Current social impact assessment practices for transport projects and plans in Chinese cities

References

• Bai X, Shi P, Liu Y. 2014. Society: Realizing China’s urban dream. Nat. 509:158–160. doi: 10.1038/509158a.
   Google Scholar
• Becker HA. 2001. Social impact assessment. Eur J Oper Res. 128(2):311–321. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00074-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari H, Yasunobu K. 2009. What is social capital? A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian J Soc Sci. 37(3):480–510. doi: 10.1163/156853109X436847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley G, Power S. 2009. Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 36(1):30–48. doi: 10.1068/b33129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanella TJ. 2008. The concrete dragon: China’s urban revolution and what it means for the world. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cao M, Hickman R. 2020. Transport, social equity and capabilities in East Beijing. In: Chen C, Pan H, Shen Q, Wang J, editors. Handbook on transport and urban transformation in China. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Chamseddine Z, Ait Boubkr A. 2020. Exploring the place of social impacts in urban transport planning: the case of Casablanca city. Urban Plan Transp Res. 8(1):138–157. doi: 10.1080/21650020.2020.1752793.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey N, Bramley G, Power S, Brown C. 2011. The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Sustain Dev. 19(5):289–300. doi: 10.1002/sd.417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Li Y, Li W, Yu Y. 2016. Urban transport social needs in China: quantification with central government transit grant. Transp Policy. 51:126–139. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou HT, Gakenheimer R. 2011. Urban transport in the developing World, a handbook of policy and practice. London: Edward Elgare Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(1):34–42. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2012.660356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao S. 2004. Comparison and analysis of EIA and strategic EA by China and Sweden [original in Chinese]. Environ Prot. 3:56–58. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/94389x/200403/9396593.html.
   Google Scholar
• Geurs KT, Boon W, Van Wee B. 2009. Social impacts of transport: literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transp Rev. 29(1):69–90. doi: 10.1080/01441640802130490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs KT, van Wee B. 2004. Land-use/transport interaction models as tools for sustainability impact assessment of transport investments: review and research perspectives. Eur J Transp Infrast. 4(3). doi: 10.18757/ejtir.2004.4.3.4272.
   Google Scholar
• Götzmann. et al., 2016. Social and human rights impact assessments: what can they learn from each other? Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 34(1): 14–23. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2015.1096036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAIA. 2009. Social impact assessment key citations, Fargo, ND: International Association for Impact Assessment. [accessed 2024 January 2]. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/key-citations/Key-Citations_SIA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs GD, Greaves N. 2003. Transport in developing and emerging nations. Transp Rev. 23(2):133–138. doi: 10.1080/01441640309895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns A, Forrest R. 2000. Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Stud. 37(5–6):995–1017. doi: 10.1080/00420980050011208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon GG, Knight J. 2006. Subjective well-being poverty vs. income poverty and capabilities poverty? J Dev Stud. 42(7):1199–1224. doi: 10.1080/00220380600884167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Arts J, Vanclay F. 2021. Stakeholder views about Land Use and Transport Integration in a rapidly-growing megacity: Social outcomes and integrated planning issues in Seoul. Sustainable Cities and Society. 67:102759. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Arts J, Vanclay F, Ward J. 2020. Examining the social outcomes from urban transport infrastructure: long-term consequences of spatial changes and varied interests at multiple levels. Sustainability. 12(15):5907. doi: 10.3390/su12155907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhasa Municipal Development and Reform Commission. 2022. Environmental impact assessment of low volume rail transit network and construction planning in Lhasa [original in Chinese]. [accessed 2022 October 1]. http://www.chinaiut.com/hysj/1581.html.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Liu Y. 2016. The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Guangzhou, China: Hukou and dual structure. Journal of Transport Geography. 54:286–294. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Wells P, Sovacool BK. 2017. Benign mobility? Electric bicycles, sustainable transport consumption behaviour and socio-technical transitions in Nanjing, China. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 103:223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Yang J. 2019. Supporting green transportation with transport impact assessment: its deficiency in Chinese cities. Transp Res Part D Tran Environ. 73:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman T. 2002. Evaluating Transportation Equity. World Transport Policy & Practice. 8(2):50–65. http://ecoplan.org/wtpp/wt_index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang X, Ng ST, Skitmore M, Dong Y. 2018. Social sustainability indicators of public construction megaprojects in China. J Urban Plann Dev. 144(4):04018034. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens K, Bastiaanssen J, Lucas K. 2019. Measuring transport equity: key components, framings and metrics. In: Measuring transport equity. Elsevier; p. 13–36. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814818-1.00002-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Ecology and Environment. 