Who is involved in environmental and social impact assessment public participation? Observations on urban and rural practices in Malawi

References

• Agrawal T. 2014. Educational inequality in rural and urban India. Int J Educ Dev. 34(1):11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso S, Keane J, Merkel W. 2011. The Future of representative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511770883.
   Google Scholar
• André P, Enserink B, Conner D, Croal P. 2006. Public Participation: international best practice principles. Special Publications Series. 34(4). Available at. [Accessed:7 March 2018]. https://conferences.iaia.org/2008/pdf/IAIA08Proceedings/IAIA08ConcurrentSessions/CS5-4_Assessing-Public-Participation-Best-Practice-Principles_Enserink.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anuar MINM, Saruwono M. 2018. Obstacles of public participation in the design process of public parks. null. 3(6):147–155. doi:10.21834/jabs.v3i6.247.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Runhaar HACF, Jha-Thakur U, Fischer, TB, Laerhoven U, Driessen FV, P J P, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 14(4):1–40. doi:10.1142/S1464333212500251.
   Google Scholar
• Atieno OL, Mutui FN, Wabwire E. 2019. An analysis of the factors affecting public participation in environmental impact assessment: case study of selected projects in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Eur Sci J. 15(9):284–303. doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n9p284.
   Google Scholar
• Bawole JN. 2013. Public hearing or “hearing public”? An evaluation of the participation of local stakeholders in Environmental Impact Assessment of Ghana’s Jubilee oil fields. Environ Manage. 52(2):385–397. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0086-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammack D, Kanyongolo E, O’Neil T (2009) ‘Town Chiefs’ in Malawi. Africa Power and politics Working Paper No. 3. Availableat: 10.1.1.671.7919(Accessed: 6 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Canter LW, Wood C (1996) Environmental impact assessment. Available at: https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadg551.pdf (Accessed: 6 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Chingaipe H (2013) ‘Green belt initiative: an assessment of the policy processes and Civic engagement’Lilongwe:CISANET. Available: https://www.academia.edu/4683289/Policy_Processes_and_Civic_Engagement_in_the_Greenbelt_Initiative (Accessed:12 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Chinsinga B. 2006. The Interface between Tradition and Modernity. Civilisations. 54(54):255–274. doi:10.4000/civilisations.498.
   Google Scholar
• Chiweza AL. 2007. The ambivalent role of chiefs: rural recentralization initiatives in Malawi. In: Buur L Kydd HM, editors. State recognition and democratization in sub-Saharan Africa: a new dawn for traditional authorities? New York: Palgrave; pp. 53–78. 10.1057/9780230609716_3
   Google Scholar
• Chiweza AL. 2021. Discursive construction of citizen participation in democratic decentralisation discourses in Malawi. null. 29(1):23–55.
   Google Scholar
• Devente J, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Valente S, Newig J. 2016. How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. Ecol Soc. 21(2):24. doi:10.5751/ES-08053-210224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Stern PC. 2008. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eggen Ø. 2011. Chiefs and everyday governance: parallel state organisations in Malawi. J South Afr Stud. 37(2):313–331. doi:10.1080/03057070.2011.579436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007. Theory and Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment -towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, González A, eds. 2021. Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Kidd S, Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D. 2009. Learning through EC directive-based SEA in spatial planning? Evidence from the Brunswick region in Germany. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(6):421–428. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa J. 2004. Representation, community leadership and participation: citizen involvement in neighbourhood renewal and local governance. Report, Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, Office Of Deputy Prime Minister, July, 04. Accessed:7 March 2018, Available at. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/12494/Gaventa_2004_representation.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• George TE, Karatu K, Edward A. 2020. An evaluation of the Environmental Impact Assessment practice in Uganda: challenges and opportunities for achieving sustainable development. Heliyon. 6(9):e04758. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 2019. ‘Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment.’, 5th, ed. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429470738
   Google Scholar
