Knowing and distrusting: how political trust and knowledge shape direct-democratic participation

References

• Anderson, C. and Goodyear-Grant, E. (2010) ‘Why are highly informed citizens sceptical of referenda?’, Electoral Studies 29(2): 227–38. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. R. (2012) ‘The electoral consequences of voter ignorance’, Electoral Studies 31(4): 796–15. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barankay, I., Sciarini, P. and Trechsel, A. H. (2003) ‘Institutional openness and the use of referendums and popular initiatives: Evidence from Swiss Cantons’, Swiss Political Science Review 9(1): 169–99. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2003.tb00404.x
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Å. (2012) ‘Citizens’ perceptions of political processes. A critical evaluation of preference consistency and survey items’, Revista Internacional de Sociología 70(Extra 2): 45–64. doi: 10.3989/ris.2012.01.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Å. and Christensen, H. S. (2016) ‘Ideals and actions: Do citizens’ patterns of political participation correspond to their conceptions of democracy?’, Government and Opposition 51(2): 234–60. doi: 10.1017/gov.2014.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Å. and Mattila, M. (2009) ‘Direct democracy and its critics: Support for direct democracy and “stealth” democracy in Finland’, West European Politics 32(5): 1031–048. doi: 10.1080/01402380903065256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Karp, J. A. (2007) ‘Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies’, Political Research Quarterly 60(3): 351–62. doi: 10.1177/1065912907304108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S. (2016) ‘All the same? Examining the link between three kinds of political dissatisfaction and protest’, Comparative European Politics 14(6): 781–801. doi: 10.1057/cep.2014.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S. and Bengtsson, Å. (2011) ‘The political competence of internet participants’, Information, Communication & Society 14(6): 896–916. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.566931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S., Jäske, M., Setälä, M. and Laitinen, E. (2017) ‘The Finnish citizens’ initiative: towards inclusive agenda-setting?’, Scandinavian Political Studies 40: 411–33. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S., Karjalainen, M. and Lundell, K. (2016) ‘Democratic innovations to the rescue? Political trust and attitudes toward democratic innovations in Southwest Finland’, International Journal of Public Administration 39(5): 404–16. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2015.1015560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S., Karjalainen, M. and Nurminen, L. (2015) ‘Does crowdsourcing legislation increase political legitimacy? The case of Avoin Ministeriö in Finland’, Policy & Internet 7(1): 25–45. doi: 10.1002/poi3.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, H. and Michels, A. (2014) ‘Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy’, Electoral Studies 35: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (1984) ‘Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies’, The Journal of Politics 46(1): 264–84. doi: 10.2307/2130444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Burklin, W. P. and Drummond, A. (2001) ‘Public opinion and direct democracy’, Journal of Democracy 12(4): 141–53. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1993) ‘Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first’, American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1179–206. doi: 10.2307/2111549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, T. and Karp, J. A. (2006) ‘Popular support for direct democracy’, Party Politics 12(5): 671–88. doi: 10.1177/1354068806066793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, J., Wojcieszak, M. and Navarro, C. J. (2015) ‘Participation, representation and expertise: Citizen preferences for political decision-making processes’, Political Studies 63(S1): 153–72. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K. and Milner, H. (2006) ‘The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective’, Scandinavian Political Studies 29(4): 386–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (1998) ‘The political relevance of political trust’, American Political Science Review 92(4): 791–808. doi: 10.2307/2586304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M. and Marien, S. (2013) ‘A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe’, European Societies 15(1): 131–52. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jäske, M. (2017) ‘“Soft” forms of direct democracy: explaining the occurrence of referendum motions and advisory referendums in Finnish local government’, Swiss Political Science Review 23(1): 50–76. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentmen-Cin, C. (2014) ‘Explaining willingness to use the European Citizens’ initiative: political cynicism, anti-EU attitudes and voting weight of member states’, Comparative European Politics 12(3): 301–18. doi: 10.1057/cep.2013.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lac, L. T. and Lascher, E. L. (2013) ‘The impact of direct democracy on governance: A replication and extension’, California Journal of Politics and Policy 5(1): 30–46. doi: 10.5070/P2259S
   Google Scholar
• Leemann, L. (2015) ‘Political conflict and direct democracy: explaining initiative use 1920-2011’, Swiss Political Science Review 21(4): 596–616. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leemann, L. and Wasserfallen, F. (2016) ‘The democratic effect of direct democracy’, American Political Science Review 110(4): 750–62. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, R. and Riehm, U. (2011) ‘Broadening participation through E-petitions? An empirical study of petitions to the German Parliament’, Policy & Internet 3(1): 63–85. doi: 10.2202/1944-2866.1083
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. (1994) ‘Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections’, American Political Science Review 88(1): 63–76. doi: 10.2307/2944882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, J. G. (1992) ‘Economics of direct legislation’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2): 541–71. doi: 10.2307/2118481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, J. G. (2005) ‘Direct democracy works’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(2): 185–206. doi: 10.1257/0895330054048713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. (2002) Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work, Hanover NH: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (ed.) (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oscarsson, H. (2007) ‘A matter of fact? Knowledge effects on the vote in Swedish General Elections, 1985–2002’, Scandinavian Political Studies 30(3): 301–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00182.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E. and van Deth, J. W. (2014) ‘Supporting democracy: Political participation and political attitudes. Exploring causality using panel data’, Political Studies 62(1_suppl): 153–71. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, M. (2013) Direct Democracy: A Comparative Study of the Theory and Practice of Government by the People. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapeli, L. (2015) ‘Public support for expert decision-making: Evidence from Finland’, Politics 36(2): 142–52. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008) Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1987) The Theory of Democracy Revisited, London: Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, T. and Setälä, M. (2012) ‘Introduction’, in M. Setälä and T. Schiller (eds), Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sciarini, P., Cappelletti, F., Goldberg, A. C. and Lanz, S. (2016) ‘The underexplored species: Selective participation in direct democratic votes’, Swiss Political Science Review 22(1): 75–94. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, M. (2006) ‘On the problems of responsibility and accountability in referendums’, European Journal of Political Research 45(4): 699–721. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, M. and Schiller, T. (eds) (2012) Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009) Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006) Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. (2013) ‘Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom’, European Journal of Political Research 52(6): 747–72. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S. and Hooghe, M. (2011) Political Trust: Why Context Matters, Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar