):044033. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker J, Sheate WR, Phillips P, Eales R. 2013. Ecosystem services in environmental assessment — help or hindrance? Environ Impact Assess Rev, Ecosystem Services in EIA and SEA. 40:3–13. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbedo J, Miguez M, van der Horst D, Marins M. 2014. Enhancing ecosystem services for flood mitigation: a conservation strategy for peri-urban landscapes? Ecol Soc. 19. doi:10.5751/ES-06482-190254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl J, Köppel J, Rodorff V, Huesca Pérez ME, Zimmermann A, Geißler G, Rehhausen A. 2019. Implementing strategic environmental assessment in countries of the global South – an analysis within the Peruvian context. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 77:23–39. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bina O. 2008. Context and systems: thinking more broadly about effectiveness in strategic environmental assessment in China. Environ Manage. 42(4):717–733. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9123-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2021. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual Psychol. doi:10.1037/qup0000196.
   Google Scholar
• Brownlie S, Treweek J. 2018. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment international best practice principles, special publication series No. 3. Fargo (USA): International Association for Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Swangjang K, Morrison-Saunders A. 2021. Addressing the spectrum of strategic environmental assessment potential: evolving practice in Thailand and its effectiveness. In: Fischer TB, Gonzalez A, editors. Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 402–423. doi:10.4337/9781789909937.00040.
   Google Scholar
• Cherp A, Partidário MR, Arts J. 2010. From formulation to implementation: strengthening SEA through follow-up. In: Sadler, B, Dusik, J, Fischer, TB, Partidario, M, Verheem, R, Aschemann, R, editors. Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London, UK: Routledge; p. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Congreso del Estado de Jalisco. 2008. Código Urbano para el Estado de Jalisco. Guadalajara, México: Congreso del Estado de Jalisco.
   Google Scholar
• Dirección de Planeación Urbana y Ecología (DPUE). 2020. Programa Municipal de Desarrollo Urbano del Municipio de Puerto Vallarta Visión 2050. H. Jalisco:Ayuntamiento Constitucional de Puerto Vallarta.
   Google Scholar
• The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) (Ed.), 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. UNEP, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Enlace Ambiental y Proyectos. 2020. Evaluación Ambiental del Programa Municipal de Desarrollo Urbano 2050 para el Municipio de Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco y sus Planes Parciales. Puerto Vallarta, México: Enlace Ambiental y Proyectos.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2005. HAVING AN IMPACT? CONTEXT ELEMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE SEA APPLICATION IN TRANSPORT POLICY, PLAN AND PROGRAMME MAKING. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 7(3):407–432. doi:10.1142/S1464333205002158.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007. The theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: towards a more systematic approach. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781849775922.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, González A. 2021. Conclusions: towards a theory of strategic environmental assessment? Handb Strateg Environ Assess. 425–437.
   Google Scholar
• Fundingsland-Tetlow M, Hanusch M. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 30(1):15–24. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.666400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego Dávila J, Azcárate J, Kørnøv L. 2019. Strategic Environmental Assessment for development programs and sustainability transition in the Colombian post-conflict context. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 74:35–42. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneletti D. 2013a. Ecosystem services in environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneletti D. 2013b. Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:25–35. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneletti D, Adem Esmail B, Cortinovis C, Arany I, Balzan M, van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges P, Borisova B, Broekx S, et al. 2020. Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies. One Ecosyst. 5:e53111. doi:10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111.
   Google Scholar
• González A. 2022. Strategic environmental assessment monitoring: the enduring forgotten sibling. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40:1–9. doi:10.1080/14615517.2022.2031552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A, Therivel R. 2022. Raising the game in environmental assessment: insights from tiering practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 92:106695. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon A, Langford WT, Todd JA, White MD, Mullerworth DW, Bekessy SA. 2011. Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies. Environ Model Softw. 26(12):1481–1488. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnell K, Mulligan M, Francis RA, Hole DG. 2019. Evaluating natural infrastructure for flood management within the watersheds of selected global cities. Sci Total Environ. 670:411–424. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez M, Bekessy S, Gordon A. 2021. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: an evaluation of six Australian cases. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 87:13. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug S. 2021. A Thirdspace approach to the ‘Global South’: insights from the margins of a popular category. Third World Q. 42(9):2018–2038. doi:10.1080/01436597.2020.1712999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner R, Carmody P. 2020. Global North/South. In: Kobayashi, A, editor. International encyclopedia of human geography. Elsevier; p. 181–187. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10648-1.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Información Estadística y Geográfica del Estado de Jalisco (IIEG Jalisco), 2021. Puerto Vallarta: Diagnóstico Municipal 2021 [WWW Document]. [accessed 2022 July 7]. https://iieg.gob.mx/ns/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Puerto-Vallarta-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Rajvanshi A. 2021. Strategic environmental assessment in India: trends and prospects. In: Fischer, TB, Gonzalez, A, editors. Handbook on strategic environmental assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 388–401. doi:10.4337/9781789909937.00039.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Esen SE, Yashiro M. 2013. Linking ecosystem services to strategic environmental assessment in development policies. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:75–81. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luján Álvarez C, Olivas García JM, Magaña Magaña JE. 2004. Evaluación estratégica del desarrollo forestal sustentable en Chihuahua, México. Región Soc. 16:85–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ma S, Lin B, Yun S-J. 2022. Strategic environmental assessment implementation: variation across regions in China. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(4):283–295. doi:10.1080/14615517.2022.2050666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvestio AC, Montaño M. 2019. From medicine to poison: how flexible strategic environmental assessment may be? Lessons from a non-regulated SEA system. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 1–15. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1574390.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden S. 1998. Importance of context in measuring the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 16(4):255–266. doi:10.1080/14615517.1998.10600136.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister LK, 2008. Enforcement Style in the Global South, in: The Virtues & Vices of Legalism – A Conference Honoring the Work of Robert A. Kagan. Berkeley, CA, p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Menos Dos Grados Consultores SC. 2020. Programa Municipal de Cambio Climatico de Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco 2020-2030, Gaceta Municipal de Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco. Jalisco (Puerto Vallarta, Mexico): H. Ayuntamiento Constitucional de Puerto Vallarta.
   Google Scholar
• Mills A, Durepos G, Wiebe E. 2010. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412957397.
   Google Scholar
• Montañez-Cartaxo LE. 2014. Strategic environmental assessment in the Mexican electricity sector. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 16(2):1450012. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500124.
   Google Scholar
• Montaño M, Fischer TB. 2018. Towards a more effective approach to the development and maintenance of sea guidance. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 1–10. doi:10.1080/14615517.2018.1550185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaño M, Oppermann P, Malvestio AC, Souza MP. 2014. CURRENT STATE OF THE SEA SYSTEM IN BRAZIL: a COMPARATIVE STUDY. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 16(2):1450022. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500227.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro MB, Do Rosário Partidário M, Meuleman L. 2018. A comparative analysis on how different governance contexts may influence strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:79–87. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J. 2004. Introduction to EIA Follow-up. In: Morrison-Saunders, A, Arts, J, editors. Assessing Impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morzaria-Luna HN, Cruz-Piñón G, Brusca RC, López-Ortiz AM, Moreno-Báez M, Reyes-Bonilla H, Turk-Boyer P. 2018. Biodiversity hotspots are not congruent with conservation areas in the Gulf of California. Biodivers Conserv. 27(14):3819–3842. doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1631-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment (NCEA), 2022. ESIA/SEA per country [WWW Document]. [accessed 2022 October 5]. https://www.eia.nl/en/countries
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Applying Strategic Environmental Assessment, DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Mexico 2013. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Orienta. 2018. Evaluación Ambiental Estratégica del Proceso de Planeación Territorial de El Bajío. Zapopan (Jalisco): Orienta Agenda-Pública.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Vega R. 2020. Environmental regulation, governance, and policy instruments, 20 years after the stick, carrot, and sermon typology. J Environ Policy Plan. 22(5):620–635. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palerm J. 2005. Needs and opportunities for SEA in Mexico: a view through the Arcediano dam case study. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 23(2):125–134. doi:10.3152/147154605781765607.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MDR. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment better practice guide: methodological guidance for strategic thinking in SEA. Lisbon: Portuguese Environmental Agency and Redes Energéticas Nacionais (REN), SA.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário M, Fischer T. 2004. Follow-up in current SEA understanding. In: Morrison-Saunders, A, Arts, J, editors. Assessing Impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-Up. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR, Gomes RC. 2013. Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:36–46. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partidário MR, Paddon M, Eggenberger M, Chau DM, Van Duyen N. 2008. Linking strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and city development strategy in Vietnam. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 26(3):219–227. doi:10.3152/146155108X365861.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters R, Dussauge Laguna MI. 2021. Acting out or playing along: a typology of citizens’ low trust responses to public organizations. Governance. 34(4):965–981. doi:10.1111/gove.12631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. 2019. NVivo 12 Pro. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
   Google Scholar
• Rega C, Baldizzone G. 2015. Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: a practitioners’ perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:105–115. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief F, Jones C, Jay S. 2008. The emperor’s new clothes — reflections on strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice in South Africa. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(7):504–514. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigo-Ilarri J, González-González L, Rodrigo-Clavero M-E, Cassiraga E. 2020. Advances in implementing strategic environmental assessment (SEA) techniques in central America and the Caribbean. Sustainability. 12(10):4039. doi:10.3390/su12104039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar H, Driessen PPJ. 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 25(1):2–14. doi:10.3152/146155107X190613.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B, Dusík J. Eds. 2016. European and international experiences of strategic environmental assessment: recent progress and future prospects. London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tejeda González JC, De La Torre A, Ma C, Medellín Milán P. 2014. Present status of the implementation of strategic environmental assessment in Mexico. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 16(2):1450021. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500215.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R, González A. 2021. “Ripe for decision”: tiering in environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 87:106520. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treweek J, Therivel R, Thompson S, Slater M. 2005. Principles for the use of strategic environmental assessment as a tool for promoting the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 7(2):173–199. doi:10.1142/S1464333205002043.
   Google Scholar
• Tshibangu GM, Montaño M. 2019. Outcomes and contextual aspects of strategic environmental assessment in a non-mandatory context: the case of Brazil. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 0:1–10. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1603715.
   Google Scholar
• Unalan D, Cowell R. 2019. Strategy, context and strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 79:106305. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarreal-Rosas J, Sonter LJ, Runting RK, López-Cubillos S, Dade MC, Possingham HP, Rhodes JR. 2020. Advancing systematic conservation planning for ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol. 35(12):1129–1139. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2020.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead AL, Kujala H, Wintle BA. 2017. Dealing with cumulative biodiversity impacts in strategic environmental assessment: a new frontier for conservation planning. Conserv Lett. 10(2):195–204. doi:10.1111/conl.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirutskulshai U, Sajor E, Coowanitwong N. 2011. Importance of context in adoption and progress in application of strategic environmental assessment: experience of Thailand. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(3):352–359. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff E, Rauf HA, Diep L, Natakun B, Kelly K, Hamel P. 2022. Implementing participatory nature-based solutions in the Global South. Front Sustain Cities. 4. doi:10.3389/frsc.2022.956534.
   Google Scholar
• Zardo L, Geneletti D, Pérez-Soba M, Van Eupen M. 2017. Estimating the cooling capacity of green infrastructures to support urban planning. Ecosyst Serv. 26:225–235. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Christensen P, Kørnøv L. 2013. Review of critical factors for SEA implementation. Environ Impact Assess. Rev. 38:88–98. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar