Publication Cover
Tourism Geographies
An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment
Volume 21, 2019 - Issue 2
668
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Hybrid production of gardens: an actor–network analysis of heterogeneous power relations

ORCID Icon
Pages 195-213 | Received 08 Mar 2017, Accepted 05 Mar 2018, Published online: 16 Apr 2018

References

  • Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Alcadipani, R., & Hassard, J. (2010). Actor-Network Theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing. Organization, 17(4), 419–435.
  • Arnaboldi, M., & Spiller, N. (2011). Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of Cultural Districts. Tourism Management, 32(3), 641–654.
  • Barnes, B. (1988). The nature of power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Barnes, B. (1995). The elements of social theory. London: UCL Press.
  • Beard, L., Scarles, C., & Tribe, J. (2016). Mess and method: Using ANT in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 60, 97–110.
  • Bengtsson, T. T. (2014). What are data? Ethnographic experiences with young offenders. Qualitative Research, 14(6), 729–744.
  • Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. London: Sage.
  • Blommaert, J., & Jie, D. (2010). Ethnographic fieldwork: A beginner's guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage.
  • Burton, L., & Collins, F. L. (2015). Mediated animal geographies: Symbolism, manipulation and the imaginary in advertising. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(3), 276–298.
  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements in a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Callon, M. (1992). The dynamics of techno-economic networks. In R. Coombs, P. Saviotti, & V. Walsh (Eds.), Technological change and company strategies: Economic and sociological perspectives (pp. 77–102). London: Harcout Brace Jovanovich.
  • Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan. In K. D. Knorr Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 275–303). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
  • Cheong, S., & Miller, M. L. (2000). Power and tourism: A Foucauldian observation. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(2), 371–390.
  • Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations (foundations for organizational science). London: Sage.
  • Cloke, P., & Jones, O. (2001). Dwelling, place, and landscape: An orchard in Somerset. Environment and Planning A, 33, 649–666
  • Cloke, P., & Jones, O. (2004). Turning in the graveyard: Trees and the hybrid geographies of dwelling, monitoring and resistance in a Bristol cemetery. Cultural Geographies, 11, 313–341
  • Connell, J. (2002). A critical analysis of gardens as a resource for tourism and recreation in the UK (PhD). The University of Plymouth, Plymouth.
  • Connell, J. (2004). The purest of human pleasures: The characteristics and motivations of garden visitors in Great Britain. Tourism Management, 25(2), 229–247.
  • Connell, J. (2005). Managing gardens for visitors in Great Britain: A story of continuity and change. Tourism Management, 26(2), 185–201.
  • de Laet, M., & Mol, M. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263.
  • de Montigny, G. (2007). Ethnomethodology for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 6(1), 95–120.
  • Dzakiria, H. (2012). Theory of relatability as a possible alternative to the issue of generalising of research findings: The case of open and distance learning (ODL) at Universiti Utara Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 41–58.
  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317
  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. London: Penguin Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. London: Pantheon.
  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
  • Fox, D. (2007). Understanding garden visitors: The affordances of a leisure environment (PhD). Bournemouth University, Bournmath.
  • Fuhse, J. A. (2009). The meaning structure of networks. Sociological Theory, 27, 51–73.
  • Gad, C., & Jensen, C. B. (2010). On the consequences of post-ANT. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(1), 55–80.
  • Gallagher, J. (1983). Visiting historic gardens: A report on contemporary garden visiting and its literature. Leeds: Research Services Branch, English Tourist Board.
  • Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analysing qualitative data. London: Sage.
  • Ginn, F. (2014). Sticky lives: Slugs, detachment and more-than-human ethics in the garden. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), 532–544.
  • Gyimóthy, S., & Mykletun, R. J. (2009). Scary food: Commodifying culinary heritage as meal adventures in tourism. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 15(3), 259–273.
  • Haldrup, M., & Larsen, J. (2006). Material cultures of tourism. Leisure Studies, 25(3), 275–289.
  • Haraldsdóttir, L., & Gunnarsdóttir, G. Þ. (2014). Pure, fresh and simple: „Spicing up“ the new Nordic cuisine. In L. Jolliffe (Ed.), Spices and tourism: Destinations, attractions and cuisines (pp. 169–181). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouseTM. London: Routledge.
  • Haug, B. (2012). Enacting risk at Besseggen. In R. van der Duim, C. Ren, & G. T. Jóhannesson (Eds.), Actor-network theory and tourism: Ordering, materiality and multiplicity (pp. 80–93). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Hearn, J. (2011). Domination. In K. M. Dowding (Ed.), Encyclopedia of power (pp. 204–207). London: Sage.
  • Hearn, J. (2012). Theorizing power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hitchings, R. (2003). People, plants and performance: On actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden. Social & Cultural Geography, 4(1), 99–114.
  • Hobson, K. (2007). Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography. Political Geography, 26(3), 250–267.
  • Holifield, R. (2009). Actor-network theory as a critical approach to environmental justice: A case against synthesis with Urban political ecology. Antipode, 41(4), 637–658.
  • Hummel, J., & van der Duim, R. (2016). SNV's modes of ordering: Organizing tourism as development practice. Tourism Management, 57, 312–322.
  • Janick, J. (2014). Horticulture and art. In G. R. Dixon & D. Aldous (Eds.), Horticulture: Plants for people and places (pp. 1197–1223). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Jashimuddin, M., Alamgir, M., Majumder, R., Patwary, M. R. A., & Bhuiyan, M. A. R. (2004). Potential visitors of Mirpur zoological garden as an outdoor recreation area of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(9), 1509–1512.
  • Jellicoe, G., Jellicoe, S., Goode, P., & Lancaster, M. (Eds.). (1991). The Oxford companion to gardens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jóhannesson, G. T. (2005). Tourism translations: Actor–Network Theory and tourism research. Tourist Studies, 5(2), 133–150.
  • Jóhannesson, G. T. (2012). ʻTo get things doneʼ: A relational approach to entrepreneurship. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 12(2), 181–196.
  • Jóhannesson, G. T., van der Duim, R., & Ren, C. (2012 ). Introduction. In R. van der Duim, C. Ren, & G. T. Jóhannesson (Eds.), Actor-network theory and tourism: Ordering, materiality and multiplicity (pp. 1–12). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Kay, P., Hede, A. M., Inglis, J., & Polonsky, M. (2008). Applicability of leisure theory in managerial views on volunteerism in a volunteer managed nonprofit organisation: Some preliminary findings. Paper presented at Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2008, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kim, S., & Ellis, A. (2015). Noodle production and consumption: From agriculture to food tourism in Japan. Tourism Geographies, 17(1), 151–167.
  • Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (Eds.). (2008). Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach [E-readear vesion]. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/book/10.1007%2F978-0-387-74711-8
  • Kohlleppel, T., Bradley, J. C., & Jacob, S. (2002). A walk through the garden: Can a visit to a botanic garden reduce stress ? Hort Technology, 12(3), 489–492.
  • Larsen, J. (2005). Families seen sightseeing: Performativity of tourist photography. Space and Culture, 8(4), 416–434.
  • Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381.
  • Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 15–25.
  • Latour, B. (2002). Morality and technology: The end of the means. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5–6), 247–260.
  • Latour, B. (2004). Nonhumans. In: S. Harrison, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Patterned ground: Entanglements of nature and culture (pp. 224–227). London: Reakiton Books.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Law, J. (1990). Power, discretion and strategy. The Sociological Review, 38(1), 165–191.
  • Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.
  • Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Law, J., & Mol, A. (2001). Situating technoscience: An inquiery into spacialities. Environment and Planning D, 19, 609–621.
  • Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331–355.
  • Law, J., & Urry, J. (2005). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.
  • Lovett, F. (2009). Domination and distributive justice. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 817–830.
  • Lowe, A. (2001). After ANT: An illustrative discussion of the implications for qualitative accounting case research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 327–351.
  • Lund, K. A. (2015). Magic mussels: Ingredients for improvising a tourism destination. Journal of Gastronomy and Tourism, 1(1), 19–31.
  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Lynch, M., & Peyrot, M. (1992). Introduction: A reader's guide to ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2), 113–122.
  • Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
  • Mausner, C. (1996). A kaleidoscope model: Defining natural environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(4), 335–348.
  • Michael, M. (2017). Actor-network theory: Trials, trails and translations. London: Sage.
  • Mische, A. (2011). Relational sociology, culture, and agency. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 80–97). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 74–89.
  • Mol, A. (2012). Mind your plate! The ontonorms of Dutch dieting. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 379–396.
  • Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641–671
  • Moser, I., & Law, J. (2006). Fluids or flows? Information and qualculation in medical practice. Information Technology & People, 19(1), 55–73.
  • Müller, M. (2014). The topological multiplicities of power: The limits of governing the Olympics. Economic Geography, 90(3), 321–339
  • Munro, R. (2009). Actor-network theory. In S. R. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The Sage handbook of power (pp. 125–139). London: Sage.
  • Murdoch, J. (1998). The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum, 29(4), 357–374.
  • Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography. London: Sage.
  • Mützel, S. (2009). Networks as culturally constituted processes: A comparison of relational sociology and Actor-network theory. Current Sociology, 57(6), 871–887.
  • Nelson, V. (2015). Place reputation: Representing Houston, Texas as a creative destination through culinary culture. Tourism Geographies, 17(2), 192–207.
  • Neyland, D., & Whittle, A. ( In Press). Garfinkel on strategy: Using ethnomethodology to make sense of ʻrubbish strategy.ʼ Critical perspectives on accounting. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.03.008.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. Qualitative Report, 17(56), 1–28.
  • Parsons, T. (1957). The distribution of power in American society. World Politics, 10(1), 123–143.
  • Posthuma, R., Montes, C., Rodríguez, D., & Serrano, G. (2012). Affective choice of conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23(1), 6–18.
  • Povilanskas, R., & Armaitienė, A. (2011). Seaside resort-hinterland nexus: Palanga, Lithuania. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1156–1177.
  • Power, E. R. (2005). Human–nature relations in suburban gardens. Australian Geographer, 36(1), 39–53.
  • Ren, C., Pritchard, A., & Morgan, N. (2009). Constructing tourism research: A critical inquiry. Annales of Tourism Research, 37(4), 885–904.
  • Ren, C. (2010). Beyond hosts and guests: Translating the concept of cultural misconception. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4(4), 287–298.
  • Ren, C. (2011). Non-human agency, radical ontology and tourism realities. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 858–881.
  • Rodger, K., Moore, S. A., & Newsome, D. (2009). Wildlife tourism, science and actor network theory. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(4), 645–666.
  • Rouse, J. (2006). Power/knowledge. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault (pp. 95–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ryan, C., & Bates, C. (1995). A rose by any other name: The motivations of those opening their gardens for a festival. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 3(2), 59–71.
  • Saldaña, J. (2015). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. London: Sage.
  • Sayes, E. (2014). Actor-network theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency ? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–139.
  • Scotland's Gardens. (2014). Our guide for 2014: Full listing of open gardens across Scotland. Edinburgh: Author.
  • Simoni, V. (2012). Tourism materialities: Enacting cigars in touristic Cuba. In R. van der Duim, C. Ren, & G. T. Jóhannesson (Eds.), Actor–Network theory and tourism: Ordering, materiality and multiplicity (pp. 59–79). London: Routledge.
  • Spilková, J., & Fialová, D. (2013). Culinary tourism packages and regional brands in Czechia. Tourism Geographies, 15(2), 177–197.
  • Sprin, A. W. (1998). The language of landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp.26–56). London: Routledge.
  • Taber, K. S. (2010). Constructivism and direct instruction as competing instructional paradigms: An essay review of Tobias and Duffy's constructivist instruction: success or failure ? Education Review, 13(8), 1–45.
  • Tipples, R., & Gibbons, P. (1992). Garden visiting – twentieth century local tourism in Canterbury. Horticulture in New Zealand, 3(2), 29–34.
  • Tribe, J. (2010). Tribes, territories and networks in the tourism academy. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1), 7–33.
  • Turner, T. (2005). Garden history: Philosophy and design 2000 BC-2000 AD. Abingdon: Spon Press.
  • van der Duim, R. (2007). Tourismscapes: An actor-network perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(4), 961–976.
  • van der Duim, R., Ampumuza, C., & Ahebwa, W. M. (2014). Gorilla tourism in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: An actor-network perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 27(6), 588–601.
  • van der Duim, R., Peters, K., & Wearing, S. (2005). Planning host and guest interactions: Moving beyond the empty meeting ground in African encounters. Current Issues in Tourism, 8(4), 286–305.
  • van der Duim, R., Ren, C., & Jóhannesson, G. T. (2013). Ordering, materiality and multiplicity: Enacting ANT in Tourism. Tourist Studies, 13(1), 3–20.
  • van der Duim, R., Ren, C., & Jóhannesson, G. T. (2017). ANT: A decade of interfering with tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 139–149.
  • Vikkelsø. (2007). Description as intervention: Engagement and resistance in actor-network analyses. Science as Culture, 16(3), 297–309.
  • Walsh, N., & Tucker, H. (2009). Tourism ‘things’: The travelling performance of the backpack. Tourist Studies, 9(3), 223–239.
  • Watson, G., & Goulet, J.-G. (1998). What can ethnomethodology say about power ? Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 96–113.
  • Wearing, S., & McDonald, M. (2002). The development of community-based tourism: Re-thinking the relationship between tour operators and development agents as intermediaries in rural and isolated area communities. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10(3), 191–206.
  • Wearing, S. L., Wearing, M., & McDonald, M. (2010). Understanding local power and interactional processes in sustainable tourism: Exploring village-tour operator relations on the Kokoda Track, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(1), 61–76.
  • Whittle, A., & Spicer, A. (2008). Is actor network theory critique ? Organization Studies, 29(4), 611–629.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.