1,197
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Switch on the Big Brother! Investigating the educational gradients in acceptance of online and public areas surveillance among European citizens

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 628-656 | Received 01 Oct 2021, Accepted 29 Jan 2022, Published online: 03 Mar 2022

References

  • Achterberg, P., de Koster, W. and van der Waal, J. (2017) ‘A science confidence gap: education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014’, Public Understanding of Science 26(6). doi:10.1177/0963662515617367.
  • Baller, S., Dutta, S. and Lanvin, B. (2016) The Global Information Technology Report 2016 Innovating in the Digital Economy. Tech. rep.: 1–48. https://www.weforum.org/reports/theglobal-information-technology-report-2016.
  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage, pp. 260. doi:10.2307/2579937.
  • Bonfadelli, H. (2002) ‘The internet and knowledge gaps: a theoretical and empirical investigation’, European Journal of Communication 17(1): 65–84. doi:10.1177/0267323102017001607.
  • Bonoli, G. (2007) ‘Time matters. Postindustrialization, new social risks, and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 40(5): 495–520. doi:10.1177/0010414005285755.
  • Brayne, S. (2017) ‘Big data surveillance: the case of policing’, American Sociological Review 82(5): 977–1008. doi:10.1177/0003122417725865.
  • De Keere, K. (2010) ‘Wantrouwen in wetenschap: een kwestie van reflexiviteit of maatschappelijk onbehagen?’, Sociologie 6(1): 26–45. https://www.aup.nl/journal-downloads/sociologie/ts2010006001002.pdf.
  • de Koster, W., van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P. and Houtman, D. (2008) ‘The rise of the penal state. NeoLiberalization or new political culture?’, British Journal of Sociology 48: 720–34. doi:10.1093/bjc/azn057.
  • Degli Esposti, S. and Santiago Gómez, E. (2015) ‘Acceptable surveillance-orientated security technologies: insights from the surprise project’, Surveillance and Society 13(3–4): 437–54. doi:10.24908/ss.v13i3/4.5400.
  • Dreher, A. (2006) ‘Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization’, Applied Economics 38(10): 1091–1110. doi:10.1080/00036840500392078.
  • Elliott, A. (2002) ‘Beck’s sociology of risk: a critical assessment’, Sociology 36(2): 293–315. doi:10.1177/0038038502036002004.
  • EVS (2020) European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017). Version 4.0.0. Cologne. doi:10.4232/1.13560.
  • Flanagan, S. C. (1987) ‘Value change in industrial societies: reply to Inglehart’, The American Political Science Review 81(4): 1303–19.
  • Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N. and Sturm, J. E. (2019) ‘The KOF globalisation index – revisited’, Review of International Organizations 14(3): 543–74. doi:10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2.
  • Hakhverdian, A. and Mayne, Q. (2012) ‘Institutional trust, education, and corruption: a micro-macro interactive approach’, Journal of Politics 74(3): 739–50. doi:10.1017/S0022381612000412.
  • Hatuka, T. and Toch, E. (2017) ‘Being visible in public space: the normalisation of asymmetrical visibility’, Urban Studies 54(4): 984–98. doi:10.1177/0042098015624384.
  • Hox, J. J. (2002) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ignazi, P. (1992) ‘The silent counter-revolution: hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 22(1): 3–34. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00303.x.
  • Inglehart, R. (1977) Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (1981) ‘Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity’, The American Political Science Review 75(4): 880–900.
  • Knight, A. J. and Warland, R. (2005) ‘Determinants of food safety risks: a multi-disciplinary approach’, Rural Sociology 70(2): 253–75. doi:10.1526/0036011054776389.
  • Lind, F. and Boomgaarden, H. G. (2019) ‘What we do and don’t know: a meta-analysis of the knowledge gap hypothesis’, Annals of the International Communication Association 43(3): 210–24. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1614475.
  • Luijkx, R., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Gummer, T., Ernst Stähli, M., Frederiksen, M., Ketola, K., Reeskens, T., Brislinger, E., Christmann, P., Gunnarsson, S. and Hjaltason, Á. B. (2021) ‘The European values study 2017: on the way to the future using mixed-modes’, European Sociological Review. doi:10.1093/esr/jcaa049.
  • Lutz, C. (2019) ‘Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data’, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 1(2): 141–8. doi:10.1002/hbe2.140.
  • Lyon, D. (2005) Surveillance as Social Sorting. Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination, ed. D. Lyon, London/New York: Routledge. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, arXiv: arXiv:1011. 1669v3.
  • Lyon, D. (2014) ‘Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: capacities, consequences, critique’, Big Data and Society 1(2): 1–13. doi:10.1177/2053951714541861.
