Nuclear Energy in the Context of Climate Change: A Frame Analysis of the Dutch Print Media

References

• Bauer, M. W., S. Gylstorff, E. B. Madsen, and N. Mejlgaard. 2019. “The Fukushima Accident and Public Perceptions about Nuclear Power Around the Globe – A Challenge & Response Model.” Environmental Communication 13 (4): 505–526. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1462225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS. 2018. Aandeel hernieuwbare energie naar 7,4 procent. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2019/22/aandeel-hernieuwbare-energie-naar-7-4-procent.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culley, M., E. Ogley-Oliver, A. Carton, and J. Street. 2010. “Media Framing of Proposed Nuclear Reactors: An Analysis of Print Media.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 20 (6): 497–512. doi:10.1002/casp.1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, P., I. De Goede, and J. Van der Pligt. 2010. “De publiekeopinie over kernenergie.” Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/Publicaties_2010/De_publieke_opinie_over_kernenergie.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, C., F. Brereton, S. Mooney, D. Conway, and E. O’Neill. 2019. “Nuclear Frames in the Irish Media: Implications for Conversations on Nuclear Power Generation in the Age of Climate Change.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 110: 260–273. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. 2011. “Acclimatizing Nuclear? Climate Change, Nuclear Power and the Reframing of Risk in the UK News Media.” International Communication Gazette 73 (1–2): 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., and M. Brüggemann. 2016. “Mapping the Minds of the Mediators: The Cognitive Frames of Climate Journalists from Five Countries.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (7). 963662515583621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. M. 2011. “Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima: An Analysis of Traditional and New Media Coverage of Nuclear Accidents and Radiation.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (5): 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T. 2017. “Professional Identity and Roles of Journalists.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-95.
   Google Scholar
• Harcup, T., and D. O’Neill. 2016. “What is News?: News Values Revisited (Again).” Journalism Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2018. Climate Change and Nuclear Power. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/CCNAP-2018_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2018. Special Report. Global Warming of 1.5°C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos. 2019. Nederlanders over klimaatbeleid. Rapport voor De Telegraaf. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2019-03/rapport_ipsos_detelegraaf_klimaatbeleid_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S. 2017a. “Characteristics of the Mass Media’s Coverage of Nuclear Energy and Its Risk: A Literature Review.” Sociology Compass 11 (7): e12490. doi:10.1111/soc4.12490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S. 2017b. Media and Risk: A Phase Model Elucidating Media Attention to Nuclear Energy Risk. Ilmenau: NEU. https://www.db-thueringen.de/receive/dbt_mods_00032642.
   Google Scholar
• Mellado, C., and A. Van Dalen. 2014. “Between Rhetoric and Practice.” Journalism Studies 15 (6): 859–878. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.838046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercado-Sáez, M.-T., E. Marco-Crespo, and A. Álvarez-Villa. 2019. “Exploring News Frames, Sources and Editorial Lines on Newspaper Coverage of Nuclear Energy in Spain.” Environmental Communication 13 (4): 546–559. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1435558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. 2006. “Going Nuclear: Frames and Public Opinion about Atomic Energy.” Skeptical Inquirer. https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/going_nuclear_frames_and_public_opinion_about_atomic_energy/.
   Google Scholar
• Partanen, R., and J. Korhonen. 2015. Climate Gamble: Is Anti-Nuclear Activism Endangering Our Future? Helsinki: Cre8 Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Peil.nl. 2018. Grote verschillen tussenkiezersgroepenbij oordeel over Kinderpardon, Kernenergieen straffen Leeuwarden. https://home.noties.nl/peil/wekelijkse-stemming/.
   Google Scholar
• Perko, T., I. Prezelj, M. C. Cantone, D. H. Oughton, Y. Tomkiv, and E. Gallego. 2019. “Fukushima Through the Prism of Chernobyl: How Newspapers in Europe and Russia Used Past Nuclear Accidents.” Environmental Communication 13 (4): 527–545. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1444661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perko, T., C. Turcanu, and B. Carlé. 2012. “Media Reporting of Nuclear Emergencies: The Effects of Transparent Communication in a Minor Nuclear Event.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 20 (1): 52–63. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2012.00663.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prati, G., and B. Zani. 2013. “The Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Risk Perception, Antinuclear Behavioral Intentions, Attitude, Trust, Environmental Beliefs, and Values.” Environment and Behavior 45 (6): 782–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. 2019. Kernenergie. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/duurzame-energie/opwekking-kernenergie.
   Google Scholar
• Semetko, H., and P. Valkenburg. 2000. “Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication 50 (2): 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B. 2007. “The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back in.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 60–78. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B. 2010. “Strategies to Take Subjectivity Out of Framing Analysis.” In Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by P. D’Angelo, and J. A. Kuypers, 84–109. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vasterman, P. 2005. “Media-Hype Self-Reinforcing News Waves, Journalistic Standards and the Construction of Social Problems.” European Journal of Communication 20 (4): 508–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher, J., and M. Bot. 2017. Monitor Energie 1-meting. Kennis, houdingengedrag van het Nederlandspubliek met betrekking tot de energietransitie. Motivaction Research and Strategy. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/overig/20180214/monitor_energie_1_meting/document.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, L., and L. van Zoonen. 2011. “Power to the Frame: Bringing Sociology Back to Frame Analysis.” European Journal of Communication 26 (3): 101–115. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., N. Li, and J. Li. 2014. “Media Coverage and Government Policy of Nuclear Power in the People’s Republic of China.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 77: 214–223. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weart, S. 2012. The Rise of Nuclear Fear. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar