Toward a European social topography: the contemporary relevance of Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of ‘social space’

References

• Abbott, A. (2005) ‘Linked ecologies: states and universities as environments for professions’, Sociological Theory 23(3): 245–274. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K., Gerhards, J. and Romo, F. P. (1995) ‘Forms of capital and social structure in cultural fields: examining Bourdieu’s social topography’, American Journal of Sociology 100(4): 859–903. doi: 10.1086/230603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, W. (2017) Class in the New Millennium: The Structure, Homologies and Experience of the British Social Space, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E. B., Warde, A. and Gayo-Cal, M. (2009) Culture, Class, Distinction, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, D. (2014) The Social Structure of Right and Wrong, New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (2008) Rendre la réalité inacceptable,  Paris: Demopolis.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1980) ‘Le capital social’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 31(1): 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1985) ‘The social space and the genesis of groups’, Theory and Society 14(6): 723–744. doi: 10.1007/BF00174048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986) ‘The forms of capital’, in J.E. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenword Press, pp. 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1987) ‘What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1989) ‘Social space and symbolic power’, Sociological Theory 7(1): 14–25. doi: 10.2307/202060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1996) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998a) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998b) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. and de Saint-Martin, M. (1976) ‘Anatomie du goût’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 2(5): 2–81. doi: 10.3406/arss.1976.3471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.C. and Passeron J.C. (1991) The Craft of Sociology. Epistemological Preliminaries, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Saint-Martin, M. (2015) ‘From “Anatomie du Gout” to “La Distinction”. Attempting to construct the social space. Some markers for the history of research’, in P. Coulangeon and J. Duval (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction, London: Routledge, pp. 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Denord, F., Lagneau-Ymonet, P. and Thine, S. (2011) ‘Le champ du pouvoir en France’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 190: 24–57. doi: 10.3917/arss.190.0024
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (1990) ‘How to make things which hold together: social science, statistics and the state’, in P. Wagner,  B. Wittrock and R. P. Whitley (eds), Discourses on Society. The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Ellersgaard, C. H., Larsen, A. G. and Munk, M. D. (2013) ‘A very economic elite: the case of the Danish top CEOs’, Sociology 47(6): 1051–1071. doi: 10.1177/0038038512454349
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997) ‘Manifesto for a relational sociology’, American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317. doi: 10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemmen, M. (2012) ‘The structure of the upper class: a social space approach’, Sociology 46(6): 1039–1058. doi: 10.1177/0038038512437899
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D. (2012) A Theory of Fields, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaxie, D. (1978) Le Cens Caché: Inégalités culturelles et ségrégation politique, Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgers, M. and Mangez, É. (eds.) (2014) Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Korsnes, O., Lebaron, F., Rosenlund, L. and Rouanet, H. (2007) ‘The Norwegian field of power anno 2000’, European Societies 9: 245–273. doi: 10.1080/14616690601002749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarness, V. (2017) ‘Cultural vs economic capital: symbolic boundaries within the middle class’, Sociology 51(2): 357–373. doi: 10.1177/0038038515596909
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (1992) Money, Morals and Manners. The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, G.W. (2006 [1715]) ‘Briefwechsel mit Samuel Clarke’, in J. Dünne and S. Günzel (eds.), Raumtheorie. Grundlagentexte aus Philosophie und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 58–73.
   Google Scholar
• Le Roux, B. and H. Rouanet. (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis, New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lizardo, O. (2006) ‘The puzzle of women’s “highbrow” culture consumption: integrating gender and work into Bourdieu’s class theory of taste’, Poetics 34(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizardo, O. (2012) ‘The three phases of Bourdieu’s US reception: comment on Lamont’, Sociological Forum 27(1): 238–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J.L. (2003) ‘What is field theory?’, American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 1–49. doi: 10.1086/375201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. L. (2011) The Explanation of Social Action, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. and Simkus, A. (1992) ‘How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups' in Lamont, M. and Fournier, M. (eds) Cultivating Differences. Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 152–186.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, L. (2015) ‘The field. A Leibnizian perspective in sociology’, in M. Hilgers and É. Mangez (eds.), Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications, Routledge, 102–117.
   Google Scholar
• Porterfield, A. L. and Gibbs, J. P. (1960) ‘Occupational prestige and social mobility of suicides in New Zealand’, American Journal of Sociology 66(2): 147–152. doi: 10.1086/222843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieur, A., Rosenlund, L. and Skjott-Larsen, J. (2008) ‘Cultural capital today: a case study from Denmark’, Poetics 36(1): 45–71. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallaz, J. J. and Zavisca, J. (2007) ‘Bourdieu in American sociology, 1980–2004’, Annual Review of Sociology 33: 21–41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S. and Miles, A. (2013) ‘A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey experiment', Sociology 47(2): 219–250. doi: 10.1177/0038038513481128
   Google Scholar
• Silber, I. F. (1995) ‘Space, fields, boundaries: the rise of spatial metaphors in contemporary sociological theory’, Social Research 62(2): 323–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeoni, D. (2000) ‘Anglicizing Bourdieu’, in N. Brown and I. Szeman (eds), Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 65–87.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, D. L. (2013) Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sapiro, G. (2002) ‘The structure of the French literary field during the German occupation (1940–1944): a multiple correspondence analysis’, Poetics 30(5–6): 387–402. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00032-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandebroeck, D. (2015) ‘Classifying bodies, classified bodies, class bodies. A carnal critique of the judgment of taste’, in P. Coulangeon and J. Duval (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction, London: Routledge, pp. 227–254.
   Google Scholar
• Vandebroeck, D. (2016) Distinctions in the Flesh. Social Class and the Embodiment of Inequality, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rees, K. and Dorleijn, G. J. (2001) ‘The eighteenth-century literary field in Western Europe: the interdependence of material and symbolic production and consumption’, Poetics 28(5–6): 331–348. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00038-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (1993) ‘Bourdieu in America: notes on the transatlantic importation of social theory’, in C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma and M. Postone (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 235–262.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (ed.) (2005) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics: The Mystery of Ministry, London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, H. L. and Edwards, H. (1959) ‘The skidder: ideological adjustments of downward mobile workers’, American Sociological Review 24(2): 215–231. doi: 10.2307/2089432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar