References
- Albrecht, H.-J. and Sieber, U. (2007) Stellungnahme zu dem Fragenkatalog des Bundesverfassungsgerichts in dem Verfahren 2 BvR 392/07 zu para 173 Abs. 2 S. 2 StGB – Beischlaf zwischen Geschwistern, https://www.mpicc.de/files/pdf1/05-08-inzest_gutachten.pdf
- Arold, N. (2007) The Legal Culture of the European Court of Human Rights, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
- B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, 13 September 2005 (ECHR).
- Campbell, T. (1999) ‘Human rights: A culture of controversy’, Journal of Law and Society 26(1): 6–26. doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00112
- Chapin and Charpentier v. France, no. 40183/07, ECHR 2016.
- Choudhry, S. and Herring, J. (2010) European Human Rights and Family Law, Oxford: Hart.
- Conseil d’État. (2009) La révision des lois de bioéthique, Paris: La domentation francaise, http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/094000288.pdf
- Cretney, S. (2003) Family Law in the Twentieth Century: A History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dembour, M.-B. (2006) Who Believes in Human Rights? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dembour, M.-B. (2015) When Human Become Migrants, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Deutscher Ethikrat (2014) Inzestverbot: Stellungnahme. 24 September, http://www.ethikrat.org/dateien/pdf/stellungnahme-inzestverbot.pdf
- European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe, http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
- Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Hämäläinen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359/09, ECHR 2014.
- Hart, L. (2009) ‘Individual adoption by non-heterosexuals and the order of family life in the European court of human rights’, Journal of Law and Society 36(4): 536–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00482.x
- Hart, L. (2016) Relational Subjects: Family Relations, Law and Gender in the European Court of Human Rights. Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/161283
- Héritier, F. (1993) Les deux soeurs et leur mère : Anthropologie de l’inceste, Paris: Odile Jacob.
- Hodson, L. (2010) NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe, Oxford: Hart.
- IFFS Surveillance. 2007, Report by International Federation of Fertility Societies, https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/iffs.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/newsletters/surveillance_07.pdf
- Jackson, E., Millbank, J., Karpin, I. and Stuhmcke, A. (2017) ‘Learning from cross-border reproduction’, Medical Law Review 25(1): 23–46.
- Johnson, P. (2013) Homosexuality and the European Court of Human Rights, London: Routledge.
- Johnson, P. (2014) ‘Sociology and the European Court of Human Rights’, The Sociological Review 62: 547–564. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12180
- Kittay, E. F. (1999) Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency, New York, NY: Routledge.
- Labassee v. France, no. 65941/11, 26 June 2014 (ECHR, in French).
- Langlois, A. J. (2005) ‘The narrative metaphysics of human rights’, The International Journal of Human Rights 9(3): 369–387. doi: 10.1080/13642980500170824
- Leckey, R. (2008) Contextual Subjects: Family, State and Relational Theory, Toronto: Toronto University Press.
- Mennesson v. France, no. 65192/11, ECHR 2014.
- Nedelsky, J. (2011) Law’s Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- No Just Cause: The law of affinity in England and Wales. (1984). Report by a Group Appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. London: CIO Publications.
- Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, 21 July 2015 (EHCR).
- Ovey, C. and White, R. (2006) Jacobs and White: the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy, no 25358/12, 27 January 2015 (ECHR).
- Roffee, J. A. (2014) ‘No consensus on incest?’ Human Rights Law Review 14: 541–72. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngu023
- Schäfer, L. (2008) ‘Marrying an in-law? The future of prohibited degrees of affinity and consanguinity in English law’ Child and Family Law Quarterly 20(2): 219–29.
- Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010 (ECHR).
- Simpson, B. (2006) ‘Scrambling parenthood: English Kinship and the Prohibited Degrees of Affinity’. Anthropology Today 22(3): 3–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2006.00436.x
- Stübing v. Germany, no. 43547/08, 12 April 2012 (ECHR).
- Théry, I. and Leroyer, A.-M. (2014) Filiation, Origines, Parentalité, Paris: Odile Jacob, http://www.justice.gouv.fr/include_htm/etat_des_savoirs/eds_thery-rapport-filiation-origines-parentalite-2014.pdf
- Vallianatos and others v. Greece [GC], no. 29381/09 and 32684/09, 7 November 2013 (ECHR).
- X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, Reports of Judgements and Decisions 1997-II (ECHR).