• Glucker AN, Driessen PPJ, Kolhoff A, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment: why who and how? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:104–111. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoM(GovernmentofMalawi). 1967 ‘Chief’sact’, Available at : https://www.ecolex.org/details/legislation/chiefs-act-cap-2203-lex-faoc117646/]. (Accessed:5 December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• GoM (Government of Malawi) 1997. ‘Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines’, Available at: http://www.sdnp.org.mw/enviro/eia/chap1.html (Accessed: 6 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• GoM(Government of Malawi). 1998. Malawi Decentralisation Policy’, Available at: https://npc.mw/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Decentralization-policy.pdf ( Accessed: 10 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• GoM (Government of Malawi). 2004. ‘National Environmental Policy’Malawi. Available at: http://www.sdnp.org.mw/environment/policy/NEP1.htm (Accessed: 4 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• GoM (Government of Malawi). 2016b ‘Customary Land Act 2016’. Available at:https://www.ecolex.org/details/legislation/customary-land-act-no-19-of-2016-lex-faoc170882 (Accessed: 3 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• GoM (Government of Malawi) ‘Land Act (2016b)’. Available at https://leap.unep.org/countries/mw/national-legislation/land-act-2016-no-16-2016 (Accessed: 3 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• GoM (Government of Malawi). 2017a ‘Environment Management Act’. Available at: https://ead.gov.mw/storage/app/media/Resources/Miscellaneous (Accessed: 20 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• GoM (Government of Malawi). 2017b. Lilongwe district council socio-economic profile: 2017 - 2022. Available at: https://www.collectionbooks.net/pdf/lilongwe-district-socio-economic-profile (Accessed: 20 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Hasan MA, Nahiduzzaman KM, Aldosary AS. 2018. Public participation in EIA: a comparative study of the projects run by the government and non-governmental organizations. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:12–24. doi:10.1016/J.EIAR.2018.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe M, Botterman S. 2011. Urbanization, community size, and population density: is there a rural-urban divide in participation in voluntary organizations or social network formation? Nonprofit And Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 41(1):120–144. doi:10.1177/0899764011398297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter DB. 2016. International environmental law. In: Harris PG, editor. Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics. London and New York: Routledge; pp. 124–137. doi:10.4324/9780203799055.ch10.
   Google Scholar
• IFPRI. 2019. IFPRI Key Facts Series : Poverty May 2019 Background to the Integrated Household Surveys, Ifpri. Available at: https://massp.ifpri.info/files/2019/05/IFPRI_KeyFacts_Poverty_Final.pdf (Accessed: 7 May 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Kabanga L, Mooya MM. 2017. Assessing compensation for customary property rights in Malawi: the case of Mombera University project. null. 2(4):483–496. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.280029.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr RB. 2005. Food security in northern Malawi: gender, kinship relations and entitlements in historical context. J South Afr Stud. 31(1):53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita SM. 2019. Barriers or enablers? Chiefs, elite capture, disasters, and resettlement in rural Malawi. Disasters. 43(1):135–156. doi:10.1111/disa.12295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessmann C, Seidel A. 2017. Regional inequality, convergence, and its determinants–A view from outer space. Eur Econ Rev. 92:110–132. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzuki A. 2015. Challenges in the Public Participation and the Decision Making Process. Sociologija i prostor/Sociology & Space. 53(1). doi:10.5673/sip.53.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos S, Papaioannou E. 2015. On the ethnic origins of African development: chiefs and precolonial political centralization. Acad Manage Perspect. 29(1):32–71. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RK, Hart A, Freeman C, Coutts B, Colwill D, Hughes A. 2012. Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 32(1):11–24. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Early G 2008. What is necessary to ensure natural justice in environmental impact assessment decision-making?. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 26(1):29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Muriaas R, Wang V, Benstead L, Dulani B, Rakner L. 2020. It takes a female chief: gender and effective policy advocacy in Malawi. SSRN Electron J. 11. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3676333.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Fischer TB. 2011. An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(1):36–47. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPC (National Planning Commision) 2020. Available at: https://npc.mw/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/MW2063-VISION-FINAL.pdf (Accessed: 29 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• NSO (National Statistical Office). 2019. Malawi Poverty Report 2018. Available at: file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/malawi_poverty_report.pdf (Accessed: 19 December 2017).
   Google Scholar
• NSO (National Statistical Office). 2020. ‘The Fifth Integrated Household Survey (IHS5) 2020 Report’ Available at: http://www.nsomalawi.mw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=230&Itemid=111(Accessed: 19 December 2017).
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(1):19–27. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojogbo SE. 2018. Public participation and environmental degradation in developing markets: the challenges in focusing on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Nigeria. Legal Issues Journal. 6(1):37–60. doi:10.4236/blr.2021.121007.
   Google Scholar
• Palerm JAR. 2000. An empirical-theoretical analysis framework for PP in Environmental Impact Assessment. J Environ Assess Policy Management. 43(5):581–600. doi:10.1080/713676582.
   Google Scholar
• Petts J. 2007. Learning about learning: lessons from public engagement and deliberation on urban river restoration. Geogr J. 173(4):300–311. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00254.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer J. 2013. Municipalities and community participation: a sourcebook for capacity building.Abingdon. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rega C, Baldizzone G. 2015. ‘Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment’,: a practitioners’ perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:105–115. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainath NV, Rajan KS. 2015. Meta-analysis of EIA public hearings in the state of Gujarat, India: its role versus the goal of environmental management. Impact Assessment And Project Appraisal. 33(2):148–153. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.964085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair AJ, Doelle M, Gibson RB. 2021. Next generation impact assessment: exploring the key components. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(1):3–19. doi:10.1080/14615517.2021.1945891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Krannich RS. 2000. ‘Culture Clash Revisited’, Newcomer and Longer‐Term Residents’ Attitudes Toward Land Use, Development, and Environmental Issues in Rural Communities in the Rocky Mountain West. Rural Sociol. 65(3):396–421. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00036.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauss K, Boyas J, Murphy-Erby Y. 2012. Implementing and evaluating a rural community-based sexual abstinence program: challenges and solutions. Sex Educ. 12(1):47–63. doi:10.1080/14681811.2011.601158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwanteep K, Murayama T, Nishikizawa S. 2017. The quality of Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports in Thailand. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 19(2):1750008–1750021. doi:10.1142/S1464333217500089.
   Google Scholar
• Swapan MSH. 2016. Participatory urban governance in Bangladesh: a study of the gap between promise and realities. Environ Urban. 7(2):196–213. doi:10.1177/0975425316652548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieleman J, Uitermark J. 2019. ‘Chiefs in the city: traditional authority in the modern state. Sociology. 53(4):707–723. doi:10.1177/0038038518809325.
   Google Scholar
• Trosper R, Nelson H, Hoberg G, Smith P, Nikolakis. 2008. Institutional determinants of profitable commercial forestry enterprises among First Nations in Canada. Can J for Res. 38(2):226–238. doi:10.1139/X07-167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USAID. 2018. ‘Sociological analysis of traditional authorities in Malawi: democracy, rights and governance’. USAID in partnership with the Department of Political and Administrative Studies. Zomba: Chancellor CollegeUniversity of Malawi.
   Google Scholar
• Veneklasen L, Miller V, Budlender D, Clark C. 2007. ‘A New Weave of Power, People & Politics’–The Action Guide for Advocacy and Citizen Participation (Warwickshire, UK) Available at: https://justassociates.org/all-resources/a-new-weave-of-power-people-politics-the-action-guide-for-advocacy-and-citizen-participation/Accessible on 6 January 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Waheed A, Fischer T, Khan MI. 2021. Climate change policy coherence across policies, plans, and strategies in Pakistan—Implications for the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Plan. Environ Manage. 67(5):793–810. Accessible on 9 January 2019, 10.1007/s00267-021-01449-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassen MJ, Runhaar H, Barendregt A, Okruszko T. 2011. Evaluating the role of participation in modeling studies for environmental planning. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 38(2):338–358. doi:10.1068/b35114.
   Google Scholar
• Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O. 1995. Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 15(5):443–463. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E.
   Google Scholar
• Wood C. 2003. ‘Environmental impact assessment in developing countries: an overview’. Paper for conference on New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: methods and Practices. Manchester: EIA Centre, School of Planning and Landscape, Univesity of Manchester. Available at:https://www.academia.edu/3420793/Environmental_impact_assessment_in_developing_countries_an_overview (Accessed: 3 February 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Yao X, He J, Bao C. 2020. Public participation modes in China’ s environmental impact assessment process: an analytical framework based on participation extent and conflictlevel. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 84(1):106400. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106400.
   Google Scholar