1,533
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Welfare Rights

Who Blames the Poor?

Multilevel evidence of support for and determinants of individualistic explanation of poverty in Europe

&

References

  • Albrekt Larsen, C. (2006) The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
  • Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. L. (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe. A World of Difference, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Andress, H.-J. and Heien, T. (2001) ‘Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States’, European Sociological Review 17: 337–56.
  • Blekesaune, M. (2007) ‘Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies’, European Sociological Review 23: 393–403.
  • Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003) ‘Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations’, European Sociological Review 19: 415–27.
  • Bonoli, G. (1997) ‘Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach’, Journal of European Social Policy 26: 351–72.
  • Brady, D. (2009) Rich Democracies, Poor People. How Politics Explain Poverty, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Bullock, H. E. (1999) ‘Attributions for poverty: A comparison of middle-class and welfare recipient attitudes’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29: 2059–82.
  • Bullock, H. E., Williams, W. R. and Limbert, W. M. (2003) ‘Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality’, Journal of Poverty 7: 35–56.
  • Cerami, A. and Vanhuysse, P. (eds) (2009) Post-Communist Welfare Pathways. Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V. and Tagler, M. J. (2001) ‘Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty’, Journal of Social Issues 57: 207–27.
  • Dallinger, U. (2010) ‘Public support for redistribution: What explains cross-national differences?’, Journal of European Social Policy 20: 333–49.
  • Eger, M. (2010) ‘Even in Sweden: The effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending’, European Sociological Review 26: 203–17.
  • European Commission (2007) Eurobarometer 67. Public Opinion in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved June 30, 2010 (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb67/eb67_en.pdf).
  • Feagin, J. R. (1972) ‘Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves’, Psychology Today 6: 101–29.
  • Feagin, J. R. (1975) Subordinating the Poor: Welfare and American Beliefs, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Feather, N. T. (1974) ‘Explanations of poverty in Australian and American samples: The person, society, or both?’, Australian Journal of Psychology 26: 199–216.
  • Gallie, D. and Paugam, S. (2002) Social Precarity and Social Integration. Report for the European Commission Based on Eurobarometer 56.1, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission Directorate-General Employment.
  • Gelissen, J. (2001) Words of Welfare, Words of Consent? Public Opinion on the Welfare State, Brabant: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
  • Gilens, M. (1999) Why Americans Hate Welfare, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hox, J. (2002) Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Huber, J. and Form, W. (1973) Income and Ideology, New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Kluegel, J. R. and Smith, E. R. (1986) Beliefs about Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought to Be, New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
  • Kreidl, M. (2000) ‘Perceptions of poverty and wealth in western and post-communist countries’, Social Justice Research 13: 151–176.
  • Kuivalainen, S. and Niemelä, M. (2010) ‘From universalism to selectivism? The ideational turn of the anti-poverty policies in Finland’, Journal of European Social Policy 20: 263–76.
  • Lee, B. A., Farrell, C. A. and Link, B. G. (2004) ‘Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness’, American Sociological Review 69: 40–63.
  • Lee, B. A., Jones, S. H. and Lewis, D. W. (1990) ‘Public beliefs about the causes of homelessness’, Social Forces 69: 253–65.
  • Lepianka, D. (2007) Are the Poor to be Blamed or Pitied? A Comparative Study of Popular Attributions in Europe, Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.
  • Lepianka, D., Gelissen, J. and van Oorschot, W. (2010) ‘Popular explanations of poverty in Europe. Effects of contextual and individual characteristics across 28 European countries’, Acta Sociologica 53: 53–72.
  • Lipset, S. M. (1996) American Exceptionalism, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
  • Mau, S. (2003) The Moral Economy of Welfare States. Britain and Germany Compared, London, UK: Routledge.
  • Mau, S. and Burkhardt, C. (2009) ‘Migration and welfare state solidarity in Western Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 19: 213–29.
  • Niemelä, M. (2008) ‘Perceptions of the causes of poverty in Finland’, Acta Sociologica 51: 23–40.
  • Pfeifer, M. (2009) ‘Public opinion on state responsibility for minimum income protection: A comparison of 14 European countries’, Acta Sociologica 52: 117–34.
  • Saunders, P. (2002) The Ends and Means of Welfare. Coping with Economic and Social Change in Australia, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Svallfors, S. (1997) ‘Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations’, European Sociological Review 13: 283–304.
  • Svallfors, S. (2006) The Moral Economy of Class. Class and Attitudes in Comparative Perspective, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (1985) Public Opinion, Ideology, and State Welfare, London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • van Oorschot, W. (2006) ‘Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy 16: 23–42.
  • van Oorschot, W. (2008) ‘Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states’, International Journal of Social Welfare 17: 3–14.
  • van Oorschot, W. and Halman, L. (2000) ‘Blame or fate, individual or social? An international comparison of popular explanations of poverty’, European Societies 2: 1–28.
  • Zucker, G. S. and Weiner, B. (1993) ‘Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23: 925–43.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.