Who, What, and How: Identifying Judicial Constructions of Journalism

References

• Campbell v. Clark, 471 S.W.3d 615 (Tex. App., 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cause of Action v. FTC, 799 F.3d 1108 (D.C., 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Citizens United v. Gessler, 773 F.4d 200 (10th Cir., 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards v. Schwartz, 378 F. Supp. 3d 468 (W.D. Va., 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore v. Jones, 370 F. Supp. 3rd 630 (W.D. Va., 2019).
   Google Scholar
• In re Application of Petitioner Mahtani, 2017 Minn. Dist. LEXIS 7 (D. Minn., 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Liberman v. United States, 227 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C., 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Obsidian Finance v. Cox, 740 F.3d 1284 (9th Cir., 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Phillips v. Clark, 575 S.W.3d 882 (Tex. App., 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Project Veritas v. Ohio Election Commission, 418 F. Supp. 3d 232 (S.D. Ohio, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• SEIU, Local 5 v. Professional Janitorial Service of Houston, 481 S.W.3d 210 (Tex., 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi v. Lang, 2017 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 389 (Minn. Ct. App., 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130. 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Time v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374. 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. 1996. Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. A. 1982. “The Origins of the Press Clause.” UCLA L. Rev. 30: 455–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APME ethics statement. 2015. Associated Press Media Editors. Accessed September 3, 2020. https://www.apme.com/page/EthicsStatement.
   Google Scholar
• Beam, R. A., B. J. Brownlee, D. H. Weaver, and T. Di Cicco. 2009. “Journalism and Public Service in Troubled Times.” Journalism Studies 10 (6): 734–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665. 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2016. “Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitimation.” Communication Theory 26: 349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney, B., and D. Citron. 2019. “Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security.” Calif. L. Rev. 107: 1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudbury, N. 2014. “World Wide Web and its Journey from Web 1.0 to Web 4.0.” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies 5: 8,096–88100.
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C., T. Glasser, D. McQuail, R. Nordenstreng, and R. White. 2009. Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. 2017. “Journalism and the Public-Service Model: In Search of an Ideal.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, edited by K. Kenski, and K. H. Jamieson, 333–346. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cushion, S. 2019. “Journalism Under (Ideological) Threat: Safeguarding and Enhancing Public Service Media Into the 21st Century.” Journalism 20: 69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. 2005. “What is Journalism?” Journalism 6: 442–464.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, Jr., L., and R. G. Kaiser. 2007. The News About the News: American Journalism in Peril. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• First National Bank v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765. 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. 2014. “The Future of Journalism.” Journalism Studies 15: 481–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannet Newspaper Division Principals of Ethical Conduct. n.d. News Leaders Association. Accessed September 3, 2020. https://members.newsleaders.org/resources-ethics-gannett.
   Google Scholar
• Gertz v. Welch, 418 U.S. 323. 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, K. D. 2019. A year to embrace journalism as public service. NiemanLab. Accessed December 30, 2021. https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/12/a-year-to-embrace-journalism-as-public-service/.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines. n.d. BBC Editorial Guidelines. Accessed February 3, 2022. https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/.
   Google Scholar
• Hermida, A. 2012. “Social Journalism: Exploring how Social Media is Shaping Journalism.” In The Handbook of Global Journalism, edited by E. Siapera, and A. Veglis, 309–328. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Houchins v. KQED, 438 U.S. 1. 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., and A. Wallace. 2017. “Who is a Journalist? Changing Legal Definitions in a de-Territorialised Media Space.” Digital Journalism 5 (7): 850–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., and A. Wallace. 2021. “Media Disorder and the Future of Journalism: International Developments and the Challenge of Wikileaks.” In Handbook of Communication Rights, Law, and Ethics, edited by I. Corredoira, R. C. Presuel, and I. Bel, 253–263. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kearl, B. 1943. “Journalism-What is it? A Redefinition.” Journalism Quarterly 20: 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, B., and T. Rosenstiel. 2014. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, L. W. 1960. Legacy of Suppression: Freedom of Speech and Press in Early American History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, Brian. 2017. “After Objectivity? Schudson’s Sociology of Journalism in the era of Post-Factuality.” Journalism Studies 18 (10): 1318–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miami Herald v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241. 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697. 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Nechushtai, E., and S. C. Lewis. 2019. “What Kind of News Gatekeepers do we Want Machines to be? Filter Bubbles, Fragmentation, and the Normative Dimensions of Algorithmic Recommendations.” Computers in Human Behavior 90: 298–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254. 1964.
   Google Scholar
• New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713. 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noh, Y. 2015. “Imagining Library 4.0: Creating a Model for Future Libraries.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41: 786–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPR Ethics Handbook. n.d. NPR Ethics Handbook. Accessed March 8, 2022. https://www.npr.org/ethics.
   Google Scholar
• Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817. 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C. 2019. “Journalism Needs a Better Argument: Aligning Public Goals with the Realities of the Digital News and Information Landscape.” Journalism 20 (1): 73–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, J., and E. Tandoc. 2013. “People Who Aren’t Really Reporters at All, Who Have no Professional Qualifications”: Defining a Journalist and Deciding Who may Claim the Privileges.” N.Y.U. Journal of Legislation and Public Policy Quorum 34: 34–63.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. 1956. “The Libertarian Theory of the Press.” In The Four Theories of the Press, edited by F. S. Siebert, T. Peterson, and W. Schramm, 73–104. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. 2020. Democracy without Journalism? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saxbe v. Washington Post, 417 U.S. 843. 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. 2018. The Press Clause and Digital Technology’s Fourth Wave. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 1978. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 2011. The Sociology of News. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sehl, A., A. Cornia, and R. K. Nielsen. 2016. Public Service News and Digital Media. Accessed March 8, 2022. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/Public%2520Service%2520News%2520and%2520Digital%2520Media.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, C., G. L. Ciampaglia, O. Varol, K. C. Yang, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. 2018. “The Spread of Low-Credibility Content by Social Bots.” Nature Communications 9 (1): 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. 2014. “Why Democracies Need a Functional Definition of Journalism now More Than Ever.” Journalism Studies 15: 555–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, F. S. 1956. “The Libertarian Theory of the Press.” In The Four Theories of the Press, edited by F. S. Siebert, T. Peterson, and W. Schramm, 39–72. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. 2011. “Journalism and Digital Technologies.” In Changing the News, edited by W. Lowrey, and P. Gade, 213–229. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Society of Professional Journalists. 2014. Society of Professional Journalists: Code of Ethics. Accessed March 8, 2022. https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp.
   Google Scholar
• South African Press Council: Code of Ethics for Print and Online Media. n.d. Accountable Journalism. Accessed February 3, 2022. https://accountablejournalism.org/ethics-codes/code-of-ethics-and-conduct-for-south-african-print-and-online-media.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, P. 1974. “Or of the Press.” Hastings Law Journal 26: 631.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. 2017. #Republic. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. 2019. “Journalism at the Periphery.” Media and Communication 7: 138–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugland, E., and J. Henderson. 2007. “Who is a Journalist and Why Does it Matter?” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22: 241–261.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post Standards and Ethics. n.d. News Leaders Association. Accessed September 3, 2020. https://members.newsleaders.org/resources-ethics-wapo.
   Google Scholar
• West, S. 2014. “Press Exceptionalism.” Harvard Law Review 127: 2434–2463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, C. S. 1924. The Principles of Journalism. New York: D. Appleton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547. 1978.
   Google Scholar