  • Maineri, A. M., Achterberg, P. and Luijkx, R. (2021) ‘The closing educational gap in e-privacy management in European perspective’, Sociological Research Online, 1–21. doi:10.1177/13607804211023524.
  • Makarovs, K. and Achterberg, P. (2017) ‘Contextualizing educational differences in “vaccination uptake”: a thirty nation survey’, Social Science and Medicine 188: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.039.
  • Mann, M. and Matzner, T. (2019) ‘Challenging algorithmic profiling: the limits of data protection and antidiscrimination in responding to emergent discrimination’, Big Data & Society, 1–11. doi:10.1177/2053951719895805.
  • Marwick, A. E. and Hargittai, E. (2018) ‘Nothing to hide, nothing to lose? Incentives and disincentives to sharing information with institutions online’, Information Communication and Society 22(12): 1–17. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1450432.
  • Nisbet, M. and Markowitz, E. M. (2014) ‘Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society’, PLoS One 9: 2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088473.
  • Norris, P. and Inglehart, R. (2018) Cultural Backlash Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Authoritarian Populism, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.
  • Park, Y. J. and Chung, J. E. (2017) ‘Health privacy as sociotechnical capital’, Computers in Human Behavior 76: 227–36. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.025.
  • Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. and Core Team, R. (2020) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-149. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
  • Price, A. M. and Peterson, L. P. (2016) ‘Scientific progress, risk, and development: explaining attitudes toward science cross-nationally’, International Sociology 31(1): 57–80. doi:10.1177/0268580915614593.
  • R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Samatas, M. (2005) ‘Studying surveillance in Greece: methodological and other problems related to an authoritarian surveillance culture’, Surveillance and Society 3(2–3): 181–97. doi:10.24908/ss.v3i2/3.3500.
  • Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A. J. and van Dijk, J. A. (2017) ‘Determinants of internet skills, use and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide’, Telematics and Informatics 34(8): 1607–24. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
  • Schneider, S. L. (2009) ‘Confusing credentials: the cross-nationally comparable measurement of educational Attainment’, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology, Oxford. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.35997.51683.
  • Snijders, T. A. B. and Bosker, R. J. (1999) ‘Chap. 13: multivariate multilevel models’, in Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, Sage Publications, pp. 200–6.
  • Stubager, R. (2008) ‘Education effects on authoritarian-libertarian values: a question of socialization’, British Journal of Sociology 59(2): 327–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00196.x.
  • Trüdinger, E. M. and Steckermeier, L. C. (2017) ‘Trusting and controlling? Political trust, information and acceptance of surveillance policies: the case of Germany’, Government Information Quarterly 34(3): 421–33. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.07.003.
  • Van De Werfhorst, H. G. and De Graaf, N. D. (2004) ‘The sources of political orientations in post-industrial society: social class and education revisited’, British Journal of Sociology 55(2): 211–35. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00016.x.
  • van den Broek, T., Ooms, M., Friedewald, M., van Lieshout, M. and Rung, S. (2017) ‘Chap 1: privacy and security. Citizens’ desires for an equal footing’, in M. Friedewald, J. P. Burgess, J. Cas, R. Bellanova and W. Peissl (eds.), Surveillance, Privacy and Security. Citizens’ Perspective, pp. 15–35. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2015.11.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2014) ‘Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology’, Surveillance & Society 12(2): 197–208.
  • van Heek, J., Arning, K. and Ziefle, M. (2017) ‘The surveillance society: which factors form public acceptance of surveillance technologies?’, in M. Helfert, C. Klein, B. Donnellan and O. Gusikhin (eds.), Smart Cities, Green Technologies, and Intelligent Transport Systems. VEHITS 2016, SMARTGREENS 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Cham: Springer, pp. 170–91.
  • Wegscheider, C. and Stark, T. (2020) ‘What drives citizens’ evaluation of democratic performance? The interaction of citizens’ democratic’, Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. doi:10.1007/s12286-020-00467-0.
  • Wester, M. and Giesecke, J. (2019) ‘Accepting surveillance – an increased sense of security after terror strikes?’, Safety Science 120: 383–7.