(Dis-)Empowerment in context: a proto-evaluative perspective on welfare reform agendas and their impact, North-West and South

References

• Abrahamson, P. (2010) ‘European welfare states beyond neoliberalism: toward the social investment state’, Development and Society 39(1): 61–95.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, M. and Bode, I. (2009) ‘Killing the golden goose? Third sector organisations and back-to-work programmes in Germany and the UK’, Social Policy and Administration 43(3): 209–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzani, T. (2017) ‘Italy, Denmark and Germany: a comparative analysis in active and passive labour market policies’, European Labour Law Journal 8(2): 133–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, S. (2010) ‘Genere e precarietà tra lavoro e famiglia: percezioni, aspettative e strategie delle giovani donne’, Autonomie Locali e Servizi Sociali 30(1): 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bertotti, T. (2016) ‘Resources reduction and welfare changes: tensions between social workers and organisations. The Italian case in child protection services’, European Journal of Social Work 19(6): 963–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betzelt, S. and I. Bode (2017) ‘German angst’ in a liberalized world of welfare capitalism. The hidden problem with post-conservative welfare policies’, in C. Needham, M. Fenger and J. Hudson (eds.), Social Policy Review 29, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 127–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bezes, P. (2018) ‘Exploring the legacies of new public management in Europe’, in: E. Ongaro and S. van Thiel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 919–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1978) A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd edition, Hassoks: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, I. and Turba, H. (2020) ‘Schizophrenic sensemaking as (non-)response to institutional ambiguity: the case of the German child protection industry’, Human Service Organisations 44(1): 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Boehle, M. (2019) Armut von Familien im sozialen Wandel. Verbreitung, Struktur, Erklärungen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bolz, C., Grimm, R., Schoen, A., Wolfs, L. and Zindle, A. (2019) Entlastung gesucht. Gute Politik für Frauen mit geringem Einkommen, Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bothfeld, S. and Rosenthal, P. (2018) ‘The end of social security as we know it. The erosion of status protection in German labour market policy’, Journal of Social Policy 47(2): 275–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. and Kügler, A. (2019) ‘Labor market reforms: an evaluation of the Hartz policies in Germany’, European Economic Review 113: 108–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brülle, J., Gangl, M., Levanon, A. and Saburov, E. (2019) ‘Changing labour market risks in the service economy: low wages, part-time employment and the trend in working poverty risks in Germany’, European Journal of Social Policy 29(1): 115–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, C. (2019) ‘Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: a vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed’, Journal of European Social Policy 29(2): 228–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterina, D. (2019) Struggles for Hegemony in Italy's Crisis Management, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cheater, A. P. (ed.) (1999) The Anthropology of Power: Empowerment and Disempowerment in Changing Structures, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daniele, L. (2018) ‘Governmentality, subjectivity, and the neoliberal form of life’, Journal for Cultural Research 22(2): 154–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DPGV (Deutscher Paritätischer Gesamtverband) (2019) Empirische Befunde zum Bildungs- und Teilhabepaket – Teilhabequoten im Fokus, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsæter, A. L. (2003) ‘The complexity of family policy reform: the case of Norway’, European Societies 5(4): 419–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Eversberg, D. (2016) ‘Beyond individualisation: the German “Activation Toolbox”’, Critical Social Policy 36(2): 167–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazzi, L. (2019) ‘‘Social workers’ views on community involvement in child protection work in Italy’’, Child & Family Social Work 24(1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, L., Jacobone, V., Balenzano, C. and G. Moro (2017) ‘Social Investment e Mezzogiorno: Il caso della Puglia’, Politiche Sociali 20(2): 357–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. (1996) ‘The “southern” model of welfare state in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fervers, L. (2019) ‘Economic miracle, political disaster? political consequences of Hartz IV’, European Journal of Social Policy 29(3): 411–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, R., Calò, E. D. and Cassela, M. (2019) ‘On the reasons for an informal economy in Italy: the motivations of entrepreneurs and workers’, in C. Larsen, S. Rand, A. Schmid, V. Bobkov and V. Lukosov (eds.), Assessing Informal Employment and Skills Needs. Approaches and Insights from Regional and Local Labour Market Monitoring, München / Mering: Rainer Hampp, pp. 103–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gambardella, D., Pavolini, E., and M. Arlotti (2015) ‘Il social investment alle prese con le disuguaglianze sociali e territoriali’, in U. Ascoli, C. Ranci and G.B. Sgritta (eds.), Investire nel sociale. La difficile innovazione del welfare italiano, Bologna: il Mulino, pp. 45–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gottwald, M. and F. Sowa (2019). ‘‘A little more humanity’: placement officers in Germany between social work and social policy’, in U. Klammer, S. Leiber and S. Leitner (eds.), Social Work and the Making of Social Policy. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 201–16.
   Google Scholar
• Haugh, H. M. and O’Carroll, M. (2019) ‘Empowerment, social innovation and social change’, in G. George, T. Baker, P. Tracey and H. Joshi (eds.), Handbook of Inclusive Innovation. The Role of Organisations, Markets and Communities in Social Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 486–502.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2015) ‘The quiet paradigm revolution of social investment’, Social Politics 22(2): 242–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, M. H. (2006) ‘Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines’, Journal of Community Psychology 34(5): 523–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvinden, B. and M.A. Schoyen (2020) Western and Northern Europe. In: N. Ellison and T. Haux (eds.), Handbook on Society and Social Policy. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 147–65
   Google Scholar
• Kampen, T. and Tonkens, E. (2019) ‘Empowerment and disempowerment of workfare volunteers: a diachronic approach to activation policy in the Netherlands’, Social Policy & Society 18(3): 351–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazepov, Y. and Ranci, C. (2017) ‘Is every country fit for social investment? Italy as an adverse case’, Journal of European Social Policy 27(1): 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, H. and Mierendorff, J. (2020) ‘Childcare, education, protection and prevention: the transformation of early childhood policies in Germany since 2000’, in: K. Repo, M. Alasuutari, K. Karila, and J. Lammi-Taskula (eds.), The Policies of Childcare and Early Childhood Education. Does Equal Access Matter? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kohfeldt, D., Chhun, L., Grace, L. S. and Langhout, R. D. (2011) ‘Youth empowerment in context: exploring tensions in school-based yPAR’, American Journal of Psychology 47(1-2): 28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, S. (2019) ‘Familienpolitik’, in H. Obinger and M. G. Schmidt (eds.), Handbuch Sozialpolitik, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 739–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I. and Moreira, A., (eds.) (2014). Activation or Workfare? Governance and Neo-Liberal Convergence. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maestripieri, L. (2020) ‘The social investment challenge and young Italians’, in V. Cuzzocrea, B. G. Bello and Y. Kazepov (eds.), Italian Youth in International Context: Belonging, Constraints and Opportunities, London: Routledge, pp. 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, X. Ú., Jiménez-Morales, M., Masó, P. S. and Bernet, J. T. (2017) ‘Exploring the conceptualization and research of empowerment in the field of youth’, International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 22(4): 405–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. and Wilson, A. T. (2019) Program Evaluation Theory and Practice. A Comprehensive Guide, 2nd edition, New York/London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moro, G. (2013) ‘Regional social planning for childhood in Italy’, Journal of Comparative Social Work 8(2): 141–68.
   Google Scholar
• Moro, G. (2021) ‘Power to the people? The European social model and the convergence of new social policies for empowerment’, in: Bertin, G., Ellison, M., and Moro, G. (eds.), The European Social Model and an Economy of Well-Being. Repairing the Social Fabric of European Societies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 129–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nüchter, O. and Schmid, A. (2019) ‘Einstellungen zum Sozialstaat und Erwerbsstatus’, in H. Seifert, and O. Struck (eds.), Arbeitsmarkt und Sozialpolitik, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, H. U., Egdell, V., Bonvin, J. and Atzmuller, R. (eds.) (2017) Empowering Young People in Disempowering Times. Fighting Inequality Through Capability-Oriented Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. (2020) ‘Re-theorizing the welfare state and the political economy of neoliberalism’s campaign against it’, Journal of Economic Issues 54(3): 588–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2020) ‘Addressing the relatively autonomous relationship between child maltreatment and child protection policies and practices’, International Journal on Child Maltreatment 3(1): 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. and Zimmerman, M. (1995) ‘Empowerment theory, research and application’, American Journal of Community Psychology 23(5): 569–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettinicchio, D. (2019) Politics of Empowerment: Disability Rights and the Cycle of American Policy Reform, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau-Effinger, B. and T. Reimer (2019) ‘The interplay of welfare state policies with supply-and demand-side factors in the production of marginalised part-time employment among women in Germany’, in H. Nicolaisen, H. C. Kavli and R. S. Jensen (eds.), Dualisation of Part-Time Work. The Development of Labour Market Insiders and Outsiders, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 245–64.
