Re-theorising participation in undeclared work in the European Union: lessons from a 2019 Eurobarometer survey

References

• Allingham, M. G. and Sandmo, A. (1972) ‘Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis’, Journal of Public Economics 1(3-4): 323–38.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, J. (1999) ‘Tax compliance and administration’, in W. B. Hildreth and J. A. Richardson (eds.), Handbook on Taxation, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 741–69.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, J. (2012) ‘Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies’, International Tax Public Finance 19(1): 54–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J., Cherry, T., Jones, M. and McKee, M. (2010) ‘Taxpayer information assistance services and tax compliance behaviour’, Journal of Economic Psychology 31(4): 577–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J., Kirchler, E., Muelhbacher, M., Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., Kogler, C. and Pollai, M. (2012) ‘Rethinking the research paradigms for analyzing tax compliance behavior’, CESifo Forum 10: 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, J., McClelland, G. H. and Schulze, W. D. (1999) ‘Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting’, Kyklos 52(2): 141–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J. and Torgler, B. (2006) ‘Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe’, Journal of Economic Psychology 27(2): 224–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alstadsæter, A. and Jacob, M. (2013) The Effect of Awareness and Incentives on Tax Evasion, Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B. (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baric, M. (2016) ‘Undeclared work in Croatia: a social exchange perspective’, PhD thesis, Management School, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1968) ‘Crime and punishment: an econometric approach’, Journal of Political Economy 76(1): 169–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1983 [1788]) ‘Principles of penal law’, Reprinted in J. H. Burton (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard, pp. 42–63.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, C. (2010) ‘Meta-analysis of incentive effects in tax compliance experiments’, in J. Alm, J. Martinez-Vazquez and B. Torgler (eds.), Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance, New York: Routledge, pp. 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Boels, D. (2014) ‘It’s better than stealing: informal street selling in Brussels’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 34(9/10): 670–93.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (2009) Defiance in Taxation and Governance: Resisting and Dismissing Authority in a Democracy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T.-J. and Lai, C. C. (2004) ‘Collaborative tax evasion and social norms: why deterrence does not work’, Oxford Economic Papers 56(2): 344–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibben, P. and Williams, C. C. (2012) ‘Varieties of capitalism and employment relations: informally dominated market economies’, Industrial Relations: A Review of Economy & Society 51(S1): 563–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dularif, M., Sutrisno, T., Nurkholis and Saraswati, E. (2019) ‘Is deterrence approach effective in combating tax evasion? A meta-analysis’, Problems and Perspectives in Management 17(2): 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016) Decision (EU) 2016/344 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on establishing a European platform to enhance cooperation in tackling undeclared work. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2016/344/oj [Accessed 24 Mar 2020].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020) #EU4FairWork campaign. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1496&langId=en&langId=en.
   Google Scholar
• Fellner, G., Sausgruber, R. and Traxler, C. (2013) ‘Testing enforcement strategies in the field: threat, moral appeal, and social information’, Journal of the European Economic Association 11: 634–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabiner, L. (2000) The Informal Economy, London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2018) Econometric Analysis, New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallsworth, M., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R. D. and Vlaev, I. (2017) ‘The behavioralist as tax collector: using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance’, Journal of Public Economics 148: 14–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl, B., Hofmann, E., Gangl, K., Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M. and Kirchler, E. (2015) ‘Does the sole description of a tax authority affect tax evasion? The impact of described coercive and legitimate power’, PLoS One 10(4): 123–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasseldine, J. and Li, Z. (1999) ‘More tax evasion research required in new millennium’, Crime, Law and Social Change 31(1): 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (2004) ‘Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda’, Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hodosi, A. (2015) ‘Perceptions of irregular immigrants’ participation in undeclared work in the United Kingdom from a social trust perspective’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 35(5/6): 375–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horodnic, I. and Williams, C. C. (2020) ‘Tackling undeclared work in the European Union: beyond the rational economic actor approach’, Policy Studies. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1649384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILO (2015) Transitioning from the Informal to the Formal Economy, Geneva: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2018) Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture, Geneva: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. and Wöhlbier, F. (2012) Improving Tax Governance in EU Member States: Criteria for Successful Policies, Brussels: Occasional Paper 114, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Job, J., Stout, A. and Smith, R. (2007) ‘Culture change in three taxation administrations: from command and control to responsive regulation’, Law and Policy 29(1): 84–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kastlunger, B., Lozza, E., Kirchler, E. and Schabmann, R. (2013) ‘Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: the slippery slope framework and tax compliance in Italy’, Journal of Economic Psychology 34(1): 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, P. and Diwan, U. (2014) ‘A comparison of psychological factors for tax compliance: self-employed versus salaried people’, International Journal in Management and Social Science 2(3): 107–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchler, E. (2007) The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E. and Wahl, I. (2008) ‘Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: the “slippery slope” framework’, Journal of Economic Psychology 29(2): 210–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchler, E., Kogler, C. and Muehlbacher, S. (2014) ‘Cooperative tax compliance: from deterrence to deference’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 23(2): 87–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleven, H. J., Knudsen, M. B., Kreiner, C. T., Pedersen, S. and Saez, E. (2011) ‘Unwilling or unable to cheat? Evidence from a tax audit experiment in Denmark’, Econometrica 79: 651–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (2000) The Handbook of Psychological Testing, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kluge, J. N. and Libman, A. (2017) Sticks or Carrots? Comparing Effectiveness of Government Shadow Economy Policies in Russia, Sarajevo: Institute for East and Southeast European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A. and Kirchler, E. (2013) ‘Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia’, Journal of Economic Psychology 34: 169–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, M., Pestieau, P., Riedl, A. and Villeval, C. (2015) ‘Tax evasion and social information: an experiment in Belgium, France, and the Netherlands’, International Tax and Public Finance 22(3): 401–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loayza, N. (2018) Informality: Why Is It so Widespread and How Can It Be Reduced?, Kuala Lumpur: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, W. F. (2004) ‘Informality revisited’, World Development 32(7): 1159–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas’ud, A., Manaf, N. A. A. and Saad, N. (2015) ‘Testing assumptions of the “slippery slope framework” using cross-country data: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa’, International Journal of Business and Society 16(3): 408–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohdali, R., Isa, K. and Yusoff, S. H. (2014) ‘The impact of threat of punishment on tax compliance and noncompliance attitudes in Malaysia’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 164: 291–7.
