The Vicious Circle

References

• Abramson, L., Seligman, M. and Teasdale, J. (1978) ‘Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87: 49–74. 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1989) The Civic Culture Revisited: An Analytical Study, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977) ‘Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change’, Psychological Review 84: 191–215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S. (2003) Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. and Rahn, W. (1997) ‘Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital’, American Journal of Political Science 41: 999–1023. 10.2307/2111684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Gurin, G. and Miller, W. (1952) The Voter Decides, Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Catterberg, G. and Moreno, A. (2006) ‘The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18: 31–48. 10.1093/ijpor/edh081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. and Maggiotto, M. (1981) ‘Political discontent and political action’, The Journal of Politics 43: 514–22. 10.2307/2130380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., Gabriel, O. and Torcal, M. (2007) ‘Political confidence in representative democracies. Socio-cultural vs. political explanations’, in J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero and A. Westholm (eds), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Dreifelds, J. (1996) Latvia in Transition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EVS (2011) ‘European Values Study 1981–2008, Longitudinal Data File’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA4804 Data File Version 2.0.0 (2011-12-30) DOI:10.4232/1.11005.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2002) Structural Equation Models: Appendix to an R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. and Klingemann, H.-D. (2006) ‘Democratic communities in Europe: A comparison between East and West’, in H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs and J. Zielonka (eds), Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 25–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (2000) ‘Can we trust trust?’, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, New York, NY: Basil Blackwel, pp. 213–37.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, E. (2008) ‘Are the Baltics the new Argentina?’, Credit Writedowns, July 30, http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/07/are-baltics-new-argentina.html
   Google Scholar
• Hazans, M. (2011) ‘Latvijas emigrācijas mainīgā seja: 2000–2010’, in B. Zepa and E. Kļave (eds), Latvija. Pārskats par tautas attīstību 2010./2011. Nacionālā identitāte, mobilitāte un rīcībspēja, Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, pp. 70–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M. (2003) The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-communist Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herreros, F. (2004) The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust?, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M. and Stolle, D. (2003) Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hugh, E. (2008) ‘Why the IMF's decision to agree on a Latvian bailout programme without devaluation is a mistake’, RGE Monitor, December 22, http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/why-the-imfs-decision-to-agree-a-lavian-bailout-programme-without-devaluation-is-a-mistake/.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (2006) ‘East European value systems in global perspective’, in H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs and J. Zielonka (eds), Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe, New York, NY: Routledge pp. 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• ISSP Research Group (2006) ‘International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government IV, 2006’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA4700, Data File Version 1.0.0, (2008-8-18), DOI:10.4232/1.4700.
   Google Scholar
• ISSP Research Group (2007) ‘International Social Survey Programme: Leisure Time and Sports, 2007’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA2900, Data File Version 2.0.0, (2009-10-29), DOI:10.4232/1.10079.
   Google Scholar
• Jansone, D. and Vilka, I. (2007) ‘Pārvaldes struktūru atsaucīgums’, in J. Rozenvalds (ed.), Cik demokrātiska ir Latvija? Demokrātijas audits, Riga: SPPI, pp. 165–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2008) Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Karklins, R. (2005) The System Made Me Do It: Corruption in Post-Communist Countries, London: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I. (2005) ‘A sense of alienation towards government – an analytic framework’, International Review of Public Administration 9: 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Knack, S. (2002) ‘Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the States’, American Journal of Political Science 46: 772–85. 10.2307/3088433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koroleva, I. and Rungule, R. (2006) ‘Latvia: democracy as an abstract value’, in H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs and J. Zielonka (eds), Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe, New York, NY: Routledge pp. 25–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerspetz, M. (2009) ‘Still citizen vs. state? Post-communist prospects for democracy in Europe’, in Annamari Konttinen (ed.), Civic Mind and Good Citizenship, Tampere: University of Tampere, pp. 147–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. (2006) ‘Collective efficacy, support for democratization, and political participation in Hong Kong’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18: 297–317. 10.1093/ijpor/edh105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letki, N. (2004) ‘Socialization for participation? Trust, membership and democratization in East-Central Europe’, Political Research Quarterly 57: 665–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelieveldt, H. and Caiani, M. (2007) ‘The political role of associations’, in W. A. Maloney and S. Rossteutcher (eds), Social Capital and Associations in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 118–52.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, D. (1987) ‘Political self-efficacy tested’, The American Political Science Review 81: 571–81. 10.2307/1961970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarovič, M., Ivančič, A. and Podmenik, D. (2007) ‘Social and political participation: is there an European convergence?’, in F. Adam (ed.), Social Capital and Governance: Old and New Members of the EU in Comparison, Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 51–90.
   Google Scholar
• Menshikov, V. (2001) ‘The advent of participation in public policy’, in T. Tisenkopfs (ed.), Latvia. Human Development Report 2000/2001. The Public Policy Process in Latvia, Riga: UNDP Latvia, pp. 75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2001) ‘What are the origins of political trust?: Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies’, Comparative Political Studies 34: 30–62. 10.1177/0010414001034001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2005) ‘What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia’, Comparative Political Studies 38: 1050–78. 10.1177/0010414005278419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, L. and Geurts, P. (2007) ‘Associational involvement’, in J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero and A. Westholm (eds), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 135–57.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, E. and Seligson, M. (1994) ‘Civic culture and democracy: The question of causal relationships’, American Political Science Review 88: 635–52. 10.2307/2944800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1999) ‘Introduction: The growth of critical citizens’, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Overmier, J. (2002) ‘On learned helplessness’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 37: 4–8. 10.1007/BF02688801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabriks, A. and Purs, A. (2001) Latvia: The Challenges of Change, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1975) Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Maier, S. and Seligman, M. (1995) Learned Helplessness: A Theory for the Age of Personal Control, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pietrzyk-Reeves, D. (2008) ‘Weak civic engagement? Post-communist participation and democratic consolidation’, Polish Sociological Review 1: 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2002) Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. and Shin, D. (2001) ‘Democratization backwards: The problem of third-wave democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 31: 331–54. 10.1017/S0007123401000138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2004) ‘Social trust and honesty in government: A causal mechanisms approach’, in J. Kornai, B. Rothstein and S. Rose-Ackerman (eds), Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2003) ‘Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach’, in M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds), Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan pp. 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Roubini, N. (2009) ‘Latvia's currency crisis is a return of Argentina's’, Financial Times, June 11.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2005) Must Politics Disappoint?, London: Fabian Society.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2008) ‘Explaining political disenchantment: Finding pathways to democratic renewal’, The Political Quarterly 77: 184–94. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00761.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolle, D. (1998) ‘Bowling together, bowling alone: The development of generalized trust in voluntary associations’, Political Psychology 19: 497–525. 10.1111/0162-895X.00115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolle, D. (2003) ‘The sources of social capital’, in Marc Hooghe and Dietlind Stolle (eds), Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1996) ‘Introduction. The lessons of 1989 for sociological theory’, in P. Sztompka (ed.) Building Open Society and Perspectives of Sociology in East-central Europe, http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~intlsa/en/meetings/reports/EastCentralEurope.html
   Google Scholar
• Toots, A. and Bachmann, J. (2010) ‘Contemporary welfare regimes in Baltic states: Adapting post-communist conditions to post-modern challenges’, Studies of Transition States and Societies 2: 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. (2003) ‘Trust, democracy and governance: Can government policies influence Generalized Trust?’, in M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds), Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171–90.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. and Brown, M. (2005) ‘Inequality, trust, and civic engagement’, American Politics Research 33: 868–94. 10.1177/1532673X04271903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbrot, M. and Ray, R. (2011) ‘Latvia's internal devaluation: A success story?’, Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research, http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/latvia-2011-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C., Inglehart, R. and Deutsch, F. (2005) ‘Social capital, voluntary associations and collective action: Which aspects of social capital have the greatest “civic” payoff?’, Journal of Civil Society 1: 121–46. 10.1080/17448680500337475
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, D. (1989) ‘Why democracies produce efficient results’, The Journal of Political Economy 97: 1395–424. 10.1086/261660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepa, B. (2001) ‘Confidence in institutions: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania’, in E. Loftsson and Y. Choe (eds), Political Representation and Participation in Transitory Democracies: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Stockholm: Soedertorn University, pp. 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S., Newton, K. and Montero, R. (2007) ‘Trust in people, confidence in political institutions, and satisfaction with democracy’, in J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero and A. Westholm (eds), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 35–65.
   Google Scholar