   Google Scholar
• Picot, G. and Tassinari, A. (2017) ‘All of one kind? Labour market reforms under austerity in Italy and Spain’, Socio-Economic Review 15(2): 461–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, P. (2019) ‘Exploring activation: a cross-country analysis of active labour market policies in Europe’, Social Science Research 81(1): 91–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollmann-Schult, M. (2016) ‘What mothers want. The impact of structural and cultural factors on mothers’ preferred working hours in Western Europe’, Advances in Life Course Research 29(1): 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. V. (2016) Reconstructing Sociology. The Critical Realist Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruijt, H. and Yerkes, M. A. (2014) ‘Empowerment as contested terrain. Employability of the Dutch workforce’, European Societies 16(1): 48–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschenbach, T. and Associates (2019) Kinder- und Jugendhilfereport 2018. Eine kennzahlenbasierte Analyse, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, R. and Klenk, T. (2019) ‘The manifold meanings of “post-new public management” – a systematic literature review’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 85(1): 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffe, H. A. and Kondrat, M. E. (1997) ‘Social worker alienation and disempowerment in a managed care setting’, Journal of Progressive Human Services 8(1): 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Riva, E. (2016) ‘Familialism reoriented: continuity and change in work-family policy in Italy’, Community, Work & Family 19(1): 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe, S. (2019) ‘Combining theory of change and realist evaluation in practice: lessons from a research on evaluation study’, Evaluation 25(3): 294–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosendahl, A. (2017) ‘Handeln in Unsicherheit. Auswirkungen der Hartz-Reformen auf die Akteure der SGB-III-geförderten beruflichen Weiterbildung’, in A. Bolder, A. H. Bremer and R. Epping (eds.), Bildung für Arbeit unter neuer Steuerung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 301–24.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, S. J., Bocking, J. and Happell, B. (2019) ‘Rhetoric of representation: the disempowerment and empowerment of consumer leaders’, Health Promotion International 34(1): 166–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1993) ‘The nature of evaluation’, New Directions for Program Evaluation 58: 5–48.
   Google Scholar
• Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2016) ‘The end of the conservative German welfare state model’, Social Policy & Administration 50(2): 219–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senghaas, M., Freier, C. and Kupka, P. (2019) ‘Practices of activation in frontline interactions: coercion, persuasion, and the role of trust in activation policies in Germany’, Social Policy & Administration 53(4): 613–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sgritta, G. B. (2019) ‘‘Il Reddito di cittadinanza’’, Politiche Sociali/Social Policies 6(1): 141–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, J. and Tosun, J. (2019) ‘‘Assessing youth labour market services: young people’s perceptions and evaluations of service delivery in Germany’’, Public Policy and Administration 34(1): 22–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiel, C., Schwartzman, S., Busemeyer, M., Cloete, N., Drori, G., Lassnigg, L., Schober, B., Schweisfurth, M. and S. Verma (2018) ‘The contribution of education to social progress’, in M. van der Linden, E. Reis, S. Castles and R. Delgado (eds.), Rethinking society for the 21st Century. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 753–78.
   Google Scholar
• Staines, Z. (2021) ‘‘Australia’s remote workfare policy: rhetoric versus reality of ‘community’ empowerment’’, Critical Social Policy 41(1): 4–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey, F. (2003) ‘The “empowerment debate”: consumerist, professional and liberational perspectives in health and social care’, Social Policy & Society 2(4): 273–84.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianou, A. and Scott, D. (2018) ‘Teaching poor ethnic minority students: a critical realist interpretation of disempowerment’, British Journal of Educational Studies 88(1): 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H. T. R. and Harvey, G. (2016) ‘Unpacking the black box: a realist evaluation of performance management for social services’, Public Management Review 18(9-10): 1456–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thones, K. (1996) ‘The anatomy and ideology of health promotion: empowerment in context’, in A. Scriven and J. Orme (eds.), Health Promotion. Professional Perspectives, Houndmills/Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Toomey, A. H. (2011) ‘Empowerment and disempowerment in community development practice: eight roles practitioners play’, Community Development Journal 46(2): 181–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trägårdh, L. and L Svedberg (2013) ‘The iron law of rights: citizenship and individual empowerment in modern Sweden’, in A. Evers and A. Guillemard (eds.), Social Policy and Citizenship. The Changing Landscape, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 222–56.
   Google Scholar
• Trappe, H., Pollmann-Schult, M. and Schmitt, C. (2015) ‘The rise and decline of the male breadwinner model: institutional underpinnings and future expectations’, European Sociological Review 31(2): 230–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesan, P. and E. Pavolini (2018) ‘The Italian labour market policy and the economic crisis: coming towards the end of Italian exceptionalism’, in S. Theodoropoulou (ed.), Labour Market Policies in the Era of Pervasive Austerity: A European Perspective, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Von Oorschot, W., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B., and T. Reeskens (eds.) (2017) The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare. Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorenmaa, M., Halme, N., Perälä, M. L., Kaunonen, M. and Päivi, A. K. (2016) ‘Perceived influence, decision-making and access to information in family services as factors of parental empowerment: a cross-sectional study of parents with young children’, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Studies 30(2): 290––302.
   Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G. (2018): ‘Understanding mechanisms in realist evaluation and research’, in N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano et al. (eds.), Doing Realist Research, London: Sage, pp. 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, S., Miehl, L. S., van Santen, E., and H. Kindler (2019) ‘Preventing child endangerment: child protection in Germany’, in L. Merkel-Holguin, J. D. Fluke, and R. D. Krugman (eds.), National Systems of Child Protection Understanding the International Variability and Context for Developing Policy and Practice, Berlin: Springer, pp. 93–114.
   Google Scholar