2003. Law of People’s Republic of China on environmental impact appraisal. [accessed 2023 September 19]. https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/laws/environmental_laws/202012/t20201204_811509.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2016. Technical guideline for environmental impact assessment of construction project General Programme (HJ2.1-2016). Original In Chinese. [accessed 2023 September 12]. http://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/other/pjjsdz/201612/W020161214348664955109.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, 2010. Technical standards of traffic impact analysis of construction projects (CJJ/T141-2010). Original In Chinese. [accessed 2023 September 12]. http://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://jtt.hunan.gov.cn/jjzdgz/jtghyj/gszc/201903/7778778/files/3f9ee87e76c14c8385bac9869a3ffb0f.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport, 2010. Rules for compiling feasibility research report of highway construction projects. Original In Chinese. [accessed 2022 March 9]. http://jtys.foshan.gov.cn/webpic/W0201105/W020110527/W020110527369168735494.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport, 2022. Appraisal indicator system building national strength in transportation. Original In Chinese. [accessed 2023 August 14]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-03/18/content_5679638.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mottee LK. 2022. Advancing beyond project-scale social impact assessment of transport infrastructure: insights into contextual constraints on practice. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 40(1):60–74. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2021.1987135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottee LK, Arts J, Vanclay F, Miller F, Howitt R. 2020. Metro infrastructure planning in Amsterdam: how are social issues managed in the absence of environmental and social impact assessment? Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(4):320–335. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2020.1741918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottee LK, Howitt R. 2018. Follow-up and social impact assessment (SIA) in urban transport-infrastructure projects: insights from the parramatta rail link. Aust Planner. 55(1):46–56. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2018.1506496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor EL, Longman H, White KM, Obst PL. 2015. Sense of community, social identity and social support among players of massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs): a qualitative analysis. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 25(6):459–473. doi: 10.1002/casp.2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. How’s life? measuring well-being. Paris: OECD; p. 1–282. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/187111
   Google Scholar
• Omann I, Spangenberg JH. 2002. Assessing social sustainability. In Biennial conference of the international society for ecological economics, 7, 304. Retrieved from Accessed on November 7, 2021. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-03/18/content_5679638.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pan H. 2012. Implementing sustainable urban travel policies in China. In: Mackett RL, May AD, Kii M Pan H, editors. Sustainable transport for Chinese cities (transport and sustainability Vol. 3 Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 10.1108/S2044-9941(2012)0000003005
   Google Scholar
• Perkins DD, Zimmerman MA. 1995. Empowerment theory, research, and application. Am J Community Psychol. 23(5):569–579. doi: 10.1007/BF02506982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pojani D, Stead D. 2015. Sustainable urban transport in the developing world: beyond megacities. Sustainability. 7(6):7784–7805. doi: 10.3390/su7067784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power A. 2012. Social inequality, disadvantaged neighbourhoods and transport deprivation: an assessment of the historical influence of housing policies. J Transp Geogr. 21:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher J, Peng ZR, Mittal N, Zhu Y, Korattyswaroopam N. 2007. Urban transport trends and policies in China and India: impacts of rapid economic growth. Transp Rev. 27(4):379–410. doi: 10.1080/01441640601089988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin Y, Pennington M. 2000. Public participation and local environmental planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environ. 5(2):153–169. doi: 10.1080/13549830050009328.
   Google Scholar
• Shanghai Municipal Development & Reform Commission. 2011. Guidance on conducting a social stability risk assessment for key construction projects [original in Chinese]. [accessed 2020 November 2] via personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Shen H, Teng F, Song J. 2018. Evaluation of spatial balance of China’s regional development. Sustainability. 10(9):3314. doi: 10.3390/su10093314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen W, Xiao W, Wang X. 2016. Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for Urban rail transit: A structural equation modeling based on partial least squares. Transport Policy. 46:20–31. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenzhen Municipal Design & Research Institute. 2018. Social Stability Risk Assessment Report on Shenzhen Metro Line 5 Project (HuangBeiling Station to Grand Theatre Section) [original in Chinese]; [accessed 2022 Nov 20]. http://www.szmedi.com.cn/uploadfiles/2018/07/2018072317541454143131.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smyth E, Vanclay F. 2017. The Social Framework for Projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 35(1):65–80. doi:10.1080/14615517.2016.1271539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Impact Assessment. 1995. Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 15(1):11–43. doi: 10.1016/0195-9255(94)00026-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Council. 2007. Urban and rural planning law of the People’s Republic of China. Original In Chinese. [accessed 2023 September 12]. http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2007-10/28/content_788494.html.
   Google Scholar
• State Council, 2014. Notice of the state council on adjusting the standards for categorizing city sizes [original in Chinese]. [ accessed 2019 March 27]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-11/20/content_9225.htm.
   Google Scholar
• State Council. 2019. The outline for Building China’s strength in transport. Original In Chinese. [accessed 2022 July 14]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-09/19/content_5431432.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Stefaniec A, Hosseini K, Assani S, Hosseini SM, Li Y. 2021. Social sustainability of regional transportation: an assessment framework with application to EU road transport. Socioecon Plann Sci. 78:101088. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stjernborg V. 2023. Social impact assessments (SIA) in larger infrastructure investments in Sweden; the view of experts and practitioners. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 41(6):463–475. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2023.2263236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang BS, Wong SW, Lau MCH. 2008. Social impact assessment and public participation in China: a case study of land requisition in Guangzhou. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(1):57–72. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian WL, Ning BB, Liu Y. 2014. Design standard of urban rail transit barrier free facilities and investigation of service demand index [original in Chinese]. Urban Mass Transit. 17(1):13–17. http://open.oriprobe.com/articles/40929347/Design_Standard_of_Urban_Rail_Transit_Barrier_Free.htm
   Google Scholar
• TRICS. 2014. TRICS multi-modal methodology 2014. London, United Kingdom: TRICS.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 22(3):183–211. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 21(1):5–11. doi: 10.3152/147154603781766491.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2006. Principles for social impact assessment: a critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26(1):3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks DM, 2015. Social impact assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Int Assoc Impact Assess. [accessed 2021 November 14]. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SIA_Guidance_Document_IAIA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg L, Vanclay F. 2017. A human rights based approach to project induced displacement and resettlement. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35(1):34–52. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R. 2010. Shaping urban transport policies in China: will copying foreign policies work? Transp Policy. 17(3):147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cao M, Liu Y, Ye R, Gao X, Ma L. 2022. Public transport equity in Shenyang: Using structural equation modelling. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 42:100555. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Lin T. 2014. Residential self-selection, built environment, and travel behavior in the Chinese context. J Transp Land Use. 7(3):5–14. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Zhou M. 2017. The built environment and travel behavior in urban China: a literature review. Transp Res Part D Tran Environ. 52:574–585. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Wang X, Sperling D. 2013. Policy and politics behind the public transportation systems of China’s medium-sized cities: evidence from the Huizhou reform. Util Policy. 27:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2013.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingaertner C, Moberg Å. 2014. Exploring social sustainability: learning from perspectives on urban development and companies and products. Sustain Dev. 22(2):122–133. doi: 10.1002/sd.536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye R. 2017. Impact of Individuals’ Commuting Trips on Subjective Well-being: Evidence from Xi’an [ Doctoral dissertation], UCL (University College London)). Retrieved from [accessed 2022 August 2]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1560143/.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Zhang T, Feng Y, Liu Y, Ye X. 2019. Does financial agglomeration promote the green development in China? A spatial spillover perspective. J Cleaner Prod. 237:117808. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng SX, Ma HY, Lin H, Zeng RC, Tam VW. 2015. Social responsibility of major infrastructure projects in China. Int J Proj Manag. 33(3):537–548. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang J, Kwan MP, Chai Y. 2019. Reside nearby, behave apart? activity-space-based segregation among residents of various types of housing in Beijing, China. Cities. 88:166–180. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zhao P. 2021. Literature review on urban transport equity in transitional China: from empirical studies to universal knowledge. J Transp Geogr. 96:103177. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Yu Z. 2020. Investigating mobility in rural areas of China: features, equity, and factors. Transp Policy. 94:66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu D, Ru J. 2008. Strategic environmental assessment in China: motivations, politics, and effectiveness. J Environ Manage. 88(4):615–626. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar