Whom do married and divorced parents consider kin?

References

• Aarts, E., Verhage, M., Veenvliet, J. V., Dolan, C. V. and van der Sluis, S. (2014) ‘A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data’, Nature Neuroscience 17(4): 491–96. doi:10.1038/nn.3648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agllias, K. (2016) Family Estrangement: A Matter of Perspective, London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ambert, A.-M. (1988) ‘Relationships with former In-laws after divorce: A research note’, Journal of Marriage and Family 50(3): 679–86. doi:10.2307/352637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anspach, D. F. (1976) ‘Kinship and Divorce’, Journal of Marriage and Family 38(2): 323–30. doi:10.2307/350391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2006). ‘Rituals as communication constituting families’, In L. Turner and R. West (eds.), The Family Communication Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 259–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson, V. L. (2001) ‘Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds’, Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E. M. (1982) ‘Divorce and the extended family: A consideration of services’, Journal of Divorce 5(1–2): 159–71. doi:10.1300/J279v05n01_12.
   Google Scholar
• Caplow, T. (1982) ‘Christmas gifts and kin networks’, American Sociological Review 47(3): 383–92. doi:10.2307/2094994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, K., Holman, A., Abetz, J., Kellas, J. K. and Vagnoni, E. (2015) ‘Giving voice to the silence of family estrangement: comparing reasons of estranged parents and adult children in a nonmatched sample’, Journal of Family Communication 15(2): 130–40. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1013106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castrén, A. M. (2008) ‘Post-divorce family configurations’, in E. D. Widmer and R. Jallinoja (eds.), Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in a Configurational Perspective, Bern: Peter Lang, Vol. 9, pp. 233–54.
   Google Scholar
• Castrén, A. M. and Widmer, E. D. (2015) ‘Insiders and outsiders in stepfamilies: Adults’ and children’s views on family boundaries’, Current Sociology 63(1): 35–56. doi:10.1177/0011392114551650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiteji, N. and Hamilton, D. (2005) ‘Family matters: Kin networks and asset accumulation’, in M. W. Sherraden (ed.), Inclusion in the American Dream: Assets, Poverty, and Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–111.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S., Cotton, C. and Marteleto, L. J. (2015) ‘Family ties and young fathers’ engagement in Cape Town’, South Africa. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(2): 575–89. doi:10.1111/jomf.12179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M., Ganong, L., D’Amore, S., Browning, S., DiNardo, D. and Methikalam, B. (2022) ‘Boundary ambiguity: A focus on stepfamilies, queer families, families with adolescent children, and multigenerational families’, in Treating Contemporary Families: Toward a More Inclusive Clinical Practice, American Psychological Association, pp. 157–86. doi:10.1037/0000280-007
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie-Burnett, M. and Lewis, E. A. (1993) ‘Use of African-American family structures and functioning to address the challenges of European-American postdivorce families’, Family Relations 42(3): 243. doi:10.2307/585552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, S. R., McLanahan, S. and Knab, J. (2003) ‘Does remarriage expand perceptions of kinship support among the elderly?’ Social Science Research 32(2): 171–90. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00046-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, E., Hox, J. and Luiten, A. (2018) ‘International nonresponse trends across countries and years: An analysis of 36 years of labour force survey data’, Survey Insights: Methods from the Field 11. doi:10.13094/SMIF-2018-00008.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008) ‘Kinship in biological perspective’, in W. James, N. J. Allen, H. Callan and R. I. M. Dunbar (eds.), Early Human Kinship: From Sex to Social Reproduction, Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 131–50.
   Google Scholar
• Duran-Aydintug, C. (1993) ‘Relationships with former in-laws: Normative guidelines and actual behavior’, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 19(3–4): 69–82. doi:10.1300/J087v19n03_05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1990) ‘Divorce, remarriage and family obligations’, The Sociological Review 38(2): 219–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb00910.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, R., Hubert, J. and Forge, A. (1970) Families and Their Relatives, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstel, N. (1988) ‘Divorce and kin ties: The importance of gender’, Journal of Marriage and Family 50(1): 209–19. doi:10.2307/352440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstel, N. and Sarkisian, N. (2006) ‘Marriage: The good, the bad, and the greedy’, Contexts 5(4): 16–21. doi:10.1525/ctx.2006.5.4.16.
   Google Scholar
• Goetting, A. (1990) ‘Patterns of support among in-laws in the United States: A review of research’, Journal of Family Issues 11(1): 67–90. doi:10.1177/019251390011001005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürmen, M. S., Anderson, S. R. and Brown, E. (2021) ‘Relationship with extended family following divorce: A closer look at contemporary times’, Journal of Family Studies 27(1): 48–62. doi:10.1080/13229400.2018.1498369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höllinger, F. and Haller, M. (1990) ‘Kinship and social networks in modern societies: A cross-cultural comparison among seven nations’, European Sociological Review 6(2): 103–24. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036553.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. (1988) ‘Divorce and social support: A review’, Journal of Divorce 11(3–4): 123–45. doi:10.1300/J279v11n03_10.
   Google Scholar
• Jallinoja, R. (2011) ‘Obituaries as family assemblages’, in R. Jallinoja and E. D. Widmer (eds.), Families and Kinship in Contemporary Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 78–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. M. (2021) ‘Theorizing ambiguous gain: Opportunities for family scholarship’, Journal of Family Theory & Review. doi:10.1111/jftr.12401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L. (1988) ‘Postdivorce reorganization of relationships between divorcing children and their parents’, Journal of Marriage and Family 50(1): 221–31. doi:10.2307/352441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L. (1989) ‘In-law relationships in the American kinship system: The impact of divorce and remarriage’, American Ethnologist 16(1): 87–99. doi:10.1525/ae.1989.16.1.02a00060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. (2010) ‘Verklaringen van intergenerationele solidariteit—Een overzicht van concurrerende theorieën en hun onderzoeksbevindingen’, Mens En Maatschappij 85(1): 70–98. doi:10.5117/MEM2010.1.KALM.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. and Broese van Groenou, M. (2005) ‘Differential effects of divorce on social integration’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22(4): 455–76. doi:10.1177/0265407505054516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. and Saraceno, C. (2008) ‘A comparatiev perspective on intergenerational support: Responsiveness to parental needs in individualistic and familialistic countries’, European Societies 10(3): 479–508. doi:10.1080/14616690701744364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivett, V. R. (1985) ‘Consanguinity and kin level: Their relative importance to the helping network of older Adults’, Journal of Gerontology 40(2): 228–34. doi:10.1093/geronj/40.2.228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, E., Spitze, G. and Logan, J. R. (2003) ‘Social support to parents-in-law: The interplay of gender and kin hierarchies’, Journal of Marriage and Family 65(2): 396–403. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00396.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, G. K. (1982) ‘Kinship interaction over the family life span’, Journal of Marriage and Family 44(1): 197–208. doi:10.2307/351273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopata, H. Z. (1999) ‘In-laws and the concept of family’, Marriage & Family Review 28(3–4): 161–72. doi:10.1300/J002v28n03_13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lück, D. and Castrén, A.-M. (2018) ‘Personal understandings and cultural conceptions of family in European societies’, European Societies 20(5): 699–714. doi:10.1080/14616696.2018.1487989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lück, D. and Ruckdeschel, K. (2018) ‘Clear in its core, blurred in the outer contours: Culturally normative conceptions of the family in Germany’, European Societies 20(5): 715–42. doi:10.1080/14616696.2018.1473624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milardo, R. M. (1987) ‘Changes in social networks of women and men following divorce: A review’, Journal of Family Issues 8(1): 78–96. doi:10.1177/019251387008001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mize, T. D., Doan, L. and Long, J. S. (2019) ‘A general framework for comparing predictions and marginal effects across models’, Sociological Methodology 49(1): 152–89. doi:10.1177/0081175019852763.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. (1990) ‘Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks’, American Sociological Review 55(5): 726–35. doi:10.2307/2095868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyer, F. J. and Lang, F. R. (2003) ‘Blood is thicker than water: Kinship orientation across adulthood’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(2): 310–21. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortman, A.-R., Stienstra, K., & De Bruijn, S. (2018). Codebook of the Survey New Families in the Netherlands (NFN). Second Wave, Utrecht: Utrecht University, p. 195.
   Google Scholar
• Poortman, A.-R., van der Lippe, T., & Boele-Woelki, K. (2014). Codebook of the Survey New Families in the Netherlands (NFN). First Wave, Utrecht: Utrecht University, p. 166.
   Google Scholar
• Poortman, A.-R. and van Gaalen, R. (2017) ‘Shared residence after separation: A review and new findings from the Netherlands’, Family Court Review 55(4): 531–44. doi:10.1111/fcre.12302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortman, A.-R. and van Gaalen, R. (2019) New families in the Netherlands (NFN): Wave 2. DANS.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, C. M. (2008) ‘The assimilation of in-laws: The impact of newcomers on the communication routines of families’, Journal of Applied Communication Research 36(1): 74–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rands, M. (1988) ‘Changes in social networks following marital separation and divorce’, in R. M. Milardo (ed.), Families and Social Networks, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Limited, pp. 127–46.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, M. W. (1983) ‘The family in an aging society: A matrix of latent relationships’, Journal of Family Issues. doi:10.1177/019251383004003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of Human Bonding: Parent-Child Relations Across the Life Course. De Gruyter. doi:10.4324/9781351328920
   Google Scholar
• Sanner, C., Ganong, L. and Coleman, M. (2020) ‘Families are socially constructed: pragmatic implications for researchers’, Journal of Family Issues. doi:10.1177/0192513X20905334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J. D. and Levitt, M. J. (2007) ‘Intergenerational relations with In-laws in the context of the social convoy: theoretical and practical implications’, Journal of Social Issues 63(4): 827–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00539.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. M. (1980) American Kinship. A Cultural Account, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. L. (1993) ‘What is a family? A contemporary view’, Contemporary Family Therapy 15(6): 429–42. doi:10.1007/BF00892290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serovich, J. M., Chapman, S. F. and Price, S. J. (1992) ‘Former in-laws as a source of support’, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 17(1–2): 17–26. doi:10.1300/J087v17n01_02.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., Chatters, L., Cross, C. J. and Mouzon, D. (2022) ‘Fictive kin networks among African Americans, Black Caribbeans, and Non-Latino Whites’, Journal of Family Issues 43(1): 20–46. doi:10.1177/0192513X21993188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, E. (2017) ‘Family complexity and kinship’, in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, American Cancer Society, pp. 1–14. doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0437
   Google Scholar
• Widmer, E. D. (2006) ‘Who are my family members? Bridging and binding social capital in family configurations’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 23(6): 979–98. doi:10.1177/0265407506070482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (2012) ‘Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal Effects’, The Stata Journal 12(2): 308–31. doi:10.1177/1536867X1201200209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zartler, U. (2014) ‘How to deal With moral tales: Constructions and strategies of single-parent Families’, Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 604–19. doi:10.1111/jomf.12116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar