Participation, equality of opportunity and returns to tertiary education in contemporary Europe

References

• Acemoglu, D. (2002) ‘Technical change, inequality and the labor market’, Journal of Economic Literature 40: 7–72. doi: 10.1257/0022051026976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, J. (1989) ‘Educational system and labour markets outcomes’, European Sociological Review 54: 231–50.
   Google Scholar
• Arum, R., Gamoran, A. and Shavit, Y. (2007) ‘More inclusion than diversion: Expansion, differentiation and market structure in higher education’, in Shavit Arum and Gamoran (eds), Stratification in Higher Education. A Comparative Study, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ballarino, G., Bernardi, F., Schadee, H. and Requena, M. (2009) ‘Persistent inequalities? Expansion of education and class inequality in Italy and Spain’, European Sociological Review 25: 123–38. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballarino, G. and Schadee, H. (2010) ‘Allocation and distribution. A discussion of the educational transition model, with reference to the Italian case’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28: 45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2009.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, F. (2003) ‘Returns to educational performance at entry into the Italian labour market’, European Sociological Review 19(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1093/esr/19.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, F., Gangl M. and van de Werfhorst, H. (2004) ‘The from school to work dynamics. Timing of work and quality of work in Italy, the Netherlands and the United States, 1980–1998’, Fundacion Juan March, CEACS Estudio/Working Paper 2004/201.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, R. (2004) Social Mobility in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2001) ‘Class, mobility and merit: The experience of two British birth cohorts’, European Sociological Review 17: 81–101. doi: 10.1093/esr/17.2.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, R. and Jonsson, J. (2005) ‘Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility’, Annual Review of Sociology 31: 223–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W. and Pollak, R. (2009) ‘Non-persistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries’, American Journal of Sociology 114: 1475–521. doi: 10.1086/595951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1979) The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification, New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2000) ‘Comparative and historical patterns of education’, in M. T. Hallinan (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Education, New York, NY: Kluwer, pp. 213–39.
   Google Scholar
• Firebaugh, G. (2008) Seven Rules for Social Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gangl, M. (2003) ‘Explaining change in early career outcomes: Labour market conditions, educational expansion, and youth cohort sizes’, W. Müller and M. Gangl (eds), Transitions from Education to Work in Europe: The Integration of Youth into EU Labour Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 251–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ganzeboom, H. and Luijkx, R. (2004) ‘Recent trends in intergenerational occupational class reproduction in the Netherlands, 1970–99’, in R. Breen (ed.), Social Mobility in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganzeboom, H. and Treiman, R. (1996) ‘Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations’, Social Science Research 25: 201–39. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1996.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, C. (1999) ‘Egalitarianism and the returns to education during the great transformation of American education’, Journal of Political Economy 107: S65–S94. doi: 10.1086/250104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007) On Sociology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartog, J. and Oosterbeek, H. (1998) ‘Health, wealth and happiness: Why pursue a higher education?’, Economics of Education Review 17: 245–56. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(97)00064-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A. F. and Cheung, S. I. (eds) (2007) Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets, Oxford: British Academy/Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. (1997) A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kivinen, O., Hedman, J. and Kaipainen, P. (2007) ‘From elite university to mass higher education. Educational expansion, equality of opportunity and returns to university education’, Acta Sociologica 50: 231–47. doi: 10.1177/0001699307080929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, J. O. (1996) ‘Stratification in post-industrial society: Are educational qualifications of growing importance?’, in R. Erikson and J. O. Jonsson (eds), Can Education Be Equalized? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 113–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. B. and Linzer, D. A. (2005) ‘Estimating regression models in which the dependent variable is based on estimates’, Political Analysis 13: 345–364. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. (2009) ‘Stratification theory, socioeconomic background, and educational attainment. A formal analysis’, Rationality and Society 21: 459–511. doi: 10.1177/1043463109348987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, K., Moretti, E. and Oreopoulos, (2004) ‘Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom’, Journal of Public Economics 88: 1667–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mood, K. (2010) ‘Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it’, European Sociological Review 26: 67–82. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. and Shavit, Y. (1998) ‘The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process: A comparative study of qualifications and occupations in thirteen countries’, in Shavit and Müller (eds), From School to Work. A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations, Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, F. (2008) ‘Persistent Inequality in educational attainment and its institutional context’, European Sociological Review 24: 543–65. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. (2010) ‘Nominal comparability is not enough: (In-)equivalence of construct validity of cross-national measures of educational attainment in the European Social Survey’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28(3), 343–57. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. L. and Müller W. (2009) ‘Measurement of education in EU-SILC – Preliminary evaluation of measurement quality’, in EQUALSOC EDUC/INCDIS Meeting on the Potential of the EU-SILC Intergenerational Module, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Shavit, Y. and Blossfeld, H.-P. (eds) (1993) Persistent Inequalities. A Comparative Study of Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vallet, L. A. (2001) ‘Forty years of social mobility in France. Change in social fluidity in the light of recent models’, Revue Française de Sociologie 42 (Suppl.).
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, M., Pop, I. and Wolbers, M. (2011) ‘Intergenerational transmission of education across European countries and cohorts’, European Societies 131, doi:10.1080/14616696.2010.540351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Werfhorst, H. and Mijs, J. (2010) ‘Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective’, Annual Review of Sociology 36: 407–28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar