1,489
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Producing Journalistic News Satire: How Nordic Satirists Negotiate a Hybrid Genre

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Baumgartner, Jody, and Jonathan Morris. 2006. “The Daily Show Effect: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and American Youth.” American Politics Research 34 (3): 341–367. doi:10.1177/1532673X05280074.
  • Baym, Geoffrey. 2005. “The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism.” Political Communication 22 (3): 259–276. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492.
  • Baym, Geoffrey. 2010. From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publisher.
  • Berkowitz, Dan, and Robert Gutsche. 2012. “Drawing Lines in the Journalistic Sand: Jon Stewart, Edward R. Murrow, and Memory of News Gone By.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (4): 643–656. doi:10.1177/1077699012456020.
  • Bolin, Göran. 2014. “Television Journalism, Politics, and Entertainment: Power and Autonomy in the Field of Television Journalism.” Television & New Media 15 (4): 336–349. doi:10.1177/1527476414525671.
  • Boukes, Mark. 2018. “Agenda-setting with Satire: How Political Satire Increased TTIP’s Saliency on the Public, Media, and Political Agenda.” Political Communication (Online First), 1–26. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1498816.
  • Boukes, Mark. 2019. “Infotainment.” The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, 1–9. doi:10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0132.
  • Brewer, Paul, and Emily Marquardt. 2007. “Mock News and Democracy: Analyzing The Daily Show.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 15 (4): 249–267. doi:10.1080/15456870701465315.
  • Bruun, Hanne. 2010. “Genre and Interpretation in Production: a Theoretical Approach.” Media, Culture & Society 32 (5): 723–737. doi:10.1177/0163443710373950.
  • Bruun, Hanne. 2012. “Political Satire in Danish Television: Reinventing a Tradition.” Popular Communication 10 (1–2): 158–169. doi:10.1080/15405702.2012.638568.
  • Carlson, Matt. 2016. “Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitimation.” Communication Theory 26 (4): 349–368. doi:10.1111/comt.12088.
  • Carpentier, Nico. 2005. “Identity, Contingency and Rigidity: The (Counter-) Hegemonic Constructions of the Identity of the Media Professional.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 6 (2): 199–219. doi:10.1177/1464884905051008.
  • Condren, Conal. 2012. “Satire and Definition.” Humor 25 (4): 375–399. doi:10.1515/humor-2012-0019.
  • Dagnes, Alison. 2012. A Conservative Walks into a Bar: The Politics of Political Humor. New York: Springer.
  • Doona, Joanna. 2016. Political Comedy Engagement: Genre Work, Political Identity and Cultural Citizenship. Avdelningen för medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap: Lund University.
  • Druick, Zoë. 2009. “Dialogic Absurdity: TV News Parody as a Critique of Genre.” Television & New Media 10 (3): 294–308. doi:10.1177/1527476409332057.
  • Edgerly, Stephanie. 2017. “Making Sense and Drawing Lines: Young Adults and the Mixing of News and Entertainment.” Journalism Studies 18 (8): 1052–1069. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1100522.
  • Faina, Joseph. 2012. “Public Journalism Is a Joke: The Case for Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 14 (4): 541–555. doi:10.1177/1464884912448899.
  • Feldman, Lauren. 2007. “Young Audiences, The Daily Show, and Evolving Notions of Journalism.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 8 (4): 406–427. doi:10.1177/1464884907078655.
  • Feldman, Lauren. 2013. “Learning about Politics from The Daily Show: The Role of Viewer Orientation and Processing Motivations.” Mass Communication and Society 16 (4): 586–607. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.735742.
  • Fox, Julia. 2018. “Journalist or Jokester?” In Political Humor in a Changing Media Landscape: A New Generation of Research, edited by Jody Baumgartner, and Amy Becker, 29–44. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Fox, Julia, Glogy Koloen, and Volkan Sahin. 2007. “No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Presidential Election Campaign.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 51 (2): 213–227. doi:10.1080/08838150701304621.
  • Fox, Julia R., and Edo Steinberg. 2019. “News You Can’t Use: Jon Stewart’s Daily Show Media Critiques.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (Online First). doi:10.1177/1077699019851228.
  • Gieryn, Thomas. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095325. doi: 10.2307/2095325
  • Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey Jones, and Ethan Thompson. 2009. Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. New York: NYU Press.
  • Griffin, Dustin. 1994. Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
  • Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Communication, Society, and Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hart, Roderick, and Johanna Hartelius. 2007. “The Political Sins of Jon Stewart.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 24 (3): 263–272. doi:10.1080/07393180701520991.
  • Hermann, Anne. 2016. “Ethnographic Journalism.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 17 (2): 260–278. doi:10.1177/1464884914555964.
  • Hersey, Curt. 2013. Nothing but the Truthiness: A History of Television News Parody and Its Entry into the Journalistic Field. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
  • Jones, Jeffrey. 2010. Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Kilby, Allaina. 2018. “Provoking the Citizen.” Journalism Studies 19 (13): 1934–1944. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2018.1495573.
  • Kivistö, Sari. 2007. Satiiri kirjallisuuden lajina. In Satiiri. Johdatus lajin historiaan ja teoriaan, edited by Sari Kivistö. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino. 9–26.
  • Koivukoski, Joonas. 2019. “Journalistinen uutissatiiri hybridinä genrenä: Noin viikon uutisten ja Uutisraportin tekijöiden itseymmärrys ja käsitteellinen rajatyö.” Media & viestintä 42 (1): 26–46. doi:10.23983/mv.80181.
  • Koivukoski, Joonas, and Janne Zareff. 2018. “Scatological Anecdotes, Heavy Drinking, and Backpacker Culture: Gonzo Humor and Edgework in Contemporary Finnish Journalism.” In Fear and Loathing Worldwide: Gonzo Journalism Beyond Hunter S. Thompson, edited by Robert Alexander, and Christine Isager, 225–242. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Lamont, Michèle, and Virag Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–195. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.
  • Lamont, Michèle, and Ann Swidler. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–171. doi: 10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z
  • Lockyer, Sharon. 2006. “A Two-Pronged Attack? Exploring Private Eye's Satirical Humour and Investigative Reporting.” Journalism Studies 7 (5): 765–781. doi: 10.1080/14616700600890422
  • Mäntynen, Anne, and Susanna Shore. 2014. “What Is Meant by Hybridity? An Investigation of Hybridity and Related Terms in Genre Studies.” Text & Talk 34 (6): 737–758. doi:10.1515/text-2014-0022.
  • Otto, Lukas, Isabella Glogger, and Mark Boukes. 2017. “The Softening of Journalistic Political Communication: A Comprehensive Framework Model of Sensationalism, Soft News, Infotainment, and Tabloidization.” Communication Theory 27: 136–155. doi:10.1111/comt.12102.
  • Ödmark, Sara. 2018. “Making News Funny: Differences in News Framing Between Journalists and Comedians.” Journalism (Online First). doi:10.1177/1464884918820432.
  • Patton, Michael. 1980. Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Peifer, Jason, and Taeyoung Lee. 2019. “Satire and Journalism.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.87.
  • Peters, Chris. 2013. “Even Better Than Being Informed. Satirical News and Media Literacy.” In Rethinking Journalism. Trust and Participation in a Transformed News Landscape, edited by Marcel Broersma, and Chris Peters, 173–188. New York: Routledge.
  • Pew Research Center. 2008. Journalism, Satire, or Just Laughs? “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart”, Examined. Accessed 21 March 2019. https://www.journalism.org/2008/05/08/journalism-satire-or-just-laughs-the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-examined/
  • Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
  • Reinemann, Carsten, James Stanyer, Sebastian Scherr, and Guido Legnante. 2012. “Hard and Soft News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 13 (2): 221–239. doi:10.1177/1464884911427803.
  • Rottinghaus, Brandon, Kenton Bird, Travis Ridout, and Rebecca Self. 2012. ““It’s Better than Being Informed,” College-aged Viewers of The Daily Show.” In Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age, edited by Jody Baumgartner, and Jonathan Morris, 279–294. New York: Routledge.
  • Schudson, Michael. 2001. “The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 2 (2): 149–170. doi: 10.1177/146488490100200201
  • Schultz, Ida. 2007. “The Journalistic Gut Feeling: Journalistic Doxa, News Habitus and Orthodox News Values.” Journalism Practice 1 (2): 190–207. doi:10.1080/17512780701275507.
  • Smith, Chris. 2016. The Daily Show (The Book): An Oral History as Told by Jon Stewart, the Correspondents, Staff and Guests. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.
  • Tenenboim-Weinblatt, Keren. 2009. “Jester, Fake Journalist, or the New Walter Lippmann? Recognition Processes of Jon Stewart by the US Journalistic Community.” International Journal of Communication 3 (2009): 416–439.
  • Valaskivi, Katja. 2002. Leipää ja rinkeliä: johdatus asian ja viihteen suhteeseen suomalaisessa televisiossa. Tampere: University of Tampere.
  • Waisanen, Don J. 2018. “The Rise of Advocacy Satire.” In Political Humor in a Changing Media Landscape: A New Generation of Research, edited by Jody Baumgartner, and Amy Becker, 11–29. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Ward, Stephen J. 2004. The Invention of Journalism Ethics. The Path to Objectivity and Beyond. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Westerståhl, Jörgen. 1983. “Objective News Reporting: General Premises.” Communication Research 10 (3): 403–424. doi:10.1177/009365083010003007.
  • Wiesman, Penina. 2011. “We Frame to Please: A Preliminary Examination of The Daily Show’s Use of Frames.” In The Daily Show and Rhetoric: Arguments, Issues and Strategies, edited by Trischa Goodnow, 131–151. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Young, Dannagal. 2012. “The Daily Show as the New Journalism: In Their Own Words.” In Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age, edited by Jody Baumgartner, and Jonathan Morris, 265–284. New York: Routledge.
  • Young, Dannagal. 2019. Irony and Outrage: The Polarized Landscape of Rage, Fear, and Laughter in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Young, Dannagal, and Lindsay Hoffman. 2012. “Acquisition of Current-Events Knowledge From Political Satire Programming: An Experimental Approach.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 20 (5): 290–304. doi:10.1080/15456870.2012.728121.
  • Zareff, Janne. 2012. Journalistinen komiikka: teoreettisia ja käytännöllisiä avauksia. Jyväskylä Studies in humanities n. 18.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.