Moving online: political parties and the internal use of digital tools in Hungary

References

• Arató, K. (2020) ‘Hungary’, in Hloušek, V. and Kaniok, P. (eds) The European Parliament Election of 2019 in East-Central Europe: Second-Order Euroscepticism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 107–131.
   Google Scholar
• Barberà, O. and Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2020) Democratic innovations and their consequences in Spanish political parties. ConstDelib Working Paper Series, no. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Bene, M. and Farkas, X. (2018). ‘Kövess, reagálj, oszd meg! A közösségi média a 2018-as országgyűlési választási kampányban’, in Böcskei, B. and Szabó, A. (eds) Várakozások és valóságok. Parlamenti választás. Budapest: mtatkpti - Napvilág Kiadó, pp. 410–438.
   Google Scholar
• Bene, M. and Somodi D. (2018) '"Mintha lenne saját médiánk … " A kis pártok és a közösségi média', Médiakutató: Médialméleti Folyóirat 19(2): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. and Segerberg, A. (2012) ‘The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics’, Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A. and Knüpfer, C. B. (2018) ‘The democratic interface: technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation’, Information, Communication & Society 21(11): 1655–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (2018) ‘De-democratization in Hungary: diffusely defective democracy’, Democratization 25(8): 1481–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. (2012) ‘New party organization in Western Europe: Of party hierarchies, stratarchies and federations’, Party Politics 18(3): 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge Bravo, R. and Santamarina Sáez, E. (2016) ‘From protest to political parties: online deliberation in new parties in Spain’, Medijske Studije 7(14): 104–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, A. and Hegedűs, D. (2018) ‘An externally constrained hybrid regime: Hungary in the European Union’, Democratization 25(7): 1173–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Carty, R. K. (2004) ‘Parties as franchise systems: The stratarchical organizational imperative’, Party Politics 10(1): 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. and Stromer-Galley, J. (2016) ‘Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: party decline or party renewal?’, The International Journal of Press/Politics 21(3): 283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. (2018) ‘Understanding power-sharing within political parties: stratarchy as mutual interdependence between the party in the Centre and the party on the Ground’, Government and Opposition 53(2): 205–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, S., Linde, J. and Holmberg, S. (2015) ‘Democratic discontent in old and new democracies: assessing the importance of democratic input and governmental output’, Political Studies 63(S1): 18–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M. (2020a) ‘Digital movement parties: a comparative analysis of the technopolitical cultures and the participation platforms of the Movimento 5 Stelle and the Piratenpartei’, Information, Communication & Society 23(12): 1770–1786.
   Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M. (2020b) ‘Rethinking the digital democratic affordance and its impact on political representation: toward a new framework’, New Media and Society, 1–22. doi:10.1177/1461444820929678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M. (2020c) ‘Two variants of the digital party: The platform party and the networked party’, Partecipazione e Conflitto 13(1): 896–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. (2016) ‘Populist polarization and party system institutionalization: The role of party politics in de-democratization’, Problems of Post-Communism 63(4): 210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. and Benoit, K. (2011) ‘Kritikus választás 2010 (critical election)’, in Enyedi, Z., Tardos, R., and Szabó, A. (eds) Új Képlet (The New Formula). Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány, pp. 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. and Deegan-Krause, K. (2017) ‘Voters and parties in Eastern Europe’, in Fagan, A. and Kopecký, P. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 169–183.
   Google Scholar
• Fallows, D. (2004) The Internet and Daily Life, Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006) ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to majone and Moravcsik’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gad, N. (2020) ‘A “new political culture”: the challenges of deliberation in alternativet’, European Political Science 19(2): 190–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2019a) ‘Are digital parties more democratic than traditional parties? Evaluating Podemos and Movimento 5 Stelle's online decision-making platforms’, Party Politics 1–13. doi:10.1177/1354068819884878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2019b) The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy, London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerl, K., Marschall, S. and Wilker, N. (2018) ‘Does the Internet encourage political participation? Use of an online platform by members of a German political party’, Policy and Internet 10(1): 87–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. (2013) ‘One-shot party primaries: The case of the Romanian social democrats’, Politics 33(3): 185–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. (2014) Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing Voter Loyalty, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. and Soare, S. (2019) ‘Electoral performance beyond leaders? The organization of populist parties in postcommunist Europe’, Party Politics 27(1): 58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., Soare, S. and Jacquet, V. (2020) ‘Deliberative democracy and political parties: functions and consequences’, European Political Science 19(2): 200–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. and Stoiciu, V. (2020) ‘Selecting candidates through deliberation: The effects for demos in Romania’, European Political Science 19(2): 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K. and McAllister, I. (2006) ‘Does cyber-campaigning win votes? online communication in the 2004 Australian Election’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16(3): 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. and Ward, S. (2009) ‘Parties in the digital age – a review article’, Representation 45(1): 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hartleb, F. (2013) ‘Anti-elitist cyber parties?’, Journal of Public Affairs 13(4): 355–369.
   Google Scholar
• Heidar, K. and Saglie, J. O. (2003) ‘A decline of linkage? Intra-party participation in Norway, 1991-2000’, European Journal of Political Research 42(6): 761–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illonszki, G. and Várnagy, R. (2014) ‘Stable leadership in the context of party change: the Hungarian case’, in Pilet, J.-B. and Cross, W. P. (eds) The selection of political party leaders in contemporary parliamentary democracies: a comparative study. London: Routledge, pp. 156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B. (2016) ‘The social media paradox explained: comparing political parties’ Facebook strategy versus practice’, Social Media + Society 2(2): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. and Mair, P. (1993) ‘The evolution of party organizations in Europe: the three faces of party organization’, The American Review of Politics 14(Winter): 593–617.
   Google Scholar
• Körösényi, A., Tóth, C. and Török, G. (2009) The Hungarian Political System, Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kovarek, D. and Soós, G. (2017) ‘Hungary: cut from the same cloth? A comparative analysis of party organizations in Hungary’, in Sobolewska-Myślik, K., Kosowska-Gąstoł, B., and Borowiec, P. (eds) Organizational Structures of Political Parties in Central and Eastern European Countries. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press, pp. 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel, A. and Lucardie, P. (2008) ‘Waiting in the wings: new parties in the Netherlands’, Acta Politica 43(2): 278–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., Koc-Michalska, K., Schweitzer, E. J., Jacunski, M., Jackson, N. and Vedel, T. (2011) ‘Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: searching for a European model of web campaigning’, European Journal of Communication 26(3): 195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxbo, K. (2013) ‘The fate of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party’, Party Politics 19(4): 537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, H. (2006) ‘The cyber party’, in Katz, R. S. and Crotty, W. (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 528–235.
   Google Scholar
• McSwiney, J. (2020) ‘Social networks and digital organisation: far right parties at the 2019 Australian federal election’, Information Communication and Society. Taylor & Francis1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1997) ‘Representation and the democratic deficit’, European Journal of Political Research 32(2): 273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, K. and Saglie, J. (2005) ‘New technology in ageing parties: use in Danish and Norwegian Parties’, Party Politics 11(3): 359–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, R. K. (2005) ‘The Internet and political participation: exploring the explanatory links’, European Journal of Communication 20(4): 435–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompl, S. and Gherghina, S. (2019) ‘Messages and familiar faces: crowdfunding in the 2017 U.K. electoral campaign’, Politics & Policy 47(3): 436–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raniolo, F. and Tarditi, V. (2020) ‘Digital revolution and party innovations: an analysis of the Spanish case’, Italian Political Science Review 50(2): 235–253.
   Google Scholar
• Römmele, A. (2003) ‘Political parties, party communication and new information and communication technologies’, Party Politics 9(1): 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Selm, M., Jankowski, N. W. and Tsaliki, L. (2002) ‘Political parties online: digital democracy as reflected in three Dutch political party web sites’, Communications 27(2): 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Stoiciu, V. and Gherghina, S. (2020) ‘Intra-Party deliberation, under-represented groups, and candidate selection: the case of demos in Romania’, Political Studies Review 19(2): 179–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittori, D. (2017) ‘Podemos and the five stars movement: divergent trajectories in a similar crisis’, Constellations (oxford, England) 24(3): 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittori, D. (2019) ‘Membership and members’ participation in new digital parties: bring back the people?’, Comparative European Politics 18(4): 609–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachová, K. (2018) ‘Lost in transition, found in recession? Satisfaction with democracy in Central Europe before and after economic crises’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 52(3): 227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodová, P. and Voda, P. (2020) ‘The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate party: the case of coalition formation in Brno (2018)’, European Political Science 19(2): 181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, S. C. and Howard, P. N. (2019) Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar