Visitors’ place-based evaluations of unacceptable tourism impacts in Oulanka National Park, Finland

References

• Alatossava, S. (2011). Sustainable tourism development strategy for Oulanka National Park 2011. Nature Protection Publications of Metsähallitus ( Series C 112). Vantaa: Metsähallitus.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2012). Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 25(2), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Fagerholm, N. (2015). Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13, 119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Montag, J. M., & Lyon, K. (2012). Public participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Society & Natural Resources, 25(7), 633–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Reed, P. (2009). Public participation GIS: A new method for use in national forest planning. Forest Science, 55(2), 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Reed, P. (2012). Social landscape metrics: Measures for understanding place values from public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Landscape Research, 37(1), 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2011). Public Participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2012). A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(4), 455–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Weber, D., & de Bie, K. (2014). Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Applied Geography, 53, 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Antonio, A., Monz, C., Newman, P., Lawson, S., & Taff, D. (2013). Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: A combined social–ecological approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 124, 72–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, J., Qiang, S., Walker, G. J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Assessment on and perception of visitors' environmental impacts of nature tourism: A case study of Zhangjiajie National Forest Park, China. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(6), 529–548.
   Google Scholar
• Dinsdale, E. A. (2009). Linking ecological and perceptual assessments for environmental management: A coral reef case study. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolnicar, S., Crouch, G. I., & Long, P. (2008). Environment-friendly tourists: What do we really know about them? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16, 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorwart, C. E., Moore, R. L., & Leung, Y. F. (2009). Visitors' perceptions of a trail environment and effects on experiences: A model for nature-based recreation experiences. Leisure Sciences, 32(1), 33–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkkonen, J., & Sievänen, T. (2001). Kävijätutkimusopas [Guide for conducting Visitor survey]. Nature Protection Publications of Metsähallitus. ( Series B 62). Vantaa: Metsähallitus.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M. (2014). Tourism and social marketing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. E., & Cole, D. N. (2007). Changes in the motivations, perceptions and behaviours of recreation users: Displacement and coping in wilderness ( Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-63). Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Hammitt, W. E., & Cole, D. N. (1998). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hausner, V. H., Brown, G., & Lægreid, E. (2015). Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway. Land Use Policy, 49, 446–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendee, J., Stankey, G., & Lucas, R. (1990). Wilderness management (2nd ed.). Golden, CO: North American Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In Steiner, I. D.(Ed.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301–309). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kainzinger, S., Burns, R. C., & Arnberger, A. (2015). Whitewater Boater and Angler conflict, crowding and satisfaction on the North Umpqua River, Oregon. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(6), 542–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajala, L., Erkkonen, J., & Perttula, M. (2004). Measures for developing sustainability of nature tourism in protected areas. In T. Sievänen, J. Erkkonen, J. Jokimäki, J. Saarinen, S. Tuulentie, & E. Virtanen (Eds.), Policies, methods and tools for visitor management ( Working Papers) (pp. 241–246). Rovaniemi: Finnish Forest Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kuentzel, W. F., & Heberlein, T. A. (1992). Cognitive and behavioural adaptions to perceived crowding: A panel study of coping and displacement. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(4), 377–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuentzel, W. F., & Heberlein, T. A. (2003). More visitors, less crowding: Change and stability of norms over time at the Apostle Islands. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(4), 349–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krymkowski, D. H., Manning, R. E., & Valliere, W. A. (2009). Norm crystallization: Measurement and comparative analysis. Leisure Sciences, 31(5), 403–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, A. M., Raymond, C. M., Adams, V. M., Polyakov, M., Gordon, A., Rhodes, J. R., & Lefroy, E. C. (2014). Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 28(6), 1497–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, Y. F., & Marion, J. L. (2000). Recreation impacts and management in wilderness: A state-of-knowledge review. In D. N. Cole, S. F. McCool, W. T. Borrie, & J. O'Lounghlin (Eds.), Wilderness science in a time of change conference. Volume 5: Ecosystems, threats, and management; 1999 May 23–27; Missoula, MT. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-5 (pp. 23–48). Odgen, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, N. A., & Brown, R. D. (2003). Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(1), 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, K., Cottrell, S. P., Siikamäki, P., & Van Marwijk, R. (2011). Biodiversity hotspots and visitor flows in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 11(suppl. 1), 100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., & Decker, D. J. (1995). Human dimensions of wildlife management: Basic concepts. In R. Knight & Gutzwiller (Eds.), Wildlife and recreationists: Coexistence through management and research (pp. 17–31). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. (2011). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Valliere, W., Minteer, B., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (2000). Crowding in parks and outdoor recreation: A theoretical, empirical, and managerial analysis. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18(4), 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Valliere, W., Minteer, B., Wang B., & Jacobi, C. (2009). Crowding, conflict, and coping in outdoor recreation. In R. Manning (Ed.), Parks and people: Managing outdoor recreation at Acadia National Park (pp. 109–121). New England: University of Vermont Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metsähallitus (2014). Metsähallitus Year 2014. Retrieved from http://julkaisut.metsa.fi/assets/pdf/mhtoimintakertomus2014eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Metsähallitus (2015). Visitation numbers in protected areas of Finland. Retrieved from http://www.metsa.fi/documents/10739/11431/kayntimaarat2014_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L., Leung, Y. F., Matisoff, C., Dorwart, C., & Parker, A. (2012). Understanding users’ perceptions of trail resource impacts and how they affect experiences: An integrated approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(4), 343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuvonen, M., Pouta, E., Puustinen, J., & Sievänen, T. (2010). Visits to national parks: Effects of park characteristics and spatial demand. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(3), 224–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo, I., Martín-López, B., Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., & Montes, C. (2013). National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 4, 104–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä, M., & Kangas, K. (2015). Examining the relationship between recreation settings and experiences in Oulanka national park – a spatial approach. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 9, 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Puhakka, R. (2011). Environmental concern and responsibility among nature tourists in Oulanka PAN Park, Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 11(1), 76–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risvoll, C., Fedreheim, G. E., Sandberg, A., & BurnSilver, S. (2014). Does Pastoralists' participation in the management of national parks in northern Norway contribute to adaptive governance? Ecology and Society, 19(2), 71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbach, B., Anderson, S., & Laube, P. (2015). The effects of sample size on data quality in participatory mapping of past land use. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0265813515618578
   Google Scholar
• Scolozzi, R., Schirpke, U., Detassis, C., Abdullah, S., & Gretter, A. (2015). Mapping alpine landscape values and related threats as perceived by tourists. Landscape Research, 40(4), 451–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (1996). Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18(2), 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse, B. C., Semmens, D. J., & Clement, J. M. (2014). An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators, 36, 68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siikamäki, P., Kangas, K., Paasivaara, A., & Schroderus, S. (2015). Biodiversity attracts visitors to national parks. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24(10), 2521–2534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G. H., Cole, D. N., Lucas, R. C., Petersen, M. E., & Frissell, S. S. (1985). The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning (General Technical Report INT-176). Ogden, UT: Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Su, M. M., Wall, G., & Ma, Z. (2014). Assessing ecotourism from a multi-stakeholder perspective: Xingkai Lake National Nature Reserve, China. Environmental management, 54(5), 1190–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y. P., Kyle, G. T., Shafer, C. S., Graefe, A. R., Bradle, T. A., & Schuett, M. A. (2009). Exploring the crowding–satisfaction relationship in recreational boating. Environmental Management, 43(3), 496–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Riper, C. J., & Kyle, G. T. (2014). Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: A spatial analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 374–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Riper, C., Manning, R. E., & Reigner, N. (2010). Perceived impacts of outdoor recreation on the summit of Cascade Mountain, New York. Adirondack Journal of Environmental Studies, 16. Retrieved from http://www.ajes.org/v16/vanriper2010.php
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (2001). Social impact indicators and standards at the Columbia Icefield (HDNRU Report No. 47). Fort Collins: Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., & Lehto, X. (2002). Visitor crowding and normative tolerances at congested areas of Rocky Mountain National Park (HDRNU Report No. 50). Fort Collins: Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., & Shelby, L. B. (2008). Crowding as a descriptive indicator and an evaluative standard: Results from 30 years of research. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlič, A., Arnberger, A., Japelj, A., Simončič, P., & Pirnat, J. (2015). Perceptions of recreational trail impacts on an urban forest walk: A controlled field experiment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. D., Hall, T. E., & Farrell, T. A. (2001). Influence of ecological impacts and other campsite characteristics on wilderness visitors' campsite choices. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19(2), 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, D. (1992). Selecting indicators: Which impacts matter more? In B. Shelby, G. Stankey, & B. Shindler (Eds.), Defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management – a workshop proceedings (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-305). Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar