References
- Anderson EP, Jenkins CN, Heilpern S, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Carvajal-Vallejos FM, Encalada AC, Rivadeneira JF, Hidalgo M, Cañas CM, Ortega H, et al. 2018. Fragmentation of Andes-to-Amazon connectivity by hydropower dams. Sci Adv. 4(1):eaao1642. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao1642.
- Benhin JKA. 2006. Agriculture and deforestation in the tropics: a critical theoretical and empirical review. AMBIO: A J Hum Environ. 35(1):9–16. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-35.1.9.
- Berges L, Avon C, Bezombes L, Clauzel C, Duflot R, Foltête JC, Gaucherand S, Girardet X, Spiegelberger T. 2020. Environmental mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets revisited through habitat connectivity modelling. J Environ Manage. 256:109950. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109950.
- Berg M, Scheringer M. 1994. Problems in environmental risk assessment and the need for proxy measures. Fresenius Environ Bull. 3(8):487–492.
- Bryman A, Bell E. 2019. Social Research Methods. Canadian Edition. 5th ed. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press. p. 456.
- Chetkiewicz C, Lintner A 2014. Getting it right in Ontario’s far North: The need for a regional strategic environmental assessment in the Ring of Fire (Wawangajing). Wildlife Conservation Society Canada and Ecojustice. [accessed 5 Nov 2022]. https://www.wcscanada.org/Publications/Conservation-Reports.aspx.
- [CMS] Convention on Migratory Species. 2020. Improving ways of addressing connectivity in the conservation of migratory species, Resolution 12.26 (REV.COP13). ( 17-22 February 2020). UNEP/CMS/COP13/CRP 26.4.4. Gandhinagar, India: [accessed 5 Aug 2022]. https://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/document/
- Cumming K, Tavares D. 2022. Using strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment to assess ecological connectivity at multiple scales in a national park context. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(6):507–516. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2031553.
- Drinnan IN. 2005. The search for fragmentation thresholds in a southern Sydney suburb. Biol Conserv. 124(3):339–349. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.040.
- [EEA] European Environment Agency, [FOEN] Swiss Federal Office for the Environment. 2011. Landscape fragmentation in Europe. Joint EEA-FOEN report. EEA Report No 2/2011. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; p. 87. [accessed 2022 Sep 30]. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/landscape-fragmentation-in-europe/.
- EV CEMF Working Group. 2018. Elk Valley Cumulative Effects Management Framework. [accessed 2022 Aug 5]. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/natural-resource-stewardship/cumulative-effects-framework/regional-assessments/kootenay-boundary/elk-valley-cemf.
- Fung DTC, van der Ree R, McCaffrey N, Gibbins C, Lechner AM. 2023. Ecological connectivity in environmental impact assessments: Modelling alternative highway bypass scenarios. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 41(5):xx–xx. in part II of this special issue. doi:10.1080/14615517.2023.2237294.
- Garrote G, Fernández–López J, López G, Ruiz G, Simón MA. 2018. Prediction of Iberian lynx road–mortality in southern Spain: A new approach using the MaxEnt algorithm. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 41(2):217–225. doi: 10.32800/abc.2018.41.0217.
- Government Offices of Sweden. 2015. The Swedish Environmental Code. [accessed 2022 July 4]. https://www.government.se/49b73c/contentassets/be5e4d4ebdb4499f8d6365720ae68724/the-swedish-environmental-code-ds-200061.
- [GSH SAC] Great Sand Hills Scientific Advisory Committee. 2007. The Great Sand Hills regional environmental study. Canada Plains Research Centre. [accessed 2022 August 8]. http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=4f2c7161-f0a0-45a8-8ba8-60958fb0410d.
- Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, …, Townshend JR. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv. 1(2):e1500052. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052.
- Heller NE, Zavaleta ES. 2009. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv. 142(1):14–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006.
- [IFC] International Finance Corporation. 2012a. Performance Standard 1: Assessment and management of environmental and social risks and impacts. [accessed 2019 Aug 15]. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/8804e6fb-bd51-4822-92cf-3dfd8221be28/PS1_English_2012.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=jiVQIfe.
- [IFC] International Finance Corporation. 2012b. Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity conservation and sustainable management of living natural resources. [accessed 2019 Aug 15]. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/policies-standards/performance-standards/ps6.
- Iglesias-Merchan C, Diaz-Varela L, Cuenca J. 2013. Conectividad ecológica e infraestructuras lineales: el caso histórico del Parque Natural de Despeñaperros. In: DOSSIERS ciudades 1: Corredores Ecológicos (Herrera Calvo PM & Santos L, cords). Spain: Instituto Universitario de Urbanística, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid. p. 241–268. [accessed 15 Aug 2023]. https://www.ciglesiasmerchan.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Chapter_7.pdf.
- Iglesias-Merchan C, Dominguez-Ares E. 2020. Challenges to integrate health impact assessment into environmental assessment procedures: The pending debate. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(4):299–307. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2020.1716161.