   Google Scholar
• Molero, J. C. and Pujol, F. (2012) ‘Walking inside the potential tax evader’s mind: tax morale does matter’, Journal of Business Ethics 105(2): 151–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E. and Schwarzenberger, H. (2011) ‘Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: empirical evidence for the “slippery slope” framework’, European Journal of Law and Economics 32(1): 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2005) ‘Regulating more effectively: the relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax non-compliance’, Journal of Law and Society 32(4): 562–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2008) ‘Enforcing tax compliance: to punish or persuade?’, Economic Analysis & Policy 38(1): 113–35.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2017) Shining Light on the Shadow Economy: Opportunities and Threats, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pearle, J. and Mackenzie, D. (2018) The Book of Why: New Science of Cause and Effect, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, A., Muehlbacher, S. and Kirchler, E. (2013) ‘The slippery slope framework on tax compliance: an attempt to formalization’, Journal of Economic Psychology 40(1): 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G. (2006) ‘Determinants of tax evasion: a cross-country investigation’, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 15(2): 150–69.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. and Sawyer, A. (2001) ‘A taxonomy of the tax compliance literature: further findings, problems and prospects’, Australian Tax Forum 16(2): 137–320.
   Google Scholar
• Torgler, B. (2007) Tax Compliance and Morale. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Torgler, B. (2011) Tax Morale and Compliance Review of Evidence and Case Studies for Europe, Washington DC: Policy Research Working Paper 5922, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, C. (2010) ‘Social norms and conditional cooperative taxpayers’, European Journal of Political Economy 26(1): 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. (2014) ‘Out of the shadows: a classification of economies by the size and character of their informal sector’, Work, Employment and Society 28(5): 735–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. (2019) ‘Tackling undeclared work in the European Union: an evaluation of government policy approaches’, UTMS Journal of Economics 10(2): 135–47.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. (2020) COVID-19 and Undeclared Work: Impacts, Challenges and Policy Responses, Sarajevo: Regional Cooperation Council.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C., Bejakovic, P., Mikulic, D., Franic, J., Kedir, A. and Horodnic, I. A. (2017) An Evaluation of the Scale of Undeclared Work in the European Union and Its Structural Determinants: Estimates Using the Labour Input Method, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Franic, J. (2016) ‘Beyond a deterrence approach towards the undeclared economy: some lessons from Bulgaria’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18(1): 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Horodnic, I. A. (2017a) ‘Evaluating the policy approaches for tackling undeclared work in the European Union’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35(5): 916–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Horodnic, I. A. (2017b) ‘Tackling the informal sector in East-Central Europe’, Journal of Tax Administration 3(2): 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Horodnic, I. A. (2019) ‘Evaluating working conditions in the informal economy: evidence from the 2015 European working conditions survey’, International Sociology 34(3): 281–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Horodnic, I. (2021) Trends in the Undeclared Economy and Policy Approaches, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C., Horodnic, I. A. and Windebank, J. (2015) ‘Explaining participation in the informal economy: an institutional incongruence perspective’, International Sociology 30(3): 294–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Nadin, S. (2014) ‘Evaluating the participation of the unemployed in undeclared work: evidence from a 27 nation European survey’, European Societies 16(1): 68–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Round, J. (2010) ‘Explaining participation in undeclared work: a result of exit or exclusion’, European Societies 12(3): 391–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C. and Windebank, J. (2005) ‘Refiguring the nature of undeclared work: some evidence from England’, European Societies 7(1): 81–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windebank, J. and Horodnic, I. A. (2017) ‘Explaining participation in undeclared work in France: lessons for policy evaluation’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 37(3-4): 203–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2019) Global Economic Prospects: Darkening Skies, Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar