Dynamic Cleavages of ‘Welfare Rights and Duties’ in Public Attitude Towards Old-age Pensions

References

• Ahn, S.-H. (2000) Pro-welfare Politics: A Model for Changes in European Welfare States, Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, S.-H. (2002) ‘Dilution of class politics and defense mechanism of the welfare state: Some macro evidence for welfare status model’, Korean Social Welfare Studies 19: 159–81 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, S.-H. and Jung, H.-S. (2010) ‘Welfare status and “social quality”’, Korean Journal of Social Policy 17(3): 93–121 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, S.-H. (2003) ‘A socio-political comparative study on welfare state cleavage of pro-welfare alliance: Swedish experience and Korean experiment’, Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies 21: 79–104 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, S.-H. (2009) ‘A preliminary study on Koreans’ pro-welfare attitude cleavage and its path structure’, Korean Journal of Social Policy 16(1): 163–92 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Andreß, H. and Heien, T. (2001) ‘Four worlds of welfare state attitude? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States’, European Sociological Review 17(4): 337–56. doi: 10.1093/esr/17.4.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2001) ‘Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?’, Acta Sociologica 44: 283–99. doi: 10.1177/000169930104400401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, C. and Papadakis, E. (1998) ‘A comparison of mass attitudes. Towards the welfare state in different institutional regimes 1985–90’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10: 211–36. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/10.3.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blekesaune, M. (2007) ‘Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies’, European Sociological Review 23(3): 393–403. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcm012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003) ‘Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations’, European Sociological Review 19(5): 415–27. doi: 10.1093/esr/19.5.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2007) ‘Time matters: Postindustrialization, new social risks, and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 40(5): 495–520. doi: 10.1177/0010414005285755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. and Hausermann, S. (2009) ‘Who wants what from the welfare state? Socio-structural cleavages in distributional politics: Evidence form Swiss referendum votes’, European Societies 11(2): 211–32. doi: 10.1080/14616690801942116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. and Reber, F. (2010) ‘The political economy of childcare in OECD countries: Explaining cross-national variation in spending and coverage rates’, European Journal of Political Research 49(1): 97–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01884.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. and Svallfors, S. (2010) ‘Why does class matter? Policy attitudes, mechanisms, and the case of the Nordic countries’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28: 199–213. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1993) ‘Alternative ways of assessing model fit’, in K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (eds), Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 136–62.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlin, R. M. (1980) Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy: Attitudes toward Taxes and Spending in Industrialized Societies, Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, R. (1993) Class and Stratification: An Introduction to Current Debates, Cambridge: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (1996) ‘Cross-national differences in support for welfare and redistribution: An evaluation of competing theories’, in B. Taylor and K. Thomson (eds), Understanding Change in Social Attitudes, Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth, pp. 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Galasso, V. (2006) The Political Future of Social Security in Ageing Societies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelissen, J. (2000) ‘Popular support for institutionalized solidarity: A comparison between European welfare states’, International Journal of Social Welfare 9: 285–300. doi: 10.1111/1468-2397.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelissen, J. (2001) ‘Old-age pensions: Individual or collective responsibility? An investigation of public opinion across European welfare states’, European Societies 3(4): 495–523. doi: 10.1080/14616690120112235
   Google Scholar
• Hammarström, G. (1998) ‘Offentlig eller privat finansiering?’, Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 4: 315–33.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. (2010) The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heien, T. and Hofäcker, D. (1999) How do welfare regimes influence attitudes? A comparison of five European countries and the United States 1985–1996. (Working Paper No. 9)Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, H. (1987) Welfare State and Women Power: Essays in State Feminism, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T. and Rosenbluth, F. (2006) ‘The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labour and the gender voting gap’, American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, M. M. (2006) ‘What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: Self-interest or political ideology? A longitudinal approach’, Acta Sociologica 49(3): 321–38. doi: 10.1177/0001699306067718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E.-J. & Ahn, S.-H. (2010) ‘Gender mechanism of Korean welfare politics: Gender difference in attitudes and mediating effects of welfare statuses’, Social Welfare Studies 41(2): 309–34 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, M. (2006) ‘Aging and justice’, in R. Binstock and L. George (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, (6th edition), San Diego, CA: Elsevier, pp. 456–78.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. (2008) ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies 41(2): 145–68. doi: 10.1177/0010414006295234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. (1950) ‘Citizenship and social class’, in T. H. Marshall and T. Bottomore (eds), Citizenship and Social Class, London: Pluto, pp. 3–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. (1990) The Welfare State in Capitalist Society, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. and Satorra, A. (1995) ‘Complex sample data in structural equation modelling’, Sociological Methodology 25: 267–316. doi: 10.2307/271070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2005) Pensions at a Glance, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2010) Revenue Statistics 1965–2009, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pampel, F. C. (1994) ‘Population aging, class context, and age inequality in public spending’, AJS 100(1): 153–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadakis, E. and Bean, C. (1993) ‘Popular support for the welfare state: A comparison between institutional regimes’, Journal of Public Policy 13(3): 227–54. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00001057
   Google Scholar
• Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000) Political Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996) ‘The new politics of the welfare state’, World Politics 48(2): 143–79. doi: 10.1353/wp.1996.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (ed.) (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. F. (1985) ‘Women and the state: Ideology, power, and the welfare state’, in A. S. Rossi (ed.), Gender and the Life Course, New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. S. (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, (2nd edition), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (1995) ‘The end of class politics? Structural cleavages and attitudes to Swedish welfare policies’, Acta Soiologica 38: 53–74. doi: 10.1177/000169939503800105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (1997) ‘Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight Western countries’, European Sociological Review 13: 283–304. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (2004) ‘Class, attitudes, and the welfare state: Sweden in comparative perspective’, Social Policy and Administration 38: 119–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (2008) ‘The generational contract in Sweden: Age-specific attitudes to age-related policies’, Policy & Politics 36(3): 381–96. doi: 10.1332/030557308X307720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (2001) ‘Sustaining state welfare in hard times: Who will foot the bill?’, Journal of European Social Policy 11(2): 133–47. doi: 10.1177/095892870101100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2004) New Risk, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (2000) ‘Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public’, Policy & Politics 28: 33–48. doi: 10.1332/0305573002500811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (1990) ‘The economic burden of ageing and the prospect of intergenerational conflict’, Ageing and Society 10: 377–96. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X00007376
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (ed.) (1996) The New Generational Contract: Intergenerational Relations, Old Age and Welfare, London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wennemo, I. (1994) Sharing the Cost of Children, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar