Substantive, normative and transactive effectiveness of EIA: perception of key actors in Namibia

References

• Ali Z, Khan D, Hussain R. 2012. Adaptation measures in EIA and risk management: an overview of the legal framework in Pakistan. TOJSTAT. 2(3):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Runhaar HA, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Laerhoven FV, Driessen PP, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. journal of Environ Assess Policy, Manage Theory Pract. 14(04):171–210.
   Google Scholar
• Baker DC, McLelland JN. 2003. Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia’s environmental assessment process for first nations’ participation in mining development. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23(5):581–603. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00093-3.
   Google Scholar
• Betey CB, Godfred E. 2013. Environmental impact assessment and sustainable development in Africa: a critical review. null. 3(2):37. doi:10.5539/enrr.v3n2p37.
   Google Scholar
• Bina O, Jing W, Brown L, Partidário MR. 2011. An inquiry into the concept of SEA effectiveness: towards criteria for Chinese practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(6):572–581. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2013. Conceptualizing the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:65–72. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke B, Cong VC. 2021. EIA effectiveness in Vietnam: key stakeholder perceptions. Heliyon. 7(2):e06157. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz FB, Veronez FA, Montaño M. 2018. Evidence of learning processes in EIA systems. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 36(3):242–252. doi:10.1080/14615517.2018.1445177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes J. 2008. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. Int J Market Res. 50(1):61–77. doi:10.1177/147078530805000106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diduck AP, Pratap D, Sinclair AJ, Deane S. 2013. Perceptions of impacts, public participation and learning in the planning, assessment, and mitigation of two hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand, India. Land Use Policy. 33:170–182. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte CG, Dibo APA, Siqueira-Gay J, Sánchez LE. 2017. Practitioners’ perceptions of the Brazilian environmental impact assessment system: results from a survey. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35(4):293–309. doi:10.1080/14615517.2017.1322813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Fadl K, El-Fadel M. 2004. Comparative assessment of EIA systems in MENA countries: challenges and prospects. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 24(6):553–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans T, Wingard J, Humle T. 2021. The mitigation hierarchy in environmental impact assessment and related legislation as a tool for species conservation: a case study of western chimpanzees and mining development. Biol Conserv. 261:109237. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hapuarachchi AB, Hughey K, Rennie H. 2016. Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in addressing development-induced disasters: a comparison of the EIA processes of Sri Lanka and New Zealand. Natural Hazards. 81(1):423–445. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-2089-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husselmann SE (2016). Environmental impact assessment in Namibia: the effectiveness of the system and its implementation in practice Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2016. 25 years of the UK EIA System: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:19–26. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BTB. 2000. Lessons learned and impacts of the Living in a Finite Environment (LIFE) Project Phase 1: development of effective, representative conservancy management committees. LIFE project. Windhoek: World Wildlife Fund-Canon.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph G (2018). Towards improving the contribution of the EIA process to environmental governance: analysis of Namibian case studies Doctoral Dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Khan M, Chaudhry MN, Ahmad SR, Saif S, Mehmood A. 2020. Performance of EIA authority and effectiveness of EIA system in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 81:106357. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi F, Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2019. Enhancing EIA systems in developing countries: a focus on capacity development in the case of Iran. Sci Total Environ. 670:425–432. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiaka RD (2018). Environmental (In) Justice in Namibia: Costs and benefits of community-based water and wildlife management Doctoral dissertation, Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowska-Malina J. 2016. Environmental compensation and mitigation impacts of road investments in EIA in Poland. In: Infrastructure and ecology of rural area journal: polska Akademia Nauk. Komisja Technicznej Infrastruktury Ws: Oddział W Krakowie; pp. S. 643–657.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis JJ, Dziedzic M. 2018. Evaluating EIA systems’ effectiveness: a state of the art. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 68:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madlome SF (2016). Evaluation of the effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment in promoting sustainable development in the energy sector of South Africa Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Science, School of Environmental Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Marara M, Okello N, Kuhanwa Z, Douven W, Beevers L, Leentvaar J. 2011. The importance of context in delivering effective EIA: case studies from East Africa. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(3):286–296. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan R. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(1):5–14. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Fischer TB. 2006. What is wrong with EIA and SEA anyway? A sceptic’s perspective on sustainability assessment. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 08(01):19–39. doi:10.1142/S1464333206002372.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen M, Fischer TB. 2016. Special issue on ex-post evaluation of environmental assessment. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 18(1):1601001. 4 pages. doi:10.1142/S1464333216010018.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircherllaigh C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(1):19–27. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partidario MR, Monteiro MB. 2019. Strategic environmental assessment effectiveness in Portugal. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):247–265. doi:10.1080/14615517.2018.1558746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rega C, Singer JP, Geneletti D. 2018. Investigating the substantive effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment of urban planning: evidence from Italy and Spain. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 73:60–69. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson LW, Philip D, Alejandra O, (2012). Framework for assessing governance for landscape-level ecosystem-based management – Draft 2.1. PAPR Working Paper No. 13. [online] URL: http://www.papr.co.ca/index.php?p=1_25_Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B, (1996). International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment. Final report environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson NP, Basta C. 2018. Sufficiently capable of effective participation in environmental impact assessment? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 70:57–70. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosovele H. 2011. Governance challenges in Tanzania’s environmental impact assessment practice. Afr J Environ Sci Technol. 5(2):126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss SJ (2022). An evaluation of the effectiveness of public participation in environmental impact assessments: a Namibian case study.
   Google Scholar
• Suiseeya KRM (2020). Procedural justice matters: power, representation, and participation in environmental governance. Environmental Justice, 37–51. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Țăpurică OC, Ispășoiu CE. 2013. Analyzing the influence of environmental leadership on pollution abatement costs. Young Econ J Rev Tinerilor Economisti. 10(20).
   Google Scholar
• Tarr P, Tarr J. 2003. Namibia: summary and future focus. Windhoek, Namibia: Southern African Institute for Environmental Assessment (SAIEA).
   Google Scholar
• Theophilou V, Bond A, Cashmore M. 2010. Application of the SEA directive to EU structural funds: perspectives on effectiveness. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(2):136–144. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokarczyk-Dorociak K, Kazak JK, Anna H, Szewrański S, Świąder M. 2019. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Poland. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):279–291. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1601441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veronez FA, Montaño M (2015, October). EIA effectiveness: a conceptual basis for an integrative approach. In IAIA15 Conference Proceedings: Impact Assessment in the Digital Era. Florence, Italy, (April 6).
   Google Scholar
• Weber B, Mendelsohn J (2017). Informal settlements in Namibia- their nature and growth: exploring ways to make Namibian urban development more socially just and inclusive. Occasional paper 1. Development Workshop Namibia Ausspannplatz, Windhoek, Namibia.
   Google Scholar
• Wood C. 1995. Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar