The social space, the symbolic space and masculine domination: the gendered correspondence between class and lifestyles in the UK

References

• Adkins, L. (2002) Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late Modernity, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adkins, L. and Skeggs, B. (eds.) (2004) Feminism After Bourdieu, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Anthias, F. (2001) ‘The concept of “social division” and theorising social stratification’, Sociology 35(4): 835–54.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, W. (2011) ‘The context and genesis of musical tastes: Omnivorousness debunked, Bourdieu buttressed’, Poetics 39(3): 169–86. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, W. (2016a) Beyond Bourdieu: From Genetic Structuralism to Relational Phenomenology, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, W. (2016b) ‘The structure of literary taste: Class, gender and reading in the UK’, Cultural Sociology 10(2): 247–66. doi: 10.1177/1749975516639083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, W. (2017) Class in the New Millennium: The Structure, Homologies and Experience of the British Social Space, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, W. and Deeming, C. (2015) ‘Class and cuisine in contemporary Britain’, The Sociological Review, 63(4): 876–96. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, W. and Rosenlund, L. (2014) Mapping the British Social Space: Toward a Bourdieusian Class Scheme, SPAIS working paper no. 02-14, University of Bristol, http://www.bristol.ac.uk/spais/research/workingpapers/
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Gayo-Cal, M. and Wright, D. (2009) Culture, Class, Distinction, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benzécri, J.-P. (1992) Correspondence Analysis Handbook, New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998) Practical Reason, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2001) Masculine Domination, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T.W. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (2007) ‘Social stratification and cultural consumption: music in England’, European Sociological Review 23: 1–19. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcl016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christin, A. (2012) ‘Gender and highbrow cultural participation in the United States’, Poetics 40(5): 423–43. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, T. (2007) ‘Negotiating the field of masculinity’, Men and Masculinities 12(1): 30–44. doi: 10.1177/1097184X07309502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulangeon, P. and Duval, J. (eds.) (2014) The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cveticanin, P. (ed.) (2012) Social and Cultural Capital in Serbia, Belgrade: Centre for Empirical Cultural Studies of South-East Europe.
   Google Scholar
• George, M. (2014) ‘Rejecting the specifically sexual: locating the sexual field in the work of Pierre Bourdieu’, in I. Green (ed.), Sexual Fields, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 101–22.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (1997) ‘Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu’s Theory of tastes from its critics’, Poetics 25: 93–120. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, B. and Rouanet, H. (2004) Geometric Data Analysis, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lizardo, O. (2006) ‘The puzzle of women’s ‘highbrow’ cultural consumption’, Poetics 34(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (1992) ‘Does gender fit?’, Theory and Society 21(6): 837–67. doi: 10.1007/BF00992814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, L. (1999) ‘Gender, habitus and the field’, Theory, Culture and Society 16(1): 95–117. doi: 10.1177/026327699016001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2014) ‘The Great British class fiasco’, Sociology 48(3): 437–44. doi: 10.1177/0038038513519880
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. (1992) ‘Understanding audience segmentation: from elite and mass to omnivore and univore’, Poetics 21: 243–58. doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(92)90008-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. (1997) ‘The rise and fall of snobbery as a status marker’, Poetics 25: 75–92. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieur, A. and Savage, M. (2011) ‘Updating cultural capital theory’, Poetics 39: 566–80. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieur, A. and Savage, M. (2013) ‘Emerging forms of cultural capital’, European Societies 15: 246–67. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2012.748930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieur, A., Rosenlund, L. and Skjott-Larson, J. (2008) ‘Cultural capital today: a case study from Denmark’, Poetics 36: 45–71. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purhonen, S., Gronow, J. and Rakhonen, K. (2011) ‘Highbrow culture in Finland’, Acta Sociologica 54(4): 385–402. doi: 10.1177/0001699311422092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenlund, L. (2009) Exploring the city with Bourdieu, Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenlund, L. (2015) ‘Working with distinction: Scandinavian experiences’, in P. Coulangeon and J. Duval (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction, London: Routledge, pp. 157–86.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., et al. (2013) ‘A new model of social class?’, Sociology 47(2): 219–50. doi: 10.1177/0038038513481128
   Google Scholar
• Vandebroeck, D. (2016) Distinctions in the Flesh, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wuggenig, U. (2007) ‘Pitfalls in testing Bourdieu’s homology assumptions using mainstream social science methodology’, Poetics 35: 306–16. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar