Influence factors on the quality of regulatory impact analysis in Brazil

References

• Adelle C, Macrae D, Marusic A, Naru F. 2015. New development: regulatory impact assessment in developing countries—tales from the road to good governance. Public Money Manage. 35(3):233–238. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2015.1027500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelle C, Weiland S, Dick J, González Olivo D, Marquardt J, Rots G, Wübbeke J, Zasada I. 2016. Regulatory impact assessment: a survey of selected developing and emerging economies. Public Money Manage. 36(2):89–96. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1118930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantine B, Devonald B. 2006. Modern regulatory impact analysis: the experience of the European Union. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 44(1):57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.06.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardin L, Borsdorf A. 2011. Content analysis. J Protected Mountain Areas Res. 3(1):70–70. Edições 70. eco.mont. doi: 10.1553/eco.mont-3-1s70.
   Google Scholar
• Belcore J, Ellig J. 2008. Homeland secutiry and regulatory analysis: are we safe yet? Rutgers Law J. 40(1):1–96.
   Google Scholar
• Belfield CR, Bowden AB, Rodriguez V. 2018. Evaluating regulatory impact assessments in education policy. Am J Eval. 40(3):335–353. doi: 10.1177/1098214018785463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianculli AC. 2013. The brazilian association of regulatory agencies: integrating levels, consolidating identities in the regulatory state in the south. Regul Gov. 7(4):547–559. doi: 10.1111/rego.12036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll P. 2010. Does regulatory impact assessment lead to better policy? Policy And Society. 29(2):113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecot C, Hahn RW, Renda A, Schrefler L. 2007. A statistical analysis of the quality of impact assessment in the European Union. Soc Sci Res. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.984473.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP. 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm Sci Q. 17(1):1. doi: 10.2307/2392088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskal S, Ayalon O, Shechter M. 2019. Closing the loop: the challenges of regulation in municipal solid waste Management. Detritus :1. In Press. doi:10.31025/2611-4135/2019.13775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho BE, Costa SAB, Marques RC, Netto OC. 2019. The impact of household connection to public network wastewater systems: regulatory impact assessment. Water Sci Technol. 79(6):1060–1070. doi: 10.2166/wst.2019.102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho BE, Marques RC, Netto OC. 2017. Delphi technique as a consultation method in regulatory impact assessment (RIA) – the Portuguese water sector. Water Policy. 19(3):423–439. doi: 10.2166/wp.2017.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro CM. 2014. Some aspects of implementing regulatory impact analysis in Brazil. Rev Adm Pública. 48(2):323–342. doi: 10.1590/0034-76121359.
   Google Scholar
• de Francesco F, Radaelli CM, Troeger VE. 2012. Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe: the case of impact assessment. J Eur Public Policy. 19(4):491–511. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.607342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellig J, Horney M. 2019. Statutory delegation, agency authority, and the asymmetry of impact analysis. Theory Prac. 7(3):227–256. doi: 10.1080/20508840.2020.1730097.
   Google Scholar
• Ellig J, Mclaughlin PA. 2012. The quality and use of regulatory analysis in 2008. Computat Studies. 32(5):855–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01715.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ellig J, Mclaughlin PA, Morrall JF. 2013. Continuity, change, and priorities: the quality and use of regulatory analysis across US administrations. Regul Gov. 7(2):153–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01149.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euclydes FM, dos Macedo AS, Macedo SV, Valadares JL. 2022. Capacidades estatais e mineração: uma análise da agência nacional de regulação. Rev Adm Pública. 56(1):163–175. doi: 10.1590/0034-761220210203.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch O, Radaelli CM, Schrefler L, Renda A. 2013. Comparing the content of regulatory impact assessments in the UK and the EU. Public Money Manage. 33(6):445–452. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.836007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein E. 1995. Benefit-cost analysis at the EPA. J Socio Econ. 24(2):375–389. doi: 10.1016/1053-5357(95)90026-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn RW, Burnett JK, Chan YHI, Mader EA, Moyle PR. 2000. Assessing regulatory impact analyses: the failure of agencies to comply with executive order 12,866. Harv J Law Public Policy. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.213854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs S. 2004. Regulatory impact assessment and the economic transition to markets. Public Money Manage. 24(5):283–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2004.00435.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrar AG. 2018. Regulatory impact assessment role in developing participatory work between civil society Organizations and Jordanian ministry of political and parliamentary affairs. J Polit Law. 11(1):88. doi: 10.5539/jpl.v11n1p88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick C, Parker D. 2004. Regulatory impact assessment and regulatory governance in developing countries. In: Regulatory impact assessment. Vol. 344, Edward Elgar Publishing; pp. 171–189. doi:10.4337/9781847208774.00015.
   Google Scholar
• Larionova M, Shelepov A. 2022. BRICS, G20 and global economic governance reform. Int Pol Sci Rev. 43(4):512–530. doi: 10.1177/01925121211035122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE. 1959. The science of “muddling through. Public Adm Rev. 19(2):79–88. doi: 10.4324/9780429498411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(1):5–14. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Regulatory Management indicators: brazil 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing. pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2022. Regulatory reform in Brazil. doi:10.1787/d81c15d7-en.
   Google Scholar
• Peci A. 2007. Reforma regulatória brasileira dos anos 90 à luz do modelo de Kleber Nascimento. Rev adm contemp. 11(1):11–30. doi: 10.1590/s1415-65552007000100002.
   Google Scholar
• Peci A, de Menezes Santos A, Pino Oliveira de Araújo BC. 2022. Quo Vadis? Career paths of Brazilian regulators. Regul Gov. 16(2):470–486. doi: 10.1111/rego.12348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peci A, Sobral F. 2011. Regulatory impact assessment: how political and organizational forces influence its diffusion in a developing country. Regul Gov. 5(2):204–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01105.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner R. 1974. Theories of economic regulation. Regulation. Issue 41. doi:10.3386/w0041.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli CM. 2005. Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. J Eur Public Policy. 12(5):924–943. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli CM. 2010. Rationality, Power, Management and symbols: four images of regulatory impact assessment. Scan Polit Stud. 33(2):164–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00245.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radchenko T, Parshina E. 2014. Regulatory impact assessment in Russia: application and lessons from economic theory. Econ. Policy. 3(1): 36–60 .
   Google Scholar
• Reyes R, Romano A, Sottilotta CE. 2015. Regulatory impact assessment in Mexico: a story of interest groups pressure. Law Develop Rev. 8(1):99–121. doi: 10.1515/ldr-2014-0030.
   Google Scholar
• Russel D, Turnpenny J. 2009. The politics of sustainable development in UK government: what role for integrated policy appraisal? Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 27(2):340–354. doi: 10.1068/c0810j.
   Google Scholar
• Saab F, Silva SDAM. 2022. Qual a qualidade da análise de impacto regulatório elaborada por agências reguladoras do Brasil? Rev Adm Pública. 56(4):529–549. doi: 10.1590/0034-761220220111.
   Google Scholar
• Saab F, Silva SDAME. 2021a. ANÁLISE DE IMPACTO REGULATÓRIO E PREVENÇÃO DA CORRUPÇÃO: UM ESTUDO EXPLORATÓRIO SOBRE A AIR NO BRASIL. Revista da Controladoria-Geral da União. 13(24):167–179. doi: 10.36428/revistadacgu.v13i24.451.
   Google Scholar
• Saab F, Silva SDAME. 2021b. Evaluating the quality of regulatory impact analysis: a literature review. Revista Do Serviço Público. 72(b):34–57. doi: 10.21874/rsp.v72.ib.5875.
   Google Scholar
• Salinas NSC, Gomes LT. 2021. The use and exemption of regulatory impact assessment by the National Health Surveillance Agency. Revista Do Serviço Público. 72(b):8–33. doi: 10.21874/rsp.v72.ib.5954.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro S, Morrall J. 2016. Does haste make waste? How long does it take to do a good regulatory impact analysis? Adm Soc. 48(3):367–389. doi: 10.1177/0095399713498745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souto-Otero M. 2013. Is ‘better regulation’ possible? Formal and substantive quality in the impact assessments in education and culture of the European commission. Evid Policy. 9(4):513–529. doi: 10.1332/174426413X662725.
   Google Scholar
• Staronova K. 2016. Regulatory impact assessment in Slovakia: performance and procedural reform. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 34(3):214–227. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2016.1176410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staroňová K. 2009. Better regulation and regulatory quality: the case of RIA in Slovakia. Sociologia. 41(3):247–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staroňová K. 2010. Regulatory impact assessment: formal institutionalization and practice. J Public Policy. 30(1):117–136. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X09990201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ. 1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manage Sci. 2(1):3–21. doi: 10.2307/3003160.
   Google Scholar
• Tarter CJ, Hoy WK. 1998. Toward a contingency theory of decision making. J Educ Admin. 36(3):212–228. doi: 10.1108/09578239810214687.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener JB, Alemanno A. 2017. Comparing regulatory oversight bodies: the US Office of information and regulatory Affairs and the EU regulatory Scrutiny Board. In: Rose-Ackerman S, Lindseth P, Emerson B, editors. Comparative administrative law. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener JB, Ribeiro DL. 2016. Impact assessment: diffusion and integration. In: Francesca B, David Z, editors. Comparative Law and Regulation: understanding the global regulatory process. pp. 159–189.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2018. Global Indicators of regulatory governance: worldwide practices of regulatory impact assessments. Washington, D.C, U.S.A: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2022. The World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/country/BR
   Google Scholar
• Zentner RD. 1984. Chemical Industry Perspectives on regulatory impact analysispp. 161–173. doi: 10.1021/bk-1984-0239.ch011.
   Google Scholar