- Jaeger J. 1998. Exposition und Konfiguration als Bewertungsebenen für Umweltgefährdungen. [On the use of exposition and configuration as stages for assessing environmental threats). Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung. 11(3/4):444–466.
- Jaeger JAG, Bowman J, Brennan J, Fahrig L, Bert D, Bouchard J, Charbonneau N, Frank K, Gruber B, Tluk von Toschanowitz K. 2005. Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: An interactive model of road avoidance behavior. Ecol Modell. 185(2–4):329–348. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.015.
- Karlson M, Mörtberg U, Balfors B. 2014. Road ecology in environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 48:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.04.002.
- Karlsson M, Bodin Ö. 2022. Ten years of experience with ecological connectivity analysis and urban planning in Sweden. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(2):146–155. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2031551.
- Kor L, O’Hickey B, Hanson M, Coroi M. 2022. Assessing habitat connectivity in environmental impact assessment: A case-study in the UK context. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(6):495–506. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2128557.
- Laurance WF, Arrea IB. 2017. Roads to riches or ruin? Science. 358(6362):442–444. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0312.
- Laurance WF, Clements GR, Sloan S, O’Connell CS, Mueller ND, Goosem M, Venter O, Edwards DP, Phalan B, Balmford A, et al. 2014. A global strategy for road building. Nature. 513(7517):229–232. doi: 10.1038/nature13717.
- Lee P, Hanneman M 2012. Atlas of land cover, industrial land uses and industrial-caused land change in the Peace Region of British Columbia. Global Forest Watch Canada Report #4 International Year of Sustainable Energy for All. [accessed 2022 Aug 10]. https://davidsuzuki.org/science-learning-centre-article/atlas-land-cover-industrial-land-uses-industrial-caused-land-changes-peace-region-british-columbia/.
- Lees J, Jaeger JAG, Gunn JAE, Noble BF. 2016. Analysis of uncertainty consideration in environmental assessment: An empirical study of Canadian EA practice. J Environ Plan Manag. 59(11): 2024–2044. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640568.2015.1116980.
- Leung W, Noble B, Gunn J, Jaeger JAG. 2015. A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.005.
- Leung W, Noble BF, Jaeger JAG, Gunn JAE. 2016. Disparate perceptions about uncertainty consideration and disclosure practices in environmental assessment and opportunities for improvement. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 57:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.001.
- Liu J, Coomes DA, Gibson L, Hu G, Liu J, Luo Y, Wu C, Yu M. 2019. Forest fragmentation in China and its effect on biodiversity. Biol Rev. 94(5):1636–1657. doi: 10.1111/brv.12519.
- Magioli M, De Barros KMPM, Setz EZF, Percequillo AR, Rondon MVDSS, Kuhnen VV, da Silva Canhoto MC, Dos SK, Kanda CZ, de Lima Fregonezi G, et al. 2016. Connectivity maintains mammal assemblages functional diversity within agricultural and fragmented landscapes. Eur J Wildl Res. 62(4):431–446. doi: 10.1007/s10344-016-1017-x.
- Mahon CL, Pelech S. 2021. Guidance for analytical methods to cumulative effects assessment for terrestrial species. Environ Rev. 29(2):201–224. doi: 10.1139/er-2020-0037.
- Noble BF. 2015. Scoping out potentially significant impacts: Constraints of current regulatory-based cumulative effects assessment. In: Gillingham M, Johnson C, Parkes M, and Halseth G, editors. The integration imperative: Addressing the cumulative environmental, community and health effects of multiple natural resource developments. New York: Springer; p. 176–181.
- Noble BF. 2017. Getting the Big Picture: How regional assessment can pave the way for more inclusive and effective environmental assessments. Ottawa, Canada: MacDonald-Laurier Institute for Public Policy. p. 32.
- Noble BF. 2020. Introduction to Environmental Assessment: A Guide to Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Don Mills (ON): Oxford University Press.
- Noble B, Liu G, Hackett P. 2017. The contribution of project environmental assessment to assessing and managing cumulative effects: Individually and collectively insignificant? Environ Manage. 59(4):531–545. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0799-7.
- Oliveira Gonçalves L, Kindel A, Galvão Bastazini VA, Zimmermann Teixeira F. 2022. Mainstreaming ecological connectivity in road environmental impact assessments: A long way to go. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(6):475–480. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2099727.
- Patterson C, Casasanta Mostaço F, Jaeger JAG. 2022a. Lack of consideration of ecological connectivity in Canadian environmental impact assessment: Current practice and need for improvement. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(6):481–494. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2135232.
- Patterson C, Torres A, Coroi M, Cumming K, Hanson M, Noble B, Tabor G, Treweek J, Jaeger JAG. 2022b. Treatment of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: A global survey of current practices and common issues. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(6):460–474. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2099728.
- Pavlyuk O, Noble BF, Blakley JAE, Jaeger JAG. 2017. Fragmentary provisions for uncertainty disclosure and consideration in EA legislation, regulations and guidelines and the need for improvement. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 66:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.001.
- Peterson CH. 1993. Improvement of environmental impact analysis by application of principles derived from manipulative ecology: Lessons from coastal marine case histories. Aust J Ecol. 18(1):21–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-99931993.tb00433.x.
- Privy Council Office and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. 2010. The Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. [accessed 2018 Sep 14]. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/iaac-acei/documents/strategic-environmental-assessment/cabinet-directive-environmental-assessment-policy-plan-program-proposals/cabinet_directive_on_environmental_assessment_of_policy_plan_and_program_proposals.pdf.
- Quintero JD. 2016. A Guide to Good Practices for Environmentally Friendly Roads. Latin America Conservation Council (LACC); p. 92. [ Accessed 2023 March 3]. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/latin-america/Friendlyroads.pdf and bit.ly/3pEBC8s.
- Richardson ML, Wilson BA, Aiuto DA, Crosby JE, Alonso A, Dallmeier F, Golinski GK. 2017. A review of the impact of pipelines and power lines on biodiversity and strategies for mitigation. Biodivers Conserv. 26(8):1801–1815. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1341-9.
- Rodríguez A, Calzada J. 2015. Lynx pardinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T12520A50655794. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T12520A50655794.en.
- Samways MJ, Pryke JS. 2016. Large-scale ecological networks do work in an ecologically complex biodiversity hotspot. Ambio. 45(2):161–172. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0697-x.
- Sánchez-Cuervo AM, de Lima LS, Dallmeier F, Garate P, Bravo A, Vanthomme H. 2020. Twenty years of land cover change in the southeastern Peruvian Amazon: Implications for biodiversity conservation. Reg Environ Change. 20(1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10113-020-01603-y.
- Saura S, Bastin L, Battistella L, Mandrici A, Dubois G. 2017. Protected areas in the world’s ecoregions: How well connected are they? Ecol Indic. 76:144–158. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.047.
- Secretariat of the CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2021. First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD/WG2020/3/3. [accessed 2021 Jul 12]. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/abb5/591f/2e46096d3f0330b08ce87a45/wg2020-03-03-en.pdf.
- Shamsudin K, Neo SS. 2010. Climate change and liveable cities in Malaysia. In: Yuen B, and Kumssa A, editors. Climate Change and Sustainable Urban Development in Africa and AsiaClimate Change and Sustainable Urban Development in Africa and Asia. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York: Springer; p. 221–241.
- Söderman T. 2005. Treatment of biodiversity issues in Finnish environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 23(2):87–99. doi: 10.3152/147154605781765634.
- Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos. 68(3): 571–573. doi: 10.2307/3544927.
- Tennøy A, Kværner J, Gjerstad KI. 2006. Uncertainty in environmental impact assessment predictions: The need for better communication and more transparency. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 24(1):45–56. doi: 10.3152/147154606781765345.
- TERA Environmental Consultants 2014. Environmental Assessment Certificate Application for the Westcoast Connector Gas Transmission Project. Prepared for review under the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Act. Vancouver, BC: Prepared for Westcoast Connector Gas Transmission Ltd; [accessed 2022 March 3]. https://projects.eao.gov.bc.ca/p/588511b7aaecd9001b824889/project-details.
- Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature. 371:65–66. doi: 10.1038/371065a0.
- Timpane-Padgham BL, Beechie T, Klinger T, Chapman M(G. 2017. A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration. PLoS One. 12(3):e0173812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173812.
- Torres A, Patterson C, Jaeger JAG. 2022. Advancing the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: Synthesis and next steps forward. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(6):451–459. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2134619.
- Treweek J, Therivel R, Thompson S, Slater M. 2005. Principles for the use of strategic environmental assessment as a tool for promoting the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. J Environ Assess Policy Management. 7(2):173–199. doi: 10.1142/S1464333205002043.
- [WCD of Bhutan] Wildlife Conservation Division of Bhutan. 2010. Regulatory Framework for Biological Corridors in Bhutan, Part III: Policy Recommendations and Framework for Developing Corridor Management Plans. Wildlife Conservation Division, Department of Forests, Thimphu, Bhutan: Royal Government of Bhutan; [accessed 2022 October 20]. https://conservationcorridor.org/cpb/Wildlife_Conservation_Division_Royal_Government_of_Bhutan_2010.pdf.
- Yahey M 2014 October 28. Letter from Chief Marvin Yahey, Blueberry River First Nations, to Mary Polak, Minister of Environment, Government of British Columbia, regarding the Spectra Energy’s Westcoast Connector Gas Transmission Project Environmental Assessment. [accessed 2021 Oct 15]. https://projects.eao.gov.bc.ca/p/westcoast-connector-gas-transmission/docshttps://projects.eao.gov.bc.ca/api/public/document/58868f87e036fb01057683e4/download/Blueberry%20River%20First%20Nations%20Submission.pdf.