Innovation through the EIA tender: a case of Copenhagen metro and the SDGs

References

• Alhola K. 2012. Environmental criteria in public procurement: focus on tender documents. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Banhalmi-Zakar Z, Gronow C, Wilkinson L, Jenkins B, Pope J, Squires G, Witt K, Williams G, Jon W. 2018. Evolution or revolution: where next for impactassessment? Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 36(6):506–515. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2018.1516846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braulio-Gonzalo M, Bovea MD. 2020. Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 81:106310. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castor J, Bacha K, Fuso Nerini F. 2020. SDGs in action: A novel framework for assessing energy projects against the sustainable development goals. Energy Res Social Sci. 68:101556. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W, Appolloni A, D’Amato A, Zhu Q. 2018. Green public procurement, missing concepts and future trends – a critical review. J Cleaner Prod. 176:770–784. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikelboom ME, Gelderman C, Semeijn J. 2018. Sustainable innovation in public procurement: the decisive role of the individual. J Public Procure. 18(3):190–201. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-09-2018-012.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton P, Gustafsson S. 2017. Moving from high-level words to local action—governance for urban sustainability in municipalities. Curr Opin Sust. 26-27(26):129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2020. Editorial - embedding the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in IAPA’s remit. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(4):269–271. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2020.1772474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisetti C. 2017. Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement. Technol Forecast Soc. 125:178–187. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Del Campo A, Gazzola P, Onyango V. 2020. The mutualism of strategic environmental assessment and sustainable development goals. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 82:106383–106389. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulis G. 2023. Health in environmental assessment. Guidance on how to improve assessment of impacts on human health in a danish context. Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking T. 2019. The SDGs and the sustainability assessment of private-sector projects: theoretical conceptualisation and comparison with current practice using the case study of the Asian development Bank. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(1):2–16. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2018.1477469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holian R, Coghlan D. 2013. Ethical issues and role duality in insider action research: challenges for action research degree programmes. Syst Pract Action Res. 26(5):399–415. doi: 10.1007/s11213-012-9256-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton. 2021. How to apply the UN’s sustainable development goals in a tender procedure. [accessed 2023 July 6]. https://en.horten.dk/publications/articles/articles2021/how-to-apply-the-uns-sustainable-development-goals-in-a-tender-procedure.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson K, Richardson T, Olsson K. 2009. From consultation to deliberation? Tracing deliberative norms in EIA frameworks in Swedish roads planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(5):295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kågström M. 2016. Between ‘best’ and ‘good enough’: How consultants guide quality in environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 60:169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kågström M, Faith-Ell C, Longueville A. 2023. Exploring researcher’ roles in collaborative spaces supporting learning in environmental assessment in Sweden. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 99:106990. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kørnøv L, Lyhne I, Davila JG. 2020. Linking the UN SDGs and environmental assessment: Towards a conceptual framework. Environ Impact Assess Revi. 85:106463–106469. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kørnøv L, Lyhne I, Vammen LS, Hansen AM. 2011. Change agents in the Field of Strategic Environmental Assessment: What does it involve and what potentials does it have for research and practice?. Jou Env Assmt Pol Mgmt. 13(02):203–228. doi: 10.1142/S1464333211003857.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger B, Zipperer V. 2022. Does green public procurement trigger environmental innovations? Res Policy. 51(6):104516. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkman S. 2015. Interview: Det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk Vol. 3. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzals Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lyhne I, Kørnøv L, Munk LH, Kristensen KS, Wael SM. 2023. Væsentlighed af klimapåvirkninger. Tilgange til at vurdere væsentlighed af drivhusgasudledninger i miljøvurderinger. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney B. 2021. Fooling ourselves and others: confirmation bias and the trustworthiness of qualitative research – part 1 (the threats). JOCM. 34(5):1063–1075. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-04-2021-0117.
   Google Scholar
• Metroselskabet I/S Frederiksberg Municipality Copenhagen Municipality. 2008. Cityringen. VVM-redegørelse og miljørapport. (Schweitzer Kbh).
   Google Scholar
• Montalbán-Domingo L, García-Segura T, Sanz MA, Pellicer E. 2018. Social sustainability criteria in public-work procurement: An international perspective. J Cleaner Prod. 198:1355–1371. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Bailey M. 2009. Appraising the role of relationships between regulators and consultants for effective EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(5):284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Sánchez LE, Retief F, Sinclair J, Doelle M, Jones M, Wessels J, Pope J. 2020. Gearing up impact assessment as a vehicle for achieving the UN sustainable development goals. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(2):113–117. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2019.1677089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Co-operation. 2021. Sustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals. [accessed 2023 July 6]. https://www.norden.org/en/news/sustainable-public-procurement-effective-way-achieve-global-goals.
   Google Scholar
• Ntsondé J, Aggeri F. 2021. Stimulating innovation and creating new markets – the potential of circular public procurement. J Cleaner Prod. 308:127303. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikka-Alhola K, Nissinen A. 2012. Environmental impacts and the most economically advantageous tender in public procurement. Jour Pub Procur. 12(1):43–80. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-12-01-2012-B002.
   Google Scholar
• Partidario MR. 2020. Transforming the capacity of impact assessment to address persistent global problems. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(2):146–150. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2020.1724005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravn Boess E. 2023. Practitioners’ pursuit of change: A theoretical framework. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 98:106928. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravn Boess E. 2024. Sustainable development goals in environmental assessment: abilities to change and practice and pursue a greater sustainability focus. Aalborg Denmark: Aalborg University Open Publishing. ISSN: 2446-1628.
   Google Scholar
• Ravn Boess E, González del Campo A. 2023. Motivating a change in environmental assessment practice: Consultant perspectives on SDG integration. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 101:107105. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravn Boess E, Kørnøv L, Coutant AE, Jensen JU, Jantzen E, Kjellerup U, Partidário MR. 2023. UN sustainable development goals in environmental assessment practice: a danish standard. Aalborg, Denmark: The Danish Centre for Environmental Assessment. Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Ravn Boess E, Kørnøv L, Lyhne I, Partidário MR. 2021. Integrating SDGs in environmental assessment: Unfolding SDG functions in emerging practices. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 90:106632. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravn Boess E, Lyhne I, Davila JG, Jantzen E, Kjellerup U, Kørnøv L. 2021. Using sustainable development goals to develop EIA scoping practices: The case of Denmark. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 39(6):463–477. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2021.1930832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidwell AC, Budiawan D, Ma T. 2001. The significance of the tendering contract on the opportunities for clients to encourage contractor-led innovation. Constr Innovation. 1(2):107–116. doi: 10.1191/147141701701571652.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeglehner G, Brown AL, Kørnøv BL. 2009. SEA and planning: ‘ownership’ of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(2):111–120. doi: 10.3152/146155109X438742.
   Google Scholar
• Tambach M, Visscher H. 2012. Towards energy-neutral new housing developments. Municipal climate governance in the Netherlands. Eur Plan Stud. 20(1):111–130. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.638492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttam K. 2014. Seeking sustainability in the construction sector: opportunities within impact assessment and sustainable public procurement. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-144885.
   Google Scholar
• Uttam K, Faith-Ell C, Balfors B. 2012. EIA and green procurement: Opportunities for strengthening their coordination. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 33(1):73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnäs A, Balfors B, Faith-Ell C. 2009. Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry. J Cleaner Prod. 17(13):1214–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnäs A, Faith-Ell C, Balfors B. 2009. Linking environmental impact assessment, environmental management systems and green procurement in construction projects: lessons from the City Tunnel Project in Malmö, Sweden. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(1):69–76. doi: 10.3152/146155109X410869.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Lochner P. 2008. Contributing to sustainability as an environmental impact assessment practitioner. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 26(2):91–98. doi: 10.3152/146155108X316423.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Kørnøv L, Christensen P. 2018. The discretionary power of the environmental assessment practitioner. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar