(What) Can Journalism Studies Learn from Supervised Machine Learning?

References

• Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, J. W., and D. Trilling. 2016. “Taking Stock of the Toolkit: An Overview of Relevant Automated Content Analysis Approaches and Techniques for Digital Journalism Scholars.” Digital Journalism 4 (1): 8–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. “Statistical Modeling: The two Cultures (with Comments and a Rejoinder by the Author).” Statistical Science 16 (3): 199–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broersma, M., and F. Harbers. 2018. “Exploring Machine Learning to Study the Long-Term Transformation of News: Digital Newspaper Archives, Journalism History, and Algorithmic Transparency.” Digital Journalism 6 (9): 1150–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. 2005. Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Burggraaff, C., and D. Trilling. 2017. “Through a Different Gate: An Automated Content Analysis of how Online News and Print News Differ.” Journalism. doi:10.1177/1464884917716699.
   Google Scholar
• Burscher, B., D. Odijk, R. Vliegenthart, M. de Rijke, and C. H. de Vreese. 2014. “Teaching the Computer to Code Frames in News: Comparing two Supervised Machine Learning Approaches to Frame Analysis.” Communication Methods and Measures 8 (3): 190–206.
   Google Scholar
• Burscher, B., R. Vliegenthart, and C. H. de Vreese. 2015. “Using Supervised Machine Learning to Code Policy Issues: Can Classifiers Generalize Across Contexts?” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659 (1): 122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., S. Robinson, S. C. Lewis, and D. A. Berkowitz. 2018. “Journalism Studies and its Core Commitments: The Making of a Communication Field.” Journal of Communication 68 (1): 6–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, C., M. El-Haddad, J. Pfeffer, and M. Stempeck. 2014, February. “Characterizing the Life Cycle of Online News Stories Using Social Media Reactions.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, 211–223. Baltimore, Maryland: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, C., M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. 2011, March. “Information credibility on twitter.” In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, 675–684. Hyderabad, India: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N.-C., M. Drouhard, R. Kocielnik, J. Suh, and C. R. Aragon. 2018. “Using Machine Learning to Support Qualitative Coding in Social Science.” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 8 (2): 1–20. doi:10.1145/3232718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, D. 2007. “Yesterday’s Papers and Today’s Technology.” European Journal of Communication 22 (1): 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Choudhury, M., N. Diakopoulos, and M. Naaman. 2012, February. “Unfolding the Event Landscape on Twitter: Classification and Exploration of User Categories.” In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 241–244. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• de Mello, R. F., and M. A. Ponti. 2018. Machine Learning: A Practical Approach on the Statistical Learning Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deutch, D., and N. Frost. (n.d.). Explaining White-box Classifications to Data Scientists. Retrieved from https://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~danielde/WhiteBoxFull.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. 2008. “The Changing Context of News Work: Liquid Journalism for a Monitorial Citizenry.” International Journal of Communication 18 (2): 848–865.
   Google Scholar
• Doshi-Velez, F., and B. Kim. 2017. Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F. 1999. “`Tabloidization’ of News: A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism.” European Journal of Communication 14 (3): 291–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., and A. Umbricht. 2014. “The Evolution of Objective and Interpretative Journalism in the Western Press: Comparing six News Systems Since the 1960s.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91 (2): 229–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. 2016. “The Advocacy Continuum: Towards a Theory of Advocacy in Journalism.” Journalism 17 (6): 711–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaounas, I., O. Ali, T. Lansdall-Welfare, T. De Bie, N. Mosdell, J. Lewis, and N. Cristianini. 2013. “Research Methods in the Age of Digital Journalism.” Digital Journalism 1 (1): 102–116. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.714928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 2004. “Mindless Statistics.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 33 (5): 587–606.
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, N. 2018. “ Identifying Modes of User Engagement With Online News and Their Relationship to Information Gain in Text.” In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 1745–1754. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, April.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, E., and T. Quandt. 2015. “Word Counts and Topic Models.” Digital Journalism 4 (1): 75–88. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1093270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamborg, F., K. Donnay, and B. Gipp. 2018. “Automated Identification of Media Bias in News Articles: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review.” International Journal on Digital Libraries. doi:10.1007/s00799-018-0261-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamborg, F., S. Lachnit, M. Schubotz, T. Hepp, and B. Gipp. 2018, March. Giveme5W: Main Event Retrieval from News Articles by Extraction of the Five Journalistic W Questions. In International Conference on Information, 356–366. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A. 2011. Network Journalism: Journalistic Practice in Interactive Spheres. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hermida, A. 2010. “Twittering the News: The Emergence of Ambient Journalism.” Journalism Practice 4 (3): 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., F. Charte, A. J. Rivera, and M. J. del Jesus. 2016. Multilabel Classification: Problem Analysis, Metrics and Techniques. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41111-8
   Google Scholar
• Hester, J. B., and E. Dougall. 2007. “The Efficiency of Constructed Week Sampling for Content Analysis of Online News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84 (4): 811–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S., and J. Schmidhuber. 1997. “LSTM Can Solve Hard Long Time Lag Problems.” In Advances in neural information processing systems, 473–479.
   Google Scholar
• James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., and E. H. Han. 2019. ModBot: Automatic Comments Moderation. https://drive.google.com/file/d/10bkVVPwqMolzEm_MSsmkecoWWq496pw7/.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, M., W. W. Cohen, M. Dredze, and C. P. Rosé. 2012. “Multi-Domain Learning: When Do Domains Matter?” In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, 1302–1312. Association for Computational Linguistics, July.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. M., D. A. Chambers, and R. E. Glasgow. 2014. “Big Data and Large Sample Size: A Cautionary Note on the Potential for Bias.” Clinical and Translational Science 7 (4): 342–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., C. Clerwall, and L. Nord. 2014. “You Ain't Seen Nothing yet: Transparency's (Lack of) Effect on Source and Message Credibility.” Journalism Studies 15 (5): 668–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. 2007. “Curmudgeonly Advice.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczyk, B. 2016. “Learning From Imbalanced Data : Open Challenges and Future Directions.” Progress in Artificial Intelligence 5 (4): 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A.-L. Barabasi, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, and M. Gutmann. 2009. “SOCIAL SCIENCE: Computational Social Science.” Science 323 (5915): 721–723. doi:10.1126/science.1167742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavy, S. 2018. “Uncovering Gender Bias in Newspaper Coverage of Irish Politicians Using Machine Learning.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (1): 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. D., Y. Yang, T. G. Rose, and F. Li. 2004. “Rcv1: A new Benchmark Collection for Text Categorization Research.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 5: 361–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, J., B. R. Watson, S. Lacy, and D. Riffe. 2014. “Assessing the Reporting of Reliability in Published Content Analyses: 1985-2010.” Communication Methods and Measures 8 (3): 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Mahrt, M., and M. Scharkow. 2013. “The Value of Big Data in Digital Media Research.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57 (1): 20–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, D. B. 2019. “: Computational Contributions: A Symbiotic Approach to Integrating big, Observational Data Studies Into the Communication Field.” Communication Methods and Measures. doi:19.1080/19312458.2019.1639144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., and D. L. Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. K. 2017. “Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework.” Sociological Methods & Research. doi:10.1177/0049124117729703.
   Google Scholar
• Opperhuizen, A. E., K. Schouten, and E. H. Klijn. 2019. “Framing a Conflict! How Media Report on Earthquake Risks Caused by gas Drilling.” Journalism Studies 20 (5): 717–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J. 2015. “Hero on Twitter, Traitor on News.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 20 (2): 166–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, M. T., S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. 2016, August. “Why Should I Trust You?: Explaining the Predictions of any Classifier.” In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 1135–1144. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., S. Lacy, and F. Fico. 2014. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. 3rd ed. Mahwah: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rizos, G., S. Papadopoulos, and Y. Kompatsiaris. 2016. “Predicting News Popularity by Mining Online Discussions.” In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 737–742. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, April.
   Google Scholar
• Rudkowsky, E., M. Haselmayer, M. Wastian, M. Jenny, Š Emrich, and M. Sedlmair. 2018. “More Than Bags of Words : Sentiment Analysis with Word Embeddings.” Communication Methods and Measures 12 (2–3): 140–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M. 2013. “Thematic Content Analysis Using Supervised Machine Learning: An Empirical Evaluation Using German Online News.” Quality and Quantity 47 (2): 761–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaudt, S., and S. Carpenter. 2009. “The News That’s fit to Click: An Analysis of Online News Values and Preferences Present in the Most-Viewed Stories on Azcentral.com.” Southwestern Mass Communication Journal 24 (2): 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., and D. Tewksbury. 2006. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G. 2010. “To Explain or to Predict?” Statistical Science 25 (3): 289–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreyas, R., D. M. Akshata, B. S. Mahanand, B. Shagun, and C. M. Abhishek. 2016. “Predicting Popularity of Online Articles Using Random Forest Regression.” In 2016 s International Conference on Cognitive Computing and Information Processing (CCIP), 1–5. IEEE, August.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. B. 2014. “User-generated Visibility: Secondary Gatekeeping in a Shared Media Space.” New Media & Society 16 (1): 55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., L. Young, and M. Balmas. 2015. “Bad News or mad News? Sentiment Scoring of Negativity, Fear, and Anger in News Content.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659 (1): 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. A., and K. G. Barnhurst. 1996. “The Journalism of Opinion: Network News Coverage of U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1968–1988.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 13 (3): 187–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steensen, S., and L. Ahva. 2015. “Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age.” Journalism Practice 9 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, D., P. Tolochko, and B. Burscher. 2017. “From Newsworthiness to Shareworthiness: How to Predict News Sharing Based on Article Characteristics.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 94 (1): 38–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Canneyt, S., P. Leroux, B. Dhoedt, and T. Demeester. 2018. “Modeling and Predicting the Popularity of Online News Based on Temporal and Content-Related Features.” Multimedia Tools and Applications 77 (1): 1409–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasdev, S. 2019. “Can Machine Learning Help us Measure the Trustworthiness of News?” Presented at the Computation + Journalism Symposium, February. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_Qrp2pGhl3eu7r-3BU6nwG_XN32jv7T_/view.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. M. 1950. “The ‘Gatekeeper': A Case Study in the Selection of News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 27 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B., and H. Shen. 2015. “Analyzing and Predicting News Popularity on Twitter.” International Journal of Information Management 35 (6): 702–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. 2004. Taking Journalism Seriously: News and the Academy. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., R. Jin, and Z. H. Zhou. 2010. “Understanding bag-of-Words Model: A Statistical Framework.” International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 1 (1–4): 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar