410
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
European Social Contexts

Unifying self-responsibility and solidarity in social security institutions

The circular logic of welfare-state reforms in Europe

References

  • Amable, B. (2010) ‘Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism’, Socio-Economic Review 9: 3–30. 10.1093/ser/mwq015
  • Barbier, J.-C. (2005) ‘Citizenship and the activation of social protection, a comparative approach’, in J. G. Andersen, A. M. Guillemard, P. Jensen and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds), The Changing Face of Welfare. Social Policy, Marginalization and Citizenship, COST A13 Book Series, Bristol: University Press.
  • Barr, N. (2010) ‘Long-term care: A suitable case for social insurance’, Social Policy and Administration ( Special Issue on Long-term care) 44(4): 359–74. 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00718.x
  • Barr, N. and Diamond, P. (2009) Reforming Pensions: Principles and Policy Choices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bonoli, G. (2005) ‘The politics of the new social policies: Providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states’, Policy & Politics 33(3): 431–49. 10.1332/0305573054325765
  • Bonoli, G. (1997) ‘Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach’, Journal of Social Policy 26: 351–72. 10.1017/S0047279497005059
  • Bonoli, G. and Palier, B. (2007) ‘When past reforms open new opportunities: Comparing old-age insurance reforms in Bismarckian welfare systems’, Social Policy & Administration 41(6): 555–73. 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00572.x
  • Born, C. (2003) ‘Changes in family roles and arrangements between generations: An indicator for the modernization of gender relations?’, in W. H. Heinz and V. W. Marshall (eds), Social Dynamics of the Life Course, New York, pp. 279–98.
  • Clasen, J. and Siegel, N. (eds) (2007) Investigating Welfare State Change, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Crouch, C. (2011) The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ebbinghaus, B. (ed.) (2011) The Varieties of Pension Governance. Pension Privatization in EUROPE, Oxford (u.a.): Oxford University Press.
  • EC-Report (2010) Joint Report on Pensions: Progress and key challenges in the delivery of adequate and sustainable pensions in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • EC (European Commission) (2012) WHITE PAPER. An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions. ( COM(2012)55 final), Brussels: European Commission.
  • Eichler, M. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (2009) ‘Consumer choice in the care of elderly people – Free choice and actual choice in the German welfare state’, Social Policy and Administration 43(6): 617–33. 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00684.x
  • Engelen, E. (2003) ‘The logic of funding European pension restructuring and the danger of financialisation’, Environment and Planning A 35(8): 1357–72. 10.1068/a35307
  • Ervik, R. (2005) ‘The battle of future pensions’, Global Social Policy 5(1): 29–54. 10.1177/1468018105050119
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2002) ‘A new gender contract’, in G. Esping Andersen, A. Hemerijck, J. Myles and D. Gallie (eds), Why we Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–95.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. and Myles, J. (2006) ‘Sustainable and equitable retirement in a life course perspective’, in G. Clark, A. Munnell, and J. Orszag (eds), Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retirement Income, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 839–57.
  • Eurostat (2008) The Life of Women and Men in Europe', A statistical portrait, Brussels: European Commission.
  • Eurostat (2011) Statistics in focus, 17/2011.
  • Ferber, M. and Simpson, P. (2009) ‘Whither systemic reform? A critical review of the literature on the distributional and income adequacy effects of systemic pension reforms’, Management Revue: The International Review of Management Studies 20(3): 254–67.
  • Frericks, P. (2007) Setting Rights: Resource Flows, Life-Course Norms and the Dynamics of Citizenship in European Pension Systems, Utrecht: Utrecht University.
  • Frericks, P. (2010) ‘Capitalist welfare societies’ trade-off between economic efficiency and social solidarity’, European Societies 13(5): 719–41. 10.1080/14616696.2010.483010
  • Frericks, P. (2011) ‘Marketising social protection in Europe: Two distinct paths and their impact on social inequalities’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 31(5/6): 319–34. 10.1108/01443331111141282
  • Frericks, P. (2012) ‘Funded pensions and their implications for women and migrant workers’, Global Social Policy ( Special Issue: Governing Pension Fund Capitalism in Times of Uncertainty, eds B. Ebbinghaus, M. Orenstein, N. Whiteside), pp. 342–44.
  • Frericks, P., Harvey, M. and Maier, R. (2010) ‘The “paradox of the shrinking middle”: The central dilemma of European social policy’, Critical Social Policy 30(3): 315–36. 10.1177/0261018310367671
  • Frericks, P., Maier, R. and De Graaf, W. (2006 /re-published 2012) ‘Shifting the pension mix: Consequences for Dutch and Danish women’, Social Policy and Administration 40(5): 475–92. 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00500.x
  • Frericks, P., Maier, R. and De Graaf, W.* (2007) ‘European pension reforms: Individualization, privatization and gender pension gaps’, Social Politics 14(2): 212–37. 10.1093/sp/jxm008
  • Frericks, P., Maier, R. and De Graaf, W. (2008) ‘Male norms and female adjustments: The influence of care credits on gender pension gaps in France and Germany’, European Societies 10(1): 97–119. 10.1080/14616690701348810
  • Geißler, B. (2004) ‘Das Individuum im Wohlfahrtsstaat: Lebenslaufpolitik und Lebensplanung’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 50: 1–2.
  • Guardiancich, I. (2009) ‘Institutional survival and return: Examples from the new pension orthodoxy’, Working Paper, 2009.08. Brussels: etui (European Trade Union Institute).
  • Handler, J. F. (2004) Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe. The Paradox of Inclusion, Cambridge Studies in Law and Society, Cambridge.
  • Hann, C. (2007) ‘A new double movement? Anthropological perspectives on property in the age of neoliberalism’, Socio-Economic Review 5(2): 287–318. 10.1093/ser/mwl027
  • Harvey, M. (2005) ‘Book review: Reforming pensions in Europe: Evolution of Pension Financing and Sources of Retirement Income’, Industrial Relations 60(3): 584–6. 10.7202/012166ar
  • Harvey, M. and Maier, R. (2004) ‘Rights over resources’, in B. Clasquin, N. Moncel, M. Harvey and B. Friot (eds), Wage and Welfare. New Perspectives on Employment and Social Rights in Europe, Brussels: Peter Lang, pp. 25–48.
  • Herderscheê, G. (2004) ‘Het pensioenreglement is oneerlijk’, De Volkskrant 7.1.2004.
  • Hills, J. (2004) Inequality and the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hinrichs, K. (2005) ‘New century – new paradigm: Pension reforms in Germany’, in G. Bonoli and T. Shinkawa (eds), Ageing and Pension Reform around the World. Evidence from Eleven Countries, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 47–73.
  • Hughes, G. and Stewart, J. (eds) (2004) Reforming Pensions in Europe: Evolution of Pension Financing and Sources of Retirement Income, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Hyde, M., Dixon, J. and Drover, G. (ed.) (2006) The Privatization of Mandatory Retirement Income Protection. International Perspectives, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
  • Jensen, P. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005) ‘“Active” citizenship: The new face of welfare’, in P. Jensen, B. Pfau-Effinger, J. Goul Andersen and A.-M. Guillemard (eds), The Changing Face Of Welfare. Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 1–14.
  • Langley, P. (2004) ‘In the eye of the “perfect storm”: The final salary pension crisis and financialisation of Anglo-American Capitalism’, New Political Economy 9(4): 539–58. 10.1080/1356346042000311164
  • Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy 2(3): 159–73. 10.1177/095892879200200301
  • Lister, R. (2003) Citizenship. Feminist Perspective, New York: University Press.
  • Mahoney, J. (2000) ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society 29(4): 507–48. 10.1023/A:1007113830879
  • Marshall, T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meyer, T., Bridgen, P. and Riedmüller, B. (eds) (2007) Private Pensions Versus Social Inclusion? Non-state Arrangements for Citizens at Risk in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Minns, R. (2001) The Cold War in Welfare: Stock Markets versus Pensions, London/New York: Verso.
  • MISSOC (2011) Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and in Switzerland, Brussels: European Commission.
  • Moen, P. (2003) ‘Linked lives: Dual careers, gender, and the contingent life course’, in W. H. Heinz and V. W. Marshall (eds), Social Dynamics of the Life Course, New York, pp. 237–58.
  • Müller, K. (2008) ‘The politics and outcomes of three-pillar pension reforms in Central and Eastern Europe’, in C. Arza and M. Kohli (eds), Pensions Reforms in Europe: Politics, Policies and Outcomes, New York: Routledge.
  • Musgrave, R. and Musgrave P. (1989) Public Finance in Theory and Practice, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Myles, J. (2002) ‘A new social contract for the elderly?’, in G. Esping-Andersen, A. Hemerijck, J. Myles and D. Gallie (eds), Why we need a New Welfare State, Oxford: University Press, pp. 130–72.
  • Newman, J. (2001) Modernizing governance: New Labour, policy and society, London: Sage.
  • Nullmeier, F. (2006) ‘Personal responsibility and its contradiction in terms’, German Policy Studies 3(3): 386–99.
  • OECD (2012) Pensions at a Glance. Current trends and policy topics in retirement income provision in OECD countries, Paris: OECD.
  • Pension Commission (2005) A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century, The Second Report of the Pensions Commission.
  • Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005) ‘Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements’, European Societies 7(2): 321–47. 10.1080/14616690500083592
  • Pierson, P. (2000) ‘The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13(4): 475–99. 10.1111/0952-1895.00142
  • Raitano, M. (2008) ‘The Italian pension system and social inclusion’, in T. Meyer, P. Bridgen and B. Riedmüller (eds), Private Pensions Versus Social Inclusion? Non-state Arrangements for Citizens at Risk in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 168–92.
  • Ranci, C. (2010) Social Vulnerability in Europe: The New Configuration of Social Risks, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rein, M. and Anderson, K. (2008) ‘The interdependence of the system of solidarity and the system of equivalence’, in C. Arza and M. Kohli (eds), Pensions Reforms in Europe: Politics, Policies and Outcomes, New York: Routledge.
  • Román, A. and Schippers, J. (2005) To Work or Not to Work: A Vital Life Course Decision and how it affects Labor Careers. Results from Dutch Panel Data 1990–2001, Tilburg.
  • Schmidt, V. (2002) ‘Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare adjustment?’, Comparative Political Studies 35(2): 168–93. 10.1177/0010414002035002002
  • Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (ed.) (2008) Welfare State Transformations in Comparative Perspective: Shifting Boundaries of ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ Social Policy?, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Sinn, H.-W. (2000) ‘Why a funded pension system is useful and why it is not useful’, International Tax and Public Finance 7: 389–410. 10.1023/A:1008760717038
  • SPC (Social Protection Committee) (2008) Privately Managed Funded Pension Provision and Their Contribution to Adequate and Sustainable Pensions, Brussels.
  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004) ‘New social risks and welfare states: New paradigm and new politics?’, in P. Taylor-Gooby (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare – The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Vanhuysse, P. and Goerres, A. (2012) Ageing Populations in Post-industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Policies and Politics, Routledge.
  • Veil, M. (2002) Alterssicherung von Frauen in Deutschland und Frankreich. Reformperspektiven und Reformblockaden, Duesseldorf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.